Lemme get this straight.

Leonard Blaisdell

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 9:17:40 PM1/9/22

to

Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 9:20:21 PM1/9/22

to

On 1/9/2022 21:17, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?

A little late to the party... LOL

Yes, unfortunately... the first day or two only Bruce was posting under
Dave's name. Like a moron, Bruce flaunted that he's now "invincible"
because his forgers don't want to hide "good 'ole Dave". They promptly
began spamming relentlessly under Dave's name. Bruce is a coward, and a
pathetic one at that.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 9:29:59 PM1/9/22

to

On Sun, 09 Jan 2022 21:20:16 -0500, Michael Trew
<michae...@att.net> wrote:

>On 1/9/2022 21:17, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>
>A little late to the party... LOL
>
>Yes, unfortunately... the first day or two only Bruce was posting under
>Dave's name. Like a moron, Bruce flaunted that he's now "invincible"
>because his forgers don't want to hide "good 'ole Dave".

I didn't flaunt anything. This only lasts while it lasts.

> They promptly began spamming relentlessly under Dave's name. Bruce is a coward, and a
> pathetic one at that.

I understand that you don't like me, but I don't spam. Talk to your
friend Greg (but keep some distance, as he's a sinner in your book).

--
This is NOT a post by Dave Smith

GM

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 9:44:27 PM1/9/22

to

A most stoopid puke, for sure, lol...

And she's still responding to your every post with the usual childish insults, but then what else
is new... it really pisses her off that you have her killfiled...

<chuckle>

--
GM

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 9:51:27 PM1/9/22

to

On 2022-01-09 9:17 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>

He has had a bit of a melt down. You have to see at least a little
humour in him forging my name. He doesn't like me but he is having a
hissy fit because so many people have filtered him and denied him the
attention he craves.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 9:55:00 PM1/9/22

to

That's not a very truthful report of what happened and you know it :)

GM

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 10:05:44 PM1/9/22

to

Leonard Blaisdell wrote:

> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?

As Miss Bwuthie proclaimed:

"I really wanted a sex change, but all I can afford is a very crummy imitation of Dave Smith..."

<snicker>

--
GM

Hank Rogers

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 10:22:03 PM1/9/22

to

Do you remember the approximate date or month that he had his last
meltdown

GM

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 10:33:01 PM1/9/22

to

Isn't it a *constant* state of meltdown... kinda like a Chernobyl that never got "capped"...

--
GM

Hank Rogers

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 10:55:40 PM1/9/22

to

Well, I'll rephrase: the last time he went ape shit and started
forging dave, then subsequently apologized and stopped forging dave
for a good long while.

GM

unread,

Jan 9, 2022, 11:12:59 PM1/9/22

to

Ayup, maybe last spring or summer if I recall terrectly...

--
GM

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 3:18:21 AM1/10/22

to

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 3:19:00 AM1/10/22

to

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 3:19:19 AM1/10/22

to

On 10 Jan 2022 02:17:34 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell

<leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
>Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?

bruce bowser

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 10:12:03 AM1/10/22

to

On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 3:19:19 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2022 02:17:34 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
> <leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?

Not me.

Mike Duffy

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 10:56:28 AM1/10/22

to

BB, you use at least a putative surname. Null Bruce is too scared of his
own shadow to even profer a fake one. That makes you & I & Leonard & Dave
an order of magnitude more credible. And anyone who has the guts to put a
real working email address in his headers is even moreso, especially one
that is ISP-based.

We should come up with a consensus vector of credibility coefficients
which can be applied objectively to everyone here in order to put
everyone in order.

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:30:20 PM1/10/22

to

It's liberating to not care. Kind of funny that apparently Bruce
continues to respond to me. He ought to take the hint and just ignore
me like Jebus did. I'm certainly not offended, if it works out for both
parties.

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:34:58 PM1/10/22

to

His first "melt-down" was not longer after I started here, I'd say April
- May of this past year... maybe as late as June. I wasn't here long
enough to quite process what was going on. Has that ever happened in
years before?

I'm sure that Bruce will post some whiny response about it being his
frogger's fault, a response which I won't see. In anticipation of that,
I'll now state that he is *JUST AS BAD* as the forgers for attempting to
soil Dave Smith's name *JUST* out of spite.

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:35:52 PM1/10/22

to

The funny part is, that people are still responding to your posts, and
deleting his. He doesn't realize how miserably he has failed, LOL.

