Good JOB Humans!

[John Kuthe]

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/26/climate/iceberg-a68a-antarctica.html

Melting the South Pole!

What will FLOOD now!

:-(

John Kuthe...

[GM]

Watch all the flowers
Dance with the wind
Listen to snowflakes
Whisper your name
Feel all the wonder
Lifting your dreams
You can fly

Fly to who you are
Climb upon your star
You believe you'll find your wings
Fly to your heart

Touch every rainbow
Painting the sky
Look at the magic
Glide through your life
A sprinkle of pixie dust circles the night you can fly.

</>

[Tony]

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 18:49:31 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
wrote:

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my not frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe
:)))))))))))

[Tonio]

Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it

[Tonio]

[itsjoan...@webtv.net]

The Washington Post

The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places
the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce
Department yesterday from Consulate, at Bergen, Norway. Reports from fishermen,
seal hunters, and explorers all point to a radical change in climate conditions and
hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report
that scarcely any ice has been met as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings
to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice
have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at
many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared.

Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of
herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered
in the old seal fishing grounds. Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt
the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.

====================

I apologize, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922, as
reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post - 99 years ago!

[Dave Smith]

;-)


I am not a climate denier but I would like to point out that the polar
icecaps have been receding for more than 15,000 years. Less than a mile
to the north of me is a huge hill of sand that was pushed by the glacier
and then dumped here when it started moving back. Someone who us better
at Math than I am can explain about the rate of change increasing as the
cap gets smaller and smaller.

[Ed Pawlowski]

The local meteorologist explained what is happening this weekend and how
global warming is causing the cold snap. Seems contradictory but the
warm Gulf Stream in being pushed back from melting ice and causing a lot
of moisture for snow.

In a decade we usually have five big storms but the past decade has had
25.

[Leonard Blaisdell]

On 2022-01-28, itsjoan...@webtv.net <itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote:

> the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.

>====================

> I apologize, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922, as
> reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post - 99 years ago!

I didn't realize that the mania went that far back. Today, it's a global
wealth redistribution scheme.
For the outraged, the climate has continuously changed since Earth first
became Earth, so I believe in climate change.

[Tonyo]

Right-wingers don't care about any of that. It's all communist facts!
Right-wingers don't care because they don't have children,
grandchildren, great-grandchildren, etc. Either that or right-wingers
just don't give a shit. They want to rape the planet and make their
money. And they want it NOW!

[Ed Pawlowski]

The next step, does man affect it? Cutting down forests and burning
billions of tons of coal and oil may have some affect.

[Tonyo]

Communist propaganda!

[Michael Trew]

On 1/27/2022 23:18, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2022-01-27 11:01 p.m., itsjoan...@webtv.net wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/26/climate/iceberg-a68a-antarctica.html
>>>
>>> Melting the South Pole!
>>

>> Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic,
>> while vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before
>> ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing
>> grounds. Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice
>> melt the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.
>>
>> ====================
>>
>> I apologize, I neglected to mention that this report was from
>> November 2, 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The
>> Washington Post - 99 years ago!
>
> ;-)
>
> I am not a climate denier but I would like to point out that the polar
> icecaps have been receding for more than 15,000 years. Less than a mile
> to the north of me is a huge hill of sand that was pushed by the glacier
> and then dumped here when it started moving back. Someone who us better
> at Math than I am can explain about the rate of change increasing as the
> cap gets smaller and smaller.

Nor am I a climate denier, but I refuse to buy into the scare tactics
that play on emotion. Didn't the eco-hippies preach in 1970 that by
2000 the coastal cities would be under water? Still waiting... As
you've said, ice age/heat cycles seem to be naturally occurring.

[Ronny]

I wouldn't put it past a Trump voter to deny that there is a climate.

[Leonard Blaisdell]

On 2022-01-28, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

> The next step, does man affect it? Cutting down forests and burning
> billions of tons of coal and oil may have some affect.

Life affects it. There's a phony rage against cattle flatulence now. Do
you buy into that? Climatology used to be the prophetic arm of
meteorology. Then, they found the power! Funding flowed in. Now, the
cognoscenti sell climate prophecy to the masses, like fortune tellers, and
call the mess "science".
I foresee that we will thin ourselves out in the not to distant future,
and the Earth will keep on turning. "Climate change" will have nothing
to do with it.
Anyone or group who tells you what is going to happen tomorrow, the next
day or the next hundred years are this eras fortune tellers. They don't
know sh*t but profit from their words.
Did I mention that I'm a cynic?

