>>>> paul ryan understands this fucking chart. do you? we know obama
>>>> doesn't. if you don't, you should vote lawyer idiot.
>>> May I cross-examine you on your understanding of it?
>> That's what I thought.
> sorry, what can i help you understand?
Non-reponsive. I don't need help understanding it. I asked if I may cross-examine you on YOUR understanding of your chart (and how Ryan's policies -- or lack thereof -- will address any problems illustrated therein).
> Non-reponsive. I don't need help understanding it. I asked if I may > cross-examine you on YOUR understanding of your chart (and how Ryan's > policies -- or lack thereof -- will address any problems illustrated > therein).
> It's a yes or no question.
non-responsive. that's what i thought. it was a simple question.
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:24:24 AM UTC-7, mo_ntresor wrote:
> On Aug 14 2012 12:13 PM, BillB wrote:
> > > sorry, what can i help you understand?
> > Non-reponsive. I don't need help understanding it. I asked if I may > > cross-examine you on YOUR understanding of your chart (and how Ryan's > > policies -- or lack thereof -- will address any problems illustrated > > therein).
> > It's a yes or no question.
> non-responsive. that's what i thought. it was a simple question.
Jesus, Bill. I have never seen so many people run so fast from these Ryan Bill threads. The only responders are the ones we've already proven stupid. And even they cannot directly answer or address any part of it. They're actually the embarrassment of those that have just STFU.
Mo_ Charles, ask BillB + Turd if they've been beating their wives for
over a year and a half, and they HAVE to give a "yes" or "no" answer or
they're unresponsive.
> Mo_ Charles, ask BillB + Turd if they've been beating their wives for
> over a year and a half, and they HAVE to give a "yes" or "no" answer or
> they're unresponsive.
An appropriate "yes or no" question is the exception, not the rule. Asking someone if he is willing to submit to a cross-examination of his understanding of a chart is one such exception. He is either willing or he isn't.
Mo_ Charles, ask BillB + Turd if they've been beating their wives for
over a year and a half, and they HAVE to give a "yes" or "no" answer or
they're unresponsive.
> Mo_ Charles, ask BillB + Turd if they've been beating their wives for
> over a year and a half, and they HAVE to give a "yes" or "no" answer or
> they're unresponsive.
billb's telemarking down k2 when his kidneys aren't failing, so i doubt
he's got much time to beat his ailing wife.
<amontilladofortun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 12 2012 1:24 PM, ChrisRobin wrote:
>> > he's made some horrible mistakes in congress, but obamacare wasn't one of
>> > them. read up on medicare, medicaide, and social security. he's not
>> > perfect, but he kicks the shit out of obama/biden.
>> You hear that, Paul? Don't pay any attention to his actual voting
>> record... but trust his promises and his budget projections!
>it's sad when people can't talk about what's been actually said rather
>than what they believe was said. i see it here all the time.
