OT - seriously- bored with forgers and trolls?

[Kelly O'Hara]

Are you as bored with forgers and trolls on RFC as I am?

Take break and see if you're smarter than a fourth grader.
https://my.uscis.gov/en/prep/test/civics/view
"Welcome to the 2008 Civics Practice Test!"

--
That's 10 minutes of my life I won't get back.

[Bruce]

It’s tempting to blame demographic defections on culture-war stupidity like the insistent use of loathed words
like “Latinx,” but that’s just a symptom of the real problem: Democrats under Biden have become the party of
the nomenklatura. Their base is the slice of hyper-educated, jargon-spouting bureaucrats whose ranks are
growing thanks to their skill at siphoning resources to themselves before they have a chance to reach a
wider base of regular people:

'There are plenty of workers in America, it's just that many are occupied at Soviet style bureaucratic nonsense, like
health insurance, management consulting, university administration, hospital billing, etc. Private equity has 100k
workers earning large salaries doing arson.'

These new commissars are the most hated people in the country, and they’re the Democrats’ main constituency.

Every species of viper and corporate parasite is swimming in riches now, from tax-evading private equity titans to
the oil & gas CEOs who are right now gouging everyone, to old pals in the banking sector (Goldman’s just-announced
special 1% bonus celebrating last year’s record $27 billion profit was a nice touch), all thriving but lionized so long
as they mask appropriately and genuflect to “norms.”

Meanwhile, the party increasingly demonizes every species of complaining underclass person as a right-wing enemy, even the minorities.

[Gary]

On 1/19/2022 5:09 PM, Kelly O'Hara wrote:
> Are you as bored with forgers and trolls on RFC as I am?
>
> Take break and see if you're smarter than a fourth grader.
> https://my.uscis.gov/en/prep/test/civics/view
> "Welcome to the 2008 Civics Practice Test!"
>

That was fun to do. I scored 80%.

[Cindy Hamilton]

I guess you're not smarter than a fourth grader. I scored 100%.

Cindy Hamilton

[Gary]

So you're a 4th grader? :)

[Ophelia]

lol

[Cindy Hamilton]

Which questions did you miss?

Cindy Hamilton

[Ed Pawlowski]

I screwed up on Federalist papers. I'm eligible to be deported now.

[Cindy Hamilton]

They must have more than 20 questions that rotate. I didn't have a
Federalist Papers question.

Some of them were worded a little trickily, though.

Cindy Hamilton

[Dave Smith]

Holy crap Gary. I beat you and I am not an American.

[Dave Smith]

That test was almost as bad as some of the FaceBook click bait with
blurbs about how only 5% of the population can get more than 50% right
and they turn out to be so simple than any fool can ace them. I blew
the same one that you did and the one about the year of the document. I
kept waiting for "Who is buried in Grant's tomb?"

[Bruce]

70% here. Does that mean I can emigrate to the US?

[Bruce]

People always confuse factual knowledge with intelligence.

[Bruce]

I screwed up on 2 questions about those old geezers. Something about
Madison Square Gardens. And one or two more.

[Bruce]

Maybe you got all the easy questions.

[Graham]

Is that a fact?

[Bruce]

Only unintelligent people, of course.

[Dave Smith]

Was it intelligent?
No to both.

[Ed Pawlowski]

On 1/20/2022 11:57 AM, heyjoe wrote:
> Ed Pawlowski wrote :

>
>> I screwed up on Federalist papers. I'm eligible to be deported now.
>

> Missed that one too. Now I don't feel so stupid.
>

I don't even recall hearing about them in High School but that was a
long time ago.

What is the Federalist Papers short definition?
Federalist papers, formally The Federalist, series of 85 essays on the
proposed new Constitution of the United States and on the nature of
republican government, published between 1787 and 1788 by Alexander
Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in an effort to persuade New York
state voters to support ratification

[Bruce]

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:31:46 -0500, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:

Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Bruce]

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:53:25 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:

[Bruce]

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:20:17 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

[Bruce]

[Bruce]

[bruce bowser]

On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 10:48:16 AM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

That's fancy. Where would you be deported to?