[Ronny]

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:53:02 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

effect

[Ronny]

[Bryan Simmons]

I'm looking forward to you being thinned out.

--Bryan

[Ronny]

[Gary]

On 1/28/2022 2:19 AM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> On 2022-01-28, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>
>> The next step, does man affect it? Cutting down forests and burning
>> billions of tons of coal and oil may have some affect.
>
>
> Life affects it. There's a phony rage against cattle flatulence now. Do
> you buy into that?

That's such a funny claim. Human flatulence counts for more methane.
Maybe we (and the cattle) should start wearing ass-gas bags to collect
it all and use for fuel.

[Cindy Hamilton]

On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 9:41:59 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> On 1/28/2022 2:19 AM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> > On 2022-01-28, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
> >
> >> The next step, does man affect it? Cutting down forests and burning
> >> billions of tons of coal and oil may have some affect.
> >
> >
> > Life affects it. There's a phony rage against cattle flatulence now. Do
> > you buy into that?
> That's such a funny claim. Human flatulence counts for more methane.

Perhaps not:
<https://blogs.nicholas.duke.edu/citizenscientist/silent-but-deadly/>

Cindy Hamilton

[jmcquown]

Keep driving your electric car which is powered by coal. You've got
nothing to worry about other than a flood in those tire ruts in your
back yard which you call Kuthe's Creek.

Jill

[Mike Duffy]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:13:53 -0800, Bryan Simmons wrote:

> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 1:19:12 AM UTC-6, Leonard Blaisdell

>> I foresee that we will thin ourselves out in the not to distant future,

> I'm looking forward to you being thinned out.

Okay. That's John, Dave, and now Leonard.

Did I miss anyone on your deathwatch?

[Gary]

I've managed to annoy him quite a bit lately.
I might be next.

[jmcquown]

I'm probably high up there on Bryan's list, too. I think his main
purpose here is to goad his ex BFF. A silly 20+ year vendetta over some
stupid Usenet posts and a lot of leftover teenage angst between men who
are now in their 60's. Yeesh!

Jill

[Bryan Simmons]

On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 10:04:00 AM UTC-6, j_mc...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 1/28/2022 10:47 AM, Gary wrote:
> > On 1/28/2022 10:18 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> >> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:13:53 -0800, Bryan Simmons wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 1:19:12 AM UTC-6, Leonard Blaisdell
> >>
> >>>> I foresee that we will thin ourselves out in the not to distant future,
> >>
> >>> I'm looking forward to you being thinned out.
> >>
> >> Okay. That's John, Dave, and now Leonard.
> >>
> >> Did I miss anyone on your deathwatch?
> >
> > I've managed to annoy him quite a bit lately.
> > I might be next.
> >
> >
> I'm probably high up there on Bryan's list, too.
>

Nah, you're just a boring, constipated old crone, a dumb cunt.

>
> I think his main
> purpose here is to goad his ex BFF. A silly 20+ year vendetta over some
> stupid Usenet posts and a lot of leftover teenage angst between men who
> are now in their 60's. Yeesh!
>

I post more food pix than you do, and more interesting ones.
>
> Jill

--Bryan

[Mustafa]

Me.

[Mustafa]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:03:53 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Your favourite soap.

[Mustafa]

They're drowned out by your psychiatric posts.

[Wahid]

[GM]

"I agree with this psot..."

--
GM

[%]

On 1/28/2022 2:52 PM, GM wrote:
{...}

> "I agree with this psot..."
>

you slurp more assholes than Kuthe

[Munir]

Uhm Yes. Vote Trump. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Munir]

[Bryan Simmons]

It's fun knowing that you are functionally impotent. Your ex-wife
took your manhood. Your dick hangs pathetically. When you get
it out to pee, do you miss being a man?

--Bryan

[John Kuthe]

On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 2:51:36 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
...

> It's fun knowing that you are functionally impotent. Your ex-wife
> took your manhood. Your dick hangs pathetically. When you get
> it out to pee, do you miss being a man?

I am more of a man that YOU are, Bryan! Because I do NOT equate a functional erection with being a man! YOU evidently DO! :-( Pathetic!

