Usenet is the least secure a medium

[John Kuthe]

Easily FAKED!

John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

[Hank Rogers]

John Kuthe wrote:
> Easily FAKED!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>

Nobody reads it anyway, except you.

Remember?

[Eastern brown]

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 7:31:20 PM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org wrote:
> Easily FAKED!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

And you come here, year after year, to bully John Kuthe for crying out
loud, so you're still a loser.

[Judith Latham]

They claim it's read by millions, but I'll be damned if I know one other
person who has even heard of Usenet.

[Gary]

In local life, I've never talked to someone that knew about Usenet. I
always had to explain to them what it is.

[Cindy Hamilton]

I have, but everybody I know is a nerd.

--
Cindy Hamilton

[Ed Pawlowski]

I know a few but not many at all compared to Facebook and such. John is
right that few people will read this group but the Google search will
lead you right to his specific posts.

On a regular basis, there are about 30 of us here. Not much at all and
the major ISPs dropped newsgroups years ago so people never see they exist.

What is sad, there are a couple of people taking the time to cause
havoc. Like him or not, Bruce is not leaving but what is gained by
posting 50 to 75 posts under his name of the day? OK, it may have been
funny once but still?

What is gained by denigrating others? Sure, not everyone likes everyone
so use the kill file or ignore.

[Michael Trew]

Very true, and they spam with well over 75 "Bruce" posts per day.

[Keelback]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:19:16 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>What is sad, there are a couple of people taking the time to cause
>havoc. Like him or not, Bruce is not leaving but what is gained by
>posting 50 to 75 posts under his name of the day? OK, it may have been
>funny once but still?

I can't believe that so many people don't understand why I'm doing it.
I don't do it because I think it's funny. I also don't do it to annoy.

[Keelback]

Talk to the troll. And if you don't want to be "denigrated" start by
not bitching about people you've killfiled. That's what cowards do.

[Keelback]

We Dutch have a saying about froggers like yoos, which is KILL YOURSELF
you loser. no friends no real job no money no sex and no hope for the
future. Loser. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[Keelback]

[GM]

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 7:31:20 PM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org wrote:

> Easily FAKED!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

With Greg? What do you mean?

[Ed Pawlowski]

Only reason I can see is to drive off Bruce or have everyone ignore him.
It isn't working. Your intentions may be good but results are dismal.

If that is not correct, please explain.

[Stephens Banded Snake]

Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it

[Stephens Banded Snake]

[Taipan]

Oh sorry, I thought you were talking to me (the real Bruce), but you
were talking to my troll. In that case, why on earth did you say that
his intentions may be good? Why is it good to drive someone off when
you disagree with them? Freedom of speech, Land of the Free and all
that.

[Bryan Simmons]

We are free to say that I'd like to see you after
you'd been bitten by one of those really fucked
up Australian spiders that is deadly.

--Bryan

[Taipan]

You want to see so many people dead, that nobody raises an eyebrow
anymore.

[Hank Rogers]

Some know. It's compulsion, and you just can't help it.

[Hank Rogers]

It's much more enjoyable to bitch about you if you are kill filed.

[Hank Rogers]

And then urinate on his grave.

[GM]

Like pulling wings off of a fly...

--
GM

[Taipan]

[Taipan]

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Taipan]

[Taipan]

[Ed Pawlowski]

Good is in the eyes of the beholder.

You may have noticed I've even replied to some of your posts recently.
There are times you are on topic, non critical and your question
deserves an answer. If someone want to be a part of the group and post
meaningful dialog, great. If they want to just agitate, piss on them.
Though there are still some times that, well . . .

The other reason, I'm not in favor of the troll's tactics to disrupt the
entire group because he does not like you, if that is the mission.
By replying, it answers your question and shows the troll we are not
going to be intimidated.

Easy enough to ignore or kill file someone if you don't want to
associate with them. Yes, land of the free.

[Jeßus]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:10:39 -0600, Hank Rogers <Ha...@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>> Talk to the troll. And if you don't want to be "denigrated" start by
>> not bitching about people you've killfiled. That's what cowards do.
>>
>
>It's much more enjoyable to bitch about you if you are kill filed.

