John Kuthe - All sexual perversions aside, he has no business in nursing

[Bryan Simmons]

Look at his sloppiness in writing, with misspellings, fucked
up sentence structure, and exclamation marks after more
than half of his sentences.

Look at his ranting, and his inability to deal with situations
that most folks just skate through. His list of things that he
says suck is long, but it never includes the real reason why
he has so many crappy interactions with the world around
him, and that is that it is he, himself, who sucks.

Any "agency" who places this nutcase is taking a great risk
in doing so. His education is out of date, as is his work
experience, and everyone here knows that his mind has
significantly deteriorated since he began posting here. If he
were to fuck up, a plaintiff's lawyer would surely discover
his posts here, and could make the case that the agency had
failed to vet him before placing him in a skilled nursing role.
Any settlement against the agency could be huge.

Everyone here knows that all this is true, and yet some still
encourage him, even though I doubt that anyone here, if they
had an invalid child in need of skilled home health care,
knowing him through his posts here, would allow him
anywhere near their child.

--Bryan

[Sqwertz]

Which is why *I've* at least tried to do something about it other
than just pointing it out here. And there's more to come (from me at
least).

-sw

[Elegant Sea Snake]

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my not frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))

[Dubois Sea Snake]

[GM]

"..but it never includes the real reason why he has so many crappy interactions
with the world around him, and that is that it is he, himself, who sucks..."

GEE, Bryan, are you saying that John has:

NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER

<chuckle>

[ and well - said, BTW ]

--
GM

[Bryan Simmons]

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/toxic-relationships/201903/how-confront-narcissists-lethal-weapon-projection

>
> <chuckle>
>
> [ and well - said, BTW ]
>

You should read my book. :-)
>
> --
> GM

--Bryan

[White-lipped Snake]

[John Kuthe]

On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 2:06:56 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
...

> You should read my book. :-)
> >
> > --
> > GM
>
> --Bryan

Your book is a projection of your Narcissistic Personality Disorder!


John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

[Brown Water Python]

On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:31:16 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
wrote:

And the way he's peddling it as well. Nobody wants to read it. He
should get over it. Not everybody's a writer.

[Hank Rogers]

Hows your glabrous nads? Yoose need to pet them boyz before they
run away with a sailor.

[Brown Water Python]

We Dutch have a saying about froggers like yoos, which is KILL YOURSELF
you loser. no friends no real job no money no sex and no hope for the
future. Loser. Ghe Ghe Ghe.

[Brown Water Python]

[Brown Water Python]

> John Kuthe, NPD, GHE, PEDO...
>

Ghe?? Uhm, I dont ghet it?!?

[Bryan Simmons]

I'm not peddling it. I don't ask for anyone's money. I
don't *need* anyone's money. When I write, "You
should read my book," it's mostly in jest. Besides, I
was directing my comment to Greg, and no one else
here.

--Bryan

[Hank Rogers]

Damn. I figured you let a potent but silent one slide by.

Master druce's nose sure wrinkled up and started wiggling immediately.

[Bryan Simmons]

Even if they do, he will still have the best stereo
system, roof, gutters, and a ZERO MPG electric
vehicle! And of course, we all envy his 4 hour
erections. His perfectly shaven ballsack is just
icing on the cake of his greatness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5DmDPor1EM

--Bryan

[Hank Rogers]

And THREE degrees !!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Joan of Arc]

On 2/18/2022 5:31 PM, eat shit, KOOKthe:

> Your

Your demise can't come soon enough. DIE!

[Thomas Joseph]

I can't take sides in this issue because I don't know the guy well enough. But I enjoyed your post nonetheless. In fact I believe that not knowing Mr. Kuthe or his posting history actually made reading your post even more enjoyable. I like to read stuff in that fashion, not knowing or caring who is being attacked or besmirched or whatever, just enjoying it the way someone turns on the adventure channel and watches one animal devour another after a long exhausting chase. I enjoyed your attack. I'm talking about the way you started out, like a jazz cat on the sax, coming in strong - "Oh yeah man, he's got a groovy attack." So I am not taking sides and want no part of that - not yet anyway. For now I just want to say again that I enjoyed the way you ripped into your subject. Excellent attack. Mr. Kuthe?

[Rough Scaled Python]

[Numbat]

[Numbat]

[GM]

She put the "brown" in "brown - noze"...

--
GM

[Gary]

In all fairness, I found his writing style very good. There just wasn't
any story that linked all those conversations together so it was a
boring book.

First Bryan should read many books. Good ones to see how they should be
constructed with a conflict, quest and solution. Learn why those books
were a success. Make a book outline (like a computer flow chart) before
you start writing and follow it.