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:36:50 PM1/10/22

to

You're good, Mr. Bowser. We are talking about the lesser Bruce. Maybe
the land of Oz is like the Bermuda triangle...

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:37:17 PM1/10/22

to

On 1/10/2022 10:56, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 07:12:00 -0800, bruce bowser wrote:
>
>> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 3:19:19 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 10 Jan 2022 02:17:34 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
>>> <leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>>
>> Not me.
>
> BB, you use at least a putative surname. Null Bruce is too scared of his

> own shadow to even profer a fake one. That makes you& I& Leonard& Dave

> an order of magnitude more credible. And anyone who has the guts to put a
> real working email address in his headers is even moreso, especially one
> that is ISP-based.

+1!!

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:43:35 PM1/10/22

to

5 consecutive posts about me. Michael needs to forget about me and
start living his own life. I can't live it for him. Can someone
recommend a self help book?

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:53:22 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 1:57:37 PM1/10/22

to

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:03:36 PM1/10/22

to

This is not my frogger.

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:16:41 PM1/10/22

to

On 2022-01-10 1:30 p.m., Michael Trew wrote:

> On 1/9/2022 21:44, GM wrote:

>> And she's still responding to your every post with the usual childish
>> insults, but then what else
>> is new... it really pisses her off that you have her killfiled...
>>
>> <chuckle>
>
> It's liberating to not care. Kind of funny that apparently Bruce
> continues to respond to me. He ought to take the hint and just ignore
> me like Jebus did. I'm certainly not offended, if it works out for both
> parties.

Of course she replies to you. She is thrilled to see that she got some
attention when everyone else is ignoring her.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:24:58 PM1/10/22

to

On 2022-01-10 1:34 p.m., Michael Trew wrote:

>
> His first "melt-down" was not longer after I started here, I'd say April
> - May of this past year... maybe as late as June. I wasn't here long
> enough to quite process what was going on. Has that ever happened in
> years before?
>
> I'm sure that Bruce will post some whiny response about it being his
> frogger's fault, a response which I won't see. In anticipation of that,
> I'll now state that he is *JUST AS BAD* as the forgers for attempting to
> soil Dave Smith's name *JUST* out of spite.

She has a special hard on for me because was probably the first one to
filter her and pointed out her nymshifting to get past the filters.
Rather than learn how to behave like an adult so that people would take
him seriously he got vindictive and made more enemies. The last time he
pulled this crap he was the one came out smelling like crap.

He still has the opportunity to slink away and perhaps reinventing
himself as a decent human being. Until then, the poor dumb bastard has
to keep on forging the person he hates in order for anyone to see his posts.

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:25:53 PM1/10/22

to

I only see the Bruce replies when other people decided to quote them, so
I'm not sure what you are talking about. I do have to glance at them so
I know which to delete and which are your posts, since I go out of my
way to make sure that I still see the actual Dave Smith posts.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:27:40 PM1/10/22

to

Yes indeed. It would appear that almost all his posts are being ignored
while people are still reading and replying to mine. That probably
really pisses her off.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:36:30 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:49 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>She has a special hard on for me

There's a bit of gender confusion going on there, Dave. That's very
modern of you!

> because was probably the first one to
>filter her and pointed out her nymshifting to get past the filters.

I don't know if that's true, but I don't mind playing along.

Ladies and gentlemen, Dave "Pickleball" Smith was the first to filter
me and point out my nymshifting. Let's hear if for Pickleball!

>Rather than learn how to behave like an adult so that people would take
>him seriously he got vindictive and made more enemies. The last time he
> pulled this crap he was the one came out smelling like crap.
>
>He still has the opportunity to slink away and perhaps reinventing
>himself as a decent human being. Until then, the poor dumb bastard has
>to keep on forging the person he hates in order for anyone to see his posts.

I don't hate you. I may not be your biggest fan, but I don't hate you
:)

Michael Trew

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:37:07 PM1/10/22

to

I don't like to ignore people, so I hope that he considers your last
paragraph. I can't fathom being somewhere and being particularly
disliked by the majority of the people, yet continuing to dig my hole
deeper. Unless a person is just vindictive, your average person
probably would feel the same way. I would bet that most people would
give him another shot if he disappeared for a couple of months and came
back with a less crappy attitude.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:37:41 PM1/10/22

to

We know, Michael, we know. You don't have to say it 10 times. Get over
me.