I shouldn't take the bait, but:

"If you can't handle my posts, you can killfile me. No problem. I
sometimes killfile someone too. More often I just don't read their
posts"

Path: not-for-mail
From: Dave Smith <adavid...@sympatico.ca>
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
Subject: Re: Don't eat crap
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 07:37:29 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <ss4k2b$s0v$1...@dont-email.me>
References: <srvvfi$gaa$1...@dont-email.me>
<3734a3f6-9c03-4a04...@googlegroups.com>
<ss1n8a$fmi$3...@dont-email.me>
<04t8ugpp3eudubfsj...@4ax.com>
<ss31it$ue5$2...@dont-email.me> <ss3q11$i9f$1...@dont-email.me>
<ss4ab4$43v$3...@dont-email.me> <OdiFJ.225486$np6.1...@fx46.iad>
<ss4d1l$981$1...@dont-email.me> <_bjFJ.225494$np6....@fx46.iad>
<ss4f9k$oi7$1...@dont-email.me> <8NjFJ.303010$3q9....@fx47.iad>
<ss4i2e$jna$1...@dont-email.me> <uikFJ.225496$np6....@fx46.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:37:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="7373dbcadfb9f710dc450ea9495b3e5f";
logging-data="28703";
mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Vpi2t+Kg2Px5GYQRFhSB6"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8r8pcwsnyOg1GcbzOdbOL9kf1wI=
X-Received-Bytes: 2651

[Jeßus]

He hasn't changed from what I can see, apart from some transparent
attempts to engage people in a dialog by pretending to be interested
in something he isn't. He's not ever going to change, his raison
d'être would cease to exist on RFC if he did.

>The other reason, I'm not in favor of the troll's tactics to disrupt the
>entire group because he does not like you, if that is the mission.
>By replying, it answers your question and shows the troll we are not
>going to be intimidated.
>
>Easy enough to ignore or kill file someone if you don't want to
>associate with them. Yes, land of the free.

Yep.

[GM]

Lol...

--
GM

[Bryan Simmons]

On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:32:39 PM UTC-6, GM wrote:
>
Hey, Greg.
>
> --
> GM

--Bryan

[GM]

On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:32:39 PM UTC-6, GM wrote:
> >
> Hey, Greg.
> >

"You rang...???"

B-)

--
GM

[Bryan Simmons]

You know, I got to thinking about that picture Jill posted,
and one thing we must admit is that she had good teeth.
Heck, if she'd have been a horse, I'd have bought her. You
know, there'd be one big advantage to doing it with Jill,
over doing it with a horse.
>
> --
> GM

--Bryan

[GM]

bryang...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:48:59 PM UTC-6, GM wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:32:39 PM UTC-6, GM wrote:
> > > >
> > > Hey, Greg.
> > > >
> > "You rang...???"
> >
> You know, I got to thinking about that picture Jill posted,
> and one thing we must admit is that she had good teeth.
> Heck, if she'd have been a horse, I'd have bought her. You
> know, there'd be one big advantage to doing it with Jill,
> over doing it with a horse.

GAWD...!!!

;-D

--
GM

[Bryan Simmons]

Yep, you don't need a step stool to do it with Jill.
>
> --
> GM

--Bryan

[Dave Smith]

On 2022-02-15 4:20 p.m., Je�us wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:10:39 -0600, Hank Rogers <Ha...@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>> Talk to the troll. And if you don't want to be "denigrated" start by
>>> not bitching about people you've killfiled. That's what cowards do.
>>>
>>
>> It's much more enjoyable to bitch about you if you are kill filed.
>
> I shouldn't take the bait, but:
>
> "If you can't handle my posts, you can killfile me. No problem. I
> sometimes killfile someone too. More often I just don't read their
> posts"
>

I am glad you included the message source information that shows my
user name but coming from the asshole forger. Should I ask if it is
acceptable to talk trash about someone who is sending crap using my
name? Does that mean I am talking about me or about the asshole forging
my name.

[Roughscale Snake]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:59:49 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>You may have noticed I've even replied to some of your posts recently.
>There are times you are on topic, non critical and your question
>deserves an answer. If someone want to be a part of the group and post
>meaningful dialog, great. If they want to just agitate, piss on them.
> Though there are still some times that, well . . .

I don't just want to agitate, but people like Jill, Joan and Janet UK
behave like terrible bitches, and nobody says a word about it. I've
never seen such a dysfunctional group of people. In the only other
forum that I participate in, THEY would be ostracised.

