William Coleman of Las Vegas Nevada is a dangerous, violent convicted
criminal. He has recently committed felonies in his harassment of an RGP
user.
"As a result of my encounter with the Henderson Police SWAT team, I
eventually pled guilty to Conspiracy to Commit a Crime, a gross
misdemeanor." - William Coleman admits that he is a convicted criminal
(cite: http://recgroups.com/a/1/127894/)
"I have killed many dogs in my life, and I will kill many more." William
P. Coleman boasting about his sociopathic tendencies (cite:
http://recgroups.com/a/1/128390/)
"For years, when I see one or more teenaged girls walking down the
street, I pull up beside them and ask them if they want to go smoke
dope and fuck. Amazingly, this technique gets good results fairly
often. Otherwise, I wouldn't continue to use it." Convicted criminal
William Coleman (cite: http://recgroups.com/a/1/123930/)
> William Coleman of Las Vegas Nevada is a dangerous, violent convicted
> criminal. He has recently committed felonies in his harassment of an RGP
> user.
> "As a result of my encounter with the Henderson Police SWAT team, I
> eventually pled guilty to Conspiracy to Commit a Crime, a gross
> misdemeanor." - William Coleman admits that he is a convicted criminal
> (cite: http://recgroups.com/a/1/127894/)
> "I have killed many dogs in my life, and I will kill many more." William
> P. Coleman boasting about his sociopathic tendencies (cite:
> http://recgroups.com/a/1/128390/)
> "For years, when I see one or more teenaged girls walking down the
> street, I pull up beside them and ask them if they want to go smoke
> dope and fuck. Amazingly, this technique gets good results fairly
> often. Otherwise, I wouldn't continue to use it." Convicted criminal
> William Coleman (cite: http://recgroups.com/a/1/123930/)
> WARNING! 67-year old convicted criminal William Coleman describes how he
> uses Facebook to meet minor girls. See:
> http://recgroups.com/t/1/123914#a123914
> > He met with union and labor leaders first. He didn't pull in the CEOs
> > until at least a day later.
> > Because, it's you know, the union people who make jobs.
> the ceos' firms were predominantly government goody collectors.
> mo_ntresor
What could Obama possibly learn form CEOs? He knows everything.
-----
Jobs' Meeting With Obama
Jobs, who was known for his prickly, stubborn personality, almost missed
meeting President Obama in the fall of 2010 because he insisted that the
president personally ask him for a meeting. Though his wife told him that
Obama "was really psyched to meet with you," Jobs insisted on the personal
invitation, and the standoff lasted for five days. When he finally
relented and they met at the Westin San Francisco Airport, Jobs was
characteristically blunt. He seemed to have transformed from a liberal
into a conservative.
"You're headed for a one-term presidency," he told Obama at the start of
their meeting, insisting that the administration needed to be more
business-friendly. As an example, Jobs described the ease with which
companies can build factories in China compared to the United States,
where "regulations and unnecessary costs" make it difficult for them.
Jobs also criticized America's education system, saying it was "crippled
by union work rules," noted Isaacson. "Until the teachers' unions were
broken, there was almost no hope for education reform." Jobs proposed
allowing principals to hire and fire teachers based on merit, that schools
stay open until 6 p.m. and that they be open 11 months a year.
Aiding Obama's Reelection Campaign
Jobs suggested that Obama meet six or seven other CEOs who could express
the needs of innovative businesses -- but when White House aides added
more names to the list, Jobs insisted that it was growing too big and that
"he had no intention of coming." In preparation for the dinner, Jobs
exhibited his notorious attention to detail, telling venture capitalist
John Doerr that the menu of shrimp, cod and lentil salad was "far too
fancy" and objecting to a chocolate truffle dessert. But he was overruled
by the White House, which cited the president's fondness for cream pie.
Though Jobs was not that impressed by Obama, later telling Isaacson that
his focus on the reasons that things can't get done "infuriates" him, they
kept in touch and talked by phone a few more times. Jobs even offered to
help create Obama's political ads for the 2012 campaign. "He had made the
same offer in 2008, but he'd become annoyed when Obama's strategist David
Axelrod wasn't totally deferential," writes Isaacson. Jobs later told the
author that he wanted to do for Obama what the legendary "morning in
America" ads did for Ronald Reagan.
> > the ceos' firms were predominantly government goody collectors.
> What could Obama possibly learn form CEOs? He knows everything.
> -----
> Jobs' Meeting With Obama
> Jobs, who was known for his prickly, stubborn personality, almost missed
> meeting President Obama in the fall of 2010 because he insisted that the
> president personally ask him for a meeting. Though his wife told him that
> Obama "was really psyched to meet with you," Jobs insisted on the personal
> invitation, and the standoff lasted for five days. When he finally
> relented and they met at the Westin San Francisco Airport, Jobs was
> characteristically blunt. He seemed to have transformed from a liberal
> into a conservative.
> "You're headed for a one-term presidency," he told Obama at the start of
> their meeting, insisting that the administration needed to be more
> business-friendly. As an example, Jobs described the ease with which
> companies can build factories in China compared to the United States,
> where "regulations and unnecessary costs" make it difficult for them.
> Jobs also criticized America's education system, saying it was "crippled
> by union work rules," noted Isaacson. "Until the teachers' unions were
> broken, there was almost no hope for education reform." Jobs proposed
> allowing principals to hire and fire teachers based on merit, that schools
> stay open until 6 p.m. and that they be open 11 months a year.