John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

[Muhammad]

Bryan Simmons wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 9:46:42 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
>> On 1/28/2022 10:18 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:13:53 -0800, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 1:19:12 AM UTC-6, Leonard Blaisdell
>>>
>>>>> I foresee that we will thin ourselves out in the not to distant future,
>>>
>>>> I'm looking forward to you being thinned out.
>>>
>>> Okay. That's John, Dave, and now Leonard.
>>>
>>> Did I miss anyone on your deathwatch?
>> I've managed to annoy him quite a bit lately.
>> I might be next.
>>
> It's fun knowing that you are functionally impotent. Your ex-wife
> took your manhood. Your dick hangs pathetically. When you get
> it out to pee, do you miss being a man?
>
> --Bryan
>

[Rachid]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:34:31 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
wrote:

Give him a break. It's all he has :)

[Buthaynah]

Bryan Simmons wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 10:04:00 AM UTC-6, j_mc...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On 1/28/2022 10:47 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> On 1/28/2022 10:18 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:13:53 -0800, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 1:19:12 AM UTC-6, Leonard Blaisdell
>>>>
>>>>>> I foresee that we will thin ourselves out in the not to distant future,
>>>>
>>>>> I'm looking forward to you being thinned out.
>>>>
>>>> Okay. That's John, Dave, and now Leonard.
>>>>
>>>> Did I miss anyone on your deathwatch?
>>>
>>> I've managed to annoy him quite a bit lately.
>>> I might be next.
>>>
>>>
>> I'm probably high up there on Bryan's list, too.
>>
> Nah, you're just a boring, constipated old crone, a dumb cunt.
>>
>> I think his main
>> purpose here is to goad his ex BFF. A silly 20+ year vendetta over some
>> stupid Usenet posts and a lot of leftover teenage angst between men who
>> are now in their 60's. Yeesh!
>>
> I post more food pix than you do, and more interesting ones.
>>
>> Jill
>
> --Bryan
>

[jmcquown]

On 1/28/2022 4:34 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 2:51:36 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
>> It's fun knowing that you are functionally impotent.
>

> I am more of a man that YOU are, Bryan! Because I do NOT equate a functional erection

> John Kuthe

Both of you need to SHUT UP. Constantly talking about your erections
only proves you are both irritating juveniles who never got past
puberty. Constantly posting stupid childish crap. It's boring as hell.
The two of you should meet at the donut shop and beat the crap out of
each other and get over it.

Jill

[Rachid]

[Rachid]

[Mike Duffy]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:34:31 -0800, John Kuthe wrote:

> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 2:51:36 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com
> wrote:

>> When you get it out to pee, do you miss being a man?

> I do NOT equate a functional erection with being a man!

I still don't understand how either of you can pee with an erection.

[Graham]

Have you never changed the diaper on a baby boy? :-)

[Lablab]

[Lablab]

[Dave Smith]

LOL, but there are few things more frustrating that waking up with
morning wood and a full bladder.

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 18:49:31 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
wrote:

>https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/26/climate/iceberg-a68a-antarctica.html
>
>Melting the South Pole!
>
>What will FLOOD now!

LOL. Ask yourself why billionaires and people like Obama and Pelso
still buy property right on the beach.


>:-(

Better invest in a snorkle and flippers, John.

[Jeßus]

On 28 Jan 2022 04:38:59 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
<leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On 2022-01-28, itsjoan...@webtv.net <itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
>> the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.
>
>>====================
>
>> I apologize, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922, as
>> reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post - 99 years ago!
>
>
>I didn't realize that the mania went that far back. Today, it's a global
>wealth redistribution scheme.

Bingo. At least one other person here is on the ball.
Always remember: 'the issue isn't the issue' when they start spruiking
narratives like this.

>For the outraged, the climate has continuously changed since Earth first
>became Earth, so I believe in climate change.

Yep. We must have an impact, of course, but the effect we actually
have in the grand scheme of things is minimal.

[Jeßus]

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 23:53:02 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:

>On 1/27/2022 11:38 PM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>> On 2022-01-28, itsjoan...@webtv.net <itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote:
>>
>>> the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.
>>
>>> ====================
>>
>>> I apologize, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922, as
>>> reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post - 99 years ago!
>>
>>
>> I didn't realize that the mania went that far back. Today, it's a global
>> wealth redistribution scheme.

>> For the outraged, the climate has continuously changed since Earth first
>> became Earth, so I believe in climate change.
>

>The next step, does man affect it? Cutting down forests and burning
>billions of tons of coal and oil may have some affect.

