LOTTO IDIOCY AWARD 2001 GOES TO NUMEROLOGIST ION SALIU
Colin Fairbrother
for the enumeration of Lotto number possibilities came from and it
would appear it is all down to the freak from muddy, thinking creek,
Ion Saliu.
This charlatan who works on the basis of spluttering along with the
most unintelligible ravings and rantings known to man and which any
self - respecting psychiatrist would immediately commit to an asylum
in a barred room with straight jacket after reading a sentence or
two.
Recently, we had numerologist Manfred trot out some bizarre nonsense
about some index differences giving a better chance of success. It
seems his mentor was the crazy Romanian that someone hasn't got around
to sticking the stake in.
How about this excerpt from the nut that feels it necessary to tell
the world about pipe noises he hears in the middle of the night let
alone the arcane voices, " ... The index range for past drawings does
follow the normal probability rule. I know what most people will do
with the results. Instead of selecting 6 or so lotto numbers, they
will simply select an index ;Ok. So index 34,245,621 already came out.
I think the next index will be 33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and
it's located under the bell."
Read the article here -
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lotto.players/msg/0e696de1f5b786c7
-
but don't dally as his crazy meanderings are a public nuisance and
danger to mental health.
For a rational consideration of indexes from a database specialist
read my article here: -
Distribution in Lotto by Index Enumeration
http://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=655
Colin Fairbrother
Just when you think he's forgotten you'll run into an iron fist.
nigel
> "So index 34,245,621 already came out.
> I think the next index will be 33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and
> it's located under the bell."
> (Ion Saliu)
I understand Ion to be saying that if people had easy access to
combination sequence numbers, he believes they would utilise them in a
Gambler's Fallacy manner.
I don't see anything wrong with that, he's making an educated guess
about human nature, not about the lottery.
Evil Nigel
duncan smith
Although a pretty uneducated guess about how the CSNs should be
distributed. A bell curve?
Duncan
nigel
I'm not sure which lottery he's thinking of with over 33 million
combinations, but after a trillion draws or so wouldn't the frequency
distribution of combinations ought to start to look approximately like a
normal distribution?
If that wasn't what Ion meant, I'm barking up the wrong tree.
Evil Nigel
a
wrote:
> I have often wondered where the preoccupation in the past with Indexes
> for the enumeration of Lotto number possibilities came from and it
> would appear it is all down to the freak from muddy, thinking creek,
> Ion Saliu.
Hold that thought Colin ^^^^^^ ("it is all down to--" "Ion Saliu"?)
Agree? Then you wrote (first two words mind) ...
> This charlatan ....
HOW is Ion now FAKE if it is down to Ion who (you say) was the
instigator/founder ?
Bad post really Colin,
a
a
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ion mostly, cocks up.
However, as much as I dislike the spiel it is food for thought and
promotes ideas.
Which I do like,
a
Royce Penny
For every 100 or so lumps of #%! that Ion drops, one may contain a
diamond (ie: stimulate thought or a new idea). The problem is having
to sift through all the lumps to find it...
Royce
duncan smith
I took it he was referring to the distribution if indices "Are
most indexes located within the Gauss curve, around the median?". The
indices would clearly be expected to be uniform (each one equally
likely). The distribution of frequencies is a different matter. Those
you would expect to be approximately normally distributed.
Duncan
nigel
Perhaps I should stick to trying to forecast the lottery - more reason
for optimism than in trying to fathom the inner workings of Ion's mind.
Evil Nigel
Parpaluck
---------
“Refrain:
“The rats are rattled! Oh, rattled rats!
They wanna be Tiger copycats!”
(Mnionin Vintejay, “A Song for Sour Losers”)
Ion Saliu
http://forums.saliu.com/showthread.php/16-Intent-to-disrupt-Disgruntled-paid-membership-users
a
>
> - Show quoted text -
Bloody hell, ;)
Ion is here! ;)
How do you find Colin's views Ion?
Fun, fun, fun.
Well for me anyways,
a
Colin Fairbrother
wrong but is unable to admit it. No shades of Vlad there.
A notable admission is his non-reference to me with the usual string
of derisory, adolescent like names. It's obviously an insanity period
of his past he chooses to muffle.
The following articles may be of assistance: -
Random Lotto Numbers using the Mersenne Twister
http://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661
Integer Occurrence UK Lotto for Order Drawn
http://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=669
Distribution in Lotto by Index Enumeration
http://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=655
LOTTO YIELDS BY METHOD AND COMBINATIONS PLAYED
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=647&FID=46&PR=3
All World’s Lotto 649 Sums Analyzed
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=143&PN=1
The last link above shows an example of a Bell Curve ie Gaussian or
Normal Distribution which is applicable for frequency. After 14
million random selections roughly one third of the 13,983,816
combinations for a 6/49 Lotto game have not appeared.
It appears apart from Duncan Smith and myself recent contributors to
this newsgroup rarely get above the trite comment.
Colin Fairbrother
Royce Penny
wrote:
> I have often wondered where the preoccupation in the past with Indexes
> for the enumeration of Lotto number possibilities came from and it
> would appear it is all down to the freak from muddy, thinking creek,
> Ion Saliu.
>
> This charlatan who works on the basis of spluttering along with the
> most unintelligible ravings and rantings known to man and which any
> self - respecting psychiatrist would immediately commit to an asylum
> in a barred room with straight jacket after reading a sentence or
> two.
>
> Recently, we had numerologist Manfred trot out some bizarre nonsense
> about some index differences giving a better chance of success. It
> seems his mentor was the crazy Romanian that someone hasn't got around
> to sticking the stake in.
>
> How about this excerpt from the nut that feels it necessary to tell
> the world about pipe noises he hears in the middle of the night let
> alone the arcane voices, " ... The index range for past drawings does
> follow the normal probability rule. I know what most people will do
> with the results. Instead of selecting 6 or so lotto numbers, they
> will simply select an index ;Ok. So index 34,245,621 already came out.
> I think the next index will be 33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and
> it's located under the bell."
>
> -
> but don't dally as his crazy meanderings are a public nuisance and
> danger to mental health.
>
> For a rational consideration of indexes from a database specialist
> read my article here: -
>
> Colin Fairbrother
> Just when you think he's forgotten you'll run into an iron fist.
Colin - On your post Distribution in Lotto by Index Enumeration you
state in highlighted red print that "...This my friends is another
first by yours truly, the well and truly utter debunking of the Sums
Lotto Myth".
Please note that your post was in 2005. I posted the exact information
(using the Canada 649 data) along with a bell curve chart in 1998
which is 7 years prior to your claim.
Having said that, by selecting a summation total there is no advantage
over any other selection method - only maybe in the satisfaction of
knowing that, in the case of a 150, when it did come in, your chances
of winning were at 1 in 165,772 (for that specific draw) - and you
still did not win.
What I could never resolve mathematically was the number of times that
one of the seven summation totals (the winning combination and the 6
bonus number totals) for a draw repeated in the next draw.
Royce
Royce
>
Colin Fairbrother
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Royce
I have suitably modified the article at : -
All World’s Lotto 649 Sums Analyzed
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=143&PN=1
At the time I hadn't gone through some of the early posts on
rec.gambling.lottery and when I did go through a few I found some of
the topics had been addressed. Regarding Sums I found this post
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.lottery/msg/01c922a05a894894
by Mike H June 15, 1995 (3 years before you) and acknowledged it in a
page (which is not editable now and is incomplete) at
Rec.Gambling.Lottery FAQ and Index of Worthy Posts
http://groups.google.com/group/lottogroup/web/rec-gambling-lottery-faq-and-index-of-worthy-posts
Colin
Royce Penny
wrote:
>
> At the time I hadn't gone through some of the early posts on
> rec.gambling.lottery and when I did go through a few I found some of
> by Mike H June 15, 1995 (3 years before you) and acknowledged it in a
> page (which is not editable now and is incomplete) at
>
> Colin
----------------
Thanks Colin - Just to let you know that the post you refer to relates
to the actual theoretical bell curve whereas your post in 2005 and
mine in 1998 both refer to the correlation of actual data with the
bell curve data.
Royce
a
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah Colin!
What Royce said, get your act together!
I just luv this place (Joey 1834)
;)
a
Parpaluck
wrote:
> The prattle reply of Ion Saliu can be taken as an admission he was
> wrong but is unable to admit it. No shades of Vlad there.
>
> A notable admission is his non-reference to me with the usual string
> of derisory, adolescent like names. It's obviously an insanity period
> of his past he chooses to muffle.
>
> The following articles may be of assistance: -
>
>
> Integer Occurrence UK Lotto for Order Drawnhttp://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=669
>
> Distribution in Lotto by Index Enumerationhttp://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=655
>
> LOTTO YIELDS BY METHOD AND COMBINATIONS PLAYEDhttp://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=647&FID=46&PR=3
>
> All World’s Lotto 649 Sums Analyzedhttp://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=143&PN=1
>
> The last link above shows an example of a Bell Curve ie Gaussian or
> Normal Distribution which is applicable for frequency. After 14
> million random selections roughly one third of the 13,983,816
> combinations for a 6/49 Lotto game have not appeared.
>
> It appears apart from Duncan Smith and myself recent contributors to
> this newsgroup rarely get above the trite comment.
>
> Colin Fairbrother
Psycholin and Duncopath
Both have a cringing element in common: OBSESSION with Ion Saliu. They
badly want to copycat Ion Saliu — but they don’t have the brains!!!
Poor Duncopath! He’s been in this closet for years and years and years
… just to spill his venom over. Ion Saliu is the only reason he posts
— to launch attacks.
F-Coli, however, is one step ahead of Duncopath. Psycholin is madder
even than Madam Madness!
“Psycholin — hallucinater;
Duncopath: the screaming hater.”
Colin Fairbrother
and as I correctly predicted consists of some juvenile, puerile name
calling.
For those that are interested in Lotto numbers the name Ion Saliu
crops up as a madman and not as someone to admire or emulate. I first
came across him with his Gambling Formula back around the turn of the
century. Turns out that is a bit of plagiarism, see Michael
Shackleford: -
http://wizardofodds.com/askthewizard/probability.html
In years to come, if not now, Ion Saliu will be marked by his spurious
claim that a sequence of random selections as in a Lotto History of
draws is useful in predicting when the integers will reoccur; this
from a person purportedly to have written a book on "mathematics"
which in effect says that an Independent Event such as a Lotto Draw is
dependent on the previous draws for that particular Lotto game. That
is, it is a book more relevant to NUMEROLOGY.
See : -
ANALYSIS OF LOTTO DRAW HISTORY - THE FINAL WORD
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=638&FID=46&PR=3
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
http://LottoToWin.com
Jack Ricci
news:88689b3c-71a6-41bd...@h36g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
A further reply by Ion Saliu April 27, 2011 does not address the issue
and as I correctly predicted consists of some juvenile, puerile name
calling.
For those that are interested in Lotto numbers the name Ion Saliu
crops up as a madman and not as someone to admire or emulate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...Oh please, Colin...That mirror is still staring you right in the face...
Colin Fairbrother
How many times in his decrepit, miserable, pitiful, vacuous existence
has he been told by ordinary people to just piss off and mind his own
business. He has nothing to contribute because there is no expertise
in the subject of interest and relevance and expects to be admired for
simply burping or farting condescending bullshit.
If only he had a nose for these things!
nigel
> In years to come, if not now, Ion Saliu will be marked by his spurious
> claim that a sequence of random selections as in a Lotto History of
> draws is useful in predicting when the integers will reoccur; this
> from a person purportedly to have written a book on "mathematics"
> which in effect says that an Independent Event such as a Lotto Draw is
> dependent on the previous draws for that particular Lotto game.
Interesting.
That ties in neatly with my latest concept of 'randomness'. I think Ion
would be interested in the early results I'm getting.
Evil Nigel
Parpaluck
Only Randomness is Almighty
Write about it! Nobody needs anybody’s permission to write or start
debates. Otherwise, it’s like begging for attention. Or, what — you
scared of Duncopath’s reaction?
You’ll write — they’ll read. They read even heaps of putrid insanity,
like Psycholin’s delirious speech. Although, in the latter case, the
reading is preponderantly professional — psychiatric in nature.
Only Randomness is Almighty. Randomness is great!
Ion Saliu
http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/683.html
(Randomness, Degree of Randomness, Degree of Certainty, True Random
Numbers Generators)
Gerry
> Only Randomness is Almighty. Randomness is great!
It has always been a great conversation starter at RGL
but beyond that nobody gives a shit.
Colin Fairbrother
misused slogan of "Only Randomness is Almighty" but it does nothing
towards winning the argument. It is akin to an atheist chanting "God
is Great".
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
Gerry
8+4=12
nigel
The page starts by saying:
"We must define RANDOMNESS first and foremost. I believe I achieved that
great feast by discovering the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG)."
