OFFICIAL RGP NFL BRACKET THREAD
DaVoice
Week #1 AFC
#6 Baltimore over #3 New England
#4 Cincinatti over #5 Jets
If those are correct, then
#6 Baltimore over #1 Indy
#2 San Diego over #4 Cincinatti
if those are correct, then
#2 San Diego over #6 Baltimore
Week #1 NFC
#3 Dallas over #6 Philly
#5 Green Bay over #4 Arizona (although they're playing in ARI and the
opening line is ARI -2.5)
if correct, then:
#1 Saints over #5 Green Bay
#2 Minnesota over #3 Arizona
If correct, then
#1 New Orleans over #2 Minnesota
If all of the above are correct, we've got a helluva game
San Diego over New Orleans 44-35
Thoughts?
Rick "DaVoice" Charles
(yeah, the real one)
Paul Popinjay
news:kVg0n.586$Mv3...@newsfe05.iad...
How long does this shit go on for? I thought football was usually over with
by January.
K9way
dont let being a "fan " force you to embarass yourself
Recession .. when IMike's neighbor loses his trailer
Depression .. when IMike loses his trailer
Recovery .. when IMike accepts public assistance funded by Obama
------�
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
K9way
I would love to see GB play MINN again .. alas , that cannot heppen as
MINN will get waxed by their next opponent ..GB is peaking and playing
better than they ever have since the Favre exit .
Dallas will run MINN out of their own stadium .. Dallas is peaking at
EXACTLY the right time and the Vikes have done nothing but ran over a bad
team for one half of football and then still LOST the game... and then
they mauled a team that mailed in from the airport in their romp over the
DEADZONE NYG.
if anyone thinks that favre can 'run and gun ' his way thru the playoffs
. they are sadly mistaken
Recession .. when IMike's neighbor loses his trailer
Depression .. when IMike loses his trailer
Recovery .. when IMike accepts public assistance funded by Obama
------�
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
Clave
news:ibk817x...@recgroups.com...
<...>
> I would love to see GB play MINN again ..
That matchup does not mean what it used to, not that it'll happen.
Wildcard week:
NYJ over CIN
BAL over NE
DAL over PHI (I hate this one)
ARI over GB
Div week:
IND over BAL
SD over NYJ
NO over ARI
DAL over MIN
AFC:
IND over SD
NFC:
NO over ARI
SB:
NO over IND
Jim
Schmedley
"K9way" <ad1...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:ibk817x...@recgroups.com...
>>
> I would love to see GB play MINN again .. alas , that cannot heppen as
> MINN will get waxed by their next opponent ..GB is peaking and playing
> better than they ever have since the Favre exit .
>
Minnesota in W2. 1 vs 6, 2 vs 5.
Based on yesterday, Philly is totally dead. But crazier things have
happened and it would be sweet if they happened to Dallas.
Schmedley
"Clave" <ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:hhsa39$2tm$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> "K9way" <ad1...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:ibk817x...@recgroups.com...
>
> <...>
>
For what it is worth (which is very little), I pick Philly. But it is based
solely on faith and please don't ask for any action on this one. They
can't play any worse?
phlash74
Is this a rebuy tournament??
Michael
U.S. American
-----------------
"Frankly, I think this was a good post. And on its merit too, not just
because you jammed it up Irish Mike's ass pretty good. Icing on the cake.
lol"
-Paul Popinjay, 3/19/08
-------�
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
Alim Nassor
> "K9way" <ad14...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
You've got the same teams playing in the NFC championship that you had
in one of the earlier divisional games. I don't see NO going very
far at all after dropping 3 straight to limp in.
John_Brian_K
#3 New England over #6 Baltimore
#5 Jets over #4 Cincinatti
If those are correct, then
#1 Indy over #3 New England
#2 San Diego over #5 Jets
if those are correct, then
#2 San Diego over #1 Indy
Week #1 NFC
#3 Dallas over #6 Philly
#5 Green Bay over #4 Arizona (although they're playing in ARI and the
opening line is ARI -2.5)
if correct, then:
#1 Saints over #5 Green Bay
#2 Minnesota over #3 Arizona
If correct, then
#1 New Orleans over #2 Minnesota
If all of the above are correct, we've got a helluva game
New Orleans over San Diego 37-27
==========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
==============================
47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
JBK
_______________________________________________________________________�
RedKnave
[snip]
> Week #1 NFC
>
> #3 Dallas over #6 Philly
> #5 Green Bay over #4 Arizona (although they're playing in ARI and the
> opening line is ARI -2.5)
>
> if correct, then:
>
> #1 Saints over #5 Green Bay
> #2 Minnesota over #3 Arizona
Am I missing something here?