> Aiding Obama's Reelection Campaign
> Jobs suggested that Obama meet six or seven other CEOs who could express
> the needs of innovative businesses -- but when White House aides added
> more names to the list, Jobs insisted that it was growing too big and that
> "he had no intention of coming." In preparation for the dinner, Jobs
> exhibited his notorious attention to detail, telling venture capitalist
> John Doerr that the menu of shrimp, cod and lentil salad was "far too
> fancy" and objecting to a chocolate truffle dessert. But he was overruled
> by the White House, which cited the president's fondness for cream pie.
> Though Jobs was not that impressed by Obama, later telling Isaacson that
> his focus on the reasons that things can't get done "infuriates" him, they
> kept in touch and talked by phone a few more times. Jobs even offered to
> help create Obama's political ads for the 2012 campaign. "He had made the
> same offer in 2008, but he'd become annoyed when Obama's strategist David
> Axelrod wasn't totally deferential," writes Isaacson. Jobs later told the
> author that he wanted to do for Obama what the legendary "morning in
> America" ads did for Ronald Reagan.
axelrod is a lying whore and piece of shit. he's the reason guys like
dutch parrot the idiot line they do, "squawkk!"
> You're still politically illiterate. The president invited and they
came-a-runnin'
> They've already stated they'd pay higher taxes; now - hat in hand - they're
ready to listen to the
> winner of the peoples' vote.
> Jerry
Right, because in business, it's politics that are of paramount importance
after all.
And you wonder why Obama has never run a successful business in his
life... With thinking like this, and voting yourself a paycheck, who
needs a business?
On Friday, November 16, 2012 8:08:31 AM UTC-8, Follow wrote:
> On Nov 15 2012 10:07 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > You're still politically illiterate. The president invited and they
> came-a-runnin'
> > They've already stated they'd pay higher taxes; now - hat in hand - they're
> ready to listen to the
> > winner of the peoples' vote.
> > Jerry
.> Right, because in business, it's politics that are of paramount
> importance after all.
You don't have to prove your ignorance; it's already known.
.> And you wonder why Obama has never run a successful business in his
> life...
No, actually I don't (care about your dodge). Especially with Bush having lost money in EVERY BUSINESS HE EVER RAN. Try and make that connections, will you?
> With thinking like this, and voting yourself a paycheck, who
> needs a business?
Remember about you not having to prove something (above)?
> On Friday, November 16, 2012 8:08:31 AM UTC-8, Follow wrote:
> > On Nov 15 2012 10:07 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > You're still politically illiterate. The president invited and they
> > came-a-runnin'
> > > They've already stated they'd pay higher taxes; now - hat in hand -
they're
> > ready to listen to the
> > > winner of the peoples' vote.
> > > Jerry
> ..> Right, because in business, it's politics that are of paramount
> > importance after all.
> You don't have to prove your ignorance; it's already known.
> ..> And you wonder why Obama has never run a successful business in his
> > life...
> No, actually I don't (care about your dodge). Especially with Bush having
lost money in EVERY
> BUSINESS HE EVER RAN. Try and make that connections, will you?
> > With thinking like this, and voting yourself a paycheck, who
> > needs a business?
> Remember about you not having to prove something (above)?
> Jerry (lol) 'n Vegas
> > Follow :)
I don't think I noticed anything of substance there besides some vague
allusion to Bush's inability to turn a profit at business. That is very
true. Dubya sucked at business, but at least he was there and at least
had some kind of groundwork. I've said many times, but it slides right
off that teflon pea you call a brain, that I am no fan of George W. Bush. I don't know why I say it again, because it's just going to end up sliding
straight off again and you will continue this "you support Bush" strawman
every time you can't figure out what to say.
On Saturday, November 17, 2012 1:13:26 PM UTC-8, Follow wrote:
> On Nov 16 2012 2:54 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > On Friday, November 16, 2012 8:08:31 AM UTC-8, Follow wrote:
> > > On Nov 15 2012 10:07 AM, VegasJerry wrote:
> > > > You're still politically illiterate. The president invited and they
> > > came-a-runnin'
> > > > They've already stated they'd pay higher taxes; now - hat in hand -
> they're
> > > ready to listen to the
> > > > winner of the peoples' vote.
> > > > Jerry
> > ..> Right, because in business, it's politics that are of paramount
> > > importance after all.
> > You don't have to prove your ignorance; it's already known.
> > ..> And you wonder why Obama has never run a successful business in his
> > > life...
> > No, actually I don't (care about your dodge). Especially with Bush having
> lost money in EVERY
> > BUSINESS HE EVER RAN. Try and make that connections, will you?
> > > With thinking like this, and voting yourself a paycheck, who
> > > needs a business?
> > Remember about you not having to prove something (above)?
> > Jerry (lol) 'n Vegas
> > > Follow :)
.> I don't think I noticed anything of substance there besides some vague
> allusion to Bush's inability to turn a profit at business. That is very
> true. Dubya sucked at business, but at least he was there and at least
> had some kind of groundwork.
Then he ran the whole country's economy into the ground. Did you make that connection?
> I've said many times, but it slides right
> off that teflon pea you call a brain, that I am no fan of George W. Bush.
You pea brain didn't notice I never said you were? Did you make that connection?
> I don't know why I say it again, because it's just going to end up sliding
> straight off again and you will continue this "you support Bush" strawman
> every time you can't figure out what to say.