I followed your links but couldn't find anything resembling a formal
definition of randomness. Perhaps you'd humour me by posting the
definition here or a direct link to it.
From:
"The opposite of Randomness is Absolute Certainty."
it seems to me that you hold a traditional view of randomness.
Since you have written a computer program which generates "TRUE random
and unique numbers", would you like to generate 100,000 pseudo-draws of
a 6/49 lottery, numbers in drawn order, for me to incorporate in my
ongoing trial?
You can e-mail them to me at evil_nigel @ hotmail . co . uk
Evil Nigel
Parpaluck
> Parpaluck wrote:
> > On Apr 27, 7:27 am, nigel <use...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
1.-
“From:
"The opposite of Randomness is Absolute Certainty."
it seems to me that you hold a traditional view of randomness.”
In the end, every theory becomes “traditional”. But they all start as
“blasphemies” as Bernard Shaw put it.
When I first presented the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (the famous
FFG that “killed” Duncopath), the negative reaction was virulent. As
Norm "Worm" Wormtenburger put it:“… random events cannot, by
definition, be captured in formulae" (http://saliu.com/gambling-
fights.html). Now, all of a sudden, FFG is just “traditional”.
Moreover, it was not the creation of Ion Saliu. I never said it was
entirely my discovery.
But a man of character always gives credit. The lowly “Norms Worms”
never do. Like the Duncopath did years ago (2002) when he littered
this very board with “his” code snippets of lexicographical indexing
and combination generating. I had presented the algorithms (one
belonging to another scientist) in 2001! But I have not published
algorithms for cases such as Powerball, Euromillions, arrangements….
No more code snippets from Duncopath, or the likes of Psycholin ….
The same about Randomness. The reaction was virulent when I
demonstrated mathematically (FFG) that randomness is the fundamental
rule of the Universe. Now, it is a “traditional” view!!! Soon you’ll
hear the likes of Duncopath, even Psycholin, shouting that Everything
is random — and they discovered that!
2.-
“… would you like to generate 100,000 pseudo-draws of a 6/49 lottery,
numbers in drawn order, for me …”
You seem disingenuous! Why should I do that — generate numeric sets
for you?! You should do that! Or you suffer from that “golden boy”
syndrome?! You have the source code I published (two algorithms) to
generate random numbers. You can also run my compiled software:
RandomNumbers.exe and Shuffle.EXE:
http://saliu.com/random-numbers.html
(“Random Numbers, Shuffle, Randomize: Theory, Algorithms, Software”).
“numbers in drawn order” are, mathematically speaking, ARRANGEMENTS
(not combinations). The two programs can generate arrangements; plus,
PermuteCombine.exe. You can even generate delayed arrangements, like
the real-life lottery drawings. Powerball and Euromillions are also
covered.
You have followed me for a long time. It is guaranteed you have all my
software — and run it!
Perhaps you wanted to poke a little mockery here. Anyway, it is not in
the same pestilential category as Psycholin’s self-divulging madness …
Go ahead! Start your discussion in a thread with a relevant title…
Ion Saliu
Jack Ricci
"nigel" wrote in message
news:5qKdneZsvLnH4yTQ...@brightview.co.uk...
Parpaluck wrote:
Evil Nigel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If we take a look at the full lotto history data of the UK 6/49 lottery,
the Canadian National 6/49 lottery, and the Ontario 6/49 Lottery in Ontario,
Canada, we will have to conclude that those draw results ARE the direct
result of " randomness " by definition, ( because the engineers of the
gaming industry have deemed this presumption to be understood as such by
everyone who buys into the phenomenon ), but this " randomness " for those
6/49 games mentioned appear to be slightly different than each others' "
randomness " factors when studied closely.
Each 6/49 game seems to exhibit its own unique " randomness personality "
when all of the statistics available are accounted for and reasoned with.
Either " randomness has a different definition for each and every different
6/49 game, or each game is at a different level of " randomness maturity ",
and continues in that direction until the game reaches full circle to bear
out the mathematical laws which are supposed to govern lottery game
activity.
It is for that very reason that all serious players should make use of
the past lotto history data of the game you are interested in playing, in
order to exploit the " brand " or " flavour " or " maturity " levels of
randomness demonstrated by your game's past results. Those results reveal
the " randomness " definition of that game, and might point to the area of
that game's " randomness combo arrivals ", as to which possible group of
combos are imminent to be drawn in that game based on the " randomness type
" demonstrated in the past draws.
Any pain-in-the-ass bystander lotto enthusiast who reports without real
proof, that the past lotto history data of a game has nothing to do with the
future draws in that game, is absolutely full of shit. The past draws of a
game show its " randomness of a certain colour, personality, or signature ",
which will probably have a bearing on the type of randomness to expect in
the future draws of that game.
Either way, the " mathematician-wannabees " will report that past games
do not influence future games, but it doesn't really matter which method you
use to choose combos to play with! My combos are just as good as your
combos, period. I just like choosing them differently, so there!
...neener, neener, neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeener...
LottoHackJack
Parpaluck
Randomness can be the case of “beauty is in the eyes of the beholder”.
Most people now say that thing is “more random”; or, that thing is
“less random”. Both are wrong, ‘cuz EVERYTHING IS RANDOM. But those
are just ‘feelings”.
Randomness, however, can be measured mathematically. A certain series
of events is necessary. Series means TIME. There is PAST, therefore —
the Psychosamas will scream when they hear PAST EVENTS.
1) The first measure of randomness is performed by ‘Ion Saliu’s
Paradox of N Events’. A lotto 6/49 game has N = 13983816 (total
combosnations). The probability of one combonation to hit is p = 1 /
N. If you RANDOMLY generate 13983816 combinations, the probability of
appearance for one combo is only {1 – 1/e} or 63.2%. That also means
that only 63.2% of the combos generated are UNIQUE; 36.8% of the
outcome represents duplicates.
This measurement requires a very large number of events to be “drawn”.
2) The second form of measurement is represented by the ‘probability
of collisions or duplication’. Its most famous representation is the
‘Birthday Paradox’. It takes a lower number of events to have at least
one repetition with a certain degree of certainty. In the same 6-49
lotto, it takes 4404 drawings to get a repeat-combination with a
degree of certainty DC = 50%.
http://saliu.com/birthday-paradox.html
(“Probability of Repetition: Birthday Paradox Applied to Lotto,
Lottery, Roulette”).
3) Things can look random alright! But they can still be the result of
cheating. The lottery agent can check all combinations played. They
decide to “draw” a combination that was not played (e.g. for a jackpot
rollover). Human decision in this case evaporates randomness, for all
intents and purposes. Measuring randomness can be false in this
situation.
4) The ‘normal probability rule’ can also measure randomness. It
requires lower numbers of events. But the rule is too “loose”…
nigel
> On Apr 28, 10:48 am, nigel <use...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> 2.-
> “… would you like to generate 100,000 pseudo-draws of a 6/49 lottery,
> numbers in drawn order, for me …”
>
> You seem disingenuous! Why should I do that — generate numeric sets
> for you?!
Why not? You know your software inside out and how to run it to produce
the most random results. I presume it would be trivial for you, but
could well take me several hours with no guarantee that I'm using the
optimum settings.
> You should do that! Or you suffer from that “golden boy”
> syndrome?! You have the source code I published (two algorithms) to
> generate random numbers. You can also run my compiled software:
> RandomNumbers.exe and Shuffle.EXE:
>
> http://saliu.com/random-numbers.html
> (“Random Numbers, Shuffle, Randomize: Theory, Algorithms, Software”).
>
> “numbers in drawn order” are, mathematically speaking, ARRANGEMENTS
> (not combinations). The two programs can generate arrangements; plus,
> PermuteCombine.exe. You can even generate delayed arrangements, like
> the real-life lottery drawings. Powerball and Euromillions are also
> covered.
>
> You have followed me for a long time. It is guaranteed you have all my
> software — and run it!
Frayed knot. I have very little lottery software on this PC. The only
program I can think of is Covermaster.
Since you claim 'true random' numbers from your software I'll add it to
my list but at the bottom of the queue. If you're a scientist and
curious to see how your random numbers appear under my testing, by
generating them yourself you'll promote yourself to top of the queue.
> Perhaps you wanted to poke a little mockery here. Anyway, it is not in
> the same pestilential category as Psycholin’s self-divulging madness …
I'm serious about wanting to understand randomness. Some opinions I have
previously mocked seem to have a grain of truth about them.
> Go ahead! Start your discussion in a thread with a relevant title…
>
> Ion Saliu
>
Evil Nigel
Parpaluck
“… produce the MOST RANDOM results …”
Case closed! Leave this one also to the doctors!
You are just a deprecatingly milder case of Pshycolinosis or
Duncopathics. Ruminating so many years in self-deprecation, mockery
and self-mockery … drowned in all kinds of tests with hundreds of
thousands of numbers to feed your masochism! An abused ungrownup with
an oppressed childhood, for sure. Hence, that kissy-girly, self-
deprecating behavior.
If you were normal, you would have started a meaningful discussion
long ago. A relevant title, with relevant data, and relevant analyses
(like measurements of randomness). Keep doing it — especially since
you believe I pay serious attention. BRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Perhaps you WILL write that book: “The Horse with No Fifth Column”. It
would provoke the … most random sympathy ever …
nigel
>
> “… produce the MOST RANDOM results …”
>
> Case closed! Leave this one also to the doctors!
>
On your website you seem to suggest that better results are achieved by
incorporating pauses. Is that different from 'more random'?
> You are just a deprecatingly milder case of Pshycolinosis or
> Duncopathics. Ruminating so many years in self-deprecation, mockery
> and self-mockery … drowned in all kinds of tests with hundreds of
> thousands of numbers to feed your masochism! An abused ungrownup with
> an oppressed childhood, for sure. Hence, that kissy-girly, self-
> deprecating behavior.
>
> If you were normal, you would have started a meaningful discussion
> long ago. A relevant title, with relevant data, and relevant analyses
> (like measurements of randomness).
What was wrong with "Anyone Want To Discuss Randomness"?
And how am I supposed to measure randomness when I don't understand what
it is? How do you measure randomness?
Evil Nigel
Gerry
I know the answer but will wait to see if Ion knows.
Colin Fairbrother
wrote:
>snip
>
> How about this excerpt from the nut that feels it necessary to tell
> the world about pipe noises he hears in the middle of the night let
> alone the arcane voices, " ... The index range for past drawings does
> follow the normal probability rule. I know what most people will do
> with the results. Instead of selecting 6 or so lotto numbers, they
> will simply select an index ;Ok. So index 34,245,621 already came out.
> I think the next index will be 33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and
> it's located under the bell."
>
> Read the article here -http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lotto.players/msg/0e696de1f5b786c7
> -
> but don't dally as his crazy meanderings are a public nuisance and
> danger to mental health.
>
All the puff and nonsense, frith froth and demagogue ravings have not
addressed that issue the basis of him winning the award for that year.
For a consideration of consistency and a measure of randomness for
Lotto draws or random selections see : -
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.lottery/msg/05ef83c35b7ec886
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
Parpaluck
Degrees of Insanity: Psycholin, Duncopath, Psychosamas . . .
There is a cringing obsession with Ion Saliu all over the virtual
world. Searching on ‘ion saliu’ yields quite a few results like this
thread.
It started in 1998 with virulent attacks. The ignition point was the
Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG). Followed by attacks against
anything Ion Saliu published.
One of the reasons: The attackers had the uncontrollable desire to
claim ownership of Ion Saliu’s discoveries, and/or creations. Those
attackers fall in a category named ‘rattled rats who wanna be Tiger
copycats’.
A second category of haters-attackers is filled with sour competitors
(software, systems). Their pathetic acts were severely threatened
because of Ion Saliu’s acts. They had also financial interests that
were hurt.
A third category of haters-detractors has been the well-paid
representative of the casinos. The huge business of gambling has
always felt terribly threatened by gambling mathematics. FFG has
established itself to be ‘public enemy number one’.
Some guys have shown unmistaken insanity. The most notorious mouth-
foaming attacker of mine was one I named Psychosama. He signed as John
Griffin. Psychosama is now “defunct”. Apparently, I succeeded in
“killing” him. To vicious attacks one must respond with vigorous
force. Turns out, Psychosama was the “literary creation” of one Gerry.
Gerry himself felt the “death” of Psychosama inside him. He had been
hospitalized several times. He would disappear from the cyber world.
