Another stupid RGP poll

[bratt]

Saying that a city can not be great if it has a 40% black population is

[ ] Ignorance at its worst.

[ ] Racism at its worst.

[ ] Bigotry at it worst.

[ ] OK if you are an arrogant bigoted Canadian lawyer because he didn't
really mean it.


------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas

---- 

[BillB]

On 2/9/2012 12:18 PM, bratt wrote:
> Saying that a city can not be great if it has a 40% black population is
>
> [ ] Ignorance at its worst.
>
> [ ] Racism at its worst.
>
> [ ] Bigotry at it worst.
>
> [ ] OK if you are an arrogant bigoted Canadian lawyer because he didn't
> really mean it.

As you all know, susan has *extreme* reading comprehension and lying
problems. Here is what I actually wrote:

"One minute mo is trying to tell us what a great place Chicago is, and
the next he's telling us how he has to criss-cross the street because
black teenagers are so dangerous (the city is close to 40% black). Does
this make any sense to you?"

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.poker/msg/f145c11e0af4aabc



I think this calls for a fourth choice:

[ ] susan is either stupid, a liar, or both.

[Tad Perry]

"bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:aamd09...@app-01.ezprovider.com...

> Saying that a city can not be great if it has a 40% black population is
>
> [ ] Ignorance at its worst.
>
> [ ] Racism at its worst.
>
> [ ] Bigotry at it worst.
>
> [ ] OK if you are an arrogant bigoted Canadian lawyer because he didn't
> really mean it.

[X] Possibly true given that even black people get scared when approached on
the street by other black people they don't know.

Now ask me if I think it has to be that way due to their color and I'll say
no. It has to be that way because so many black people have gone gangland
through a complete lack of other viable options. Go live in Compton for
awhile and get back to me.

Tad "Standing for truths that hurt" Perry

[bratt]

On Feb 9 2012 9:41 PM, Tad Perry wrote:

> "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:aamd09...@app-01.ezprovider.com...
> > Saying that a city can not be great if it has a 40% black population is
> >
> > [ ] Ignorance at its worst.
> >
> > [ ] Racism at its worst.
> >
> > [ ] Bigotry at it worst.
> >
> > [ ] OK if you are an arrogant bigoted Canadian lawyer because he didn't
> > really mean it.
>
> [X] Possibly true given that even black people get scared when approached on
> the street by other black people they don't know.

Not according to B-BillB. He isn't afraid of anyone. Have you been
following his rants? Anyone would be a pussie to feel fear when
approached on the street by any color. You above statement makes you a
racist in his eyes.

> Now ask me if I think it has to be that way due to their color and I'll say
> no. It has to be that way because so many black people have gone gangland
> through a complete lack of other viable options. Go live in Compton for
> awhile and get back to me.
>
> Tad "Standing for truths that hurt" Perry

B-BillB could never do that because it is under his socio-economic way of
life.

The point was that he said Chicago could not be a great city BECAUSE it
was 40% black.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas

________________________________________________________________________ 

[BillB]

On 2/10/2012 3:38 AM, bratt wrote:

> Not according to B-BillB. He isn't afraid of anyone.

False. There are people I am somewhat afraid of, but black teenagers are
not among them. That's about as far away as you can get from the people
I am afraid of.

Have you been
> following his rants? Anyone would be a pussie to feel fear when
> approached on the street by any color. You above statement makes you a
> racist in his eyes.

> The point was that he said Chicago could not be a great city BECAUSE it

> was 40% black...

....*IF*, like mo, you are so afraid of black people that you have to
criss-cross the street every time you see a couple of black teenagers.

Why do you keep leaving that part out? That's the most important part of
my statement. You aren't trying to lie again, are you?

Actually, I watched a *really* sad documentary last night about life on
the South Side of Chicago. It was called The Interrupters.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1319744/

I would encourage everyone to see that film. I defy anyone to watch that
movie and then declare Chicago a "great city." It's absolutely fucking
criminal what you've done to those people, and to think it's been more
or less replicated in every urban center in America just boggles the
mind. It was really hard to watch. If I was watching it in my car, I
would have pulled over and wept, like Mitt Romney did when he heard the
Mormons decided to stop overtly discriminating against black people and
keep it on the down-low.