[Thomas]

Pick two. Two underlined. I am a loser. Needed to pick all which was all three.

[Bruce]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 04:07:20 +1100, Bruce <Br...@invalid.invalid>

wrote:

>On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:53:25 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>>On 2022-01-20 9:46 a.m., Bruce wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:16:37 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>>> <angelica...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 8:31:04 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
>>>>> On 1/19/2022 5:09 PM, Kelly O'Hara wrote:
>>>>>> Are you as bored with forgers and trolls on RFC as I am?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Take break and see if you're smarter than a fourth grader.
>>>>>> https://my.uscis.gov/en/prep/test/civics/view
>>>>>> "Welcome to the 2008 Civics Practice Test!"
>>>>>>
>>>>> That was fun to do. I scored 80%.
>>>>
>>>> I guess you're not smarter than a fourth grader. I scored 100%.
>>>
>>> People always confuse factual knowledge with intelligence.
>>Is that a fact?
>
>Only unintelligent people, of course.

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Bruce]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 03:46:44 +1100, Bruce <Br...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:

[Bruce]

[Michael Trew]

On 1/20/2022 8:31, Gary wrote:
> On 1/19/2022 5:09 PM, Kelly O'Hara wrote:
>> Are you as bored with forgers and trolls on RFC as I am?
>>
>> Take break and see if you're smarter than a fourth grader.
>> https://my.uscis.gov/en/prep/test/civics/view
>> "Welcome to the 2008 Civics Practice Test!"
>>
>
> That was fun to do. I scored 80%.

I got a 90%; yay, Michael!

I did not enjoy High school, but history (and government, to an extent)
was one class that I did not mind, and usually excelled in.

Two wrong. The Statue of Liberty question got me. Embarrassingly, also
Susan B Anthony.

[Michael Trew]

Yes, they seem to rotate.

I missed "where is the statue of Liberty"... I clicked "long island"...
oops, it is New York Harbor.

Also, I don't remember which option I picked for Susan B Anthony, but it
certainly wasn't the correct one.

[Michael Trew]

On 1/20/2022 11:57, heyjoe wrote:
> Ed Pawlowski wrote :
>

>> I screwed up on Federalist papers. I'm eligible to be deported now.
>

> Missed that one too. Now I don't feel so stupid.

That question did not come up for me.

[Ed Pawlowski]

On 1/20/2022 9:48 PM, Michael Trew wrote:

>> They must have more than 20 questions that rotate.  I didn't have a
>> Federalist Papers question.
>>
>> Some of them were worded a little trickily, though.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> Yes, they seem to rotate.
>
> I missed "where is the statue of Liberty"... I clicked "long island"...
> oops, it is New York Harbor.
>
> Also, I don't remember which option I picked for Susan B Anthony, but it
> certainly wasn't the correct one.

I just went back. They do rotate. Some were the same. The Statue of
Liberty was in this group but not Susan B.

[Gary]

Yes they do rotate questions. I plan to try again later.

One I missed was:
Who wrote the Constitution?

Choices were:
- George Washington
- James Madison
- Abe Lincoln
- Thomas Jefferson

I knew it wasn't Washington or Lincoln (lol)
I guessed Madison but it was Jefferson.

I wasn't so sure. So sue me...it's been forever since jr.high history.
My one college history class was all about the Civil War.

I also got the "What started the Civil War?" question wrong.
Popular belief is that the slavery issue started it and that was the
correct answer but I know it's wrong.

Secession of the 11 slave states from the union was the cause.
Lincoln didn't like slavery but he put up with it until the South
decided to leave.

Their issue was unfair economic issues from the north, not slavery.

Only after the outcome of the war was decided did he free the slaves.
Probably as paybacks to the South. The spoils of war go the the winner.