At the same time, the John Griffin disappeared as well. Gerry is
drained out now. He can barely tie together a couple of words to form
a short sentence …
At about the same time as Psychosama, another attacker did grow a self-
painstaking obsession with Ion Saliu. Poor Duncopath! He’s been in
this closet for years and years and years … just to spill his venom
over. Ion Saliu is the only reason he posts — to launch attacks. As
soon as ‘Ion Saliu’ appears in a post, Duncopath would jump at the
occasion to release the venom in his Bullboochah glands…
Years passed, while I was not aware of an attacking worm: Psycholin
(aka F-Coli). I discovered accidentally that he was jubilating at the
news that my website was closed permanently. Several others at
‘lottery compost dot cum’ were dancing over Ion Saliu’s “tomb”! The
news was false and the jubilaters had a cardiac arrest. Psycholin
resurfaced later (after periods of mental treatment) in this very
newsgroup. F-Coli, however, is one step ahead of Duncopath. Psycholin
is madder than Madam Madness! Delirious speech and hallucinating is
the name of his “writing”!
It’s not that a bunch of psychopaths can do real damage to my
interests now. As of reputations, I don’t care an iota! But it’s worth
“killing” them venomous and rattled rats from time to time! Keeps the
edge of your sword sharp! And helps the unassuming who stumbles upon
Internet searches …
“Psycholin and Duncopath
Are lost on the madness path.
Psycholin — hallucinater;
Duncopath: mouth-foaming hater.”
(Mnionin Vintejay, “A Song for Sour Losers”)
Ion Saliu
http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/693.html
http://forums.saliu.com/showthread.php/16-Intent-to-disrupt-Disgruntled-paid-membership-users
Colin Fairbrother
Colin Fairbrother and for the subject, Lotto Number Analysis, the
search engines recognize those two names for better or worse as being
significant. In my case I have a long history of exposing frauds,
charlatans, shysters and closet numerologists and am not put off by
insults, name calling and bluff or bluster. Ion Saliu has a few fans
and most of them I grant enough intelligence, although I'm not really
sure, to see that he is desperately flailing and beating around the
bush
Looking through this thread we see an award has been graciously given
to Ion Saliu called LOTTO IDIOCY AWARD 2001 because he stated that
given the lexicographic index for a Lotto draw there was a higher
likelihood that a derived index would occur in the next draw. Here
repeated is an excerpt and link and presumably he is referring to the
Pennsylvania 69/6 Lotto game with 119,877,472 possibilities : -
"The index range for past drawings does follow the normal probability
rule. I know what most people will do with the results. Instead of
selecting 6 or so lotto numbers, they
will simply select an index ;Ok. So index 34,245,621 already came out.
I think the next index will be 33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and
it's located under the bell."
Read the article here -
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lotto.players/msg/0e696de1f5b786c7
Whatever the index or number in one draw there is no predilection
towards any index or number in the next draw from all the
possibilities. Ion Saliu has not addressed this issue by simply
stating he no longer believes that or trying to substantiate his
claim.
The plain and simple fact is for a game such as the classic Pick 6,
Pool 49 Lotto game the chances of getting a winning match are 1 in 13,
983,816 and this applies to the next draw and the draw after that etc
etc. Given a specific number the chances of getting the same number in
the next draw are 1 in 13,983,816 ^ 2.
Within this very thread there is proof that Ion Saliu is not competent
to speak mathematically when he states, "the probability of appearance
for one combo is only {1 – 1/e} or 63.2%". One combination may appear
in the first draw, in the 14th million draw or not until the 32nd or
70 millionth draw or more. The standard text book definition still
applies for Probability: -
P(event) = number of favorable outcomes / total number of outcomes.
This may be checked out by the reader for a simple 1 in 49
probability by looking at Ball 1 for the UK Lotto results in drawn
order. It is not until draw 364 that our Pick 1 has all integers with
an appearance with 20 putting in a show. Interestingly, 20 has an
appearance again 28 draws later as the first ball drawn. From draw 365
it is not until draw 534 that all integers have an appearance and
similarly for draws 535 to 806. Roughly, we are looking at an average
of over 5 times the possibilities. So it could well be 70 million
draws before all numbers have appeared in a 6/49 Lotto game.
I have shown recently in January 2011 that when 14 million random
selections are enumerated and stored using the fast Mersenne Twister
algorithm for a Pick 6, Pool 49 Lotto game that "Only 8,845,381 or 63%
are distinct from the 14 million generated. (Interestingly this is the
same as 1 -(1/e) where e = 2.718218.) "
See : -
Random Lotto Numbers using the Mersenne Twister
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661
And also : -
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.lottery/browse_thread/thread/d590361fcabff8ef#
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
Conquistador Supremo in the Third Mini Ionic Pacific Wars
Parpaluck
wrote:
> Colin Fair Brothel
> Just when you think he's forgotten you'll run into an iron fist.
On Jan 31 2010, 6:52 pm, Psycholin Fairbrothel
<colin.fairbrot...@gmail.com>
wrote:
““Because I'm an honest person I am not flummoxed by accusations of
posting fictitious data. The egg was well and truly on the face of
those who thought my 307, 210 and 177 lines were fictitious…”
Colin Fairbrothel
http://lotto Compost.cum”
Psycholin: The Psycho-Screamer in the Olive Tree
Netflix offers me the opportunity to watch great films. I mean, works
of the seventh art, as real cinematography is. I watched again, after
years, creations of a great cinematographic period known as the
Italian Neorealism. Films by great masters: Federico Fellini (the
greatest filmmaker in history, in my screenplay), Michelangelo
Antonioni, Vittorio De Sica, Roberto Rossellini. It just happened that
I watched Fellini’s ‘Amarcord’ the other day. I couldn’t help but make
an association with this poor madman here, F-coli Psycholin (madder
than Madam Madness herself).
In ‘Amarcord’ (placed during Mussolini’s fascist Italy), a family
takes home for a day a member confined in a mental institution. The
family takes the poor soul to their farm to enjoy a few hours of
freedom. They have a nice picnic. Good food and good wine. The family
leaves the mad member alone for just a few minutes. The cuckoo climbs
an olive tree immediately. His pockets were full of stones. He had
explained to the family that he loved to pick up stones because of
their beauty! The cuckoo was standing up in the tree and shouting:
“I WANT A WOMAN!”
Very similarly, this psycho here, F-COLI PSYCHOLIN climbed a cyber
tree and keeps shouting:
“I WANT A WHEEL!”
The family in ‘Amarcord’ tried to bring the cuckoo down. The madman,
however, “knew” exactly why he had filled his pockets with stones! He
would hit precisely in the head each and every one who tried to bring
him down from the tree! It was late at night when the family appealed
for the help of the hospice. The cuckoo was still standing in the tree
but his voice was extinguished. He could only murmur:
“I want a woman!”
Very similarly, this psycho here, Psycholin only whispers now:
“I want a wheel!”
The hospital had a dwarf nun who knew how to handle the cuckoo. She
climbed a ladder shouting to the cuckoo to come down at once. Indeed,
the cuckoo descended the ladder in a hurry! He looked really
frightened by the dwarf nun! He explained his act as he wanted to see
a distant palace again …
Like this very heap of self-divulging insanity! Psycholin wants to see
the distant palace of … database programming and indexing! That’s why
he climbed the virtual olive tree …
This is the most severe case of madness ever witnessed in the cyber
world. The real-world psychiatrists are already hard at work trying to
decipher this incredible case of human suffering.
More to come … Psycholin has chosen database and computer programming
as shields. As hallucinatory as he might be, he still knows that
doctors in general have virtually no knowledge of databases and
computer programming. He hopes to stay at large for little longer, as
he promised the doctors he would be busy with database
programming . . .
If you are in a hurry, you can go right now to lotto Compost.cum and
“read” the hallucinatory materials. Warning: Don’t try to run those
“code snippets” — your PC would go aflame …
Ion Saliu
Virtual Psychiatrist At-Large
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.gambling.lottery/browse_thread/thread/b195eace37895758/b5baa9ddc86bcdde
http://saliu.com/prophet-cartoons.html
PS
The stench of Psychosama’s ghost is approaching a nose near you …
Colin Fairbrother
newsgroup from numerologist Ion Saliu. Indeed he would be a consistent
winner of substantiated annual Lotto Idiocy Awards dating from 1999.
When confronted with his ridiculous assertions instead of handling
them in a rational way Ion Saliu goes into a typical delirious,
hysterical, frothing at the mouth routine trying to change the subject
and bringing up previous topics where he has been shot down in flames.
There are literally hundreds of shockers to pick from the annals of
Lotto misinformation by Ion Saliu. This thread addressed one (
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lotto.players/msg/0e696de1f5b786c7
) for which he was awarded the LOTTO IDIOCY AWARD 2001 namely that Ion
Saliu asserts that an index for the enumerated possibilities for a
Lotto game has a bell curve and that the next draw can be predicted by
going somewhere on that "bell". In his own words, "Ok. So index
34,245,621 already came out. I think the next index will be
33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and it's located under the bell."
This is absolute nonsense from a Lotto predictionist and numerologist
as any of the possibilities are just as likely to occur as any other.
For a considered analysis of indexes used with Lotto number
possibilities see : -
Distribution in Lotto by Index Enumeration
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=655
Anyone with an interest in mathematical ideas or concepts would be
familiar with the constant e, roughly 2.71828 encountered by John
Napier in 1618 and generally known as Euler's number but to the
general public it is less known than π (pi) roughly 3.14159. In the
18th century Pierre Montmort investigated the probability problem of
say a group of 12 people picking up their hats after lunch at random
and none getting their correct hat. The probability of this occurring
is 1/e roughly 37%. The probability that at least someone ie ONE
PERSON from the balance ie 8 getting the correct hat is 1 - 1/e or
63%. We are not talking about specific persons.
The main place where e is found is in growth. So, for a series of
random selections for a Pick 6, Pool 49 Lotto game we have the numbers
selected at least once growing and those unselected diminishing. I
have shown when enumerating 14 million random selections using the
Mersenne Twister algorithm that as expected only 1 - 1/e are distinct
but possibly selected more than once and remarked so at the time
January 2011, "Only 8,845,381 or 63% are distinct from the 14 million
generated. (Interestingly this is the same as 1 -(1/e) where e =
2.718218.".
See : -
Random Lotto Numbers using the Mersenne Twister
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661
So what are we to make of the April 29, 2011 statement by Ion Saliu in
this thread, " A lotto 6/49 game has N = 13983816 (total
combosnations). The probability of one combonation to hit is p = 1 /
N. If you RANDOMLY generate 13983816 combinations, the probability of
appearance for one combo is only {1 - 1/e} or 63.2%. That also means
that only 63.2% of the combos generated are UNIQUE; 36.8% of the
outcome represents duplicates."
Oh dear! That doesn't seem to accord with the results from my
enumeration of 14 million combinations where 5,138,435 or 37% DO NOT
APPEAR and 3,701,575 or 26.4% ARE DUPLICATES. See the table here
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661.This is typical of Ion
Saliu taking a concept, forming a distorted interpretation in his
addled mind then spewing forth utter garbage to bewilder the gullible.
There is no guarantee a specific combination will occur in 13,983,816
random selections as about 37% do not occur. How many runs of
13,983,816 random selections would be needed to be sure of getting a
match. Well, why not try a simple case for a Pick 1, Pool 49 using
Ball 1 of the UK Lotto results in drawn order as suggested for finding
how many draws are needed for all possibilities to occur in my
previous post where from the factor produced it may well be in excess
of 70 million random selections for all 13,983,816 combinations of 6
integers from a Pool of 49 to appear.
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
nigel
Using Occam's Razor and extrapolating from the silence, perhaps one can
draw conclusions thereof.
Evil Nigel
Royce Penny
1000 combinations. (ie: for 1000 combinations, about 2/3 are unique
and 1/3 duplicates.) However, can you clarify your post of last
January where you state 14,000,000 unique "numbers" generated, and
later refer to "combinations".
Also, if you generated 13,983,816 combinations of 6 numbers and had
the 1/3 repeats, were these combinations filtered so that only
combinations with 6 unique numbers (ie: 1,2,3,4,5,6 vs 1,2,3,1,2,3)
were included?
If 1-1/e applies to combinations of 6 "unique" numbers between 1 and
49 as well as combinations of 6 numbers that include repeating numbers
between 1 and 49 this is very valid mathematical information.
Please clarify...
Thanks,
Royce
Colin Fairbrother
Royce
In the context of a Pick 6 game Combination, Number, Sixes and
CombSixes are interchangeable. While each digit in a Pick 3 game is a
number, for both the daily and Jackpot games to avoid confusion I
usually refer to them as integers which is a whole number.
The 14 million combinations generated using the fast Mersenne Twister
algorithm ( see http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661 ) fall
under the category of Combinations without repetition (or
replacement). (See PROBABILITY PRIMER OR REFRESHER BY LOTTO ANALYSIS
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=606&FID=23&PR=3 )
Ion Saliu made the boo boo of stating, " ... 36.8% of the outcome
represents duplicates." The breakdown is given in the table at
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661. In summary for 14
million random selections 1/e or 37% of 13,983,816 ie 5,138,435 are
not included. The 14 million combinations are made up by 5,143,806
that appear once only (37%) ie not duplicates and the balance of
8,856,194 (63%) by 3,701,571 that appear more than once ie are
duplicates. We see here the power of the database programmer who
actually does the enumeration and analyzes the data rather than
surmising about it.
