OT: "Bruce" Is Forging Dave Smith Again

[GM]

FYI, here is what he last wrote in the "Killfile 'Arnie' aka 'Bruce' " thread, for
those of you have him killfiled:

"But some people, like Michael, love to show off their killfile.
They'll tell us who are in there, who they've just recently added etc.
They find themselves very interesting.

This is NOT a post by Dave Smith..."

</>

[Jeßus]

What do you mean 'again'? Really?? Wow, what a low-life turd he really
is. I see the headers, seems like it is Bruce. Not acceptable under
any circumstances, even worse when you consider both persons are long
standing here. Just shows the total lack of any respect or integrity.

[Dave Smith]

RFC, for all your double standards :)

--

[GM]

She used the "Dave Smith" moniker last year, using it thousands of posts...

Yes, pretty pathetic...

--
GM

[dsi1]

GM is playing you guys like a violin. It's totally awesome to watch!

[Dave Smith]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 14:26:22 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net>
wrote:

Yes, the moral indignation! Headed by GM of all people! People are so
incredibly stupid here.

--

[GM]

“I’ll have no purpose save to keep you contented. To lie, to flatter you, to praise you, to inflate your vanity.”

;-D

--
GM

[Michael Trew]

Yes, I saw that. What a POS. There's no excuse for such childish
behavior. Go somewhere that you are wanted.

[Michael Trew]

Bruce did apologize afterward, but what a pathetic way to attempt to be
seen, again.

[Michael Trew]

Are you suggesting that Greg is pretending to be Bruce forging Dave
Smith's posts...? That seems a bit out there.

[GM]

To "quote" Joan:

@@ <<<---- rolling eyes


Lol...

--
GM

[dsi1]

I just goes to show you that you don't have to be smart or clever to make fools of rfc'ers - but being clinically insane seems to help.

[Dave Smith]

Are you really not able to see that Greg Sorrow started all this? He's
the main frogger. And then he goes "Oh no, Bruce is frogging Dave!".
And all you dumbasses fall for it :)

--

[Dave Smith]

What's the point of posting here if nobody sees it?

--

[Dave Smith]

No. Greg's been forging me (Bruce) so badly that everybody killfiled
me. So in order to still be visible, I'm now forging Dave. Greg
doesn't want everybody to killfile Dave, so I'm now visible under
cover of my good friend Dave.

--

[GM]

Lol, the latest from Miss Bwuthie:

“>Yes, I saw that. What a POS. There's no excuse for such childish

>behavior. Go somewhere that you are wanted.

Are you really not able to see that Greg Sorrow started all this? He's
the main frogger. And then he goes "Oh no, Bruce is frogging Dave!".
And all you dumbasses fall for it :)

>Are you suggesting that Greg is pretending to be Bruce forging Dave
>Smith's posts...? That seems a bit out there.
>

No. Greg's been forging me (Bruce) so badly that everybody killfiled
me. So in order to still be visible, I'm now forging Dave. Greg
doesn't want everybody to killfile Dave, so I'm now visible under

cover of my good friend Dave…"

</>

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 14:09:36 -0800 (PST), GM

I guess I underestimated how weak he really is.

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 14:26:22 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi...@hawaiiantel.net>
wrote:

Oh, please... google groups boy thinks has it all figured out. There's
at least 4 by my estimation. Meanwhile, you're silent on Bruce forging
Dave. Why am I not surprised.

[Dave Smith]

There are 3. My guess is that Greg's 2 of them.

>Meanwhile, you're silent on Bruce forging Dave. Why am I not surprised.

It's the only way to remain visible. It could also have been somebody
else than Dave. (I don't expect you to understand it.)

--

[dsi1]

Sorry, you best better be doing your own whining.

[itsjoan...@webtv.net]

On 1/6/2022 5:26 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> GM is playing you guys like a violin. It's totally awesome to watch!
>

Nailed it! His puppet show is in full swing.