It does. But whether we even exist or not, the planet continually goes
through climatic changes on it's own. It sure doesn't need our help.
Just wait until there is another magnetic reversal... all talk about
'climate change' will become academic.

[Stan]

On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:40:36 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 18:49:31 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
>wrote:
>
>>https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/26/climate/iceberg-a68a-antarctica.html
>>
>>Melting the South Pole!
>>
>>What will FLOOD now!
>
>LOL. Ask yourself why billionaires and people like Obama and Pelso
>still buy property right on the beach.

They belong to a secret Illuminati organisation of people who are
growing gills, so they'll be able to breathe under water when all the
world is submerged?

[Stan]

On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 09:43:18 +1100, Jeßus <j...@j.net> wrote:

>On 28 Jan 2022 04:38:59 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
><leobla...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>On 2022-01-28, itsjoan...@webtv.net <itsjoan...@webtv.net> wrote:
>>
>>> the sea will rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.
>>
>>>====================
>>
>>> I apologize, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922, as
>>> reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post - 99 years ago!
>>
>>
>>I didn't realize that the mania went that far back. Today, it's a global
>>wealth redistribution scheme.
>
>Bingo. At least one other person here is on the ball.

Translation: at least one other person here listens to shock jocks :)

[Stan]

Academic? Eew! You mean science and facts? Eew!!

[Stan]

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 16:51:30 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 1/28/2022 4:34 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 2:51:36 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
>> ...
>>> It's fun knowing that you are functionally impotent.
>>
>> I am more of a man that YOU are, Bryan! Because I do NOT equate a functional erection
>> John Kuthe
>
>Both of you need to SHUT UP. Constantly talking about your erections
>only proves you are both irritating juveniles

...LOL. I read this in what I guess I imagine your voice is...

Also imagine a stranger wandering into this group, and reading all
this.

>who never got past
>puberty. Constantly posting stupid childish crap. It's boring as hell.
> The two of you should meet at the donut shop and beat the crap out of
>each other and get over it.

I'm still wondering how these two got together, or what happened after
they met to explain their psychology. They're both not well, not well
at all.

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:03:53 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>On 1/28/2022 10:47 AM, Gary wrote:
>> On 1/28/2022 10:18 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:13:53 -0800, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 1:19:12 AM UTC-6, Leonard Blaisdell
>>>
>>>>> I foresee that we will thin ourselves out in the not to distant future,
>>>
>>>> I'm looking forward to you being thinned out.
>>>
>>> Okay. That's John, Dave, and now Leonard.
>>>
>>> Did I miss anyone on your deathwatch?
>>
>> I've managed to annoy him quite a bit lately.
>> I might be next.
>>
>>

>I'm probably high up there on Bryan's list, too. I think his main

>purpose here is to goad his ex BFF. A silly 20+ year vendetta over some
>stupid Usenet posts and a lot of leftover teenage angst between men who
>are now in their 60's. Yeesh!

I get the impression he's drunk a lot when he posts here.

[John Kuthe]

On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 5:31:17 PM UTC-6, Jeßus wrote:
...

> I'm still wondering how these two got together, or what happened after
> they met to explain their psychology. They're both not well, not well
> at all.

Bryan and I met in Summer School in Lindberg High School to retake Freshman English.

John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:18:38 -0000 (UTC), Mike Duffy
<mxd...@bell.net> wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 01:13:53 -0800, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>
>> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 1:19:12 AM UTC-6, Leonard Blaisdell
>
>>> I foresee that we will thin ourselves out in the not to distant future,
>
>> I'm looking forward to you being thinned out.
>
>Okay. That's John, Dave, and now Leonard.
>
>Did I miss anyone on your deathwatch?

I'm coming round to the idea that Bryan is the most disturbed
individual in this group. John is John... but he doesn't constantly
post the shit Bryan does. He really needs somebody to pay him a visit,
he's all mouth. People like him only understand a punch in the face,
he feels safe behind a keyboard getting drunk, while his wife is out
supporting him.

[GM]

Global warming in the last 150 years has led to a rise in carbon dioxide, which is good
for crop production...

"To call present-day temperature a “crisis” is pure ignorance."

https://amgreatness.com/2022/01/27/be-grateful-for-global-warming/

Be Grateful for Global Warming

Human and climate history reveal that we should welcome the warmth and fear the
cold, quite the opposite of the story the Climate Industrial Complex peddles.

