"denial" of Daniel by Men by GCA
GCA
didn't you dispute the claims I have been making? Do you think they
are going away. We know each other very well. Were you afraid for me
to leak more information out?
Men, you have been a "tournament cheater" for close to 10 years now.
You know I have been around and participated. Daniel maybe the
"newbie" here, but my accusations are the one that pack the "bite".
You know I have the others to back up what I state on your tournament
cheating.
You can't and have never been able to beat the ring games. They won't
even let you cheat in the "ring game cheating packs". Dany Dang can go
from one area to another. He plays a lot better than you. Thus he can
cheat in both.
Men you are a LIAR!!!! Men you are a CHEATER!!!!! Many people are now
accusing you. I being the forerunner. I was here when you came into
the game. You have "cheated" for close to 10 years now. You don't miss
an oppoutunity.
The orders to your "stake horses" were right on the money. [Daniel
stated them].This is why many are not cheating with you anymore.
Remember you have "cheated" with many people "Men", and some know all
your moves [well most any way].
That was why it was so easy for people to "play both sides" against
you. I had one cheat in one of your "cheating packs", they received
more money from me. You and I both know you have cheated in every
tournament you could possibly cheat in.
Why did you not dispute my accusations? Did you think Daniels were
more important? Now you state, "Daniel is fabricating everything".
Common "cheating maneuver", complete "denial" when put into a position
where you have to defend yourself. How could a young, strong Daniel be
jealous of an older[perhaps 20 years] smaller, fatter you? He is also
smarter.
This is the same defense that was just used against me when I have
attacked Doyle Brunson and others. They stated, "I was jealous of
Doyle". How can anyone be jealous of a person who is 20 years older
and 200 pounds overweight? Just another "typical denial".
Jealousy!!!!!! BULL-SHIT is more like it. Some people can just take
so much. Men, your "cheating days" are coming to an end.
This is not personal. I am at war with "cheating", and you are at the
lower end. Regardless of what these magazines state, you know where
you stand on the pecking order. I even like you. We have had many a
beer together, but I have "big fish" to catch. So you had to be
exposed.
I still wonder why you didn't bother to refute my claims since this
was your first time on a computer. Also, who was your writer? Surely
you didn't compose that message yourself.
Many have now accused you. GCA, Daniel N., Casey Kastle and others not
as high.
I know for a fact you have conducted your "tournament cheating"
strategies in your house. One of "mine" [person who cheated on my
pack] was also on your "cheating pack" in those years.He was in your
house. He slept there. You know the orders you gave your guys, just as
I do. This was why it was easy for some of them to "betray you". You
were too cheap with them.
I have at least one person who would give "testimony or a court
deposition" that he has been in Men's house and on Men's "cheating
packs". He was also on mine. Tell them how easy it is to get
"tournament chips" for the Bicycle Club Men.
You can procure "tournament chips" for the BIG TOURNAMENTS at the
Bicycle Club by simply playing in some of the smaller events. Up until
the time I stopped playing at the Bicycle Club, they used the "same
tournament chips" in the smaller events. Thus you could take out a
"few thousand in chips" for mere pennies.
You then saved them to use in the "Big Events", like the Legends of
Poker. The Bicycle conducted their smaller tourneys like the "Winnin
of the Green" with the same chips. Other events also used the same
chips. The buy ins on some of these events was as low as $50 dollars.
Many $100 events. Easy to load up on AMMUNITION for the Legends of
Poker. Here the buy ins were ten times larger.
But, since you already had loaded up in the smaller tourneys before
the Legends of Poker, you were always prepared. And this came at a
miniscule price. Bet you didn't know that the BICYCLE TOURNAMENTS were
conducted in this manner.
Men, you have been a cheater for many years now. You lead your
"cheating pack". I have stated fellow associates in another post. You
guys dominate the TOP 20 in Overall Player Standing. You all use
everything available, including collusion and "passing chips in the
rest rooms".
