On 1/25/2022 5:59 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2022-01-25 5:19 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>> On 1/25/2022 5:08 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>>>> That's an 11-hour shift each day, 5 days a week. Even with a lunch
>>>> break, something about it doesn't sound right.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, that is only 10 hours, but it doesn't really matter. I
>>> think the point is that he will be at work so he won't be working. I
>>> wonder if he is bright enough to realize that if he stays out of RFC
>>> during those pretend work hours for all we know he will be working.
>>>
>> 10 hours, 11 hours, it's still a hell of a long shift.
>
> I worked a compressed work with with 10 hour shifts. A lot of nurses
> and various law enforcement agencies work 12 hour shifts.
>
I'm not disputing that. Most of those people have a certain level of
job committment which doesn't appear to apply to John Kuthe. What was
the job before last? The clients' bus was late (or he got there too
early or some silly mixup) so he left. The last one, he called to
cancel because it took all day to replace the tire on his car. He's not
exactly one to stick to a 10 hour schedule five days a week. It would
cut into his online posting!
>
>> I think you mean he'll be at work so he won't be *posting*. ;) Unless
>> he is actually working, I sincerely doubt he has the self-control to
>> stay away from the keyboard that long, five days a week!, pretending
>> he's at work.
>>
>
>
> I think I meant wrote I wrote. ...
I read "I think the point is that he will be at work so he won't be
working." as if he is actually at work he won't be posting.
> wondering if he was bright enough to
> stay out of RFC during the work hours he posted in order to convince us
> that he was working.
I think the uncontrollable urge to post the same old stuff would
overcome "bright enough" to stop posting for however many hours a day, 5
days a week.
Jill