Lovely little suck-up, by the way :)

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:42:53 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:43:13 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:44:11 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:24:49 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:44:58 PM1/10/22

to

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:45:34 PM1/10/22

to

Ed Pawlowski

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:45:48 PM1/10/22

to

Minor inconvenience. Can't let Dave get lost because of the bad guys.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:49:45 PM1/10/22

to

Are you saying the troll isn't doing his work well? Trollie, are you
reading this?

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 2:50:38 PM1/10/22

to

On 2022-01-10 2:37 p.m., Michael Trew wrote:
> On 1/10/2022 14:24, Dave Smith wrote:

>> He still has the opportunity to slink away and perhaps reinventing
>> himself as a decent human being. Until then, the poor dumb bastard has
>> to keep on forging the person he hates in order for anyone to see his
>> posts.
>
> I don't like to ignore people, so I hope that he considers your last
> paragraph. I can't fathom being somewhere and being particularly
> disliked by the majority of the people, yet continuing to dig my hole
> deeper.

Welcome to Bruce's world. He blames his frogger for his bad reputation
and doesn't understand that it was many his own behaviour.

> Unless a person is just vindictive, your average person
> probably would feel the same way. I would bet that most people would
> give him another shot if he disappeared for a couple of months and came
> back with a less crappy attitude.

They might have done so if this was the first and only time he did this.
It isn't. He did it before and apologized for it, but now he has done it
again.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 3:00:25 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:50:29 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-10 2:37 p.m., Michael Trew wrote:
>
>> I don't like to ignore people, so I hope that he considers your last
>> paragraph. I can't fathom being somewhere and being particularly
>> disliked by the majority of the people, yet continuing to dig my hole
>> deeper.
>
>Welcome to Bruce's world. He blames his frogger for his bad reputation
>and doesn't understand that it was many his own behaviour.
>

If I hadn't been frogged by 3 different accounts, I wouldn't have had
to do this. If I really wanted to frog you, I wouldn't have added the
signature.

Strange, by the way, that nobody points at Greg. RFC, for all your
double standards.

>
>> Unless a person is just vindictive, your average person
>> probably would feel the same way. I would bet that most people would
>> give him another shot if he disappeared for a couple of months and came
>> back with a less crappy attitude.
>
>They might have done so if this was the first and only time he did this.
>It isn't. He did it before and apologized for it, but now he has done it
>again.
>

I had and have no choice. I apologise to Dave for picking him again,
but I had to pick someone.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 3:25:41 PM1/10/22

to

So you want to punish me and the rest of the group because you have
trouble with someone else and you don't have the computer savvy to deal
with it?? And you think this stupid stunt is going to make people
think better of you?

I filtered you because you saw fit to post a snarky comment to
everything I post, taking cheap shots at me. You sniped at me and
everyone else. I imagine that is why other people did the same. The
last time you melted down and pulled this stunt you turned a lot of
other people against you. The reaction against you this time appears to
be a lot stronger this time, so if you think you redeemed yourself in
anyone's eyes you might want to give your head a shake.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 3:36:04 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:25:35 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>So you want to punish me and the rest of the group because you have
>trouble with someone else and you don't have the computer savvy to deal
>with it??

A few people, such as Ed and you, gleefully watched what the trolls
were doing. Suddenly you didn't hate trolls so much anymore. The
famous double standards of RFC :)

But please explain to me how you'd have dealt with the problem. Which
computer savvy trick would you have applied?

>And you think this stupid stunt is going to make people
>think better of you?

That doesn't worry me too much.

>I filtered you because you saw fit to post a snarky comment to
>everything I post, taking cheap shots at me. You sniped at me and
>everyone else. I imagine that is why other people did the same. The
>last time you melted down and pulled this stunt you turned a lot of
>other people against you. The reaction against you this time appears to
>be a lot stronger this time, so if you think you redeemed yourself in
>anyone's eyes you might want to give your head a shake.

It was either this or become invisible. I couldn't do that to y'all.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:01:00 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:02:15 PM1/10/22

to

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:00:20 +1100, Dave Smith

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:03:36 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:06:04 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:45:42 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:06:10 PM1/10/22

to

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 05:43:30 +1100, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:36:46 -0500, Michael Trew
><michae...@att.net> wrote:

>
>>On 1/10/2022 10:12, bruce bowser wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 3:19:19 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 10 Jan 2022 02:17:34 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell

>>>> <leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>>>

>>> Not me.
>>
>>You're good, Mr. Bowser. We are talking about the lesser Bruce. Maybe
>>the land of Oz is like the Bermuda triangle...
>
>5 consecutive posts about me. Michael needs to forget about me and
>start living his own life. I can't live it for him. Can someone
>recommend a self help book?