To store the randomly selected combinations as I did with an index and
a few other fields for easy and quick reference you will need a
database such as Access etc. I think it would be too unwieldy to store
as a text file even if linked to later on.
Each combination was random selected or generated from the 13,983,816
possibilities.
For the scenario you mention with Pick 6, Pool 49 and repetition of
the integers allowed the possibilities are 25,827,165. I don't see any
reason why you should not expect if doing that many random selections
that 1/e or 37% will not be included. Probably have to go to SQL
Server Developer Edition (about a $100) where the table size is not
limited to 2GB to store usefully the records.
Colin
Parpaluck
wrote:
> On May 2, 9:41 am, Royce Penny <Lottok...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Colin - Your results are consistent with mine for a pick 3 game with
> > 1000 combinations. (ie: for 1000 combinations, about 2/3 are unique
> > and 1/3 duplicates.) However, can you clarify your post of last
> > January where you state 14,000,000 unique "numbers" generated, and
> > later refer to "combinations".
>
> > Also, if you generated 13,983,816 combinations of 6 numbers and had
> > the 1/3 repeats, were these combinations filtered so that only
> > combinations with 6 unique numbers (ie: 1,2,3,4,5,6 vs 1,2,3,1,2,3)
> > were included?
>
> > If 1-1/e applies to combinations of 6 "unique" numbers between 1 and
> > 49 as well as combinations of 6 numbers that include repeating numbers
> > between 1 and 49 this is very valid mathematical information.
>
> > Please clarify...
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Royce
>
> Royce
>
> In the context of a Pick 6 game Combination, Number, Sixes and
> CombSixes are interchangeable. While each digit in a Pick 3 game is a
> number, for both the daily and Jackpot games to avoid confusion I
> usually refer to them as integers which is a whole number.
>
> The 14 million combinations generated using the fast Mersenne Twister
> under the category of Combinations without repetition (or
> replacement). (See PROBABILITY PRIMER OR REFRESHER BY LOTTO ANALYSIShttp://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=606&FID=23&PR=3)
>
> Ion Saliu made the boo boo of stating, " ... 36.8% of the outcome
> million random selections 1/e or 37% of 13,983,816 ie 5,138,435 are
> not included. The 14 million combinations are made up by 5,143,806
> that appear once only (37%) ie not duplicates and the balance of
> 8,856,194 (63%) by 3,701,571 that appear more than once ie are
> duplicates. We see here the power of the database programmer who
> actually does the enumeration and analyzes the data rather than
> surmising about it.
>
> To store the randomly selected combinations as I did with an index and
> a few other fields for easy and quick reference you will need a
> database such as Access etc. I think it would be too unwieldy to store
> as a text file even if linked to later on.
>
> Each combination was random selected or generated from the 13,983,816
> possibilities.
>
> For the scenario you mention with Pick 6, Pool 49 and repetition of
> the integers allowed the possibilities are 25,827,165. I don't see any
> reason why you should not expect if doing that many random selections
> that 1/e or 37% will not be included. Probably have to go to SQL
> Server Developer Edition (about a $100) where the table size is not
> limited to 2GB to store usefully the records.
>
> Colin
Psycholin: Insanity in Database Programming
You ain’t gonna get away with that crime, F-coli!
BRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! ‘Cuz I’m out to kill you!
BRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Psychosama warned you last year! By the way, Osama is dead now. And I
already killed Psychosama in 2009, didn’t I? The warning came from
Gerry, the “father” of Psychosama (John Griffin). Them doctors
couldn’t cure you, despite all that money. You cheated them with
database programming. That’s why I’m out to “solve” you. Mocking
database programming is NOT allowed in my book. And I am out to solve
that — by killing you. Scum of two screaming bitches and three krazed
dawgs — one without an eye, one without an ear, one without a tail …
Ion “Call-Me-Parpaluck” Saliu
http://saliu.com/prophet-cartoons.html
Parpaluck
wrote:
> On May 2, 9:41 am, Royce Penny <Lottok...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Colin - Your results are consistent with mine for a pick 3 game with
> > 1000 combinations. (ie: for 1000 combinations, about 2/3 are unique
> > and 1/3 duplicates.) However, can you clarify your post of last
> > January where you state 14,000,000 unique "numbers" generated, and
> > later refer to "combinations".
>
> > Also, if you generated 13,983,816 combinations of 6 numbers and had
> > the 1/3 repeats, were these combinations filtered so that only
> > combinations with 6 unique numbers (ie: 1,2,3,4,5,6 vs 1,2,3,1,2,3)
> > were included?
>
> > If 1-1/e applies to combinations of 6 "unique" numbers between 1 and
> > 49 as well as combinations of 6 numbers that include repeating numbers
> > between 1 and 49 this is very valid mathematical information.
>
> > Please clarify...
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Royce
>
> Royce
>
> In the context of a Pick 6 game Combination, Number, Sixes and
> CombSixes are interchangeable. While each digit in a Pick 3 game is a
> number, for both the daily and Jackpot games to avoid confusion I
> usually refer to them as integers which is a whole number.
>
> The 14 million combinations generated using the fast Mersenne Twister
> under the category of Combinations without repetition (or
> replacement). (See PROBABILITY PRIMER OR REFRESHER BY LOTTO ANALYSIShttp://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=606&FID=23&PR=3)
>
> Ion Saliu made the boo boo of stating, " ... 36.8% of the outcome
> million random selections 1/e or 37% of 13,983,816 ie 5,138,435 are
> not included. The 14 million combinations are made up by 5,143,806
> that appear once only (37%) ie not duplicates and the balance of
> 8,856,194 (63%) by 3,701,571 that appear more than once ie are
> duplicates. We see here the power of the database programmer who
> actually does the enumeration and analyzes the data rather than
> surmising about it.
>
> To store the randomly selected combinations as I did with an index and
> a few other fields for easy and quick reference you will need a
> database such as Access etc. I think it would be too unwieldy to store
> as a text file even if linked to later on.
>
> Each combination was random selected or generated from the 13,983,816
> possibilities.
>
> For the scenario you mention with Pick 6, Pool 49 and repetition of
> the integers allowed the possibilities are 25,827,165. I don't see any
> reason why you should not expect if doing that many random selections
> that 1/e or 37% will not be included. Probably have to go to SQL
> Server Developer Edition (about a $100) where the table size is not
> limited to 2GB to store usefully the records.
>
> Colin
Ion Saliu made the boo boo of stating, " ... 36.8% of the outcome
represents duplicates."
That’s called ‘Ion Saliu’s Paradox of N Trials’ madso. There is a
formula for that. There is also software to calculate. One more reason
why they’ll put you back in the madhouse for good now. You “was” out
(at large) for too long. They allowed you out, but plagiarism was not
in the scheme. It was not for you either, Royce. You suffered a lot in
that madhouse, just because you wanted Ion Saliu’s “stuff” be yours!
You begged me “in the name of your students”!! What a pathetic rattled
rat!!!
Ion Saliu
http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/693.html
Parpaluck
wrote:
> On May 2, 9:41 am, Royce Penny <Lottok...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Colin - Your results are consistent with mine for a pick 3 game with
> > 1000 combinations. (ie: for 1000 combinations, about 2/3 are unique
> > and 1/3 duplicates.) However, can you clarify your post of last
> > January where you state 14,000,000 unique "numbers" generated, and
> > later refer to "combinations".
>
> > Also, if you generated 13,983,816 combinations of 6 numbers and had
> > the 1/3 repeats, were these combinations filtered so that only
> > combinations with 6 unique numbers (ie: 1,2,3,4,5,6 vs 1,2,3,1,2,3)
> > were included?
>
> > If 1-1/e applies to combinations of 6 "unique" numbers between 1 and
> > 49 as well as combinations of 6 numbers that include repeating numbers
> > between 1 and 49 this is very valid mathematical information.
>
> > Please clarify...
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Royce
>
> Royce
>
> In the context of a Pick 6 game Combination, Number, Sixes and
> CombSixes are interchangeable. While each digit in a Pick 3 game is a
> number, for both the daily and Jackpot games to avoid confusion I
> usually refer to them as integers which is a whole number.
>
> The 14 million combinations generated using the fast Mersenne Twister
> under the category of Combinations without repetition (or
> replacement). (See PROBABILITY PRIMER OR REFRESHER BY LOTTO ANALYSIShttp://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=606&FID=23&PR=3)
>
> Ion Saliu made the boo boo of stating, " ... 36.8% of the outcome
> million random selections 1/e or 37% of 13,983,816 ie 5,138,435 are
> not included. The 14 million combinations are made up by 5,143,806
> that appear once only (37%) ie not duplicates and the balance of
> 8,856,194 (63%) by 3,701,571 that appear more than once ie are
> duplicates. We see here the power of the database programmer who
> actually does the enumeration and analyzes the data rather than
> surmising about it.
>
> To store the randomly selected combinations as I did with an index and
> a few other fields for easy and quick reference you will need a
> database such as Access etc. I think it would be too unwieldy to store
> as a text file even if linked to later on.
>
> Each combination was random selected or generated from the 13,983,816
> possibilities.
>
> For the scenario you mention with Pick 6, Pool 49 and repetition of
> the integers allowed the possibilities are 25,827,165. I don't see any
> reason why you should not expect if doing that many random selections
> that 1/e or 37% will not be included. Probably have to go to SQL
> Server Developer Edition (about a $100) where the table size is not
> limited to 2GB to store usefully the records.
>
> Colin
Database MADNESS à la Psycholin
“To store the randomly selected combinations as I did with an index
and a few other fields for easy and quick reference you will need a
database such as Access etc. I think it would be too unwieldy to store
as a text file even if linked to later on.”
That’s one of the names for MADNESS these days. The psychiatrists call
it “Psycholin Database Madness” … or being madder than Madam Madness
herself …
Doing lotto with a database is just what I said: MADNESS. You ain’t
gonna go nowhere!!! Of course, you can try! But would you follow a
kabron of self-divulging INSANITY — add Royce to the fray???
Didn’t I honestly say I’m out to kill you? Exactly …
Colin Fairbrother
1 In my infinite magnanimity and excessive generosity I bestowed upon
numerologist Ion Saliu the LOTTO IDIOCY AWARD 2001 for efforts far
exceeding the lunacy of the best mental asylum in this galaxy by
stating that the index in an enumeration of possible Lotto numbers has
a bell curve and that according to Ion Saliu the next draw is more
likely to be in a particular place on that curve. Amongst all the
demented ravings by Ion Saliu including threats to kill me there has
been no attempt to support what he has written ie "The index range for
past drawings does follow the normal probability rule. I know what
most people will do with the results. Instead of selecting 6 or so
34,245,621 already came out. I think the next index will be
33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and it's located under the bell."
2 Much is made by Ion Saliu of an elementary application of log laws,
his so called Fundamental Formula of Gambling which in effect is
offering nothing other than common knowledge ie If the odds are
against you then in the long run you lose. Michael Shackle of the
Wizard of Odds site states, "That is just an obvious extension of the
rule that log(ab)=b×log(a). It is not worthy of any special term." See
http://wizardofodds.com/askthewizard/probability.html. In a typical
numerologist tactic of mixing elements of fuzzy truth with outright
chicanery in the article titled THE FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
which I came across as a gross example of utter absurdity around 1999
where after giving a primitive table he goes on to describe in a
shyster, con-artist way how to reduce the house edge from 50% to 2.3%
by using his skip charts and discarding 2 digits. I know of no-one
that has improved their chances one iota using his low brow and
illogical methods even when playing Pick 3 on line with a house edge
of only 10%.
3 In a classic case of misunderstanding the theory Ion Saliu stated
April 29, 2011 in this thread, " A lotto 6/49 game has N = 13983816
(total combosnations). The probability of one combonation to hit is p
= 1 / N. If you RANDOMLY generate 13983816 combinations, the
probability of appearance for one combo is only {1 - 1/e} or 63.2%.
That also means that only 63.2% of the combos generated are UNIQUE;
36.8% of the outcome represents duplicates.".
The breakdown is given in the table at http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661.
In summary for 14 million random selections 1/e or 37% of 13,983,816
ie 5,138,435 are not included. The 14 million combinations are made up
by 5,143,806 that appear once only (37%) ie not duplicates and the
balance of 8,856,194 (63%) by 3,701,571 that appear more than once ie
are duplicates.
I hope that some who may have had a passing regard for Ion Saliu read
this thread and get a better perspective on what he is about, which is
basically duping people. Is he crazy as well? Absolutely no doubt
about it and I have stated that from 2004.
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
Parpaluck
wrote:
Psycholin: Hallucinating and Stealing
Psycholin is mad alright — in fact, he is madder than Madam Madness.