What he wrote was good fill-in information about the characters but
that's only support for the main story. Bryan left out a main story.

I attended a local lecture by Stephen King back in the early 1980s. When
he first started writing (and submitting), his work was rejected many
times by all the publishers before his writing career took off.

His advice (to wannabe authors): Don't quit writing. Do some every day
and keep trying to improve.

[Numbau]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:56:19 -0500, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:

>On 2/18/2022 8:33 PM, Brown Water Python wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:31:16 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Your book is a projection of your Narcissistic Personality Disorder!
>>
>> And the way he's peddling it as well. Nobody wants to read it. He
>> should get over it. Not everybody's a writer.
>
>In all fairness, I found his writing style very good. There just wasn't
>any story that linked all those conversations together so it was a
>boring book.
>
>First Bryan should read many books.

I've probably read a couple of thousand books and I'm still not a
writer. Except in RFC, of course.

Bryan's problem is also that he would only read books about... Bryan.
And there ain't any.

[Mike Duffy]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:56:19 -0500, Gary wrote:

> First Bryan should read many books. Good ones to see how they should be
> constructed with a conflict, quest and solution. Learn why those books
> were a success. Make a book outline (like a computer flow chart) before
> you start writing and follow it.

JFC, Gary. I defined grammatical extensions AND wrote some javascript
routines to ensure a few new meta-grammatical rules to make my failed e-
book more readable. It's still a failed e-book. You & Pamela are the only
ones who admitted to reading even a part of it.

BTW (for new readers to the group), look in my headers for a link to my
failed free e-book on my personal not-for-profit web-site. There is also
an SMTP URL provided for discussing Bruce 'behind his back'.

> His advice (to wannabe authors): Don't quit writing. Do some every day
> and keep trying to improve.

I noticed you have taken his advice and respond every few days to at
least a dozen threads. Don't give up on the trying to improve part.

[dsi1]

On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 3:51:26 PM UTC-10, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> Look at his sloppiness in writing, with misspellings, fucked
> up sentence structure, and exclamation marks after more
> than half of his sentences.
>
> Look at his ranting, and his inability to deal with situations
> that most folks just skate through. His list of things that he
> says suck is long, but it never includes the real reason why
> he has so many crappy interactions with the world around
> him, and that is that it is he, himself, who sucks.
>
> Any "agency" who places this nutcase is taking a great risk
> in doing so. His education is out of date, as is his work
> experience, and everyone here knows that his mind has
> significantly deteriorated since he began posting here. If he
> were to fuck up, a plaintiff's lawyer would surely discover
> his posts here, and could make the case that the agency had
> failed to vet him before placing him in a skilled nursing role.
> Any settlement against the agency could be huge.
>
> Everyone here knows that all this is true, and yet some still
> encourage him, even though I doubt that anyone here, if they
> had an invalid child in need of skilled home health care,
> knowing him through his posts here, would allow him
> anywhere near their child.
>

> --Bryan

There are a lot of nurses that are lousy at making notes. That won't keep them from getting hired. I'm not a nurse but I have to make patient notes. I just hate it. That's the breaks. Some people are very good at describing what happened during their shift.
I wouldn't hire any of the rfc posters because most posters have mental, personality, developmental, problems that cause them to be mean, petty, envious, crazies that can't ever forget the past. Most of y'alls would get canned if your employers ever got a hold of your crazy, nasty, posts.

[Numbav]

I'd get a promotion.

[GM]

I am known for my excellent and comprehensive case notes, I've a number of databases that have to be
"populated" with them, and I've got it down to an art...

> I wouldn't hire any of the rfc posters because most posters have mental, personality, developmental, problems that cause them to be mean, petty, envious, crazies that can't ever forget the past. Most of y'alls would get canned if your employers ever got a hold of your crazy, nasty, posts.

No worries, *none* of us here would degrade ourselves by even *considering* working with - or especially
*for* - you...

Please *do* carry on, though...

:-D

--
GM

[dsi1]

It's all there in your rfc "notes" - hateful, spiteful, malicious, slanderous, perverted, posts framed by mental illness, and dissociative identity disorder. Hopefully, your psychiatrist is aware of your "notes."
By "us" I assume you're talking about all the multiple personalities that you post as here. That's so creepy.

[GM]

> > GM
> It's all there in your rfc "notes" - hateful, spiteful, malicious, slanderous, perverted, posts framed by mental illness, and dissociative identity disorder. Hopefully, your psychiatrist is aware of your "notes."
> By "us" I assume you're talking about all the multiple personalities that you post as here. That's so creepy.

Make haste to make an appointment with yer orthopedist:

Proverbs 14:30:

"A tranquil heart gives life to the flesh, but envy makes the bones rot..."