[bratt]

On Feb 10 2012 6:00 AM, BillB wrote:

> On 2/10/2012 3:38 AM, bratt wrote:
>
> > Not according to B-BillB. He isn't afraid of anyone.
>
> False. There are people I am somewhat afraid of, but black teenagers are
> not among them. That's about as far away as you can get from the people
> I am afraid of.
>
> Have you been
> > following his rants? Anyone would be a pussie to feel fear when
> > approached on the street by any color. You above statement makes you a
> > racist in his eyes.
>
>
> > The point was that he said Chicago could not be a great city BECAUSE it
> > was 40% black...
>

> .....*IF*, like mo, you are so afraid of black people that you have to

> criss-cross the street every time you see a couple of black teenagers.

Liar- he never said that

> Why do you keep leaving that part out? That's the most important part of
> my statement. You aren't trying to lie again, are you?

Why must you continue to lie? Did Mo say that is a couple of black
teenagers were coming towards him he would cross the street? Can you not
understand that everything is situational?

> Actually, I watched a *really* sad documentary last night about life on
> the South Side of Chicago. It was called The Interrupters.
>
> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1319744/
>
> I would encourage everyone to see that film. I defy anyone to watch that
> movie and then declare Chicago a "great city." It's absolutely fucking
> criminal what you've done to those people, and to think it's been more
> or less replicated in every urban center in America just boggles the
> mind. It was really hard to watch. If I was watching it in my car, I
> would have pulled over and wept, like Mitt Romney did when he heard the
> Mormons decided to stop overtly discriminating against black people and
> keep it on the down-low.

Which has nothing to do with saying a city can't be great if it is 40%
black.

As many strawmen that you want to introduce, the fact is that you said it
and you are a racist/bigoted asshole of the worst kind. If you owned up
to it it would be different. Someone says the word teenager and you
insert the word black. Someone says gang and you insert the word blacks.

[BillB]

On 2/10/2012 5:04 AM, bratt wrote:

> Which has nothing to do with saying a city can't be great if it is 40%
> black.

Are you really this stupid, or is this a gag? This is the third time
it's been explained to you. I asked how *MO* can consider Chicago a
great city after *HE* admitted that he's terrified of black teenagers,
and Chicago is 40% black. That doesn't make any sense. What can be great
about living in a city where you constantly fear for your life? I'm not
blaming mo. If I was a little wisp of a man like him, picked on my
entire life, I might be frightened too. Well, probably not, but some
people would, and he's obviously one of them. If there's one thing I'm
not, it's judgmental.

Personally, all things equal, I'd rather live with in a city with a
black majority than a white majority. I just prefer their culture. White
people can be so....racist. But I wouldn't want to live with the brand
of urban black poor white-USA has created through centuries of vicious
racism. That would suck. I mean, I love dogs, but that doesn't mean I'd
want a pet pit-bull that was kept in a tiny cage and tormented with a
sharp stick on a daily basis for years. He's liable to bite.

> As many strawmen that you want to introduce, the fact is that you said it
> and you are a racist/bigoted asshole of the worst kind.

If I am a racist and bigot for constantly championing racial equity,
what the hell does that make someone like you??

>If you owned up
> to it it would be different. Someone says the word teenager and you
> insert the word black. Someone says gang and you insert the word blacks.

Just filling in the blanks on your obvious dog-whistle racism. But mo
specifically said *black* teenagers. I remember he said the <great> city
was filled with "violent African-American males."

[bratt]

On Feb 10 2012 7:43 AM, BillB wrote:


You are the one trying to explain away YOUR words.

I say what you said and I am the stupid one here? - look beyond your
arrogance and read what you wrote.

I am not the racist B-BillB. You are. Live with it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas

------ 

[mo_ntresor]

On Feb 10 2012 4:38 AM, bratt wrote:

> > [X] Possibly true given that even black people get scared when approached
on
> > the street by other black people they don't know.
>
> Not according to B-BillB. He isn't afraid of anyone. Have you been
> following his rants? Anyone would be a pussie to feel fear when
> approached on the street by any color. You above statement makes you a
> racist in his eyes.
>
> > Now ask me if I think it has to be that way due to their color and I'll
say
> > no. It has to be that way because so many black people have gone gangland
> > through a complete lack of other viable options. Go live in Compton for
> > awhile and get back to me.
> >
> > Tad "Standing for truths that hurt" Perry
>
> B-BillB could never do that because it is under his socio-economic way of
> life.
>
> The point was that he said Chicago could not be a great city BECAUSE it
> was 40% black.

susan, billb said denver didn't stack up to vancouver or calgary even
though it's bigger, more diverse, and has a better climate than either.
he lives in a city that's .5% black. you probably see a black guy more
than once every three years, so quit listening to the delusional idiot.
he hasn't got a clue about anything.