But that’s not enough. He is also criminally inclined. He steals
ideas, especially from SALIU.COM. He steals an idea or two, then he
bursts into r.g.l. or other places. Psycholin presents stolen ideas as
he had discovered them. Like those repeated combinations or
lexicographic ordering. I made those things public many years ago,
including source code! They are “simple things” for Psycholin! Of
course they are simple after someone discovered them years and years
ago!
Psycholin even stole email addresses from a lottery forum. He used
false names and emails to woo people to his forum (still under 500
members after 5 years … 300 members being Psycholin himself, with fake
emails!)
Incredible coincidence! There is another Aussie, similarly mad and
criminally inclined: Steven Hourmouzis. He was incarcerated for stock
market fraud. He also stole one of my roulette systems and sold it for
an outrageous price. He is lucky he is still alive! I received several
emails from stupidiots who paid for the system (instead of taking it
for free from my website; people were really mad at Steven Hourmouzis,
a.k.a. Stefano).
Also, both guys are drowned in a sea of hallucinations!
Like this Psycholin here. Lately he discovered he is an “expert” in
database programming! Ask him what a table is and he will answer “a
table is something to eat”! In his hallucination, he keeps saying that
he generates 6-49 lotto combinations using a database! Nothing could
be more hallucinatory than that! But ask him to show a directory
listing with his “database”, so that we can see the file size and
date. It would be the same case as last year, with that hallucinatory
lotto wheel!
I saw a horror story at his lotto compost “forum”. A code snippet of a
database! Too bad the psychiatrists have no good computer knowledge!
Psycholin and programming?! It’s similar to a cow wearing bikini.
Gerry revitalized Psychosama (John Griffin) for a short while.
Psychosama published a mockery of a program. Only Psycholin was
ecstatic about the high quality of John Griffin’s “program”! One of
the best indicators of person who is totally mad: Total lack of sense
of humor!
That’s the kind of “programming” Psycholin is good at! Incredible, but
guys like Psycholin and Stefano are at large! Their pestilential
insanity is enough of a nuisance. But add to that the criminal
tendencies!
Ion Saliu
Royce Penny
"...They allowed you out, but plagiarism was not in the scheme. It was
not for you either, Royce. You suffered a lot in that madhouse, just
because you wanted Ion Saliu’s “stuff” be yours!..."???
I just do not know where you are coming from! Have I even supported
Ion Saliu??? Never!
Please explain this madness.
Thanks,
Royce
Colin Fairbrother
To confuse the incoherent ramblings of madman, Ion Saliu, with my well
thought out pearls of wisdom is an insult Royce. Perhaps in future
when you attribute a "quote" to me you provide the llink to back it
up.
Colin
Royce Penny
wrote:
Sorry Colin - The quote was not from you...
Royce
Colin Fairbrother
FORMULA OF GAMBLING contains nothing new apart from a con-artist
scheme to reduce the odds in Pick 3 from 50% to in his words a "...
house edge that is now only 2.3%.". Obviously, the objective was to
scare players with how long it could take playing a straight number
before success was guaranteed and to lead them into thinking that by
dropping 2 digits a miraculous change in the odds took place if
adopting his strategy which he compared with playing the stock market.
One of the most viewed posts on my site since 2004 is: -
PICK 3 BASE NUMBERS 6-WAY, 3-WAY & 1-WAY
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=304&FID=46&PR=3
Every straight in Pick 3 where the order is important apart from the
triples has an equal opportunity to be picked at any draw anywhere
irrespective of what has occurred before. The odds remain the same of
1 in 1000. According to various probability calculations you can get
estimates of how long it may be before a straight occurs with a
specified probability but the best indication is from real life.
Fortunately Pick 3 Lotto histories exist and from these we see it may
well be 13,000 draws before a particular straight occurs.
For a 6/49 Lotto game an integer is expected to occur on average a bit
over 8 draws. Ladbrokes http://lottos.ladbrokes.com/en/how-to-play/odds
offer payouts for 1 integer correct in a Pick 6 game of 7 times that
wagered. If you examine the UK Lotto history you will find an integer
has not been absent over 50 draws for some 1327 draws. So if you are
prepared to wait for the next absence of 50 for a particular integer
would you place a sizable bet? It certainly would be at your peril
because although the absence has not exceeded 50 on 5 occasions new
ground can easily be broken on the 6th.
The odds for getting red or black in European Roulette are 18/37. On
the 18th of August 1913 at Monte Carlo black came up consecutively 26
times. Using Ion Saliu's simple adaption of Log Laws for a success
probability of 0.99999 you get 17 spins. This knowledge was well known
over 100 years ago and so after 15 consecutive blacks there was near
panic to get on red. There is a movie about it I viewed quite a few
years ago. Placing $1 and winnings and opting out on or before the
26th black you could have made over 100 million or the house limit.
The casino came out well in front. The chances of such a run occurring
were 1 in 18/37^26 or 1 in 136,823,184.
If you have Excel, Access, Visual Basic or some other program you can
calculate the estimate of the number of events that may occur for a
given event probability and success probability but as shown above
it's to be taken with a grain of salt and a huge dose of luck. Scare
mongering by con-artist Ion Saliu inducing people to play his crank
numerology based gambling schemes after pretending he has found
something new are to be treated with the contempt they deserve. Anyone
reading this thread and checking out his wild and crazy accusations
will soon realize he is not to be taken seriously.
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
Parpaluck
wrote:
> If you have Excel, Access, Visual Basic or some other program you can
> calculate the estimate of the number of events that may occur for a
> given event probability and success probability>
Dealing with mad persons to the extreme — is it worth it? Oh, yes. The
Psycholins have a right to live, including amongst normal humans. But
they must follow certain rules in order to keep the world of normalcy
pestilence-free. Psycholin does not follow such decency rules, more
often than not. Psychosama did the same — he is now gone. (By the way,
Osama is gone too.)
The Psycholins must be locked up in cages, when they infest the world
of normalcy with their pestilence; not to mention when they also
commit crimes (petty or not).
The psycho named Steven Hourmouzis already served some time in jail.
He is now in another trouble by stealing one of my roulette systems
and charging an exorbitant price for it. He has attempted, lately, to
make nice. He even released a “software tool” to help users apply my
roulette systems:
“Ion Saliu's Tracker -- Here's a tracker I did today for JBAZTAN.
Enjoy!”
This F-coli now says:
“If you have Excel, Access, Visual Basic or some other program you can
calculate the estimate of the number of events that may occur for a
given event probability and success probability …”
Look at the kind of “programming” Psycholin is good at —
hallucinating:
There are others with the same type of psychobehavior:
The psychiatrists have plenty of materials to study and do good to
mankind!
Ion Saliu
http://download.saliu.com/roulette-systems.html
http://saliu.com/roulette-millions.html
Colin Fairbrother
The Madness of Ion Saliu
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=677
Excerpt, "The following table easily done in Excel applies the formula
and contrasts the accurate figures with the wrong figures given by Ion
Salui. Whether he intentionally fudged the figures to deceive or to
promote his crackpot Pick 3 con-artist scheme (where he claims to
reduce the House Edge from 50% to 2.3%) or just through plain
incompetence I will leave to others to conclude. In my considered
opinion it is a combination of all three."
Colin Fairbrother
Parpaluck
>
> That’s the kind of “programming” Psycholin is good at! Incredible, but
> guys like Psycholin and Stefano are at large! Their pestilential
> insanity is enough of a nuisance. But add to that the criminal
> tendencies!
>
> Ion Saliu
Lotto Compost.cum — Overestimation
“Psycholin even stole email addresses from a lottery forum. He used
false names and emails to woo people to his forum (still under 500
members after 5 years … 300 members being Psycholin himself, with fake
emails!) “
I overestimated that nest of insanity that infests the virtual world.
The passage should read:
“Lotto Compost.cum is still under 300 members after 5 years … 290
members being Psycholin himself, registered with email addresses
stolen from lottery forums.”
Ion Saliu
Parpaluck
wrote:
> From my site: -
> The Madness of Ion Saliuhttp://lotto composter.cum/forum_posts.asp?TID=677
>
> snipped by Ion Saliu -- read the insanity "live" at your own risk!
Psycholin, Lizard of Odds, Wizard of Insanity
Indeed, there is obstinacy in insanity. Psycholin is one of the most
conspicuous cases in the history of self-destructing madness. One must
continue apply the “shock therapy” to the Psycholins. Especially when
the insane is on the attack, steals, and continues to attack and
steal.
One does not have to reveal the times of the response against the
insane. Keep the squeeze on, without revealing a timetable. The
attacks can be also discovered via the antennae. Every normal person
has “antennae” — the insane don’t. Let them know that “Just when you
think he's forgotten you'll run into an iron fist.” Indeed, my iron
fist is out there; Psycholin is the extricable punching bag.
Psycholin appeals now to the infamous Lizard of Odds. The same guy who
was ecstatic about the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG — it
“kills” Duncopath again!) Soon, he turned hostile towards FFG. No
doubt, it was the result of pressure from his patrons: Casino
executives. Lizard was also on the payroll of the casinos (indication
is he still is). The same Lizard who said matter-of-factish that
getting 200 ‘heads’ in a row is equal to getting 1 ‘head’! In his
second email to me, he dropped the 200-high bar to 20 ‘heads’ in a row
being equal to 1 ‘head’ (in a row, of course!)
Psycholin committed now the most severe case of INSANITY. The post he
refers to in the previous message is a cruel offense to MATHEMATICS.
That post alone at his “message board’ must be a most compelling
reason to confine him. Confine and restrain him as prior to 2004 when
he was turned loose. That act of mercy dumped an unacceptable amount
of pestilence over the cyber world. Attacks on everybody all over the
Internet. Not to mention plagiarism, piracy, identity theft (theft of
email addresses)… Psycholin is an unacceptable lapse of the medical
establishment and law enforcement.
Ion Saliu
http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/204.html
(“The so-called Wizard of Odds had first very high praise for Ion
Saliu and his gambling theories founded on theory of probability”)
Colin Fairbrother
becomes the number of events) for the simple probability equation that
gives the probability of 26 blacks in succession as occurred on one of
the roulette wheels at Monte Carlo August 18, 1913. The table has been
updated to include more sample values.
THE MADNESS OF ION SALIU AND HIS SPURIOUS CLAIM TO
THE SO CALLED FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=677&PN=1
Worth noting is this excerpt, "The following table is easily done in
Excel and applies the formula exactly the same way for each line.
Compare the accurate figures from myself with the red colored wrong
figures given by Ion Salui and what a difference. For a Coin Toss he
gives a degree of certainty of 75% for two tosses when it is actually
only 65%. For three tosses he gives 90% when in fact it is only 83%.
Parpaluck
wrote:
>The table has been > updated to include more sample values.
>
Psycholin’s Attempt to Sanitize His Madness
Look at the most pestilential psychopath of all time! He tries now to
sanitize his insanity! he changed dramatically his initial post. He
couldn’t possibly do that. Maybe the likes of Lizard of Odds or
Duncopath “helped” him in this regard.
First, “them psychos” realized the issue of plagiarism in the first
incarnation of Psycholin’s material that will be case history for
psychiatrists. The term “degree of certainty” was used. It is totally
documented that ‘degree of certainty’ was coined by Ion Saliu and it
was first published at SALIU.COM.
Sure, it was derived from probability formula p = n / N belonging to
Pascal. But Pascal’s formula itself was based on Aristotle’s logic,
which was based on early Greek mathematical studies. Then, de Moivre
developed Pascal’s formula further. FFG was virtually unknown until I
published it at my website.
I contributed with the ‘degree of certainty’ and deeper
interpretations, including philosophical. But, as sane and decent
human, I have always given due credit. The psychopaths — the
Psycholins, Duncopaths, the Lizards of Odds of the world — never give
credit.
The initial Psycholin’s material that will be case history for
psychiatrists was saved and emailed to this newsgroup (in addition to
other recipients). It can, and, possibly, will be produced for
everybody to see. This new “material” as well. Here are two lines from
the initial Psycholin’s material that will be case history for
psychiatrists:
Coin 99% 0.500000000000 0.990000000000 69 6
Coin 99.9% 0.500000000000 0.999000000000 693 9
Psycholin “calculated” first that for the degree of certainty DC=99%
to get a coin face required 69 tosses! He “said” that Ion Saliu (i.e.
FFG) calculated 6 tosses. In truth, FFG calculates ‘number of trials N
= 7’.
Psycholin “calculated” first that for the degree of certainty DC=99.9%
to get a coin face required an insanely aberrant 693 tosses! He “said”
that Ion Saliu (i.e. FFG) calculated 9 tosses. In truth, FFG
calculates ‘number of trials N = 10’.
The psych also says: “For a Coin Toss he gives a degree of certainty
of 75% for two tosses when it is actually only 65%.” Here, he or his
psych helpers confuse FFG for the Birthday Paradox (probability of
repetition). They’ll modify the compost again . . .