>The other reason, I'm not in favor of the troll's tactics to disrupt the
>entire group because he does not like you, if that is the mission.

But trolls don't care. Casa Boner has a history of deranged,
antisocial behaviour and Greg Sorrow joins him and also has a nasty
history. They can't be fixed or corrected.

>By replying, it answers your question and shows the troll we are not
>going to be intimidated.

True.

>Easy enough to ignore or kill file someone if you don't want to
>associate with them. Yes, land of the free.

Yes, that's how it used to be and should be. Nobody should be forced
to read anybody else's posts. But that should be each individual's
decision.

[Roughscale Snake]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:25:03 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:59:49 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>
>>You may have noticed I've even replied to some of your posts recently.
>>There are times you are on topic, non critical and your question
>>deserves an answer. If someone want to be a part of the group and post
>>meaningful dialog, great. If they want to just agitate, piss on them.
>> Though there are still some times that, well . . .
>
>He hasn't changed from what I can see, apart from some transparent
>attempts to engage people in a dialog by pretending to be interested
>in something he isn't.

Huh? Lol, you're SO paranoid.

[Dave Smith]

On 2022-02-15 4:25 p.m., Je�us wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:59:49 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>

>> You may have noticed I've even replied to some of your posts recently.
>> There are times you are on topic, non critical and your question
>> deserves an answer. If someone want to be a part of the group and post
>> meaningful dialog, great. If they want to just agitate, piss on them.
>> Though there are still some times that, well . . .
>
> He hasn't changed from what I can see, apart from some transparent
> attempts to engage people in a dialog by pretending to be interested
> in something he isn't. He's not ever going to change, his raison
> d'être would cease to exist on RFC if he did.

I remember seeing someone responding to him and the quoted text included
an apology for having done that ( several months back). No one can say
that they saw me accept that apology. I might have if it had did it
once or twice, but he kept it up for an extended period, and I figured
he would probably do it again.

Sometimes people need to nyshift because they have convinced others that
they are assholes. To be constantly nymshifting is to admit that you
know that you are an asshole.

>
>> The other reason, I'm not in favor of the troll's tactics to disrupt the
>> entire group because he does not like you, if that is the mission.
>> By replying, it answers your question and shows the troll we are not
>> going to be intimidated.
>>
>> Easy enough to ignore or kill file someone if you don't want to
>> associate with them. Yes, land of the free.
>
> Yep.

Yeah but..... some people like to make asses of themselves by saying
things to piss people off and then have a hissy fit when people ignore
them.

[itsjoan...@webtv.net]

On Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 4:26:25 PM UTC-6, Roughscale Snake wrote:
>
> I don't just want to agitate, but people like Jill, Joan and Janet UK
> behave like terrible bitches, and nobody says a word about it. I've
> never seen such a dysfunctional group of people.
>

From Julie London to you; enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkD_kYkRk3c

[jmcquown]

On 2/15/2022 1:58 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2/15/2022 1:12 PM, Keelback wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:19:16 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>> What is sad, there are a couple of people taking the time to cause
>>> havoc.  Like him or not, Bruce is not leaving but what is gained by
>>> posting 50 to 75 posts under his name of the day?  OK, it may have been
>>> funny once but still?
>>
>> I can't believe that so many people don't understand why I'm doing it.
>> I don't do it because I think it's funny. I also don't do it to annoy.
>
> Only reason I can see is to drive off Bruce or have everyone ignore him.
>  It isn't working.  Your intentions may be good but results are dismal.
>
> If that is not correct, please explain.

The "intentions" are purely nymshifting trolling. We're back to
aioe.org again. Message source from your reply to both Keelback, % and
a few others:

In-Reply-To: <sugqdq$195l$1...@gioia.aioe.org>

Jill

[Hank Rogers]

jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/15/2022 1:58 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 2/15/2022 1:12 PM, Keelback wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:19:16 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is sad, there are a couple of people taking the time to cause

>>>> havoc.  Like him or not, Bruce is not leaving but what is
>>>> gained by
>>>> posting 50 to 75 posts under his name of the day?  OK, it may

>>>> have been
>>>> funny once but still?
>>>
>>> I can't believe that so many people don't understand why I'm
>>> doing it.
>>> I don't do it because I think it's funny. I also don't do it to
>>> annoy.
>>
>> Only reason I can see is to drive off Bruce or have everyone

>> ignore him.  Â It isn't working.  Your intentions may be good

>> but results are dismal.
>>
>> If that is not correct, please explain.
>
> The "intentions" are purely nymshifting trolling.  We're back to
> aioe.org again.  Message source from your reply to both Keelback, %
> and a few others:
>
> In-Reply-To: <sugqdq$195l$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
>
> Jill
>

Aioe really burns your ass. Are you planning a daily rant about
aioe every day, just like the good ole days?

