Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

tonight's first two morons

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:32:46 AM1/3/10
to
ull Tilt Poker Game #17293490789: The Ferguson (128090977), Table 1 -
50/100 - No Limit Hold'em - 2:29:10 ET - 2010/01/03
Seat 1: Binsfeldtheman (4,470)
Seat 2: dubzie33 (3,345)
Seat 3: timncharlie (4,805)
Seat 4: Mikemid (3,560)
Seat 6: Mamuang (2,965)
Seat 7: 2PAIRDUECESUP (1,200)
Seat 8: The_Sorcerer (1,745)
Seat 9: RRwinRR (7,685)
Mamuang posts the small blind of 50
2PAIRDUECESUP posts the big blind of 100
The button is in seat #5
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to The_Sorcerer [Kd Ks]
The_Sorcerer calls 100
RRwinRR folds
Binsfeldtheman folds
Fielding26 sits down
Fielding26 adds 3,615
dubzie33 has 15 seconds left to act
dubzie33 raises to 400
RRwinRR is feeling happy
timncharlie calls 400
Mikemid folds
Mamuang calls 350
2PAIRDUECESUP folds
The_Sorcerer raises to 1,745, and is all in
dubzie33 raises to 3,090
timncharlie folds
Mamuang has 15 seconds left to act
Mamuang calls 2,565, and is all in
dubzie33 shows [Qs Qd]
Mamuang shows [Ad 8s]
The_Sorcerer shows [Kd Ks]
Uncalled bet of 125 returned to dubzie33
*** FLOP *** [3s Qh 5s]
*** TURN *** [3s Qh 5s] [Ah]
*** RIVER *** [3s Qh 5s Ah] [9s]
dubzie33 shows three of a kind, Queens
Mamuang shows a pair of Aces
dubzie33 wins the side pot (2,440) with three of a kind, Queens
The_Sorcerer shows a pair of Kings
dubzie33 wins the main pot (5,735) with three of a kind, Queens
The_Sorcerer stands up
Mamuang stands up
Binsfeldtheman stands up
dubzie33 stands up
timncharlie stands up
Mikemid stands up
Fielding26 stands up
2PAIRDUECESUP stands up
RRwinRR stands up
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 8,175 Main pot 5,735. Side pot 2,440. | Rake 0
Board: [3s Qh 5s Ah 9s]
Seat 1: Binsfeldtheman didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: dubzie33 showed [Qs Qd] and won (8,175) with three of a kind, Queens
Seat 3: timncharlie folded before the Flop
Seat 4: Mikemid didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: Mamuang (small blind) showed [Ad 8s] and lost with a pair of Aces
Seat 7: 2PAIRDUECESUP (big blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 8: The_Sorcerer showed [Kd Ks] and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 9: RRwinRR didn't bet (folded)

gtech1

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:00:42 AM1/3/10
to
Are you suggesting QQ should've folded?

____________________________________________________________________�
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com


number6

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:19:25 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 10:00 am, "gtech1" <duanepritch...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Are you suggesting QQ should've folded?
>

Of course he is ... If A/rag had three outs against him ... QQ had
only 2 ...
They should have known his range of hands were KK to KK ...

Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:55:54 AM1/3/10
to

"gtech1" <duanepr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:q1o617x...@recgroups.com...

> Are you suggesting QQ should've folded?
>
To an UTG limp reraise from a tight player?
Fuck yes

Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:58:54 AM1/3/10
to

"number6" <snum...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:94939b53-4e5e-464a...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

My range there is AA, KK, Aks (but rare. I almost never limp with AK)


Follow

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 3:55:59 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3 2010 8:55 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:

> "gtech1" <duanepr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:q1o617x...@recgroups.com...
> > Are you suggesting QQ should've folded?
> >
> To an UTG limp reraise from a tight player?
> Fuck yes

I want to see just ONE HH where you actually did that.

Follow :)

____________________________________________________________________�
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com

O-PGManager

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 1:52:00 AM1/4/10
to
On Jan 2 2010 11:32 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:

> snip bahh where QQ beats Beldonks KK

95% of players are not laying down QQ preflop no matter what. You are the
biggest whiner in the history of RGP. Your reign as RGP's Idiot of the
Month appears ongoing.

Opie-GManager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator reporting to Mr. Popinjay

______________________________________________________________________�

Alim Nassor

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:36:52 AM1/4/10
to

ROFL.
Beldin always assumes every player at the table is in awe of his
skills even when they have only played the first few rounds of a
tourney with hm.

RUStupid Mark

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:26:54 PM1/4/10
to

"Beldin the Sorcerer" <beld...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:hhqelc$ac$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

3045 in the pot / 1445 to call / QQ in hand
another 1600 behind for opp, 0 for the UTG
limp/jammer - He's got 2 options, and folding
is not one of them.

Instaship > Instacall imo. He played the hand
properly. Standard FTP coolerment!

Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 9:03:57 AM1/5/10
to

"Alim Nassor" <alimn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:33564c9e-aa78-441d...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...

***
Wow, Alim the shithead, yet again.

I assume they aren't total morons, you fuckhead.
An UTG limp reraise by a tight player is an obvious AA KK situation
Them being in awe of me doesn't figure in at all


Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 9:04:45 AM1/5/10
to

"Follow" <lamema...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vrc717x...@recgroups.com...

> On Jan 3 2010 8:55 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
>> "gtech1" <duanepr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:q1o617x...@recgroups.com...
>> > Are you suggesting QQ should've folded?
>> >
>> To an UTG limp reraise from a tight player?
>> Fuck yes
>
> I want to see just ONE HH where you actually did that.
>
Next time it comes up, I'll post it


Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 9:05:44 AM1/5/10
to

"RUStupid Mark" <dipu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hhtitu$enn$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Markus Railbirdius, this is an auto-fold.