The Duncopaths, the Lizards of Odds of the world, or the like, did NOT
clean it up, however. I know, they used my SuperFormula.EXE software
for calculations, for sure. Regardless, INSANITY can NOT be sanitized
by a bundle of keystrokes. The medical establishment and the law
enforcement still bear the burden of guilt regarding Psycholin.
Both versions of Psycholin’s compost are available. This thread is
also archived by sites other than Google Groups.
Ion Saliu
http://saliu.com/Saliu2.htm
(“The Fundamental Formula of Gambling: Theory of Probability,
Mathematics, Chance, Degree of Certainty” – first published in 1997.)
Colin Fairbrother
if any dialog engagement with Ion Saliu by regular posters. The
reasons for that are obvious from reading just a few snippets in this
thread by Ion Saliu and few could come to any conclusion other than he
is stark raving mad.
Ion Saliu in this thread has made death threats against me and made
deliberate and naive false accusations against me and others which
have not been refuted simply because this would only excite him to
deliver more vile threats and insults. As a Romanian refugee it is
well to remember that English is not his mother tongue so I
confidently state that America and the rest of the English speaking
world lay no claim to this detestable numerologist that sprinkles a
few self evident mathematical truths amongst a predominantly occultist
bunch of claptrap. Suffering from many delusions one should be refuted
emphatically that HE IS NOT A RECOGNIZED MATHEMATICIAN and indeed
rarely writes anything that is not self-contradictory.
The founders of Probability include Cardan, Fermat, Pascal, Huygens,
Bernouilli and Moivre dating back to the 16th century. Here is a quote
from J. Bernoulli (1654 - 1705) from Ars Conjectandi in 1713,
"Probability is a Degree of Certainty and differs from certainty as a
part from a whole".
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
Parpaluck
1) Psycholin is insane to the most extreme. He is madder than Madam
Madness. His best place is in that cage as prior to 2004. A large
number of netizens have made the same statement, time and again since
after the year of grace 2004.
2) Psycholin commits crimes. They were exposed by a number of people
in various Internet communities. He commits plagiarism, piracy,
identity theft. It was hotly debated a serious incident when Psycholin
tried to woo members to his under-300-member-after-5-years forum. He
stole email addresses from lottery post and sent faked emails to
people with the “invitation” to join his lotto compost.
3) Psycholin infests the Cyber World with his insane hallucinations.
His hallucinations include mathematics, lottery analysis, lotto system
development or invisible wheels, formulas, algorithms, programming,
database programming . . . He cruelly offends mathematics with
“mathematical discoveries” such as:
Coin 99% 0.500000000000 0.990000000000 69 6
Coin 99.9% 0.500000000000 0.999000000000 693 9
(See my previous post).
4) Psycholin attacks anybody in his virtual sight. This newsgroup is
full of his insane attacks and the strong responses of his “victims”.
Usually, the coward falls in a tailspin. Like in this thread that he
started. He avoids all the serious accusations leveled at his insanity
and criminal tendencies. He can’t fight the accusations, for they are
real. Also, fighting would put Psycholin back to the cage much faster.
The same cowardly silence of another Australian criminal, Steven
Hourmouzis. I have beaten him like a drum, but he is frightened to
complain — the authorities would put him back in the cage much faster.
The two could be one and the same person — the same form of
hallucinating and multiple-personality.
5) Psychopaths like Psycholin do implode, like a previous notorious
case: Psychosama (a.k.a. John Griffin). I dealt with several other
cases as well. Sanitation is a duty for me — for other sane persons as
well.
Ion Saliu
http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/97802
“Beware of emails and or messages from other Lottery post Members
recommending membership in the so-called [lotto compost] forum. You
may think these are coming from a credible source, but don't be
fooled. Colin F or whoever he/she is.”
“I, out of curiosity, did check out Colin's site after your post. I
hadn't noticed that he was gone, just hadn't seen any posts by him
lately and thought maybe he didn't have anything to post.”
“I called Colin F on plagiarism when he posted sums charts for the
Pick 3 game . . .”
Parpaluck
> “Beware of emails and or messages from other Lottery post Members
> recommending membership in the so-called [lotto compost] forum. You
> may think these are coming from a credible source, but don't be
> fooled. Colin F or whoever he/she is.”
> “I, out of curiosity, did check out Colin's site after your post. I
> hadn't noticed that he was gone, just hadn't seen any posts by him
> lately and thought maybe he didn't have anything to post.”
> “I called Colin F on plagiarism when he posted sums charts for the
> Pick 3 game . . .”
Here is that strident act of insanity, known as Psycholin’s First
Table-to-Swallow:
Probability of Success ProbEvent ProbSuccess Number Events Ion Saliu
Number of hands 5% Royal Drought 0.050000000000 0.999975240000 120989
Coin 50% 0.500000000000 0.500000000000 1 1
Coin 75% 0.500000000000 0.750000000000 2 2
Coin 90% 0.500000000000 0.900000000000 7 3
Coin 95% 0.500000000000 0.950000000000 14 4
Coin 99% 0.500000000000 0.990000000000 69 6
Coin 99.9% 0.500000000000 0.999000000000 693 9
Pick 3 Straight 10% 0.001000000000 0.100000000000 3 105
Pick 3 Straight 25% 0.001000000000 0.250000000000 5 287
Pick 3 Straight 50% 0.001000000000 0.500000000000 10 692
Pick 3 Straight 75% 0.001000000000 0.750000000000 24 1385
Pick 3 Straight 90% 0.001000000000 0.850000000000 43 2301
Pick 3 Straight 95% 0.001000000000 0.950000000000 135 2994
Pick 3 Straight 99% 0.001000000000 0.990000000000 687 4602
Pick 3 Straight 99.3113% 0.001000000000 0.993113000000 1000
Pick 3 Straight 99.9% 0.001000000000 0.999000000000 6904 6904
Any Win 6/49 Lotto 0.018637400000 0.920000000000 48
Any Win 6/45 + 2 Bonus Lotto (Aus Sat) 0.011802300000 0.780000000000
18
As you can see, winning Pick-3 straight is virtually as easy as
winning heads/tails in coin tossing!!!
Coin 99.9% 0.500000000000 0.999000000000 693 9
Pick 3 Straight 99% 0.001000000000 0.990000000000 687 4602
By the way: The figures for Ion Saliu are in red!
BRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Why da hell don’t doctors and law enforcement learn mathematics and
computer programming???
Ion Saliu
http://saliu.com/formula.htm
(“Why Colin Fears Mathematics, While Doctors Hate Programming . . . “)
Colin Fairbrother
The term Degree of Certainty was used in relation to Probability as
early as 1713 by J Bernoulli in Ars Conjectandi.
The most famous equation in the world is undoubtedly Einstein's E = MC
^ 2. It would not surprise me at all if amongst the manic, rambling
writings of Ion Saliu he has lain claim to solving the equation for
the exponent of C. Probably if done, Ion Saliu would have called this
the Degree of Light Certainty and trumpeted it as a major new
discovery for mankind. For a 1 kg mass, 9 x 10^16 joules of energy and
the constant speed of light at 3 x 10^8 ms^-1 the equation would take
the form of : -
Ion Saliu Degree of Light Certainty = log(E/M) / log(C) or log((9 x
10^18)/1) / log(3 x 10^8 ms^-1) = log(9 x 10^16)/log(3 x 10^8) = 2
See http://www.btinternet.com/~j.doyle/SR/Emc2/Equation.htm
A contradiction arises when one realizes that Albert Einstein released
his equation E = MC^2 in 1905 in a paper titled "Does an Object's
Inertia Depend on Its Energy Content?" and little Ion delighted his
mother with his first pee March 9, 1950. But true to form such a
contradiction would not stop Ion Saliu from making such a claim.
For our marvelous Fundamental Formula of Gambling the formula is where
n is the number of events: -
Degree of Certainty = (1 - Probability of Event) ^ n
As given by Ion Saliu it is: -
N = log(1 - Degree of Certainty) / log(1 - Probability of Event)
To illustrate where the simple equation comes from consider the
occurrence of 26 blacks consecutively on a roulette table at Monte
Carlo casino August 18, 1913. This particular occurrence I have known
about since a boy and have referred to it often in my writings on the
web dating from 2004 referring to it as the Monte Carlo Factor ie if
the odds are 1 in 2 as for a coin face or pretty well a color in
Roulette then multiply the 2 by 13 to give 26. For Pick 3 straights
multiply 1000 by 13 to give a possible absence of 13,000 or more.
Probability 26 consecutive blacks = 18/37 x 18/37 x 18/37 x ... 18/37
= (18/37)^26
= (0.486486486)^26
= .0000000073087
The inverse of this figure gives 1 in 136,823,184
It is a simple application of the multiplication principle found in
the first chapter of any book on probability and possibly touched on
in primary school.
Given the two other variables we can arrive at the exponent which is
26.
The equation can be written P_Success = P_Event^Events. To get the
exponent Events we can log both sides.
log(P_Success) = log(P_Event^Events)
Using one of the three basic log rules we know that
log(P_Event^Events) = Events x log(P_Event)
Therefore
log(P_Success) = Events x log(P_Event)
or
Events = log(P_Success) / log(P_Event)
If we are more interested in the complement for the two probability
figures then we subtract from 1.
The simple equation now becomes
Events = log(1 - P_Success) / log(1 - P_Event)
Looking at the table below you see that for Number Events = 26 the
probability of success is 0.999999959 and the probability for the
event is 0.486486486486
Events = log(1 - 0.999999959) / log(1 - 0.486486486486)
= -7.387216144 / -0.289448123
= 26 (to the nearest integer)
For a table that can be simply done in Excel, Access or Visual Basic
see : -
THE MADNESS OF ION SALIU AND HIS SPURIOUS CLAIM TO
THE SO CALLED FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=677&PN=1
Colin Fairbrother
http://LottoPoster.com
nb In Access or Visual Basic 6 there is a gotcha as the log function
returns a Double that is a natural logarithm to base e. To get the
common logarithm to base 10 divide by Log(10) or make your own simple
function.
Parpaluck
wrote:
> DERIVATION OF SO CALLED FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING BY ION SALIU
>
> The term Degree of Certainty was used in relation to Probability as
> early as 1713 by J Bernoulli in Ars Conjectandi.
>
> The most famous equation in the world is undoubtedly Einstein's E = MC
> ^ 2. It would not surprise me at all if amongst the manic, rambling
> writings of Ion Saliu he has lain claim to solving the equation for
> the exponent of C. Probably if done, Ion Saliu would have called this
> the Degree of Light Certainty and trumpeted it as a major new
> discovery for mankind. For a 1 kg mass, 9 x 10^16 joules of energy and
> the constant speed of light at 3 x 10^8 ms^-1 the equation would take
> the form of : -
> Ion Saliu Degree of Light Certainty = log(E/M) / log(C) or log((9 x
> 10^18)/1) / log(3 x 10^8 ms^-1) = log(9 x 10^16)/log(3 x 10^8) = 2
> nb In Access or Visual Basic 6 there is a gotcha as the log function
> returns a Double that is a natural logarithm to base e. To get the
> common logarithm to base 10 divide by Log(10) or make your own simple
> function.
Psycholin Blames Many for His Gruesome Insanity
Listen to the delirious speech of this monster of self-divulging
INSANITY! Instead of fighting off the grave accusations leveled at
him, Psycholin starts now the blame-game. Psycholin blames his madness
on Einstein, my parents, Bill Gates, the logarithms . . . and more.
Sincerely, I don’t even blame Psycholin’s parents for his terrible
suffering. It’s the result of Almighty Randomness. Nevertheless, the
madsies must abide by certain rules when they are at large. You ain’t
got no parents, Psycholin. You are one son of two screaming bitches
and three krazed dawgs: One without an eye, one without an ear, one
without a tail!
The blame falls squarely on the authorities in Psycholin’s area. They
turned him loose way too early (last time: summer of 2010). He uses an
address in Sydney, Australia, via Internet connection with Telstra. It
is fairly easy to fake an Internet Provider (IP) address. There is
legitimate software for that. Such software helps avoid infested
places on the Internet that track IP numbers to commit crimes. Google
Chrome also has such an extension — to legitimately hide IP addresses.
Hiding the IP address is not allowed for committing crimes, like the
Psycholins and Hourmouzis’ of the world do. By the way, that Steven
Hourmouzis used the same Telstra Internet Provider to send thousands
of faked emails to boost the price of a U.S. stock. One brave
Australian detective, specialized in white-collar crimes, succeeded to
track down the criminal after some effort . . .
Guess who’s guilty for Psycholin’s First Table of Insanity? He blames
the likes of Bill Gates, the “father” of Visual Basic! They gave birth
to a mad logarithm! That’s why winning Pick-3 straight is as easy as
winning heads/tails in coin tossing!!! At one dollar a pop and winning
$500, playing Pick-3 straight would have made Psycholin a billionaire
by now (by his math(s)). Of course, he could lose 26 times in a row.
