On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 19:22:11 -0400, Dave Smith
<
adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>On 2020-08-07 6:39 p.m., Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:30:36 -0500, Hank Rogers <
Nos...@invalid.com>
>
>>> It is real enough, but so far it hasn't put a damper on your hobby.
>>
>> Such an inane comment from our resident faux SJW. Partisan politics is
>> for morons.
>
>I can't disagree with that. It just seems to be so much more polarized
>these days than it was before.
Some will laugh, but I blame social media algorithms. If you
understand how they actually work in this context, it goes a long way
to explaining the inanity we have to deal with now.
> Period. I see little difference between partisan politics
>> and religion, or cults. No nuance is permitted and these idiots have a
>> Pavlovian response to any given politicised issue. But it gives them a
>> sense of comfort, so they don't have to question or challenge their
>> own perceptions and beliefs, ever.
>
>Exactly. Give then an inch and they can flip out on a whole string of
>issues and assume attitudes.
What's fascinating to watch has been the Democrat's nomination
process, how it has panned out this year and the current situation.
I've been saying for months that Biden is merely a placeholder,
because the process didn't go the way the bought-and-paid-for
establishment had hoped for. They had a couple of very good potential
candidates, but they were not shills for the establishment. So they
went for Biden in the interim, I'm sure they had no intention of
relying on Biden to take charge and be in control of the presidency,
at the very least they can have a VP in charge (who of course is a
whore for the establishment).
The Democrat elite would rather lose the election than have a
legitimately elected presidential candidate who isn't a 'team player'
for the elite. The Dems put Trump into office in the first place, and
now it looks like they may do it again.