[Dave Smith]

I think she is secretly in love with me. She keeps saying how boring
and narrow I am but then acts desperately to get my attention.

[Dave Smith]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 20:13:48 -0800 (PST), GM

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))
--

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 09:28:59 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-07 1:25 a.m., Je?us wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 14:09:36 -0800 (PST), GM
>> <gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> She used the "Dave Smith" moniker last year, using it thousands of posts...
>>>
>>> Yes, pretty pathetic...
>>
>> I guess I underestimated how weak he really is.
>
>I think she is secretly in love with me.

Seems like those who ignore him the most also lives in his head the
most...

>She keeps saying how boring
>and narrow I am but then acts desperately to get my attention.

Everything it does here is either trolling or sucking up to somebody
in a vacuous kind of way (ie, Ophelia).

Any threads started? Nope. Just trolling/sniping replies all the time.

Discusses food for the sake of food? Nope.

Nym-shifting, forging others? Yep.

By definition, he's just a trolling asshole. A very narrow-minded,
bigoted one at that.

[jmcquown]

On 1/7/2022 5:21 PM, Je�us wrote:
> Any threads started? Nope. Just trolling/sniping replies all the time.
>
> Discusses food for the sake of food? Nope.
>

Sorry, have you missed the food related posts Janet US, Ed, Graham and I
and a few others have started?

Jill

[Dave Smith]

I don't think he said that. I think he was referring to Bruce's lack of
contribution to the topic.

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:21:46 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 09:28:59 -0500, Dave Smith
><adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>On 2022-01-07 1:25 a.m., Je?us wrote:
>>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 14:09:36 -0800 (PST), GM
>>> <gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> She used the "Dave Smith" moniker last year, using it thousands of posts...
>>>>
>>>> Yes, pretty pathetic...
>>>
>>> I guess I underestimated how weak he really is.
>>
>>I think she is secretly in love with me.
>
>Seems like those who ignore him the most also lives in his head the
>most...

Oh, stop talking about me. I'm not that important.

--

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:26:36 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 1/7/2022 5:21 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> Any threads started? Nope. Just trolling/sniping replies all the time.
>>
>> Discusses food for the sake of food? Nope.
>>
>
>Sorry, have you missed the food related posts Janet US, Ed, Graham and I
>and a few others have started?

No.

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:33:21 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-07 5:26 p.m., jmcquown wrote:

>> On 1/7/2022 5:21 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> Any threads started? Nope. Just trolling/sniping replies all the time.
>>>
>>> Discusses food for the sake of food? Nope.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, have you missed the food related posts Janet US, Ed, Graham and I
>> and a few others have started?
>>
>
>I don't think he said that.

I'm giving Jill the chance to elaborate, if she would like to.

>I think he was referring to Bruce's lack of
>contribution to the topic.

Yes.

[Dave Smith]

Oh we know, but you seem to think you are.

[jmcquown]

So sorry if I misunderstood! I think we can all agree the Bruces don't
talk about food unless it is to denigrate food others eat.

Jill

[jmcquown]

I apologise for the misinterpretation. You're right, of course. The
Bruces are not here because of anything food or cooking related.

Jill

[jmcquown]

Sorry! I've noticed your food posts, too, BTW. :)

Jill

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:15:32 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

That's OK. I haven't posted all that much about food lately, I gave up
trying to be on topic in NGs years ago. I just go with the flow.

[Dave Smith]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:06:19 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 1/7/2022 5:33 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2022-01-07 5:26 p.m., jmcquown wrote:

>>> On 1/7/2022 5:21 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> Any threads started? Nope. Just trolling/sniping replies all the time.
>>>>
>>>> Discusses food for the sake of food? Nope.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, have you missed the food related posts Janet US, Ed, Graham and
>>> I and a few others have started?
>>>
>>
>> I don't think he said that. I think he was referring to Bruce's lack of
>> contribution to the topic.
>>
>>
>So sorry if I misunderstood! I think we can all agree the Bruces don't
>talk about food unless it is to denigrate food others eat.