Russ G new...@aol.com John M "whistle-blowers"
MEEHAN1952
>From: new...@aol.com (GCA)
>Date: 12/19/2001 12:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <fe4b9b6.01121...@posting.google.com>
>
Well, Russ/GCA, I owe you an apology, and I *DO* hereby apologize. You were
straight to send me a free copy, postage and tape cost pre-paid, of your
"cheating tapes", and I contracted in return a post to rgp for a review of
same. Well, I *GOT* the tapes, but I haven't seen 'em yet, so, no review; mea
culpa maxima. I *moved*, tapes and VCR at previous address, yadayada, no
excuse, a deal is a deal.
But/and, this particular post of Russ/GCA uncited, anybody who doesn't believe
that at *least* eighty per cent of what Russ/GCA posts is true is a complete
*MORON*, or, perhaps, more charitably, astoundingly, incredibly naive. :-).
The whore/publishers have a vested interest; I do not presume to know
precisely what Russ/GCA's motives are, but/and .... I personally have privately
by e-mail to tournament directors, as any with any guts will confirm, and
ocassionally publicly on rgp, railed against the common-knowledge,
everyone-knows-it's-going-on'let's-look-the-other-way=for-the=GOOD-OF-POKER "
cheating by gangs of criminals.
In fact, I have proposed a set a rules for the composition of an ethical board
to bar well-known cheaters, who have acquired that reputation over a period in
excess of ten years. But/and, of course, the tournament directors are
disinclined to show some *GUTS* when it might cost them a few tourney entries
And Russ, a self-acknowledged criminal, speaks up, and receives astounding
denials from the *EXACT* victims who *KNOW* that they personally have been
cheated for *YEARS*. Jesus Christ.
Talk about denial.
Open your *eyes*, sonny. You want corporate sponsorship - for the *good of
poker* ??? Then get *rid* of the criminals, just like the women's PGA did when
they penalized a gal for moving her marker four inches forward on a nine-putt
putt. This ain't rocket science.
Thanx for listening, if ya got this far ...
Minneapolis Jim the humble Nit
>Subject: "denial" of Daniel by Men by GCA
>From: new...@aol.com (GCA)
>Date: 12/19/2001 12:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <fe4b9b6.01121...@posting.google.com>
Dsklansky
>But/and, this particular post of Russ/GCA uncited, anybody who doesn't
>believe
>that at *least* eighty per cent of what Russ/GCA posts is true is a complete
>*MORON*, or, perhaps, more charitably, astoundingly, incredibly naive. :-).
20>x<80
calmar
"Dsklansky" <dskl...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20011219201747...@mb-ch.aol.com...
I'm wondering, WHERE is he telling the truth...and where not?
It seems you know it !
please tell your opinon about all this.
Where do you think is cheating going on in the past..and nowadays?
Where and what exactly are those 20% cheatings in your opinon ??
thanks a lot!
calmar
James L. Hankins
news:3c214b7d$1...@news.swissonline.ch...
>
> I'm wondering, WHERE is he telling the truth...and where not?
> It seems you know it !
Of course he knows it. He's playing games. He's waiting for the dam to
break and when a few more high limit players like Daniel finally acknowledge
the cheating he'll say he told us all along.
And Memo to Russ:
Look at Daniel's post. See what happens when you post a concise
statement of things you know first hand, sans the rhetoric? Other than Men,
I haven't read a single post that chanllenges Daniel's credibility on this.
AL
>From: "James L. Hankins" jhan...@cableone.net
>I haven't read a single post that chanllenges Daniel's credibility on this.
I never saw Daniels post..could someone please repost it or post a link?
thanks
Steve Brecher
> 20>x<80
This can be simplified to x<20.
--
To send mail, please change "surname" to "brecher":
st...@surname.reno.nv.us (Steve Brecher)
Ikke
He probably meant 20<x<80.
Or he meant that the previous post makes no sense. You just never know
with the Oz ;-)
Regards
Aug
Should've had Mson check his math:-)
MGuzz55625
>I never saw Daniels post..could someone please repost it or post a link?
I read rgp post through usenet and Daniel's post never appeared there only
responces appear. Here's the link:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&th=5524a4be79679269
Nick
Lee Munzer
"MGuzz55625" wrote ...
Thanks, overshadowed by the content was this satellite lineup: "In the
sattelite where Erik S, John J, Allen C, Andy B, Tony Ma, and a
few others who all saw it! Nobosy else spoke. The satellite continued and
Erik Seidel won the seat."
I didn't realize these satellites were so soft:<).
Lee