[GM]

Naw, right now she's occupied with "backpedaling" about her mom's will and The Evil Brothers...

And also nagging Sheldon that sleeping on a waterbed is different than sleeping at sea...

--
GM

[Michael Trew]

Bruce's comprehension skills aren't very strong. I wasn't complaining
about him, I was complaining about his forger. I thought the quotation
marks around "bruce" were very obvious... perhaps the Dutch are too dense.

[GM]

If Miss Bwuthie were to vamoose, then "problem solved"...

She's the original - and biggest - troll and forger here...

She absolutely deserves *everything* she *gets*...

It's FUN to see her " squirm"...

--
GM

[Gary]

On 2/15/2022 5:26 PM, Roughscale Snake wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:59:49 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>
>> You may have noticed I've even replied to some of your posts recently.
>> There are times you are on topic, non critical and your question
>> deserves an answer. If someone want to be a part of the group and post
>> meaningful dialog, great. If they want to just agitate, piss on them.
>> Though there are still some times that, well . . .
>
> I don't just want to agitate, but people like Jill, Joan and Janet UK
> behave like terrible bitches, and nobody says a word about it.

Well, as you know, I'll comment occasionally but then they all gang up
on me and even some others join in too. All of the sudden they are nice
sweet ladies and I'm the mean rat that always picks on them. lol

[Ed Pawlowski]

On 2/15/2022 5:26 PM, Roughscale Snake wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:59:49 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>
>> You may have noticed I've even replied to some of your posts recently.
>> There are times you are on topic, non critical and your question
>> deserves an answer. If someone want to be a part of the group and post
>> meaningful dialog, great. If they want to just agitate, piss on them.
>> Though there are still some times that, well . . .
>
> I don't just want to agitate, but people like Jill, Joan and Janet UK
> behave like terrible bitches, and nobody says a word about it. I've
> never seen such a dysfunctional group of people. In the only other
> forum that I participate in, THEY would be ostracised.

Land of the Free. They have every right to be here. You just ignore
them if you don't like them. Not my job to watch their behavior.
Should not be your job either.

>
>> The other reason, I'm not in favor of the troll's tactics to disrupt the
>> entire group because he does not like you, if that is the mission.
>
> But trolls don't care. Casa Boner has a history of deranged,
> antisocial behaviour and Greg Sorrow joins him and also has a nasty
> history. They can't be fixed or corrected.
>
>> By replying, it answers your question and shows the troll we are not
>> going to be intimidated.
>
> True.
>
>> Easy enough to ignore or kill file someone if you don't want to
>> associate with them. Yes, land of the free.
>
> Yes, that's how it used to be and should be. Nobody should be forced
> to read anybody else's posts. But that should be each individual's
> decision.

Yet you bitch about a few that you feel should be ostracized.

[GM]

It is deliciously hilarious to me that I live in the head of some useless eater troll
puke like Miss Bwuthie...

"Greg Sorrow... also has a nasty history. [He] can't be fixed or corrected. "

;-)

--
GM

[Crowned Snake]

That's the Sisterhood for you :)

[Crowned Snake]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:54:02 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>On 2/15/2022 5:26 PM, Roughscale Snake wrote:
>
>> I don't just want to agitate, but people like Jill, Joan and Janet UK
>> behave like terrible bitches, and nobody says a word about it. I've
>> never seen such a dysfunctional group of people. In the only other
>> forum that I participate in, THEY would be ostracised.
>
>Land of the Free. They have every right to be here. You just ignore
>them if you don't like them. Not my job to watch their behavior.
>Should not be your job either.

Sure, but I have the right to comment. I don't "want to just agitate".

