Ah yes, shrewish Lucrezia is back to flagrantly abuse the group's
_cooking_ charter yet again!
At the drop of hat, eh canucklehead?
Shall we post a lengthy indictment of the Marxist Tru-dumb's lunacies in
office?
How long till his own abuse charges come out?
http://winnipegsun.com/2017/07/13/trudeau-risks-womens-safety-for-votes/wcm/ce91e2b4-a83f-41ba-bce0-1f82ff12ffb3
Justin Trudeau claims his government has the best interests of women as
a central pillar of their reign. Yet, sadly, a recent federal policy
change on spousal immigration calls into question the validity of
Trudeau’s claim. The new policy suggests he is more interested in
getting votes through identity politics than protecting women.
Overseas marriages — requiring one of the couple needing a visa to stay
in Canada with their spouse — provide difficult situations for western
democracies. With arranged marriages the norm in India, a Canadian
marrying an East Indian can raise questions as to the validity of the
marriage bond. In many cases the couple has spent little, if any, time
together before marrying.
In the U.S., the U.K., Australia and New Zealand, immigrant spouses are
granted conditional visas, becoming unconditional only after two years.
Why? The time requirement better ensures marriages are legitimate. Even
more importantly, it protects women who find themselves in abusive
marriages. If a woman suffers abuse within the two-year period, her
husband has his visa revoked and sent back to India. While the two-year
test rule deals with out-right marriage fraud, more frequently it is
used to protect women who sponsored their husband only to be abused.
In 2011, the Canadian government finally adopted two-year conditional
visas for immigrant spouses, the international standard. While Canada’s
adoption of the two-year test only brought us into line with other
developed countries seeking to protect women, the change was met with
outrage, largely by older men of East Indian backgrounds.
Canada’s revised rules also provided wives from overseas relief from
being abused by Canadian husbands. Separated foreign wives leaving
arranged marriages escaped abuse and allowed to remain in Canada. But,
after the two- year test was introduced (to protect women), dozens of
articles appeared in the Indo-Canadian press claiming the government’s
new rules were not needed and ‘hurt’ women. The opposite was true, the
new rule protected women.
After this positive change was enacted in 2011, hundreds of false and or
abusive foreign male spouses had their visas to stay in Canada revoked,
returning them to their home country while leaving their wives here and
safe. Before the new rules came into force, there were countless stories
of cases of marriages where male immigrant spouses walked away from
their new Canadian wives after arriving (to stay) in Canada. (Either
abused or a victim of fraud, distraught new wives often didn’t know
their husband before marrying them.)
The Trudeau government then responded to fiery male-orientated
opposition by repealing the new two-year test, removing conditions to
spousal visas. Once again, women were the losers. The cause of their
loss: an outcry by males from segments of the Indo-Canadian community.
Trudeau’s government, pandering for votes at the cost of no longer
protecting women, should be ashamed. Sadly, doing what is right — the
protection now revoked — takes a back seat to playing identity politics
for hoped-for Liberal votes.
Immigration officers and consultants express deep disappointment of
Trudeau’s reversal. Most work hard to protect women from abusive and
fraudulent marriages. An important tool, the two-year test, was taken
away, once again it is much harder to protect the vulnerable.
So much for our self-described feminist Prime Minister.
— Graham Lane leads Manitoba Forward (
manitobaforward.ca).