-----�
DaVoice
"K9way" <ad1...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
Happening to be a Charger fan has nothing to do with my bracket picks. I
think they're the best team left in the AFC and if Indy loses, the Chargers
will play all home games. The Chargers are the NFC East Champs, too, you
know. They played and beat everyone in that division as well as their own
division, including two playoff teams, Dallas and Philly. The last two
times Indy and San Diego have met in the playoffs, San Diego has beaten
them. Tell me who you think will come into San Diego and beat the Chargers.
Let's see your bracket, Doggy.
RC
DaVoice
the tournament is structured. *** are my notes
"John_Brian_K" <a7e...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:7a0a17x...@recgroups.com...
> Week #1 AFC
>
> #3 New England over #6 Baltimore
>
> #5 Jets over #4 Cincinatti
>
> If those are correct, then
>
> #1 Indy over #3 New England
***If New England wins the Colts play host to the LOWEST remaining seed
which in your scenario would be the Jets
> #2 San Diego over #5 Jets
***If the Jets win they will play wk 2 @ Indy and SD will host the highest
remaining seed which in your scenario is New England
>
> if those are correct, then
>
> #2 San Diego over #1 Indy
>
> Week #1 NFC
>
> #3 Dallas over #6 Philly
> #5 Green Bay over #4 Arizona (although they're playing in ARI and the
> opening line is ARI -2.5)
>
> if correct, then:
>
> #1 Saints over #5 Green Bay
> #2 Minnesota over #3 Arizona
>
> If correct, then
>
> #1 New Orleans over #2 Minnesota
>
> If all of the above are correct, we've got a helluva game
>
> New Orleans over San Diego 37-27
>
> ==========================================
> You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
> nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
> ==============================
> 47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
> JBK
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> : the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com
RC
K9way
you guys really need to learn the difference between results from games
they NEED and games they dont give a shit about
there is money in it
Recession .. when IMike's neighbor loses his trailer
Depression .. when IMike loses his trailer
Recovery .. when IMike accepts public assistance funded by Obama
______________________________________________________________________�
K9way
> On Jan 4 2010 2:36 AM, DaVoice wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > Week #1 NFC
> >
> > #3 Dallas over #6 Philly
> > #5 Green Bay over #4 Arizona (although they're playing in ARI and the
> > opening line is ARI -2.5)
> >
> > if correct, then:
> >
> > #1 Saints over #5 Green Bay
> > #2 Minnesota over #3 Arizona
>
> Am I missing something here?
simple typo
Recession .. when IMike's neighbor loses his trailer
Depression .. when IMike loses his trailer
Recovery .. when IMike accepts public assistance funded by Obama
________________________________________________________________________�
DaVoice
I did some thinking about this while in the doctor's office today and
decided that I'm going to be putting a sizeable bet on SD to win the whole
thing. My time is due and when they win not only will I be able to pay
off Jordan and my other debts, I'll have enough to start playing poker
online for real stakes again. Anyone interested in making side bets with
me?
RC
----�
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
Clave
news:cd6775c6-f283-4002...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 4, 4:49 pm, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
> "K9way" <ad14...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:ibk817x...@recgroups.com...
>
> <...>
>
> > I would love to see GB play MINN again ..
>
> That matchup does not mean what it used to, not that it'll happen.
>
> Wildcard week:
> NYJ over CIN
> BAL over NE
> DAL over PHI (I hate this one)
> ARI over GB
>
> Div week:
> IND over BAL
> SD over NYJ
> NO over ARI
> DAL over MIN
>
> AFC:
> IND over SD
>
> NFC:
>
> SB:
> NO over IND
>
> Jim
You've got the same teams playing in the NFC championship that you had
in one of the earlier divisional games.
======================================================================
Corrected.
I don't see NO going very
far at all after dropping 3 straight to limp in.
======================================================================
I think they've been sandbagging.
Jim
Alim Nassor
>
> - Show quoted text -
Doggy, you really think the Saints laid down against the Cowboys?
Nope.
Alim Nassor
wrote:
> "Alim Nassor" <alimnas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
I don't think they were against Dallas. after the perfect season went
down the tubes, then maybe. I think most teams value momentum and
confidence and 3 losses in a row achieve neither.
Alim Nassor
>
> - Show quoted text -
Do you think they would play their starters the whole game if they
were going to sandbag it?