Still a winner: 500 – 26 = 474 bucks. But there is also a reversed
gambler’s fallacy. Equivalently, Psycholin could win 26 times in a
row: 26 * 500 = 13,000 dollars in less than a month. Multiply that
figure by the number of months since his release . . . better still,
since his mom spat him out to this world . . .
The psychohelpers who sanitized Psycholin’s first table became aware
of the crass insanity only AFTER I alerted the community. And then
they used my SuperFormula.exe to get as correct results as possible.
Psycholin still made some changes: For the purpose of originality and
to disprove … plagiarism! BRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Ion Saliu
http://saliu.com/formula.html
(“The Definitive Probability, Statistics, and Gambling Software”)
Colin Fairbrother
about a denominator and a numerator and if you log both by the same
base the result is the same irrespective of the base. eg 10/5 gives
1.4306765 whether the base is e or 10 or whatever. Toss the bait and
he goes for it every time. See: -
THE MADNESS OF ION SALIU AND HIS SPURIOUS CLAIM TO
THE SO CALLED FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=677&PN=1
Colin Fairbrother
nb Ion Saliu is the only person known to think a valid coin toss can
never land or a valid lottery draw can have no numbers or the speed of
light can be increased 0.5 times.
Parpaluck
wrote:
Psycholin Complains to God
It is entertaining for many people, including the author of this
writing . . . We have fun at Psycholin’s expense. I’m back after the
Kentucky Derby … poor Psycholin . . . he believed it was over!
Let’s have some more entertainment. Is it fair? Well . . . why not? I
feel a little guilt sometimes laughing at one of nature’s mistakes.
But it was not my fault and the Psycholins of the world should be
locked up and kept under supervision.
One day, Psycholin burst into God’s office.
“Almighty Father, people tell me that I am crooked and mad. Why did
You make me that way?”
“Well . . . son . . . I miscalculate at times . . . The logarithms are
tricky . . . ye know . . . and everything depends on logarithms. In a
case like you, I applied a baseless logarithm. That’s what
happened . . . with absolute certainty!”
BRRRRRRRRAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Ion Saliu,
Godless and well . . . thank you for asking . . .
Colin Fairbrother
OR PROBLEM OF N TRIALS
The question for the Fundamental Formula of Gambling centers around
who in history first knew about enumerating the possibilities for 1
event, then for multiple events and to use the words of Jacob
Bernoulli calculate the Degree of Certainty from his posthumous
publication of Ars Conjectandi in 1705, "Probability is a degree of
certainty and differs from certainty as a part from a whole.".
As late as May 7, 2011 Ion Saliu wrote preposterously in this very
thread, "It is totally documented that ‘degree of certainty’ was
coined by Ion Saliu and it was first published at SALIU.COM." IT IS
TOTALLY DOCUMENTED THAT STATEMENT BY ION SALIU IS A LIE. For an
interesting article see The Significance of Jacob Bernoulli's Ars
Conjectandi for the Philosophy of Probability Today by Glen Shafer
http://www.glennshafer.com/assets/downloads/articles/article55.pdf
The general equation is then dating from the 17th Century or before :
-
Probability of Success = Probability of Event ^ Number of Events or PS
= PE ^ NE
We can solve simply for Number of Events, NE, in basically two ways by
using logs. Logarithms date back to the early 17th Century and amongst
the mathematicians working on clarifying the idea was John Napier who
encountered a constant that subsequently was named by Euler as simply
e and ranks in importance alongside pi.
The first way is simply where PE is the base for the log: -
NE = logPE(PS)
The second way is to log both sides of the equation and then use a log
rule : -
log(PS) = log(PE ^ NE)
log(PS) = NE x log(PE)
NE = log(PS) / log(PE)
If we are more interested in the complement for the probabilities we
deduct each probability from 1 as in : -
NE = log1-PE(1 - PS)
or
NE = log(1-PS) / log(1 - PE)
Substituting a name such as Jacob Bernoulli's "Degree of Certainty"
for PS and then describing the equation as the Formula of Bankruptcy
and inviting others to call it The Fundamental Formula of Gambling as
Ion Saliu did in 1996 shows neither creativity or ingenuity. In a
stupendous act of plagiarism Ion Saliu went on in later modifications
of the original article to embellish it with this statement, "The
Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG) is an historic discovery in
theory of probability, theory of games, (sic) and gambling
mathematics.". THE FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING IS BLATANT,
FLAGRANT AND PREPOSTEROUS PLAGIARISM BY ION SALIU.
As previously mentioned the constant e which is approximately 2.71828
was encountered by John Napier in 1618 when working with logarithms.
Dividing 1 by e we get 0.3678796 ... or approximately 0.37 or 37%. If
we subtract a probability of 0.37 from 1 we get 0.63 or 63%. Recently
I encountered 1 - 1/e when enumerating 14 million random selections
using the Mersenne Twister algorithm as 63% were unique as expected
and I noted it at the time. See : -
Random Lotto Numbers using the Mersenne Twister
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=661
For a petty numerologist like Ion Saliu to claim 1 - 1/e as his own
discovery by renaming it Paradox or Problem of N Trials IS ALSO
BLATANT, FLAGRANT AND PREPOSTEROUS PLAGIARISM BY ION SALIU.
For further details with a table showing that the number of events may
still be obtained using the equation above where the probability of
the event is correct but where the probability of success is less than
optimum eg 1 toss of coin has probability 0.5 but 1 event is obtained
with a probability of success of 0.293. Perhaps I should call this the
Paradox of Limited Success. see
THE MADNESS OF ION SALIU AND HIS SPURIOUS CLAIM TO
THE SO CALLED FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=677
Colin Fairbrother
Parpaluck
wrote:
> Recently > I encountered 1 - 1/e when enumerating 14 million random selections
Psycholin Receives the Award of Most Twisted Insanity
One day, Psycholin burst into God’s office.
“Almighty Father, I made the greatest discovery! Got a coin?”
God handed Psycholin a big, golden coin with His Head on one side and
His Tail on the other.
“See, Almighty? The coin has two sides, right? I discovered that
during a mental twister of mine. This is one side, and this is the
second side. I discovered the greatest formula of all time:
8+4=1/2
I humbly request that I shall be recognized with the Award of Most
Twisted Insanity.”
“So shall be it forever and ever!”
Colin Fairbrother
FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING ARTICLE BY ION SALIU OR PARPALUCK
I came across the article by Ion Saliu when as the phrase was used
then "surfing the net" in 1997 or later I think accidentally although
around that time 1998 in Sydney there was considerable publicity about
a Keno player, Manfred, using a computer program to win a multi-
million dollar jackpot playing non-stop over a few days at my large
local community club. I stored the file on an old computer and printed
the article out more as an example of the level of stupidity by the
author on the subject of Lotto and gambling in general rather than for
reference and still have it. At the time with just a casual perusal I
didn't recognize the formula as PLAGIARISM of a formula or method that
was documented in the 17th century. It is simply the Probability of
Success = Probability Event ^ Number of Events and I didn't recognize
it on a quick perusal as I was more used to solving for n the
exponent in PS = PEⁿ by the more simpler n = log pe(PS) where pe is
the base rather than n = log(PS) / log(PE).
To even the most casual reader with some knowledge of mathematics it
soon becomes obvious that the author Ion Saliu or Parpaluck as he
calls himself when posting the most obscene and twisted abuse to try
and silence any who objectively comment is a crook. His net abuse
tactic usually works as mostly people choose not to be the recipient
of such abuse and choose not to engage. It is below my dignity to
engage directly with such a person so I ignore the abuse and comment
and leave it up to any rational reader to form their own conclusions.
It is well to adopt a practice of believing nothing by Ion Saliu
unless it can be backed up independently as he regularly alters text
that he purports to be written by some one else.
In the writings of Ion Saliu you see an oft used tactic by
numerologists to state something that is correct and that they accept
but then go on to state something which contradicts that. In the 2nd
paragraph he states, " ... all combinations have an equal probability
of appearance". In a later paragraph that has been dropped in later
versions he claimed to reduce the house margin in Pick 3 Lotto from
the government 50% to only 2.3%. The reason he had to do this was
because people could play the Pick 3 Lotto games online with a house
margin of 10% which meant his claim was blatantly false and that this
charlatan and shyster was out to do nothing more than deceive.
Another oft used tactic by numerologists is to misquote famous
identities such as he does with Blaise Pascal (1623 to 1662) one of
the fathers of modern probability when he falsely states, "...
contrary to common belief the past drawings do count in any game of
chance and Pascal demonstrated that hundreds of years. Blaise Pascal
one of the most brilliant minds of all time and a celebrated figure in
France had a short life of 39 years and surely must have turned in his
grave at such abuse of his intellect. I sometimes wonder whether the
French Secret Service quietly told a Romanian refugee to desist from
insulting a French hero and stick to Dracular instead. For whatever
reason apart from being a blatant lie it was dropped in later
versions.
For further reading on this contemptible shyster see: -
PLAGIARISM BY ION SALIU IN FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
AND PARADOX OR PROBLEM OF N TRIALS
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=678
Parpaluck
wrote:
> eg 10/5 gives 1.4306765 whether the base is e or 10 or whatever. Toss the bait and
> he goes for it every time.
>
Psycholin’s First Table of Insanity Erased by Almighty
It is very unusual for the Psycholins to reverse themselves. They live
their hallucinations. Hallucinating is their reality, in fact, their
lives. Psycholin truly lived a hallucination like:
“The following table is easily done in Excel and applies the formula
exactly the same way for each line. Compare the accurate figures with
the wrong figures given by Ion Salui and what a difference.”
Indeed, what a difference! Winning Pick-3 straight is as easy as
winning heads/tails in coin tossing in Psycholin hallucination!!!
Psycholin reversed himself claiming he had a rare crisis of humo(u)r!
I thought a group of benevolent “psychohelpers” were the ones who
sanitized Psycholin’s First Table of Insanity. Recent psychiatric
records show otherwise.
Psycholin was taken to the emergency room (ER) with severe self-
inflicted wounds. His face was badly bleeding. He had scratched his
face with his own paws! He was crying something about losing lots of
money at Pick-3 (PIII) lotteries!
“I had to remove my Table of Insanity that allowed me to win Pick 3
straight more easily than coin tossing! I could have become a
billionaire!”
As we know, doctors in general are not good at computers, math(s), or
spreadsheet analyses! Intrigued, they asked Psycholin:
“Why on earth did you remove that cash-cow of a table?!”
“Because of Almighty Father in Heaven! It was God who asked me to
remove my Table of Insanity and replace it with numbers calculated
by . . . FFG!!! My First Table of Insanity could not be . . .
copyrighted . . . ”
Nothing gets lost in the Universe. Not even madness — even if madness
cannot be copyrighted. You are still able to see “Da Table” to which
Psycholin dedicated a lot of his life! He put so much effort into it,
including boldface and red color:
http://saliu.com/freeware/PsycholinMathsInsanity.pdf
Ion Saliu,
Doctor At-Large
Parpaluck
Very popular discussion, ain’t it? I can see slow loading, errors
including ‘server not found’, etc.
But there is a more intense attacking against SALIU.COM. The pings
lead to where lotto compost.cum is located (Florida, huh?) It happened
before . . .
Colin Fairbrother
by Colin Fairbrother
Ion Saliu fits the bill for both an incompetent, amateur mathematician
and a numerologist. Generally, a person may be competent at using
mathematics but once they have thrown scientific rigour aside their
thoughts and conclusions are suspect. In the Lotto number analysis
field of interest the wheat can be separated from the chaff by whether
they believe the combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 is less likely to be drawn
than any other. Let's set aside arguments that it is played by too
many and therefore should be avoided even though $1,000,000 divided
among a 1000 for 1st prize is still $1000 and for most people would
represent the largest prize they've ever won in Lotto. I know of no
reputable mathematician or commentator on Lotto numbers that believes
1 2 3 4 5 6 is any different to say the other 13,983,815 combinations
in a Pick 6, Pool 49 Lotto game.
My very first post on the web on January 11, 2004 at 9:01pm stated,
"Lotto Numbers are ID's. If we used Cat or Dog species as Identifiers
then how would you say 1 off a Labrador or 1 off a Siamese.When you
say 1 less or more you are referring to numerical order which is just
1 permutation of your range of numbers and there are usually 5 billion
other permutations (ordered combinations) which are equally valid.".
That statement is as valid now as it was then.
My specialty is database programming and analysis which can be complex
and is not something I associate with the likes of Ion Saliu who had
difficulty in understanding my use of the integer number type integer.
The first consideration is that each draw for say a Pick 6 Lotto game
is usually presented in numerical order even though for each
combination it can be drawn in 720 ways. Inherently, there is a bias
when analyzing on a position basis for numerical order presentation as
1 for example always appears in position one. Obviously, one can only
validly Analise by position when the drawn order is maintained.
