"Gary" <
g.ma...@att.net> wrote in message news:5F351E39...@att.net...
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "Gary" wrote:
>> > Nothing wrong with RevereWare.
>>
>> There's a lot wrong with the new stuff!
>
> How new are you talking about, Julie?
I bought a pan probably a year ago. It came with a loose handle.
>
> Most of my revereware is from the mid-70s
> up to the mid-80s and are nice.
My original set was late 70's. The two quart pan had to be replaced in the
mid 80's because a burner on my stove went wacko. It massively overheated,
made a noise like a Whistling Pete, then the end shot off and shot a hole
through my pan, skittering across the ceiling and leaving burn marks.
My brother bought me a new one that was a double boiler. Instead of having
two pans, it came with a metal bowl. I still have the bowl.
Both the first set and the other pan were fine until the handles went bad
from putting them in the dishwasher. Actually the newer pan wasn't as bad as
I had no dishwasher in that apartment.
I bought a new set in NY, so around 2004 or 2005. The quality wasn't so
great then.
>
> My newest piece is an 8-quart pot (with lid)
> that I bought in 1990 or so.
>
> I always cooked soup and spaghetti sauce in a 5-quart
> pot and always filled it up too high. So I bought an
> 8-quart one so I would have room to spare in a large
> batch of something.
>
> That didn't work. As soon as I started using the larger
> pot, I made more and still filled it up. oh well.
I have that problem with soup. It's hard for me to make a small pot of soup.
>
> Anyway, 8-quart pot of anything is fine for me. I'd never
> buy a 16 or 24 quart Navy surplus pot.
I think my Dutch Oven is a 4 quart. That can even be too much for me.