By Gregory Wrightstone January 27, 2022

"Present-day warming has been termed a crisis, and modern economic development a cancer. But
what if I told you that much of the recent advancement in human prosperity would have been
impossible without the temperature increases of the last several hundred years?

A key to the sustenance of any society is food security. Today’s world should be grateful for
today’s relative warmth as well as higher levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels because
both have been instrumental in propelling plant growth globally.

A review of human and climate history reveals a strong link between the rise and fall of
temperature and the rise and fall of civilization—just opposite of what the climate doomsayers
are telling you.

Past warming periods were much warmer than our modern temperatures and were associated
with times of great prosperity. The intervening cold eras had names like Greek Dark Ages, the
Dark Ages, and Little Ice Age and were linked to crop failure, pestilence, and mass depopulation.

According to historian Wolfgang Behringer, “cooling has always resulted in major social
upheavals, whereas warming has sometimes led to a blossoming of culture. If we can learn
anything from the history of culture, it is that, even if humans were ‘children of the Ice Age,’
civilization was a product of climatic warming.”

Are you among those wishing for lower global temperatures? According to climatologist Dr.
Michael Mann, the ideal temperature for the planet would be “the temperature range that
prevailed since the dawn of civilization until we began burning fossil fuels.” That timing
would place humanity squarely in the death-dealing cold that prevailed during the aptly
named Little Ice Age, between 1250 and 1850. This was a cold period of global extent.

The Little Ice Age froze rivers such as the Thames, which has rarely been frozen in the
modern era. Here in the United States, we know that Martha Washington enjoyed ice
during the summers at Mount Vernon that was harvested from the Potomac River and
stored in an icehouse on the grounds. These thick freezes were an annual event in the
18th century, while today they only occur occasionally during unusually cold winters.

Historian Philipp Blom says the Little Ice Age resulted in “a long-term, continent-wide
agricultural crisis” in Europe. His book, Nature’s Mutiny: How the Little Ice Age of the
Long Seventeenth Century Transformed the West and Shaped the Present extensively
captures the collapse of Western society owing to crop failure in the 17th century.

Published scientific journals documented agricultural collapse in Europe. Finland, for
example, witnessed massive crop failure and abandonment of farmlands due to the
cooling phase.

Famine killed millions through starvation and disease.

While it is true that the 20th century’s remarkable increase in crop growth was greatly
aided by advancements in agricultural technology, it would have been impossible if the
earth hadn’t warmed to levels more conducive to plant life. As if this boost in temperatures
weren’t sufficient, the growth of plants has been further turbocharged by increasing
carbon dioxide that is likely the result of the industrial use of fossil fuels.

Today, countries across the globe excel in agriculture and are breaking records year after
year. Some formerly famine-struck countries like India, Pakistan, Mexico, China and
Philippines produce abundant quantities of crops, increasing global food security. To
call present-day temperature a “crisis” is pure ignorance. .."

</>

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:43:16 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
wrote:

Cool. How old were you both?

[Rupert]

Ah, old Jebus is advocating violence again, like the old redneck that
he is :)

[Harmen]

Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it

[Bryan Simmons]

Uncle Jebus is a Magic Mulatto. If he were an American, he'd be
wearin' the horns, and denyin' that the Second Amendment was
all about cotchin' them runaways.

--Bryan

[Bryan Simmons]

You can't even get your mental shit together enough to
spell Lindbergh correctly. You have no business having
a job in allied health. Only a fool or a pimp would let you
touch a child.
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

--Bryan

[Hank Rogers]

They pissed right in your face?

Then you gave them a stern lecture?

[Hank Rogers]

And you taught your teacher how to teach english ... remember?

[Hank Rogers]

Like Popeye?

[itsjoan...@webtv.net]

On 1/28/2022 4:51 PM, jmcquown wrote:

> On 1/28/2022 4:34 PM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 2:51:36 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com
>> wrote:

>> ...
>>> It's fun knowing that you are functionally impotent.
>>
>> I am more of a man that YOU are, Bryan! Because I do NOT equate a
>> functional erection John Kuthe
>
> Both of you need to SHUT UP.  Constantly talking about your erections

> only proves you are both irritating juveniles who never got past

> puberty.  Constantly posting stupid childish crap.  It's boring as hell.
>  The two of you should meet at the donut shop and beat the crap out of
> each other and get over it.
>

> Jill
>
Learn how to use a killfile, Jilldoe.