mo_ntresor

_______________________________________________________________________ 

[mo_ntresor]

On Feb 10 2012 6:43 AM, BillB wrote:

> > Which has nothing to do with saying a city can't be great if it is 40%
> > black.
>
> Are you really this stupid, or is this a gag? This is the third time
> it's been explained to you. I asked how *MO* can consider Chicago a
> great city after *HE* admitted that he's terrified of black teenagers,
> and Chicago is 40% black. That doesn't make any sense. What can be great
> about living in a city where you constantly fear for your life? I'm not
> blaming mo. If I was a little wisp of a man like him, picked on my
> entire life, I might be frightened too. Well, probably not, but some
> people would, and he's obviously one of them. If there's one thing I'm
> not, it's judgmental.
>
> Personally, all things equal, I'd rather live with in a city with a
> black majority than a white majority. I just prefer their culture. White
> people can be so....racist. But I wouldn't want to live with the brand
> of urban black poor white-USA has created through centuries of vicious
> racism. That would suck. I mean, I love dogs, but that doesn't mean I'd
> want a pet pit-bull that was kept in a tiny cage and tormented with a
> sharp stick on a daily basis for years. He's liable to bite.

LOL, says the guy living in a city that's .5% black. there are all kinds
of black majority cities - the continent's called AFRICA, and you're free
to move there anytime you wish. what's holding the bigot back?

> > As many strawmen that you want to introduce, the fact is that you said it
> > and you are a racist/bigoted asshole of the worst kind.
>
> If I am a racist and bigot for constantly championing racial equity,
> what the hell does that make someone like you??
>
> >If you owned up
> > to it it would be different. Someone says the word teenager and you
> > insert the word black. Someone says gang and you insert the word blacks.
>
> Just filling in the blanks on your obvious dog-whistle racism. But mo
> specifically said *black* teenagers. I remember he said the <great> city
> was filled with "violent African-American males."

mo_ntresor

-------- 

[BillB]

On 2/10/2012 6:28 AM, bratt wrote:

> You are the one trying to explain away YOUR words.
>
> I say what you said and I am the stupid one here? - look beyond your
> arrogance and read what you wrote.
>
> I am not the racist B-BillB. You are. Live with it.

haha...susan is becoming mentally ill.

[Dave the Clueless]

On Feb 10 2012 8:00 AM, BillB wrote:

> On 2/10/2012 3:38 AM, bratt wrote:
>
> > Not according to B-BillB. He isn't afraid of anyone.
>
> False. There are people I am somewhat afraid of, but black teenagers are
> not among them. That's about as far away as you can get from the people
> I am afraid of.

That isn't so shocking when you consider who and what you are and where
you live. I'll bet feral tigers aren't something you fear on a daily basis
either, you brave fuck.

> Have you been
> > following his rants? Anyone would be a pussie to feel fear when
> > approached on the street by any color. You above statement makes you a
> > racist in his eyes.
>
>
> > The point was that he said Chicago could not be a great city BECAUSE it
> > was 40% black...
>

> .....*IF*, like mo, you are so afraid of black people that you have to

> criss-cross the street every time you see a couple of black teenagers.
>
> Why do you keep leaving that part out? That's the most important part of
> my statement. You aren't trying to lie again, are you?
>
> Actually, I watched a *really* sad documentary last night about life on
> the South Side of Chicago. It was called The Interrupters.
>
> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1319744/
>
> I would encourage everyone to see that film. I defy anyone to watch that
> movie and then declare Chicago a "great city." It's absolutely fucking
> criminal what you've done to those people, and to think it's been more
> or less replicated in every urban center in America just boggles the
> mind. It was really hard to watch. If I was watching it in my car, I
> would have pulled over and wept, like Mitt Romney did when he heard the
> Mormons decided to stop overtly discriminating against black people and
> keep it on the down-low.

"It's absolutely fucking criminal what you've done to those people, and to
think it's been more
or less replicated in every urban center in America just boggles the
mind."

This might be the single most lucid thing you've ever posted.

It hasn't been Republicans in charge of the urban centers for the past
half century.... Democrats are the Mayors, the City Council, the Chiefs of
Police, the Judges, the School Board, the teachers and administrators, and
the overwhelming majority of government employees in US urban centers that
are majority black. I wonder who we could lay the blame on for the
precipitous fall of the black man and the black family over those decades.
Republicans? Tea Partiers? Tell me how THAT shit works.

-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!