👺 <<<==== wee scary GOBLIN for Poi Boi

;-D

--
GM

[Gary]

Glad you mentioned that Mike. I told you long ago that I read your story
in a hurry and have meant to reread it again. Still haven't but still
plan to. Your address for it again?

No need to nitpick my writing here in RFC. I'm not trying to impress you
or anyone else.

[Mike Duffy]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 11:57:44 -0500, Gary wrote:

>> On 2/19/2022 10:31 AM, Mike Duffy wrote:

> Your address for it again?

I did say: "BTW (for new readers to the group), look in my headers for a

link to my failed free e-book on my personal not-for-profit web-site.

Let me improve it: Change "new readers" to "new and old readers".

>> No need to nitpick my writing here in RFC.

Gosh. Couldn't you tell I was joshing? I never said anything was wrong
with your writing. Just to continually improve at anything is sage advice
to anyone for anything.

Your writing is way more cogent than John's, way less boorish than Bryan
& Sheldon, and parsecs ahead of he who cannot be mentioned by name
because his own lack of truthfulness has pushed him into the frantic ever-
tightening circles of a snake sticking his nose up his own ass in order
to escape a trail of stagnant aliases.

[Numbav]

Sometimes I think Mike doesn't like me very much.

[Numbav]

[Jeßus]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 15:31:05 -0000 (UTC), Mike Duffy
<mxd...@bell.net> wrote:


>BTW (for new readers to the group), look in my headers for a link to my
>failed free e-book on my personal not-for-profit web-site.

Oh, OK. As I'm a 'new reader' I'll take a look...

> There is also
>an SMTP URL provided for discussing Bruce 'behind his back'.

What for?

[Pamela]

On 15:31 19 Feb 2022, Mike Duffy said:

> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:56:19 -0500, Gary wrote:
>
>> First Bryan should read many books. Good ones to see how they should
>> be constructed with a conflict, quest and solution. Learn why those
>> books were a success. Make a book outline (like a computer flow
>> chart) before you start writing and follow it.
>
> JFC, Gary. I defined grammatical extensions AND wrote some javascript
> routines to ensure a few new meta-grammatical rules to make my failed
> e- book more readable. It's still a failed e-book. You & Pamela are
> the only ones who admitted to reading even a part of it.

ISTR it was around the time I read some of Bryan's novel. I have to
confess I haven't retained the details.

[Numbaw]

Good question.

[Numbaw]

[Numbaw]

[Numbaw]

[Numbax]

[Numbax]

[Numbax]

[Thomas Joseph]

Gary wrote:

> I attended a local lecture by Stephen King back in the early 1980s. When
> he first started writing (and submitting), his work was rejected many
> times by all the publishers before his writing career took off.
>
> His advice (to wannabe authors): Don't quit writing. Do some every day
> and keep trying to improve.

I am not a big reader, not of novels anyway, but I tried King a few times and did not like the way he placed his words. Anyway, I did not come here to talk about King, but while we're at it I have to say that I don't care for the guy for a reason that goes beyond his writing - his inability to take responsibility for his own actions. This King creep was hit by a car while walking in his home state of Maine. I was not there and did not see it. But I drove a cab 33 years without an accident (yes, luck is involved) and never had an accident. I am also a good pedestrian. How can a guy walk down a country road, even off to the side, and get by a car end not take at least some responsibility for it? On that basis alone my verdict is that King could well be an arrogant person.

[Thomas Joseph]

dsi1 wrote:

> I wouldn't hire any of the rfc posters because most posters have mental, personality, developmental, problems that cause them to be mean, petty, envious, crazies that can't ever forget the past. Most of y'alls would get canned if your employers ever got a hold of your crazy, nasty, posts.

I agree, most posters are mentally troubled lonely people in search of friendship they can't find in real life. But posting is real life. It is my life. This is me, this is what I do. I don't know why and I cannot stop it.

No really though, I was a very good worker at everything I ever did. Most of the jobs were minimum wage, so I guess a lot wasn't required. I hated work more than anyone I ever met, yet always believed if you're going to be there you might as well do a good job.

I like the opening to your post where you said most nurses are not qualified. I believe your comment applies to all professions - that a majority of people in most fields are not good at what they do and don't care how they do it and a minority are very good at what they do and proud of how they do it. Unfortunately, because they are a small minority they are not always easy to find. A hundred to one shot at best. Lots of idiots walking through those college doors. Learned just enough to pass a few exams. And it's going to get worse.

[Jeßus]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 13:41:14 -0800 (PST), Thomas Joseph
<jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:

>dsi1 wrote:
>
>> I wouldn't hire any of the rfc posters because most posters have mental, personality, developmental, problems that cause them to be mean, petty, envious, crazies that can't ever forget the past. Most of y'alls would get canned if your employers ever got a hold of your crazy, nasty, posts.
>
>
>I agree, most posters are mentally troubled lonely people in search of friendship they can't find in real life.