[Gary]

Freshmen in high school would be about age 15.
They were real life "Beavis and Butthead"
They both failed 9th grade English so had to do summer school. However,
those two "had to teach the teacher how to teach English" first. lol

[Bryan Simmons]

You failed at marriage. Everyone knows it. When your wife
left you, she took your manhood with her. What a drag it must
be to take that lifeless thing out, and be reminded that the
good times are all in the past. Now, the only woman in your
life is your daughter. You know, they make movies about guys
like that. Your buddy John could probably help you find them
on PornHub. Next time you touch your dick, think about your
daughter. I'll remind you now and then. Hey, if it weren't for
that dick, you wouldn't have a daughter. Yep, when you take
Mr. Droopy out to pee, think about your daughter.

--Bryan

[jmcquown]

They met because they both flunked required classes in high school and
had to go to summer school or be forced to repeat the prior school year.

Jill

[jmcquown]

You actually brag about that like it's a good thing. Too lazy to pass
it the first time around.

Jill

[jmcquown]

On 1/28/2022 6:55 PM, Je�us wrote:

As freshmen in high school they would have been about 13 years old.
Lazy or simply thought they were too cool to study, take your pick.

Jill

[jmcquown]

If they were still in the 9th grade at age 15 they really *were* stupid.

Jill

[Brazza]

Uhm Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))))

[Dave Smith]

Too self medicated.

[Jeßus]

On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 12:48:12 -0500, jmcquown <j_mc...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Thanks. But something, somewhere along the line must have happened
after that to account for their personalities. It just seems odd to me
that these two found each other, they're both very, very disturbed
individuals in an unusual way (to me at least).

[Jeßus]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:57:03 -0600, Hank Rogers <Ha...@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

Yes, but Bryan hits the sauce way more. It really shows, don't you
think?

[Bruto]

You're such a lame little gossiper. A lonely old biddy with nothing
better to do.

[Jeßus]

Same in Australia this year - record crops - but can't be harvested
etc. due to covid restrictions. Australia is fucking retarded.

[Bryan Simmons]

I drink a pretty consistent amount of beer every day, in
the evening. I don't get drunk. My sentence structure is
indistinguishable from my posts at other times of day.
I never touch alcohol any time other than late
afternoon/evening. You realize what a fucking goofball
you look like writing a phrase like, "hits the sauce"??

You're free to think I'm a philistine for drinking beer over
ice, but I like it that way. It *does* have the result of
reducing the alcohol percentage to the point where a
person has been drinking almost every day for the past
40 years of his life pretty much couldn't drink it fast
enough to get "drunk."

--Bryan

[John Kuthe]

On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 4:39:09 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
...

> I drink a pretty consistent amount of beer every day, in
> the evening. I don't get drunk. My sentence structure is
> indistinguishable from my posts at other times of day.
> I never touch alcohol any time other than late
> afternoon/evening. You realize what a fucking goofball
> you look like writing a phrase like, "hits the sauce"??
>
> You're free to think I'm a philistine for drinking beer over
> ice, but I like it that way. It *does* have the result of
> reducing the alcohol percentage to the point where a
> person has been drinking almost every day for the past
> 40 years of his life pretty much couldn't drink it fast
> enough to get "drunk."
>
> --Bryan

I gave up drinking alcohol completely due to the undesirable effects it has!


John Kuthe, RN, BSN,,,

[Joe]

On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 16:19:41 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
wrote:

It does?

[GM]

Uh, NO you did NOT, John...

This is another reason you are unemployable: you lie not only to others, but to
*yourself*...

You've a complete and utter lack of self - awareness...

--
GM

[Joe]

We Dutch have a saying about froggers like yoos, which is KILL YOURSELF
you loser. no friends no real job no money no sex and no hope for the
future. Loser. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[GM]

Oh, REALLY, John...!!!???

But you JUST posted this not TWENTY minutes ago:

"On Saturday, January 29, 2022 at 6:39:15 PM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org wrote:
> Thick sliver of French Vanilla ice cream
> Heathy shot of Hershey's Syrup
> Cashews
> Dried Cranberries with a sprinkle of red wine, shaken ands soaked in!
> Squirt of Reddi Whip
>
> YUM!!!
>
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN..."


Lol...

--
GM

[Hank Rogers]

Maybe it's something else that has made you so fucked up ?