>>> Easy enough to ignore or kill file someone if you don't want to
>>> associate with them. Yes, land of the free.
>>
>> Yes, that's how it used to be and should be. Nobody should be forced
>> to read anybody else's posts. But that should be each individual's
>> decision.
>
>Yet you bitch about a few that you feel should be ostracized.

I never said that. If you're going to put words in my mouth, this
conversation is useless.

[Crowned Snake]

We Dutch have a saying about froggers like yoos, which is KILL YOURSELF
you loser. no friends no real job no money no sex and no hope for the
future. Loser. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[Crowned Snake]

[Crowned Snake]

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Pale Headed Snake]

> Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it

Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it

[Jeßus]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:29:37 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

The best part of all is his justifications for doing so, and at one
time I saw him claim he's some sort of legitimate 'contributor' here -
what? LOL.

>and then have a hissy fit when people ignore
>them.

Yes, he particularly seems to hate that. I see that ignoring and not
mentioning him at all doesn't work either.

[Jeßus]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 19:52:51 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Yes. Somebody either lost their ES account or found it too difficult
to get around their nym shifting policy.

I did contact ES about our friend, shortly after that he suddenly
switched to aioe. I got no reply from ES, so I don't know if they did
something or not because of my message.

[Pale Headed Snake]

[Olive Sea Snake]

Je�us wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 19:52:51 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/2022 1:58 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 2/15/2022 1:12 PM, Keelback wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:19:16 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is sad, there are a couple of people taking the time to cause
>>>>> havoc.  Like him or not, Bruce is not leaving but what is gained by
>>>>> posting 50 to 75 posts under his name of the day?  OK, it may have been
>>>>> funny once but still?
>>>>
>>>> I can't believe that so many people don't understand why I'm doing it.
>>>> I don't do it because I think it's funny. I also don't do it to annoy.
>>>
>>> Only reason I can see is to drive off Bruce or have everyone ignore him.
>>>  It isn't working.  Your intentions may be good but results are dismal.
>>>
>>> If that is not correct, please explain.
>>

>> The "intentionGhe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get its" are purely nymshifting trolling. We're back to

>> aioe.org again. Message source from your reply to both Keelback, % and
>> a few others:
>>
>> In-Reply-To: <sugqdq$195l$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
>
> Yes. Somebody either lost their ES account or found it too difficult
> to get around their nym shifting policy.
>
> I did contact ES about our friend, shortly after that he suddenly
> switched to aioe. I got no reply from ES, so I don't know if they did
> something or not because of my message.
>

[Olive Sea Snake]

[Banded Sea Snake]

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my not frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Banded Sea Snake]

[Dave Smith]

I can't vouch for that because it became obvious to me a long time ago
that his sole purpose here was to snipe at just about every post for the
posts in which he tried to defend the sisterhood of stupidity, which I
took as an indication that he thought they were too stupid to defend
themselves, or else he thought that their idiocy needed to be reinforced.

>> and then have a hissy fit when people ignore
>> them.
>
> Yes, he particularly seems to hate that. I see that ignoring and not
> mentioning him at all doesn't work either.

I can't speak to that either. I have no idea how often he posts or what
he is saying. I delete my filter log every few days. I sometimes have a
quick peek and notice that the Bruce filter is pretty active, but not as
active as the Kuthe and his detractors filter.

[Dave Smith]

On 2022-02-16 3:09 p.m., Je�us wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 19:52:51 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>

>>> If that is not correct, please explain.
>>
>> The "intentions" are purely nymshifting trolling. We're back to
>> aioe.org again. Message source from your reply to both Keelback, % and
>> a few others:
>>
>> In-Reply-To: <sugqdq$195l$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
>
> Yes. Somebody either lost their ES account or found it too difficult
> to get around their nym shifting policy.
>
> I did contact ES about our friend, shortly after that he suddenly
> switched to aioe. I got no reply from ES, so I don't know if they did
> something or not because of my message.

My multiple nastygrams to their abuse address must have become too hard
for them to ignore. Good to hear I was not the only one. It's hard to
understand how someone could take any pleasure in spending so much time
changing identities just to sneak past filters in order to be a pain in
the ass.

[Ed Pawlowski]

How do you interpret what you said? You said in the other group they
would be. You don't think they should be? You sure bitch about them
enough.