[Gary]

I once took the Canadian citizenship test and I passed that without
knowing anything about Canada. lol

[Gary]

Why not? Everyone else is doing it, legal or not.

Imagine Putin defecting to the US promising to tell all the secrets he
knows about Russia.

[Gary]

I just tried it again too. Some questions the same but some different.
I got a score of 80 again today, darn it.

[Cindy Hamilton]

Another 100% for me. Only one repeat question from the first time, IIRC.

Which questions did you get wrong this time?

Cindy Hamilton

[Bruce]

I don't even know what the capital is. Ottawa? Toronto? Or on what
side of the country everything is.

[Bruce]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 07:54:01 -0500, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:

>On 1/20/2022 11:46 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 08:31:46 -0500, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/19/2022 5:09 PM, Kelly O'Hara wrote:
>>>> Are you as bored with forgers and trolls on RFC as I am?
>>>>
>>>> Take break and see if you're smarter than a fourth grader.
>>>> https://my.uscis.gov/en/prep/test/civics/view
>>>> "Welcome to the 2008 Civics Practice Test!"
>>>>
>>>
>>> That was fun to do. I scored 80%.
>>
>> 70% here. Does that mean I can emigrate to the US?
>
>Why not? Everyone else is doing it, legal or not.

But I'm not a bad hombre.

[Bruce]

Most or all of that information is completely useless.

[Bruce]

Ghe? Can you go into more detail? I don't get it

[Bruce]

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Cindy Hamilton]

What do you think prospective citizens should know?

Cindy Hamilton

[Bruce]

[GM]

If they come from different cultures, they should know about equality
between genders, religions, sexual orientations and about freedom of
speech, basics of the political system, what capitalism means. They
don't need to know about George Washington, Jefferson Airplane or
Madison Square Gardens.

--
This is a post by Bruce

[GM]

We Dutch have a saying about forgers like yous, which is KILL YOURSELF
you frogging loser Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[Dave Smith]

They could start with the language and the laws. Who cares who writes
the laws when you have people streaming across the border and engaging
in criminal behaviour.

[GM]

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Jeßus]

It's open season on the U.S. You see in NY... they've given illegal
migrants the right to VOTE in elections. Of course, they know these
would be overwhelmingly Democrat votes.

[GM]

And how do you feel about Republicans making it hard for poor 'people
of colour' to vote?

--
This is a post by Bruce.

[Graham]

What's the source for this?
After all, "They" is the biggest conspiracy in existence!

[GM]

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:34:01 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[GM]

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 08:11:09 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

[GM]

Why, the good grey liberal NY Times, Graham... guess you are too fucking lazy to
look things, up, EH...???

And we ALL know that you in Canada allow non - citizens to vote - YES...???

;-P

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/09/nyregion/noncitizens-nyc-voting-rights.html

Noncitizens’ Right to Vote Becomes Law in New York City

Starting next year, 800,000 legal permanent residents will be eligible to vote in municipal elections.

By Grace Ashford
Jan. 9, 2022

Mayor Eric Adams, setting aside prior misgivings, allowed a bill to become law on Sunday
that would grant more than 800,000 noncitizens the right to vote in municipal elections.

“I believe that New Yorkers should have a say in their government, which is why I have and
will continue to support this important legislation,” the mayor said in a statement.

“I look forward to bringing millions more into the democratic process,” he added.

The measure applies to legal residents, including those with green cards, and so-called
Dreamers who were brought to the country illegally as children but were allowed to
remain under a federal program known as DACA. Although the City Council approved
the bill last month, New York law provides the mayor the opportunity to veto it within
30 days. Without any action, the bill passes into law automatically, as happened with this measure.

Because of the new law, an estimated 808,000 adults will be eligible to vote beginning
Jan. 9, 2023, according to the City Council. They will be able to vote in primary and
general elections for citywide contests, like those for mayor and public advocate, as
well as in local races, like those for City Council and borough presidents. The law
does not allow noncitizens to vote in state or federal elections.