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:06:22 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 13:34:52 -0500, Michael Trew
<michae...@att.net> wrote:

>On 1/9/2022 22:21, Hank Rogers wrote:
>> Michael Trew wrote:

>>> On 1/9/2022 21:17, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>>>> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>>>

>>> A little late to the party... LOL
>>>
>>> Yes, unfortunately... the first day or two only Bruce was posting
>>> under Dave's name. Like a moron, Bruce flaunted that he's now
>>> "invincible" because his forgers don't want to hide "good 'ole Dave".
>>> They promptly began spamming relentlessly under Dave's name. Bruce is
>>> a coward, and a pathetic one at that.
>>

>> Do you remember the approximate date or month that he had his last meltdown

>
>His first "melt-down" was not longer after I started here, I'd say April
>- May of this past year... maybe as late as June. I wasn't here long
>enough to quite process what was going on. Has that ever happened in
>years before?
>
>I'm sure that Bruce will post some whiny response about it being his
>frogger's fault, a response which I won't see. In anticipation of that,
>I'll now state that he is *JUST AS BAD* as the forgers for attempting to
>soil Dave Smith's name *JUST* out of spite.

Ed Pawlowski

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:11:18 PM1/10/22

to

On 1/10/2022 3:35 PM, Bruce Smith wrote:

>
> A few people, such as Ed and you, gleefully watched what the trolls
> were doing. Suddenly you didn't hate trolls so much anymore. The
> famous double standards of RFC :)

Gleefully watched? I don't have a troll remover filter but I do have a
kill filter. You bring it on yourself and nothing we can do.

>
> But please explain to me how you'd have dealt with the problem. Which
> computer savvy trick would you have applied?
>
>> And you think this stupid stunt is going to make people
>> think better of you?
>
> That doesn't worry me too much.

Because you only care about yourself and damage to others is OK if it
benefits you. This stunt just adds to your frogger's dislike and
vengeance.

>

>
> It was either this or become invisible. I couldn't do that to y'all.
>

I'll keep a log of who mourns your absence and report quarterly.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:24:31 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:11:11 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>On 1/10/2022 3:35 PM, Bruce Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> A few people, such as Ed and you, gleefully watched what the trolls
>> were doing. Suddenly you didn't hate trolls so much anymore. The
>> famous double standards of RFC :)
>
>Gleefully watched?
>

Yes, you loved it :)

>>
>> But please explain to me how you'd have dealt with the problem. Which
>> computer savvy trick would you have applied?
>>
>>> And you think this stupid stunt is going to make people
>>> think better of you?
>

I still want to know how Dave would have dealt with the problem. In
which "computer savvy" way.

>
>> That doesn't worry me too much.
>
>Because you only care about yourself and damage to others is OK if it
>benefits you. This stunt just adds to your frogger's dislike and
>vengeance.
>

Who cares what a frogger thinks? Why do you want me to change my
behaviour to please a bunch of trolls? That's crazy. They're the last
people I care about.

Imagine if Casa Boner would develop a problem with you. Would you
change and become "Ed 2.0, Now Casa Boner Approved"?

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:39:32 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:41:12 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:11:11 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Ed Pawlowski

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 4:58:23 PM1/10/22

to

On 1/10/2022 4:24 PM, Dave Smith wrote:

>>
>> Because you only care about yourself and damage to others is OK if it
>> benefits you. This stunt just adds to your frogger's dislike and
>> vengeance.
>>
> Who cares what a frogger thinks? Why do you want me to change my
> behaviour to please a bunch of trolls? That's crazy. They're the last
> people I care about.
>
> Imagine if Casa Boner would develop a problem with you. Would you
> change and become "Ed 2.0, Now Casa Boner Approved"?
>

You don't have to change your behavior but there are consequences for it.

I've been saying and you have been ignoring, you are the problem. You
are one of the least popular kids in the playground. Mommy can't make
the other kids like you.

Most people just don't like someone that is constantly bashing others
and making snarky remarks. It could be RFC, your workplace, or a family
gathering. People avoid that behavior. You have free speech and we can
ignore you. One person goes out of the way to make you miserable.