You may have noticed, a lot of people don't like you for that. They
have as much right to opinions and comments as you do.

If the conversation us useless, so be it. Meantime, the troll feeds on
you. And enjoys it.

[Mulga Snake]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:42:20 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>On 2/16/2022 1:37 PM, Crowned Snake wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 08:54:02 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Yet you bitch about a few that you feel should be ostracized.
>>
>> I never said that. If you're going to put words in my mouth, this
>> conversation is useless.
>
>How do you interpret what you said? You said in the other group they
>would be. You don't think they should be? You sure bitch about them
>enough.

Personally, I don't think anybody should be kicked out or ostracised.

>You may have noticed, a lot of people don't like you for that. They
>have as much right to opinions and comments as you do.

Of course. Did I ever deny that?

>If the conversation us useless, so be it. Meantime, the troll feeds on
>you. And enjoys it.

I don't have a problem with the current situation.

[Hank Rogers]

Ed, are you trying to undermine our master druce ?

He has a certain amount of dignity, and will fight till the end. He
has previously claimed that this NG is "a big part of my life".
Indeed, he's made it his whole life, as he has no other.

You can't fix his life any more than kuth's, but it's good you are
trying. You're a good man ed.

Right now our master is a snake, but tomorrow he will be a
platypus. Or a type of nematode. Next week, some plant or weed.

It will take a long time for this psychopath to cycle back to a
simple dutch ass sniffer.

[Mulga Snake]

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 7:31:20 PM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org wrote:
> Easily FAKED!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
You were only gone for 2 days.

[Bryan Simmons]

I was hoping for both platypus and echidna. He also hasn't
used the more commonly known marsupials, and who doesn't
like a cuddly koala?

--Bryan

[Mulga Snake]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:45:09 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
<bryang...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 4:14:05 PM UTC-6, Hank Rogers wrote:
>
>> Ed, are you trying to undermine our master druce ?
>>
>> He has a certain amount of dignity, and will fight till the end. He
>> has previously claimed that this NG is "a big part of my life".
>> Indeed, he's made it his whole life, as he has no other.
>

Lol, I never said that.

>
>> You can't fix his life any more than kuth's, but it's good you are
>> trying. You're a good man ed.
>>
>> Right now our master is a snake, but tomorrow he will be a
>> platypus. Or a type of nematode. Next week, some plant or weed.
>>
>I was hoping for both platypus and echidna. He also hasn't
>used the more commonly known marsupials, and who doesn't
>like a cuddly koala?
>

I used the echidna, but not the platypus yet. I'm making an exception,
because I'm currently in my snake phase.

[Hank Rogers]

No matter his avatar, when our master gets close, you will smell
shit and recognize the dutchman's presence.

[Platypus]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:45:09 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
<bryang...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, February 16, 2022 at 4:14:05 PM UTC-6, Hank Rogers wrote:
>
>> Ed, are you trying to undermine our master druce ?
>>
>> He has a certain amount of dignity, and will fight till the end. He
>> has previously claimed that this NG is "a big part of my life".
>> Indeed, he's made it his whole life, as he has no other.
>

Lol I never said that.

>
>> You can't fix his life any more than kuth's, but it's good you are
>> trying. You're a good man ed.
>>
>> Right now our master is a snake, but tomorrow he will be a
>> platypus. Or a type of nematode. Next week, some plant or weed.
>>
>I was hoping for both platypus and echidna. He also hasn't
>used the more commonly known marsupials, and who doesn't
>like a cuddly koala?
>

[Bryan Simmons]

Apparently I was not sufficiently observant.

--Bryan

[jmcquown]

On 2/16/2022 3:09 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 19:52:51 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/2022 1:58 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 2/15/2022 1:12 PM, Keelback wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:19:16 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is sad, there are a couple of people taking the time to cause
>>>>> havoc.  Like him or not, Bruce is not leaving but what is gained by
>>>>> posting 50 to 75 posts under his name of the day?  OK, it may have been
>>>>> funny once but still?
>>>>
>>>> I can't believe that so many people don't understand why I'm doing it.
>>>> I don't do it because I think it's funny. I also don't do it to annoy.
>>>
>>> Only reason I can see is to drive off Bruce or have everyone ignore him.
>>>  It isn't working.  Your intentions may be good but results are dismal.
>>>
>>> If that is not correct, please explain.
>>
>> The "intentions" are purely nymshifting trolling. We're back to
>> aioe.org again. Message source from your reply to both Keelback, % and
>> a few others:
>>
>> In-Reply-To: <sugqdq$195l$1...@gioia.aioe.org>
>
> Yes. Somebody either lost their ES account or found it too difficult
> to get around their nym shifting policy.
>