On Monday, the Republican National Committee filed a lawsuit against the
mayor, City Council and the city Board of Elections, challenging the law as unconstitutional.

In a statement, Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee,
accused Democrats of attempting to subvert elections by allowing noncitizens to
vote, adding: “American elections should be decided by American citizens.”

</>

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:41:22 -0800 (PST), GM
<gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 3:34:08 PM UTC-6, Graham wrote:

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:34:01 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:

LOL. If only you understood how poor your critical thinking abilities
actually are.

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:41:22 -0800 (PST), GM

<gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 3:34:08 PM UTC-6, Graham wrote:

>> On 2022-01-21 2:11 p.m., Je?us wrote:
>> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:29:32 -0500, Dave Smith
>> > <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2022-01-21 12:31 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> >>> On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 12:21:02 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>>> I just tried it again too. Some questions the same but some different.
>> >>>>> I got a score of 80 again today, darn it.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> Most or all of that information is completely useless.
>> >>>
>> >>> What do you think prospective citizens should know?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> They could start with the language and the laws. Who cares who writes
>> >> the laws when you have people streaming across the border and engaging
>> >> in criminal behaviour.
>> >
>> > It's open season on the U.S. You see in NY... they've given illegal
>> > migrants the right to VOTE in elections. Of course, they know these
>> > would be overwhelmingly Democrat votes.
>> >
>> What's the source for this?
>> After all, "They" is the biggest conspiracy in existence!
>
>
>Why, the good grey liberal NY Times, Graham... guess you are too fucking lazy to
>look things, up, EH...???
>
>And we ALL know that you in Canada allow non - citizens to vote - YES...???
>
>;-P
>
>https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/09/nyregion/noncitizens-nyc-voting-rights.html
>
>Noncitizens’ Right to Vote Becomes Law in New York City

He only replies to me when he thinks he's 'got' me on something :)
Every single time, he's failed. I rarely even bother replying to him
anymore. There's not much point when he thinks it's all about being on
one side or the other.

[GM]

It is gobsmacking, and Graham *was* intelligent enough to earn an engineering degree...

--
GM

[GM]

Very true, he won't bother to read the link I shared... and it IS from a LIBERAL source, lol...

--
GM

[Jeßus]

Gaining qualifications generally only requires a functioning memory.
It does not automatically imply an ability to think critically.

For example, I pissed off the doctor I was seeing last year when I
questioned his diagnosis that he was adamant he was correct. I saw the
lack of logic in how he arrived at his conclusion... He said I had
dermatitis, I countered with my diagnosis of a melanoma. I asked for a
biopsy, which he grudgingly agreed to. Guess who was right?
After that, I chose another doctor.

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:58:56 -0800 (PST), GM

Let's see if he has any class at all by replying appropriately. ;)

[Dave Smith]

Our governing party loves immigrants. They settle in the big cities and
vote Liberal. We have an ongoing problem with aliens coming across the
border illegally. Trudeau prefers the word "irregular". The fact is that
anyone entering the country is supposed to do so at a regular border
crossing.

The thing is that we have an agreement with the US about safe third
countries. They cannot cross from the US to Canada and claim refugee
status because they are coming from a safe country. If they come across
at a regular border entry point they would be denied entry... so they
come across at "irregular" points.

Instead of putting up a fence or installing an official entry point, the
nitwits staying cops there to carry their luggage for them and transport
them to an immigration centre where, already being in the country, they
can apply for their refugee status and are automatically eligible for
health care, schooling, welfare and housing.

We do have an immigration program. They can apply to immigrant, pay the
processing fees and be required to support themselves or get someone to
sponsor them. That that would take time and their money, so they come
here illegally and get a free ride.... but they vote Liberal.

[Michael Trew]

Geeze, with this again?? I don't even know who's who now.

That being said, yes, Jefferson Airplane should be on the citizen test.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVER6hyoyJo

[Graham]

You conveniently forgot to put the word "Municipal" in front of
elections, didn't you!