No one here can fix it for you.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:10:37 PM1/10/22

to

And THOSE people are the problem. Y'all can killfile me if you want,
for instance, as in your case, when I've hurt your enormous ego.
That's fine. That's not a problem.

When are we going to see Ed Pawlowski criticise the frogger trolls? Is
that ever going to happen?

Jeßus

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:17:56 PM1/10/22

to

On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 21:51:21 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-09 9:17 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>>

>He has had a bit of a melt down. You have to see at least a little
>humour in him forging my name. He doesn't like me but he is having a
>hissy fit because so many people have filtered him and denied him the
>attention he craves.

Funny how he's somehow picked your name to forge... twice.
But hey, it's the 'right thing to do', somehow. How's that for fucked
up reasoning.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:22:27 PM1/10/22

to

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:17:48 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 21:51:21 -0500, Dave Smith
><adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>On 2022-01-09 9:17 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>>> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>>>
>>He has had a bit of a melt down. You have to see at least a little
>>humour in him forging my name. He doesn't like me but he is having a
>>hissy fit because so many people have filtered him and denied him the
>>attention he craves.
>
>Funny how he's somehow picked your name to forge... twice.

Consistency!

>But hey, it's the 'right thing to do', somehow. How's that for fucked
>up reasoning.

I don't know about 'the right thing to do'. More like 'the only thing
to do'.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:23:22 PM1/10/22

to

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:22:22 +1100, Dave Smith

<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:17:48 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 21:51:21 -0500, Dave Smith
>><adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>>On 2022-01-09 9:17 p.m., Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>>>> Bruce and all his froggers have now become Dave Smith?
>>>>
>>>He has had a bit of a melt down. You have to see at least a little
>>>humour in him forging my name. He doesn't like me but he is having a
>>>hissy fit because so many people have filtered him and denied him the
>>>attention he craves.
>>
>>Funny how he's somehow picked your name to forge... twice.
>
>Consistency!
>
>>But hey, it's the 'right thing to do', somehow. How's that for fucked
>>up reasoning.
>
>I don't know about 'the right thing to do'. More like 'the only thing
>to do'.

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:24:09 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:24:47 PM1/10/22

to

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:17:48 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:28:25 PM1/10/22

to

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

Ed Pawlowski

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:30:30 PM1/10/22

to

My ego is enormous because it was well earned.

Criticize the froggers? I never condoned it but the way you've been
crying about it, it has become a little funny watching you sulk.

OK, just for you:
Mr. Frogger, will you please leave Brucie alone. He thinks you are
picking on him because of his snarky attitude but he is really a nice
boy. Stop picking on him. Right now. Puleeeeeze

Jeßus

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:32:50 PM1/10/22

to

Yes, the solution is very obvious, the fact he won't do it says it
all. His sole reason for being here is also obvious. And it has
nothing to do with intelligent dialogue.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:33:21 PM1/10/22

to

On 2022-01-10 5:10 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:58:16 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>

>> Most people just don't like someone that is constantly bashing others
>> and making snarky remarks. It could be RFC, your workplace, or a family
>> gathering. People avoid that behavior. You have free speech and we can
>> ignore you. One person goes out of the way to make you miserable.
>
> And THOSE people are the problem. Y'all can killfile me if you want,
> for instance, as in your case, when I've hurt your enormous ego.
> That's fine. That's not a problem.

That comment suggests that it is our egos that are are fault. There is
nothing wrong with an ego in a person who is offend by the insulting
sniping that you do.

> When are we going to see Ed Pawlowski criticise the frogger trolls? Is
> that ever going to happen?

We have pointed out that it is hard to distinguish between you and your
frogger(s) because they do such a good job of imitating you. They
really affect only the volume of offensive snipes. The fact remains
that I am not going to bother reading your posts when all they consist
primarily of cheap shots at us. It's not particularly amusing to anyone
and it got old a long ago. Grow up a bit and people might take you
seriously.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:33:33 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:30:24 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>On 1/10/2022 5:10 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>> And THOSE people are the problem. Y'all can killfile me if you want,
>> for instance, as in your case, when I've hurt your enormous ego.
>> That's fine. That's not a problem.
>>
>> When are we going to see Ed Pawlowski criticise the frogger trolls? Is
>> that ever going to happen?
>>
>
>My ego is enormous because it was well earned.

There you go :) I prefer people who are not as full of themselves as
you are. Your ego has its own zip code.

>Criticize the froggers? I never condoned it but the way you've been
>crying about it, it has become a little funny watching you sulk.