[Joe]

Ghe? Uhm, can you go into more detail? I don't get it

[Gary]

As I've always said, "When drinking and posting," save the posts as
"draft." Next morning, read what you wrote then decide whether to post it.

[Gary]

Bryan Simmons wrote:
> I never touch alcohol any time other than late
> afternoon/evening.

Many people have that concept about a "drinking problem" but it's not valid.

Everyone has their own schedules. Time of day doesn't really apply to
everyone. More importantly is how long you continue to drink and how much.

Many times, I've worked all night while most people are sleeping.
At those times, my 6am is the same as someone else's after work at 6pm
in the evening.

I'll have 3-4 drinks within a few hours but then be done until the next
day. Just because you drink early doesn't mean that you'll continue all
day long. Many people wrongly assume that though.

I always grocery shop very early and that's when I buy beer too. Just
last week I bought beer at 7am and a woman behind me asked, "Are you
going to drink that this early?"

"Not at all, I just like to get the shopping over early."
She probably didn't believe me. lol

[Gary]

John Kuthe wrote:
> I gave up drinking alcohol completely due to the undesirable effects it has!

Better to drink none than too much.
Supposedly alcohol does have it's health benefits in small amounts. I
suppose that depends on what doctor you choose to believe these days.

[Bryan Simmons]

On Sunday, January 30, 2022 at 6:19:32 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
> Bryan Simmons wrote:
> > I never touch alcohol any time other than late
> > afternoon/evening.
> Many people have that concept about a "drinking problem" but it's not valid.
>
> Everyone has their own schedules. Time of day doesn't really apply to
> everyone. More importantly is how long you continue to drink and how much.
>
> Many times, I've worked all night while most people are sleeping.
> At those times, my 6am is the same as someone else's after work at 6pm
> in the evening.
>
> I'll have 3-4 drinks within a few hours but then be done until the next
> day. Just because you drink early doesn't mean that you'll continue all
> day long. Many people wrongly assume that though.
>

It's late afternoon/evening because I start work at 5 AM.
If I went in at 9 AM, my schedule would shift to mid-late
evening.

>
> I always grocery shop very early and that's when I buy beer too. Just
> last week I bought beer at 7am and a woman behind me asked, "Are you
> going to drink that this early?"
>
> "Not at all, I just like to get the shopping over early."
> She probably didn't believe me. lol
>

A missed opportunity. A great reply would have been:
"I'll answer that if you'll tell me, do you like to fuck early in
the morning? 'Cause see, a lot of people think that you're
only supposed to fuck at night, but me, I like fucking in
the morning. How about you?"

How much fun would *that* have been?

--Bryan

[Gary]

You're right, Bryan. Maybe a missed opportunity. She was very hot looking.

When she asked, "Are you going to drink that this early?"
I should have replied, "Only if you'll follow me home and have some too."

[jmcquown]

Have you never heard the phrase "birds of a feather flock together?"
Could have been worse. I can think of a couple of serial killer pairs
who were drawn to each other because they felt they were kindred
spirits. Leopold & Loeb. Hickock & Smith. Simmons & Kuthe were only
concerned with partying, sex and that silly basement band. Whew!

Jill

[Bryan Simmons]

That's just a boring, stale pickup attempt. The other would
have most likely elicited outrage, which would have been
funny, or in the odd case, *she'd* have found it funny. In my
experience, offensive occasionally gets you laid, and boring
almost never does.

--Bryan

[Bryan Simmons]

And boring dumb cunts don't flock. They die alone in sterile
retirement communities.
>
> Jill

--Bryan

[Hector]

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 06:21:25 -0500, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:

>On 1/29/2022 4:17 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but Bryan hits the sauce way more. It really shows, don't you
>> think?
>
>As I've always said, "When drinking and posting," save the posts as
>"draft." Next morning, read what you wrote then decide whether to post it.
>

But that's no fun! Let them all get sloshed and then post.

[Hector]

[Hector]

[Leonard Blaisdell]

On 2022-01-30, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:

> Better to drink none than too much.
> Supposedly alcohol does have it's health benefits in small amounts. I
> suppose that depends on what doctor you choose to believe these days.

Just this morning, a bottom banner on one of my news programs scrolled:
"New Oxford study shows alcohol causes cancer."
Since alcohol is a brand new product, I'm glad Oxford jumped right on the
study. Also, pfffffft!