[GM]

Is 52 year - old Miss Bwuthie still breast - fed by her dear old mum...???

<chuckle>

--
GM

[Dave Smith]

Does it really matter? At least they are required to be living in the
US lawfully, but they only have to live there for 30 days to qualify to
vote.

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:25:49 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:

LOL, what difference does it make? That is pathetic, Graham.
Zero sensible counter-argument, as always.

[S Viemeister]

Not surprisingly, he has it very wrong. _Legal_ permanent residents
(green card holders) have been given the right to vote in New York. No
one is giving _illegal migrants_ the right to vote.

[GM]

Ah, but such is the socialist mind, we must I suppose pity them - but DON'T give them
any POWER, lol...!!!

--
GM

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:36:55 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-21 5:25 p.m., Graham wrote:

That's his refutation to my comments, LOL... I was WRONG, because I
didn't specify municipal :)

>At least they are required to be living in the
>US lawfully, but they only have to live there for 30 days to qualify to
>vote.

Yeah, 30 days. Because they know these people will overwhelmingly vote
Democrat, that's the only reason for this law.

[GM]

But with such loose voter restrictions, you can bet a goodly number of illegals
*will* be casting ballots...

--
GM

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:18:12 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-21 4:11 p.m., Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:29:32 -0500, Dave Smith
>> <adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2022-01-21 12:31 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>> On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 12:21:02 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I just tried it again too. Some questions the same but some different.
>>>>>> I got a score of 80 again today, darn it.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Most or all of that information is completely useless.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think prospective citizens should know?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> They could start with the language and the laws. Who cares who writes
>>> the laws when you have people streaming across the border and engaging
>>> in criminal behaviour.
>>
>> It's open season on the U.S. You see in NY... they've given illegal
>> migrants the right to VOTE in elections. Of course, they know these
>> would be overwhelmingly Democrat votes.
>>
>
>Our governing party loves immigrants. They settle in the big cities and
>vote Liberal.

Yep, same cynical tactic used as in the US and UK.

> We have an ongoing problem with aliens coming across the
>border illegally. Trudeau prefers the word "irregular". The fact is that
>anyone entering the country is supposed to do so at a regular border
>crossing.
>
>The thing is that we have an agreement with the US about safe third
>countries. They cannot cross from the US to Canada and claim refugee
>status because they are coming from a safe country. If they come across
>at a regular border entry point they would be denied entry... so they
>come across at "irregular" points.

Ridiculous of course. And sounds quite intentional.

>Instead of putting up a fence or installing an official entry point, the
>nitwits staying cops there to carry their luggage for them and transport
>them to an immigration centre where, already being in the country, they
>can apply for their refugee status and are automatically eligible for
>health care, schooling, welfare and housing.

Willing to bet many lifelong Canadians are homeless at the same time.

>We do have an immigration program. They can apply to immigrant, pay the
>processing fees and be required to support themselves or get someone to
>sponsor them. That that would take time and their money, so they come
>here illegally and get a free ride.... but they vote Liberal.

Meanwhile, in Australia we are something like $16K out of pocket so
far for our visa application and probably still another year and more
$ before approval.

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 22:45:12 +0000, S Viemeister
<firs...@lastname.oc.ku> wrote:

>On 21/01/2022 21:34, Graham wrote:

>> On 2022-01-21 2:11 p.m., Je?us wrote:
>
>>> It's open season on the U.S. You see in NY... they've given illegal
>>> migrants the right to VOTE in elections. Of course, they know these
>>> would be overwhelmingly Democrat votes.
>>>
>> What's the source for this?
>> After all, "They" is the biggest conspiracy in existence!
>
>Not surprisingly, he has it very wrong. _Legal_ permanent residents
>(green card holders) have been given the right to vote in New York. No
>one is giving _illegal migrants_ the right to vote.

Can you explain the 'Not surprisingly' remark, please.