There's that glee again :)

And I'm not sulking. I keep being attacked for what I'm doing and I
keep explaining myself, unless it becomes too repetitive. That's all.

>OK, just for you:
>Mr. Frogger, will you please leave Brucie alone. He thinks you are
>picking on him because of his snarky attitude but he is really a nice
>boy. Stop picking on him. Right now. Puleeeeeze

That's not criticism. That's acting like a child.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:36:56 PM1/10/22

to

Says the man who gets angry when someone disagrees with him :)

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:38:39 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:33:23 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-10 5:10 p.m., Dave Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:58:16 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>>
>
>>> Most people just don't like someone that is constantly bashing others
>>> and making snarky remarks. It could be RFC, your workplace, or a family
>>> gathering. People avoid that behavior. You have free speech and we can
>>> ignore you. One person goes out of the way to make you miserable.
>>
>> And THOSE people are the problem. Y'all can killfile me if you want,
>> for instance, as in your case, when I've hurt your enormous ego.
>> That's fine. That's not a problem.
>
>That comment suggests that it is our egos that are are fault. There is
>nothing wrong with an ego in a person who is offend by the insulting
>sniping that you do.

I was talking about Ed.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:40:00 PM1/10/22

to

He is in love with me. He hates me but he must think that I am more
credible that he is. I don't doubt that a number of people have filtered
be because they are offended by me speaking my mind, but I am willing to
bet there are a lot fewer people filtering me than him. He thinks that
it is our egos that have suffered but imagine how his ego has been
crushed to the point that he has to frog me to get past the Bruce
filters. It sad and it's funny.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:40:53 PM1/10/22

to

I was talking about you.

Ed Pawlowski

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:46:35 PM1/10/22

to

On 1/10/2022 5:33 PM, Dave Smith wrote:

>
> And I'm not sulking. I keep being attacked for what I'm doing and I
> keep explaining myself, unless it becomes too repetitive. That's all.

Exactly. It is what you are doing. You think it is just wonderful but
most others find you offensive, critical.

>
>> OK, just for you:
>> Mr. Frogger, will you please leave Brucie alone. He thinks you are
>> picking on him because of his snarky attitude but he is really a nice
>> boy. Stop picking on him. Right now. Puleeeeeze
>
> That's not criticism. That's acting like a child.

Best I can do. No one has control over your buddy.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:49:34 PM1/10/22

to

Uhm, I don't know what you've been reading.

-I think many more people had killfiled me than you.

-I only brought up "ego" with regard to Ed.

-I don't hate you.

Jeßus

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:49:56 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:40:02 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

Yes, I'd previously never thought he would sink this low, but here we
are. I missed the last time he frogged you, fortunately. I see some
replies to him and his justification and reasoning for forging you is
unbelievable. He's really far gone now.

Anyway, hang in there Dave. Sooner or later this will sort itself out.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:52:31 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:46:29 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>On 1/10/2022 5:33 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> And I'm not sulking. I keep being attacked for what I'm doing and I
>> keep explaining myself, unless it becomes too repetitive. That's all.
>
>Exactly. It is what you are doing. You think it is just wonderful but
>most others find you offensive, critical.

What's wrong with critical?

>> That's not criticism. That's acting like a child.
>
>Best I can do. No one has control over your buddy.

Of course. It's just rather telling that you go on and on about how
bad I am, but you never say a word about Greg and the other troll (if
there is another).

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 5:53:53 PM1/10/22

to

Enough about me. Let's go back to talking about cooking and anything
else that comes up.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 6:07:38 PM1/10/22

to

Screw that Bruce.You are the one who made it all about you. People that
you were an ass before you decided to frog me. Their opinion of you is
much lower now. How is that working for you?

jmcquown

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 6:13:35 PM1/10/22

to

You know, maybe if everyone would simply stop talking about it, starting
separate threads and calling more attention to it... the forging would
cease to be a thrill for the forger.

Jill

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 6:33:06 PM1/10/22

to

I don't even know what that means.

>Their opinion of you is
>much lower now. How is that working for you?

You seem to think this is some kind of popularity contest. It's not.

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 6:36:24 PM1/10/22

to

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:13:26 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 1/10/2022 5:40 PM, Dave Smith wrote:

I hope so, but Greg doesn't have the best track record!

Dave Smith

unread,

Jan 10, 2022, 6:45:18 PM1/10/22

to

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:36:19 +1100, Dave Smith