Let's test that. What are you eating today?

--

[Dave Smith]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:09:26 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Why do you think I picked this group in 2013 or so? Because it's a
food group, of course.

--

[Dave Smith]

On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:15:32 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

If you like my drawing, I like your drawing too :)

--

[Dave Smith]

And your flow's John Kuthe. Ok, today it's me, but normally it's John
Kuthe.

--

[jmcquown]

Dipshit, don't you know how to read new posts?

Jill

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 02:19:10 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>

Well, there are days when I don't read everything you write.

[jmcquown]

Well, not-Dave, I'm not really interested in what you write. Forgers
are LAME.

Jill

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 02:44:33 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>

wrote:

>On 1/8/2022 2:21 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 02:19:10 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/8/2022 1:17 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:06:19 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So sorry if I misunderstood! I think we can all agree the Bruces don't
>>>>> talk about food unless it is to denigrate food others eat.
>>>>
>>>> Let's test that. What are you eating today?
>>>>
>>> Dipshit, don't you know how to read new posts?
>>
>> Well, there are days when I don't read everything you write.
>>
>Well, not-Dave, I'm not really interested in what you write. Forgers
>are LAME.

I agree.

[itsjoan...@webtv.net]

Hey Jilldoe, he's talking about Bruce so don't get your panties in a wad.

[Bryan Simmons]

Is this one of those, "I'll show you mine..." things?

--Bryan

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 02:48:06 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
<bryang...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Saturday, January 8, 2022 at 12:18:36 AM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:15:32 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>> >On 1/7/2022 6:02 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:26:36 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 1/7/2022 5:21 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >>>> Any threads started? Nope. Just trolling/sniping replies all the time.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Discusses food for the sake of food? Nope.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry, have you missed the food related posts Janet US, Ed, Graham and I
>> >>> and a few others have started?
>> >>
>> >> No.
>> >>
>> >Sorry! I've noticed your food posts, too, BTW. :)
>
>> If you like my drawing, I like your drawing too :)
>>

>Is this one of those, "I'll show you mine..." things?
>

Yes, I think so :)

[Dave Smith]

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 17:17:49 +1100, Dave Smith

<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:09:26 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On 1/7/2022 6:04 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 17:33:21 -0500, Dave Smith
>>> <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2022-01-07 5:26 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> On 1/7/2022 5:21 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> Any threads started? Nope. Just trolling/sniping replies all the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Discusses food for the sake of food? Nope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, have you missed the food related posts Janet US, Ed, Graham and I
>>>>> and a few others have started?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't think he said that.
>>>
>>> I'm giving Jill the chance to elaborate, if she would like to.
>>>
>>>> I think he was referring to Bruce's lack of
>>>> contribution to the topic.
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>I apologise for the misinterpretation. You're right, of course. The
>>Bruces are not here because of anything food or cooking related.
>
>Why do you think I picked this group in 2013 or so? Because it's a
>food group, of course.

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 02:19:10 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Dave Smith]

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Dave Smith]

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 02:48:06 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
<bryang...@gmail.com> wrote:

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[itsjoan...@webtv.net]

JILLDOE??? That was low froggy, very low.

[Dave Smith]

I prefer McGossip these days.

[Dave Smith]

On Sat, 8 Jan 2022 14:36:42 -0800 (PST), "itsjoan...@webtv.net"
<itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote:

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Bruce]

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:31:50 -0800 (PST), GM
<gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>FYI, here is what he last wrote in the "Killfile 'Arnie' aka 'Bruce' " thread, for
>those of you have him killfiled:
>
>"But some people, like Michael, love to show off their killfile.
>They'll tell us who are in there, who they've just recently added etc.
>They find themselves very interesting.
>
>This is NOT a post by Dave Smith..."
>
></>
Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it