At one point after the last influx of constant shifting and a lot of
complaints, AIOE disallowed posting to RFC. That's when the shift to ES
occurred. Must have been a temporary suspension because yes, the posts
appear to be again originating from AIOE based on the ones I saw Ed
reply to (each with different "from" nyms.)

> I did contact ES about our friend, shortly after that he suddenly
> switched to aioe. I got no reply from ES, so I don't know if they did
> something or not because of my message.

Beats me. I do know my aioe filters have kept on working so the efforts
of the one(s) trying to skirt around them are wasting their time. I'm
merely providing info. :)

Jill

[Dave Smith]

Sadly, he is not the only one who has a desperate need for attention
or perhaps is a need to act like an asshole. I just checked my RFC
traffic for the last 24 hours. There were 116 new messages in the RFC
folder. My filter log shows 218 that got filtered out.

[Hank Rogers]

AIOE is truly an uncomfortable Knot in your panties.

Might be a good time to buy some new drawers granny.

[Wallaby]

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 7:31:20 PM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org wrote:
> Easily FAKED!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

RIBBIT :-)

[Bryan Simmons]

Like you provided your teenage photo to assist John
with his Sunday pleasures.

> >
> > Jill
> AIOE is truly an uncomfortable Knot in your panties.
>
> Might be a good time to buy some new drawers granny.
>

I would suggest that she sell the old ones to Kuthe,
because panties are a lot more fun when you can
connect a face with them, but with his huge electric
bills I doubt that he could afford such niceties.

--Bryan

[Trurtle-Headed Sea Snake]

On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 7:31:20 PM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org wrote:
> Easily FAKED!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

I do not have a Bessemer Aluminum purification machine in my house!

But I have a $859.03 BILL TO PAY!

:-(

[Jeßus]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:16:36 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

The sheer amount of time he spend on this group pretty much says it
all. From what I can see - at all hours of the day, that's not right
for any sane person.

[Jeßus]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:11:09 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

I have his posts marked as read using filters, so I can go and check
any time. He seems to be posting at all hours of the day. What kind of
sleeping pattern does that entail? What kind of personality does that?

[Jeßus]

Don't you just love the hypocrisy? He has absolutely no self awareness
of his double standards.

[Trurtle-Headed Sea Snake]

[Jeßus]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:32:02 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

Indeed. Speculating somewhat, but the troll could be casa boner,
somebody Bruce used to talk to, even though the rest of us naturally
had it killfiled. That would be a bit of irony, if true.

[joe]

In article <2m6t0h5dar8fiiqqe...@j.net>, j...@j.net says...

> I have his posts marked as read using filters, so I can go and check
> any time. He seems to be posting at all hours of the day. What kind of
> sleeping pattern does that entail? What kind of personality does that?
>

He spends the same amount of time that GM spends in here,
coincidence? I think not.

[Turtle-Headed Sea Snake]

Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it

[Turtle-Headed Sea Snake]

[Turtle-Headed Sea Snake]

[Turtle-Headed Sea Snake]

[Turtle-Headed Sea Snake]

[Jeßus]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 18:42:15 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Bruce also used to use a paid server...

THEN, when he started this constant nym-shifting and forging Dave
Smith - he suddenly switched to E-S and now AIOE.

I wonder why he stopped using his paid server - could it be his
behavior violates Usenet etiquette that has been long established.
Yes, he KNOWS he's doing the wrong thing, despite his bullshit
protestations.

[Jeßus]

Oy vey... I guess it's possible. That would make the clone-troll/Bruce
even worse. Then again, I'm posting at the same time sometimes too.
Hmm... :)

[GM]

Lol...

;)

--
GM

[Leaf-scaled Sea Snake]

[Leaf-scaled Sea Snake]

[Leaf-scaled Sea Snake]

[Horned Sea Snake]

[Horned Sea Snake]

[Horned Sea Snake]

[Horned Sea Snake]