Clave
>On Jan 5, 10:37 am, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
>wrote:
>> "Alim Nassor" <alimnas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
<...>
>>> I don't see NO going very
>>> far at all after dropping 3 straight to limp in.
>>
>> I think they've been sandbagging.
>
>I don't think they were against Dallas. after the perfect season went
>down the tubes, then maybe. I think most teams value momentum and
>confidence and 3 losses in a row achieve neither.
After the post-season's locked up, I think players value their health.
Coaches value their players' health too, I'm told.
BTW, #1 seed, even after dropping 3 in a row, is not "limping in".
Jim
K9way
> Doggy, you really think the Saints laid down against the Cowboys?
> Nope.
call it what you want .. I told you people weeks in advance that there
would be no undefeated teams and i told you when they would lose and who
they would lose to and how
NO was 13-0 when they lost to dallas
if you think that game would have been the same if the saints were 11-2
and desperately needed to win that game ..you are out of your mind
what is it with you "FANS" ? how fucking blind do you become ?
denvers best year they got to 14-0 and stone cold layed down
Indy layed down like a little girl ..literally "QUIT"
Go back and look at teams that get to 12-0 , 13-0 .. Only one went
undefeated in regular season
When someone tells you what you are going to see and why you are going to
see it and when you will see it ..it is fool's work to argue the point
NO didnt give a shit about the Dallas game .. they made that decision
before the game , when it appeared that the Vikes were going to puke it up
FellKnight
Wildcard:
AFC:
#4 Cincy over #5 NYJ.
#6 Bal over #3 NE
NFC:
#4 Ariz over #5 GB
#6 Philly over #3 Dallas (One word. Romo.)
Conf Semis:
AFC:
#1 Indy over #6 Bal (though I will be cheering for whoever plays Indy to
embarass them)
#2 SD over #4 Cincy
NFC:
#6 Philly over #1 NO
#4 Ariz over #2 Min
Conf finals:
#2 SD over #1 Indy
#6 Philly over #4 Ariz
"The Big Game":
SD over Philly 20-17
Fell
--------�
Gary Carson
He's going to keep it going until he wins a pool and can pay off his
gambling debts.
Rick is a professional gambler and knows that the way to keep in action is
to simply keep doubling up until you finally win one.
--------�
Will_gamble
The problem is that they had a lot of defensive starters injured going
back to the New England game. For Dallas, Tampa, and Carolina, Shockey
didn't play. I am not saying he is that important just by himself, but he
adds a component that is a threat and also opens up other people. They
had to get players off the street that weren't even playing when they
played NE. I don't know if all that will be cleared up by the first
playoff game, but it has to be better.
The Saints have the offense to win it all, it just depends on who they
have on defense. Dallas looks like the team to beat and Philly might just
take care of that after they lulled them to sleep last weekend.
I think anybody that thinks the Saints can't win two games in a row based
solely on losing the last three against teams that were on a free roll is
mistaken. If they get their defense back together it will be two easy
victories in the NFC playoffs.
John_Brian_K
> have on defense. Dallas looks like the team to beat and Philly might just
> take care of that after they lulled them to sleep last weekend.
Neither Dallas nor Philly are going anywhere in the playoffs IMO.
==========================================
You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
==============================
47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
JBK
________________________________________________________________________�
Will_gamble
> > The Saints have the offense to win it all, it just depends on who they
> > have on defense. Dallas looks like the team to beat and Philly might just
> > take care of that after they lulled them to sleep last weekend.
>
> Neither Dallas nor Philly are going anywhere in the playoffs IMO.
>
>
Dallas' defense is playing really well right now. The question is when
Romo will pull a Matusow?
phlash74
> > The Saints have the offense to win it all, it just depends on who they
> > have on defense. Dallas looks like the team to beat and Philly might just
> > take care of that after they lulled them to sleep last weekend.
>
> Neither Dallas nor Philly are going anywhere in the playoffs IMO.
>
> ==========================================
> You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious,
> nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
> ==============================
> 47.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
> JBK
Either Dallas is going to Minnesota or Philly is going to New Orleans. So
you can't say that neither of them are going anywhere in the playoffs.
Now if your contention is that the winner of their game will lose in the
next round, that's something that can be debated rationally, SpazzO.
Michael
U.S. American
-----------------
"Frankly, I think this was a good post. And on its merit too, not just
because you jammed it up Irish Mike's ass pretty good. Icing on the cake.
lol"
-Paul Popinjay, 3/19/08
_____________________________________________________________________