I have written on the equal likelihood of the combination 1 2 3 4 5 6
being drawn at my website and in this newsgroup more than once. The
link below shows there is no significant difference between the
occurrence of the balls or integers by reference to the last table.
Integer Occurrence UK Lotto for Order Drawn
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=669
According to Ion Saliu , " ... for 12 'lotto' numbers:
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. ... The clearest way to look at it is
'position by position'. It strikes me that the number '6' in the 6th
position is way too low. I compare it with all the data in the UK-6
lotto 6 drawings file".
THE INTEGER 6 IN THE 6TH POSITION AT 32 IS NORMAL.
Any doubt in anybodies mind should be dispelled by reading the
illogical rantings of Ion Saliu at this link for the number 1 2 3 4 5
6 if you don't get a 403 Forbidden error http://saliu.com/bbs/messages/961.html.
(All this publicity of his madness, incoherence, plagiarism and abuse
is doing him no good towards recovering the cost of self publishing
his weirdo book.)
Colin Fairbrother
Parpaluck
Psycholin: Madness and Criminality
All insanity boils down to this: Disruption.
Many people realized that Psycholin is also a cyber crook. He fakes IP
addresses in Australia, while his domains are geographically
positioned in the U.S. (Delaware and Florida).
I have done investigations because of attacks leveled at my Web site.
Doing a series of PINGS always led me to similar IPs in Delaware and
Florida, plus Australia (Psycholin’s IPs). The first time I did it was
in November of 2008:
http://lotterygambling.phpbbnow.com/viewtopic.php?t=358
Lottoposter.com DNS Lookup | Nameserver Lookup - Who.is
LOTTOPOSTER.COM NAME SERVERS
Name Server IP Location
ns1.jodoshared.com
204.14.104.16 Wilmington, DE, US
ns2.jodoshared.com
204.14.106.14 Wilmington, DE, US
ping lottoposter.com
LOTTOPOSTER.COM SOA RECORD
Name Server ns1.jodoshared.com
Email @jodohost.com
Serial Number 2006082710
Refresh 3 hours
Retry 1 hour
Expiry 7 days
Minimum 1 day
LOTTOPOSTER.COM DNS RECORDS
Record Type TTL Priority Content
*.lottoposter.com A 1 day 204.14.107.124 (Wilmington, DE, US)
lottoposter.com A 1 day 204.14.107.124 (Wilmington, DE, US)
lottoposter.com MX 1 day 10 gw-mail.jodoshared.com
lottoposter.com NS 1 day ns1.jodoshared.com
lottoposter.com NS 1 day ns2.jodoshared.com
lottoposter.com SOA 1 day ns1.jodoshared.com. webmaster.jodohost.com.
2006082710 10800 3600 604800 86400
mail.lottoposter.com CNAME 1 day mail.jodoshared.com
General IP Information
Hostname: 204.14.107.124
ISP: AccelerateBiz
Organization: Apyl
Proxy: None detected
Type: Corporate
Assignment: Static IP
Blacklist:
Geolocation Information
Country: United States
State/Region: Florida
City: Orlando
Latitude: 28.5553
Longitude: -81.3467
Area Code: 407
Postal Code: 32803
Our users have posted 344 Posts in 193 Topics in 21 Forum(s)
Last Post; May 05 2011 at 3:39am By Colin F
We have 295 Forum Members
The Newest Forum Member is dgj0600
290 forum members being Psycholin himself, registered with email
addresses stolen from lottery forums.
Better viewing by opening this PDF file:
Colin Fairbrother
in the equation by Albert Einstein E = MC² and state it is wrong is
0.99999999999 or 99.999999999.
Given that Ion Salui has rediscovered important equations in
Probability Theory there is general alarm among the farm workers of
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, USA that heat stroke may lead again to a
resurfacing of his affliction for transforming famous known equations
from the 17th century to those of the 20th century and claiming them
as major new, independently arrived at, discoveries.
His psychiatrist has been overheard whispering to a colleague that he
thinks Ion Salui is going to go for the big one - he definitely wants
more bang for his bucks and you know what that means. Yep he's going
for the most famous equation known to mankind E = mc². The colleague
inquired further and the psychiatrist, thought to be Dr E Pi, replied
well true to form he has a thing about solving for exponents so I
think he'll say Einstein got it wrong and that it should be 2.5
instead of 2. Thats ridiculous replied the colleague how will he prove
that?
Not a problem Dr E Pi replied he just makes up the data. He's just
interested in the publicity so he'll probably say (taking out a pen
and writing on his wrist) let's call the exponent n then using
100,000,000,000 for E and 10 for m we have log((10^11)/10) /
log(10,000) which is 10/4 = 2.5. His colleague laughed so much that he
embarrassed himself and ran off to find the nearest hair dryer.
And so the saga continues with Ion Saliu independently (according to
his hallucinations) rediscovering fundamental probability equations
from the past and passing them off as his own.
He got caught out with the simple equation for Probability of Success
= Probability of Event ^ Number of Events by Colin Fairbrother. Ion
Saliu thought the only way of transforming the equation for Number of
Events was to log both sides and use a log rule to substitute
log(Probability of Event ^ Number of Events) with Number of Events x
log(Probability of Event). Colin Fairbrother showed another simpler
way which made a mockery of his claim to fame as Number of Events is
the same as Probability of Success logged to the base Probability of
Event. See: -
PLAGIARISM BY ION SALIU IN FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
AND PARADOX OR PROBLEM OF N TRIALS
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=678
THE MADNESS OF ION SALIU AND HIS SPURIOUS CLAIM TO
THE SO CALLED FUNDAMENTAL FORMULA OF GAMBLING
http://lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=677
Colin Fairbrother
nb You can read the original translation of the 1905 paper DOES THE
INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? by Albert Einstein
at the excellent John Walker site see : -
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf.
While there read his excellent -
Introduction to Probability and Statistics
http://www.fourmilab.ch/rpkp/experiments/statistics.html
Parpaluck
wrote:
> Degree of Certainty that Ion Salui will rediscover the exponent used
> in the equation by Albert Einstein E = MC² and state it is wrong is
>
QED
Colin Fairbrother
heated argument in French with black clad occupants of a Renault car
in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Conversations between Dr E Pi and Dr 0 Infinity are regularly overhead
by the owner Pierre de Fermat at the latin named Ars Conjectandia busy
French coffee house in main street Gettysburg as they choose to sit
next to the place where he recuperates from a broken leg caused by a
runaway Amish horse and wagon driven by a Mennonite christian
Gottfried Leibniz.
Dr E Pi has treated Ion Saliu ever since a severe heat stroke episode
and the consequent bizarre hallucinations. Ion Salui's fellow
farmworker Web saved him just in time after noticing froth on the
tomatoes they were picking whereupon he saw him in a collapsed state
from staying too long in the sun harvesting tomatoes without his usual
cap.
The hallucinations manifest in Ion Saliu thinking he has independently
arrived at simple transformations of probability equations from
brilliant and famous 17th century mathematicians in particular those
who are French. They also take the form of thinking he has solved
famous mathematical conundrums. This is most bizarre because Ion Salui
had a Professor Ilya Bluskov at the Academy of Economic Studies,
Bucharest, Romania who constantly chided him on his poor performance
in mathematics and indeed it is thought he only got his degree in
Political Economics (lowest class) by being the loudest singer in
songs of praise for dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu.
After Ion Saliu self published a book of his hallucinations in 2009 Dr
E Pi knew there would be trouble as the formula were blatantly
plagiarist and an affrontery and insult to the French nation and its
intellectual heroes. In times gone by such an insult could have led if
the books were not burnt to a crushing war against the Romanians Vlad
or no Vlad. Who cannot listen to the French national anthem,
undoubtedly the best in the world, and not empathize with the pride of
the French, the major partner if not the savior of the American War of
Independence.
Recently Ion Saliu has raised concerns that his website has had DOS
attacks which in turn has led to rather feckless, docile posts in a
newsgroup as if resigned to his fate of being caught out and brought
to account. He is prone to taking a shivering, foetal position in the
furtherest corner of his gloomiest room muttering over and over Sint
inca aici?, Sint inca aici?, Sint inca aici?, Sint inca aici?, Sint
inca aici?
Colin Fairbrother
Conquistador El Supremo in the mini Pacific Ionic Wars
octav...@googlemail.com
I have paid for his 'freeware' [free to use after you've paid...]and politely asked for an explanation of how actually to use his MIDIEditor but have never had a reply. No glossary for non-statisticians, no-nothing. There is also an applet in the program which reports back to the webamaster and will zero your carefully - constructed results files. I assume that this is because the payment for use is recurring and not a one-off.
On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 8:16:46 AM UTC, Colin Fairbrother wrote:
> I have often wondered where the preoccupation in the past with Indexes
> for the enumeration of Lotto number possibilities came from and it
> would appear it is all down to the freak from muddy, thinking creek,
> Ion Saliu.
>
> This charlatan who works on the basis of spluttering along with the
> most unintelligible ravings and rantings known to man and which any
> self - respecting psychiatrist would immediately commit to an asylum
> in a barred room with straight jacket after reading a sentence or
> two.
>
> Recently, we had numerologist Manfred trot out some bizarre nonsense
> about some index differences giving a better chance of success. It
> seems his mentor was the crazy Romanian that someone hasn't got around
> to sticking the stake in.
>
> How about this excerpt from the nut that feels it necessary to tell
> the world about pipe noises he hears in the middle of the night let
> alone the arcane voices, " ... The index range for past drawings does
> follow the normal probability rule. I know what most people will do
> with the results. Instead of selecting 6 or so lotto numbers, they
> will simply select an index ;Ok. So index 34,245,621 already came out.
> I think the next index will be 33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and
> it's located under the bell."
>
> Read the article here -
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lotto.players/msg/0e696de1f5b786c7
> -
> but don't dally as his crazy meanderings are a public nuisance and
> danger to mental health.
>
> For a rational consideration of indexes from a database specialist
> read my article here: -
> Distribution in Lotto by Index Enumeration
> http://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=655
>
> Colin Fairbrother
> I have often wondered where the preoccupation in the past with Indexes
> for the enumeration of Lotto number possibilities came from and it
> would appear it is all down to the freak from muddy, thinking creek,
> Ion Saliu.
>
> This charlatan who works on the basis of spluttering along with the
> most unintelligible ravings and rantings known to man and which any
> self - respecting psychiatrist would immediately commit to an asylum
> in a barred room with straight jacket after reading a sentence or
> two.
>
> Recently, we had numerologist Manfred trot out some bizarre nonsense
> about some index differences giving a better chance of success. It
> seems his mentor was the crazy Romanian that someone hasn't got around
> to sticking the stake in.
>
> How about this excerpt from the nut that feels it necessary to tell
> the world about pipe noises he hears in the middle of the night let
> alone the arcane voices, " ... The index range for past drawings does
> follow the normal probability rule. I know what most people will do
> with the results. Instead of selecting 6 or so lotto numbers, they
> will simply select an index ;Ok. So index 34,245,621 already came out.
> I think the next index will be 33,398,713. It hasn't come out yet and
> it's located under the bell."
>
> Read the article here -
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.lotto.players/msg/0e696de1f5b786c7
> -
> but don't dally as his crazy meanderings are a public nuisance and
> danger to mental health.
>
> For a rational consideration of indexes from a database specialist
> read my article here: -
> Distribution in Lotto by Index Enumeration
> http://www.lottoposter.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=655
>
> Colin Fairbrother
Gerry
> He is ABSOLUTELY UNINTELLIGIBLE, as you correctly point out.
>
> I have paid for his 'freeware' [free to use after you've paid...]and
> politely asked for an explanation of how actually to use his
> MIDIEditor but have never had a reply. No glossary for
> non-statisticians, no-nothing. There is also an applet in the program
> which reports back to the webamaster and will zero your carefully -
> constructed results files. I assume that this is because the payment
> for use is recurring and not a one-off.
>
Parpaluck
> > Colin Fartbrothel
I have paid for his 'freeware' [free to use after you've paid...]and politely asked for an explanation of how actually to use his MIDIEditor but have never had a reply. No glossary for non-statisticians, no-nothing. There is also an applet in the program which reports back to the webamaster and will zero your carefully - constructed results files. I assume that this is because the payment for use is recurring and not a one-off.”
Another “masterpiece” of DELIRIOUS SPEECH! “There is also an applet in the program which reports back to the webamaster and will zero your carefully - constructed results files.”!!! You are unknown to yourself! How can you know anything about software?! That’s why they keep you in that madhouse, under sedation most of the time. When they do it to you and Psycholin Zamzalasheep, they call it ‘piercing the rabid lamb’.
The membership is a one-time payment, far lower than any piece of lottery software out there that only counts how many times lotto numbers came out. You must be one of those scavengers …