America needs to send another man to the Moon.

Reporter

unread,

Mar 29, 2019, 5:20:28 PM3/29/19

to

America needs to send another man to the Moon. Its been about 50 years
since we last sent men to the moon. So it's time to do it again.

Lets do this immediately.

The man most deserving of this privledge is Donald Trump.
Besides that, the moon needs a wall between the northern and southern
parts to keep the aliens separated.

I suggest we send Trump and leave him up there for 50 years so he has
time to build that wall.

A Moose in Love

unread,

Mar 29, 2019, 5:51:01 PM3/29/19

to

some alternative media suggests that man never did go to the moon. i don't agree. it would be extremely difficult or impossible to fool all of the scientists/engineers/technicians involved. the conTheorists mention the van allen radiation belt as being impassable. the mainstream says different.

Ed Pawlowski

unread,

Mar 29, 2019, 6:50:57 PM3/29/19

to

There is, however, hard evidence the world is flat.
https://imgur.com/gallery/nJuMfYV

Jeßus

unread,

Mar 29, 2019, 7:26:10 PM3/29/19

to

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:50:52 -0400, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>There is, however, hard evidence the world is flat.
>https://imgur.com/gallery/nJuMfYV

What nonsense. Those arguments are easy to refute with just one
comment: https://i.postimg.cc/RhcxSGFz/catflat.jpg

jmcquown

unread,

Mar 29, 2019, 7:52:44 PM3/29/19

to

This is an absolutely ridiculous thread. :)

Jill

Bruce

unread,

Mar 29, 2019, 7:59:20 PM3/29/19

to

The proof that the moon landing was fake is that there was an empty
coca cola can laying on the ground where the big step for mankind
happened.

Ophelia

unread,

Mar 30, 2019, 7:47:35 AM3/30/19

to

"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message news:fjxnE.207761$f85.1...@fx34.iad...

==

lol totally mad:))

cshenk

unread,

Mar 31, 2019, 2:30:10 PM3/31/19

to

+1

Bruce

unread,

Mar 31, 2019, 2:39:48 PM3/31/19

to

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 18:50:52 -0400, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

So you're saying that, if the earth was round, the US and Europe would
be under water.

dsi1

unread,

Mar 31, 2019, 3:55:57 PM3/31/19

to

It seems fairly obvious to me that China will be then next country to fake a manned landing on the moon. Of course, they'll have to do better than the Americans and fake a landing on the dark side of the moon. :)

Bruce

unread,

Mar 31, 2019, 4:07:59 PM3/31/19

to

That's too easy. Nobody can see the coca cola can on the dark side.

Cindy Hamilton

unread,

Mar 31, 2019, 5:34:18 PM3/31/19

to

On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 5:20:28 PM UTC-4, Reporter wrote:

> America needs to send another man to the Moon. Its been about 50 years
> since we last sent men to the moon. So it's time to do it again.

Mmmm. Space Food Sticks.

Cindy Hamilton

Leonard Blaisdell

unread,

Apr 1, 2019, 8:23:18 PM4/1/19

to

In article <38f559bd-9131-45b4...@googlegroups.com>,

dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:

> It seems fairly obvious to me that China will be then next country to fake a
> manned landing on the moon. Of course, they'll have to do better than the
> Americans and fake a landing on the dark side of the moon. :)

When the U.S. faked our landings on the Moon, nobody had even heard of
computer generated images or CGI for the cognoscenti. I expect that the
Chinese could even convince the gullible among us of meeting two or
three Predators and possibly even Megatron. They might even land on the
Sun.

leo

A Moose in Love

unread,

Apr 1, 2019, 8:49:37 PM4/1/19

to

some say that the van allen radiation belt prohibits travel to the moon and mars. are the mars non manned landings also a hoax? according to those that believe in this theory, the radBelt damages electronics. what about the voyager space probes?
here's an excerpt from the link below:
The astronauts on the ISS do not regularly spend time inside the belts, but from time to time solar storms expand the belts to the orbit of the space station. In the 1960s, several Apollo crews went through the Van Allen belts on their way to and from the moon. Their time in that radiation-intensive region, however, was very short, in part because the trajectory was designed to pass through the thinnest known parts. With more study, astronauts can be better protected for long-term stays in Earth orbit.
Advertisement

"We study radiation belts because they pose a hazard to spacecraft and astronauts," said David Sibeck, the Van Allen Probes mission scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, in an August 2016 NASA statement. "If you knew how bad the radiation could get, you would build a better spacecraft to accommodate that."

Newer findings from the probes show that radiation in certain zones may be less harsh than scientists thought. In March 2017, the Van Allen Probes made a finding showing there is less radiation in the inner belts that previously theorized, which means less shielding is required for spacecraft and satellites in that region. The most energetic electrons residing in the inner radiation belt are there for less time than scientists thought beforehand.

https://www.space.com/33948-van-allen-radiation-belts.html

dsi1

unread,

Apr 1, 2019, 8:51:36 PM4/1/19

to

Landing on the sun would be quite an achievement for the Chinese. The important part is that they'll have to make a landing at night or during a total eclipse.

Leonard Blaisdell

unread,

Apr 1, 2019, 10:32:04 PM4/1/19

to

In article <61e6a01f-6068-43f0...@googlegroups.com>, A

Moose in Love <parkstre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> some say that the van allen radiation belt prohibits travel to the moon and
> mars. are the mars non manned landings also a hoax? according to those that
> believe in this theory, the radBelt damages electronics. what about the
> voyager space probes?

<snip>

How does one write a parody or burlesque anymore without a winkey? I
thought my ludicrous post was obviously one or the other.
So, Moose, I didn't believe a word I wrote.

leo

A Moose in Love

unread,

Apr 2, 2019, 8:35:50 AM4/2/19

to

ok. i should have figured it with the sun landing by the chinese bit.

jmcquown

unread,

Apr 2, 2019, 6:40:01 PM4/2/19

to

Space age Gogurt! ;)

Jill

jmcquown

unread,

Apr 3, 2019, 9:22:33 AM4/3/19

to

LOL :)

Jill