Ed P wrote:
> On 8/3/2023 10:20 PM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:> On 2023-08-04, Graham
> <
g.st...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Yebbut Ed lives in Florida where Desantis has turned everything
> upside down.
> >
> >
> > Or has held the line against the progressive march toward dystopia. Time
> > will tell.
> Yes, DeSantis is assuring our freedom by restricting what we can read,
> what teachers can teach, what shows we can take kids to, what doctors
> can treat.
The reason that people don’t have a problem with kids entertainment containing age
appropriate representations of heterosexual attraction, courting, and relationships but do
consider it an “abomination” when kids entertainment contains homosexual attraction
and relationships is because, regardless of the ideological push these days, people
intrinsically know and understand that heterosexual relationships are normal, healthy,
and ordered toward the good of society and the individuals, while homosexual
relationships are not.
If given a choice, no parent except the most political and ideologically committed would choose
for their child to be gay rather than straight. There are very real and valid reason for that.
The intent of homosexual relationships in children’s entertainment is to normalize homosexuality to children.
And homosexual relationships/behavior are not normal or healthy and serves no social/procreative purpose.
They aren’t even particularly common or long lasting.
Since gay marriage has been legalized in the US, only 9% of homosexuals are married compared to 48% of heterosexuals (a historically low and not good number).
And in the exact relationships where we would want stability, couples with children, the divorce
rate is 43% among same sex couples with children as opposed to 8% for opposite sex couples.
Why would we want to sell this to children? For similar reasons we don’t want children’s
entertainment that promotes divorce, cohabiting, polygamy, one night stands, etc even though
these are behaviors and relationships found in the real world...
People get mad when companies like Disney promote homosexuality to children because Disney
is then pushing a controversial value judgment onto people’s children and trying to idealize
non-ideal behavior.
There is nothing controversial in men and women falling in love and getting married.
It is controversial to promote other forms of relationships as a good.
The 1967 grant of special status to Disney was a grant of privilege, because the state saw it
in its interests to make such a grant.
Disney is no longer the company Walt founded or envisioned, and is no longer the company
that Florida constituents see as being in their interests to continue to grant such privilege(s).
If Disney were promoting neo-Nazi programs and propaganda, the state of Florida would be
well within its rights and good sense to strip the company of privileges.
The state would ***not***, however, be able to legitimately punish Disney with taxes not binding
on other such businesses, etc.
This is not a free speech issue.
It's an issue over what kind of culture the citizens of Florida want to encourage.
If the constituents think DeSantis and the legislature were off base, they can vote them out of office...
You *do* vote, *don't" you, Ed...???
;-D
--
GM