[GM]

Sometimes I think that Graham is channeling Dame Edna Everage, lol...

--
GM

[GM]

You don't answer the question. One wonders why :)

--
This is a post by Bruce.

[GM]

So she was right and you were wrong. Duly noted.

[GM]

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[GM]

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:04:58 -0800 (PST), GM

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:36:55 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-01-21 5:25 p.m., Graham wrote:

[GM]

On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 09:58:43 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 22:45:12 +0000, S Viemeister
<firs...@lastname.oc.ku> wrote:

>On 21/01/2022 21:34, Graham wrote:

>> On 2022-01-21 2:11 p.m., Je?us wrote:
>
>>> It's open season on the U.S. You see in NY... they've given illegal
>>> migrants the right to VOTE in elections. Of course, they know these
>>> would be overwhelmingly Democrat votes.
>>>
>> What's the source for this?
>> After all, "They" is the biggest conspiracy in existence!
>
>Not surprisingly, he has it very wrong. _Legal_ permanent residents
>(green card holders) have been given the right to vote in New York. No
>one is giving _illegal migrants_ the right to vote.

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:48:35 -0800 (PST), GM
<gregorymorr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> S Viemeister wrote:
>
>> On 21/01/2022 21:34, Graham wrote:

>> > On 2022-01-21 2:11 p.m., Je?us wrote:
>>
>> >> It's open season on the U.S. You see in NY... they've given illegal
>> >> migrants the right to VOTE in elections. Of course, they know these
>> >> would be overwhelmingly Democrat votes.
>> >>
>> > What's the source for this?
>> > After all, "They" is the biggest conspiracy in existence!
>> Not surprisingly, he has it very wrong. _Legal_ permanent residents
>> (green card holders) have been given the right to vote in New York. No
>> one is giving _illegal migrants_ the right to vote.
>
>
>But with such loose voter restrictions, you can bet a goodly number of illegals
>*will* be casting ballots...

[GM]

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 15:25:49 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:

[GM]

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 14:29:51 -0800 (PST), GM

[dsi1]

On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 12:25:52 PM UTC-10, Michael Trew wrote:

> Geeze, with this again?? I don't even know who's who now.
>
> That being said, yes, Jefferson Airplane should be on the citizen test.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVER6hyoyJo

The only Jefferson Airplane CD that I have is "Volunteers." Boy, it's awesome!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzHBr0ndKus

[Graham]

Oh FFS. You really are an idiot! Of course it makes a fucking difference!

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:35:19 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:

Don't ruin his agenda with facts, please.

[GM]

Uhm, Dit is mijn kikker. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[GM]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 17:35:19 -0700, Graham <g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[GM]

[GM 1]

[Bruce]

[Gary]

On 1/21/2022 12:31 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Friday, January 21, 2022 at 12:21:02 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:

>> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:16:15 -0500, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:
>>

>>> On 1/20/2022 10:33 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>> On 1/20/2022 9:48 PM, Michael Trew wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> They must have more than 20 questions that rotate. I didn't have a
>>>>>> Federalist Papers question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of them were worded a little trickily, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, they seem to rotate.
>>>>>
>>>>> I missed "where is the statue of Liberty"... I clicked "long
>>>>> island"... oops, it is New York Harbor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I don't remember which option I picked for Susan B Anthony, but
>>>>> it certainly wasn't the correct one.
>>>>
>>>> I just went back. They do rotate. Some were the same. The Statue of
>>>> Liberty was in this group but not Susan B.

>>>
>>> I just tried it again too. Some questions the same but some different.
>>> I got a score of 80 again today, darn it.
>>>
>> Most or all of that information is completely useless.
>
> What do you think prospective citizens should know?

The English language.

[Bruce]

That's very important. Or the Dutch, French, Spanish, German language,
if that's where you're emigrating to. Otherwise, you'll always remain
a spook.

[Cindy Hamilton]

Let's require that of natural-born citizens first.

Cindy Hamilton