On 5/3/2017 6:35 PM,
itsjoan...@webtv.net wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 5:15:44 PM UTC-5, Nancy2 wrote:
>>
>> I found it kinda silly, being set in a busy metro area. How do the producers expect to
>> keep up the charade? At least in the Pioneer House, the homesteads were pretty
>> much isolated from any urban centers, and the homesteads didn't have to depend on
>> masses of modern-day public to make a living, so to speak.
>>
>> And the accents were difficult for me to understand at times.
>>
>> Like I said, a silly unrealistic portrayal. I don't know how they expect this to accurately
>> portray the period and the slum-dwellers.
>>
>> N.
>>
>>
> I guess they were just trying to give an idea of how hard keeping
> body and soul together in Victorian England was. Like the presenter
> said, no healthcare and welfare; you were pretty much on your own.
> What I found so hard to believe was the price of shelter and they
> were in essentially a dump.
>
Joan (and Nancy2), do you remember the PBS series '1900 House'? That
featured a family selected to live like a typical middle class family in
a refurbished Victorian rowhouse. Fascinating stuff. Of course you
can't keep out the modern aspects of what is going on around them. But
they strive for authenticity as much as possible.
I loved the Pioneer House series, too. :)
> Doesn't the idea of eating meats smoked in the outhouse sound yummy?
>
> The next episode is to be set in the 1870's and from the preview
> there is a bit of squabbling already.
>
I didn't get to see it on TV last night. I checked and 'Victorian Slum
House' is available for viewing on one of my local PBS web sites. :)
I'll be watching the first episode online today and will try to catch
the next one on TV next week.
Jill