4.2-1 dog is not a call there
Not ever


Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 9:06:42 AM1/5/10
to

"O-PGManager" <ad6...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:gpf817x...@recgroups.com...

> On Jan 2 2010 11:32 PM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
>> snip bahh where QQ beats Beldonks KK
>
> 95% of players are not laying down QQ preflop no matter what. You are the
> biggest whiner in the history of RGP. Your reign as RGP's Idiot of the
> Month appears ongoing.
Why don't you go let Ramsitintheass bang you some more?

95% of the people are too stupid to fold, yes.
So what?
They're morons then
That's the point


RUStupid Mark

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 1:37:55 PM1/5/10
to

"Beldin the Sorcerer" <beld...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:hhvgvs$hnm$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

$1 buyin - you're not a 4.2-1 dog against the range
of hands UTG limp/jam might do this with...
$10 buyin - you're not a 4.2-1 dog against the range
of hands UTG limp/jam might do this with...
$10K buyin - you're not a 4.2-1 dog against the range
of hands UTG limp/jam (with that stack) might do this
with...


misanthropic whackjob

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 3:52:49 PM1/5/10
to

They likely don't know you are a tight player. At this level of tourney
more than likely they aren't even paying attention to the tourney table
except when it is their turn to act. I know that I, personally, watch tv,
read stuff, read rgp, whatever, when I play tourneys. In two rounds I
wouldn't notice if you were tight or not, and so many utg limpers in low
buy in online tourneys do so with hands like 78 suited.

--
I don't care about you! Fuck you! - FEAR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyM4uAJBujA

---�

RUStupid Mark

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 3:51:44 PM1/5/10
to

"misanthropic whackjob" <aca...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:1elc17x...@recgroups.com...

> On Jan 5 2010 6:03 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
>> "Alim Nassor" <alimn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:33564c9e-aa78-441d...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 3, 11:19 pm, number6 <snumb...@aol.com> wrote:
>> > On Jan 3, 10:00 am, "gtech1" <duanepritch...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Are you suggesting QQ should've folded?
>> >
>> > Of course he is ... If A/rag had three outs against him ... QQ had
>> > only 2 ...
>> > They should have known his range of hands were KK to KK ...
>>
>> ROFL.
>> Beldin always assumes every player at the table is in awe of his
>> skills even when they have only played the first few rounds of a
>> tourney with hm.
>> ***
>> Wow, Alim the shithead, yet again.
>>
>> I assume they aren't total morons, you fuckhead.
>> An UTG limp reraise by a tight player is an obvious AA KK situation
>> Them being in awe of me doesn't figure in at all
>
> They likely don't know you are a tight player.

They do if they watched him call a raise earlier with QTo!
Umm, wait a minute...

O-PGManager

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 4:58:56 PM1/5/10
to
On Jan 5 2010 9:06 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:

> 95% of the people are too stupid to fold, yes.
> So what?

If you were actually a winning player these "bad beats" wouldn't bother
you.

Opie-GManager
Rec.Gambling.Poker
Assistant Newsgroup Coordinator reporting to Mr. Popinjay

_______________________________________________________________________�

Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:53:44 PM1/5/10
to

"misanthropic whackjob" <aca...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:1elc17x...@recgroups.com...
> On Jan 5 2010 6:03 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
>> "Alim Nassor" <alimn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:33564c9e-aa78-441d...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jan 3, 11:19 pm, number6 <snumb...@aol.com> wrote:
>> > On Jan 3, 10:00 am, "gtech1" <duanepritch...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Are you suggesting QQ should've folded?
>> >
>> > Of course he is ... If A/rag had three outs against him ... QQ had
>> > only 2 ...
>> > They should have known his range of hands were KK to KK ...
>>
>> ROFL.
>> Beldin always assumes every player at the table is in awe of his
>> skills even when they have only played the first few rounds of a
>> tourney with hm.
>> ***
>> Wow, Alim the shithead, yet again.
>>
>> I assume they aren't total morons, you fuckhead.
>> An UTG limp reraise by a tight player is an obvious AA KK situation
>> Them being in awe of me doesn't figure in at all
>
> They likely don't know you are a tight player. At this level of tourney
> more than likely they aren't even paying attention to the tourney table
> except when it is their turn to act. I know that I, personally, watch tv,
> read stuff, read rgp, whatever, when I play tourneys. In two rounds I
> wouldn't notice if you were tight or not, and so many utg limpers in low
> buy in online tourneys do so with hands like 78 suited.
>
It takes about 20 seconds to look on OPR. Solid win rate is usually tight
early on


>


Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 5, 2010, 10:54:43 PM1/5/10
to

"RUStupid Mark" <dipu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hi08oa$gq6$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Calling a small raise with a deep stack is not limp reraising all in UTG
mark


Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 12:10:14 AM1/6/10
to

"RUStupid Mark" <dipu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hi00te$bfu$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Against the range anyone good would to that with, you are.


> $10 buyin - you're not a 4.2-1 dog against the range
> of hands UTG limp/jam might do this with...

See above

> $10K buyin - you're not a 4.2-1 dog against the range
> of hands UTG limp/jam (with that stack) might do this
> with...

See above

>
>


Beldin the Sorcerer

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 12:22:28 AM1/6/10
to

"O-PGManager" <ad6...@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:0apc17x...@recgroups.com...

> On Jan 5 2010 9:06 AM, Beldin the Sorcerer wrote:
>
>> 95% of the people are too stupid to fold, yes.
>> So what?
>
> If you were actually a winning player these "bad beats" wouldn't bother
> you.
Shithead, I am documentedly a winning player
Any non-imbecile can look on OPR


0 new messages