On 2020-05-18 12:44 p.m., Gary wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>>
>> At any rate, I gather that the reason for testing so many people is to
>> help track the sources. If they get people who are recently infected it
>> is easier for them to trace their contacts and find the others who may
>> have contracted it and get them into isolation before they pass it on.
>
> This virus is everywhere.
> No avoiding those little evil ones forever no matter what
> precautions are taken, imo. Sooner or later it will
> get you too.
>
> The healther people won't get too sick or even know they
> get it...minor symptoms. Others will get very sick
> like any virus can make you feel (I've had a few)
> and recover after a few very miserable days.
> And as always, any virus will kill off some weaker
> people with bad health issues to start with.
Not all of the healthy people survive. I knew one who seemed to be in
great shape and he died of it. It has become an issue in our town
because he and another town council member were at a council meeting in
person when they could have done it online. He came down with the virus
and died. The other guy manages a grocery store and he ended up testing
positive and had been going to work.
People in town are furious with him and business in his store has
dropped off to almost nothing. They are blaming him for the other guys
death, assuming that he had passed it on at the meeting, and that he
might have passed it on to his staff and customers.
He eventually released a statement in which he claimed to have been
contacted by public health and to tell him he had been in contact with
someone who had it. He immediately self isolated and got tested and was
told he had had it and was good to go back to work.
>
> Many of the risky people are the main ones to get
> flu shots each year. This virus has no vaccination
> yet so it's killing more weak people than usual.
It is wiping out large numbers of people in nursing homes and retirement
homes. In some cases half the residents of the homes have died.
>
> All of the stastics reported are not quite accurate either.
> The numbers used are correct but they don't report all the
> numbers that should be taken into consideration.
>
> The USA is in a major hypochondria meltdown, imo.
>
I don't think it is hypochondria at all. If anything, the problem is
the inconsistency of the information we we getting about symptoms and
how to avoid it, whether to wear a mask or not. When there are so many
unknowns and the consequences are so severe, you cannot be too careful.