____________________________________________________________________ 

[BillB]

On 2/10/2012 8:06 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:

> "It's absolutely fucking criminal what you've done to those people, and to
> think it's been more
> or less replicated in every urban center in America just boggles the
> mind."
>
> This might be the single most lucid thing you've ever posted.
>
> It hasn't been Republicans in charge of the urban centers for the past
> half century.... Democrats are the Mayors, the City Council, the Chiefs of
> Police, the Judges, the School Board, the teachers and administrators, and
> the overwhelming majority of government employees in US urban centers that
> are majority black. I wonder who we could lay the blame on for the
> precipitous fall of the black man and the black family over those decades.
> Republicans? Tea Partiers? Tell me how THAT shit works.

What do you mean *fall* of the black man? When were blacks better off
before the Democrats came along? You are hilarious. Sure, the Democrats
may have done only the *very barest of bare minimums* to help black
people recover from what was done to them, but that was that much more
than any Republican wanted to do for them (in the modern era).

The Republican plan to help black people achieve economic parity: do
nothing....the market will take care of it.

GMAFB!

[bratt]

ahhhhhhhhhhh - a cute Jerry dodgeting one-liner.

You keep asking us to post an example of your racism - I just proved it.

you keep calling me the racist - find one post of mine that proves I am a
racist.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas

-------- 

[bratt]

On Feb 10 2012 10:22 AM, BillB wrote:

> On 2/10/2012 8:06 AM, Dave the Clueless wrote:
>
> > "It's absolutely fucking criminal what you've done to those people, and to
> > think it's been more
> > or less replicated in every urban center in America just boggles the
> > mind."
> >
> > This might be the single most lucid thing you've ever posted.
> >
> > It hasn't been Republicans in charge of the urban centers for the past
> > half century.... Democrats are the Mayors, the City Council, the Chiefs of
> > Police, the Judges, the School Board, the teachers and administrators, and
> > the overwhelming majority of government employees in US urban centers that
> > are majority black. I wonder who we could lay the blame on for the
> > precipitous fall of the black man and the black family over those decades.
> > Republicans? Tea Partiers? Tell me how THAT shit works.
>
> What do you mean *fall* of the black man? When were blacks better off
> before the Democrats came along?

Are they better now?

>You are hilarious. Sure, the Democrats
> may have done only the *very barest of bare minimums* to help black
> people recover from what was done to them, but that was that much more
> than any Republican wanted to do for them (in the modern era).
>
> The Republican plan to help black people achieve economic parity: do
> nothing....the market will take care of it.
>
> GMAFB!

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Nov 8 2011 2:11 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
Jerry (almonst worthless) 'n Vegas

-------- 

[Dave the Clueless]

Tell me, O Wit of Usenet, what did you mean by "It's absolutely fucking
criminal what you've done to those people".

-------
Canada, keeping the brown people to a minimum for 80 years!

_____________________________________________________________________ 

[fffurken]

On Feb 9, 8:18 pm, "bratt" <a890...@webnntp.invalid> wrote:

> Saying that a city can not be great if it has a 40% black population is
>
> [   ]  Ignorance at its worst.
>
> [   ]  Racism at its worst.
>
> [   ]  Bigotry at it worst.
>
> [   ]  OK if you are an arrogant bigoted Canadian lawyer because he didn't
>  really mean it.

Oh goody, I like Poles...

[Scans options]

Oh for goodness sake, I can't go for any of those!

Let's see ...

OK.

I'll go for -

[X] Hyperbolic implication of what someone else said.

Fuck it, that'll do. Let me know when the results are in.

[Pepe Papon]

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:18:50 -0800, "bratt" <a89...@webnntp.invalid>
wrote:

>Saying that a city can not be great if it has a 40% black population is
>
>[ ] Ignorance at its worst.
>
>[ ] Racism at its worst.
>
>[ ] Bigotry at it worst.
>
>[ ] OK if you are an arrogant bigoted Canadian lawyer because he didn't
> really mean it.

[X] susan showing poor reading comprehension.

[RazzO]

On Feb 12 2012 3:55 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:

>
> [X] susan showing poor reading comprehension.

[x] Pepe Papon should go fuck himself.




RazzO n' Vegas

_______________________________________________________________________ 

[Pepe Papon]

On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:41:42 -0800, "RazzO" <ra...@razzo.com> wrote:

>On Feb 12 2012 3:55 AM, Pepe Papon wrote:
>
>>
>> [X] susan showing poor reading comprehension.
>
>
>[x] Pepe Papon should go fuck himself.

[x] Razzo, who's obsessed with me, can kiss my ass.