LOL. Mate, there's a wide variety of people posting to the group. I
certainly don't post here because I'm lonely. Nor do the majority of
people here.

[Thomas Joseph]

On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 10:43:31 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:

> There are a lot of nurses that are lousy at making notes. That won't keep them from getting hired. I'm not a nurse but I have to make patient notes. I just hate it. That's the breaks. Some people are very good at describing what happened during their shift.
> I wouldn't hire any of the rfc posters because most posters have mental, personality, developmental, problems that cause them to be mean, petty, envious, crazies that can't ever forget the past. Most of y'alls would get canned if your employers ever got a hold of your crazy, nasty, posts.

I would like to see total honesty in people trying to get jobs or get elected to public office. Just come out with the truth and dish the dirt on yourself before your opponents have a chance to do it. Admit that although you have been married for years you sucked hundreds of cocks in your early years. Come out with everything. The people will love you for it. You will be elected on the basis of your insane truth with people clamoring for more. Before long it's a big parade of public officials and other job seekers laying themselves bare in a wild and wooly "Who's the Weirdest?" competition with some inventing extra outlandish stories about themselves in order to have a chance. I always took jobs on the basis of relative freedom. I did not want any job where I could not express my true opinion. Like in the cab, if someone got in and asked me how my day was going, believe me, they were going to hear it, especially if it was going bad.

[Bryan Simmons]

On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 5:01:08 AM UTC-6, Numbau wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:56:19 -0500, Gary <g.ma...@att.net> wrote:
>
> >On 2/18/2022 8:33 PM, Brown Water Python wrote:
> >> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:31:16 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Your book is a projection of your Narcissistic Personality Disorder!
> >>
> >> And the way he's peddling it as well. Nobody wants to read it. He
> >> should get over it. Not everybody's a writer.
> >
> >In all fairness, I found his writing style very good. There just wasn't
> >any story that linked all those conversations together so it was a
> >boring book.
>

There was a story, and while it did move slowly because
the focus was primarily on the emotional states of the
characters, and their interpersonal relationships, a lot
happens to all three main characters in less than 13
months.

Winter, the title character, gets a job at a strip club
because a classmate has convinced her that she
could earn a lot of money. Before her first round on
the stage, she meets Ian, a still grieving widower who
had won a very large lottery jackpot. She spends the
rest of the evening with him, and before they leave, he
hands her a money clip, which she later realizes not
only has "almost three hundred more dollars, and
something else, a personal check for another
thousand."

The check has his name and address on it, and
Winter is pretty certain that he'd hoped she would
pay him a visit. A few days later, she does, and
agrees to become his very well paid "courtesan."
Winter is very close to her family, and she concocts
a story to explain her new job, saying that she has
become his personal assistant, and his helping him
write a memoir.

Winter had never been in love before, but she had
noticed a pretty girl at school, and seen her more
than once seeming to be emotionally abused by
another girl, and she became totally infatuated.
She finally got up her nerve to approach the girl,
Ann, and within a day, had decided to move into
her dorm room. There was only one problem.
Winter felt that she had to reveal her situation
with Ian.

When she did, Ann was OK with her keeping her
job. Winter introduces Ann to her family, loving,
fun loving people who are polar opposite her
harsh, unloving father. Ann wants to meet Ian,
and when they meet, they instantly click, and
while they have to share Winter, there's no
jealousy, but instead a strong emotional bond.
Ann thinks of Ian as the only man who ever
actually loved her.

The three take the train to Chicago for Ann to
confront her parents, one last chance to make
peace, but her father rejects her, and she snaps.
She falsely accuses her father of sexually
abusing her, and accuses her mother of knowing
about it. On the trip, the relationship between
Ian and Ann becomes physically sexual, with
Winter helping facilitate. The bond between Ian
and Ann is now stronger than every.

Not long after they return to St. Louis, Winter
asks Ann to marry her, and Ann tells her that
she will, but she insists on still living with Ian.
Ian doesn't know about Ann's bargain, and when
she and Winter fly to another state where same
sex marriage is legal, Ian believes that they will
go their separate ways, and he arranges to have
the outstanding portion of the three million
dollars deposited into Winter's account.

When Winter sees what he has done, something
changes. She now knows that the three of them
are an inseparable family unit. Now, it's time to
reveal to her parents, who in the mean time have
themselves gotten to be friends with Ian, about
what actually happened, and that they are now
essentially in a three person marriage, and that
Ian would very likely be the father of their
grandchildren. Her parents accept the new
reality, and everything is fine, but Winter realizes
that because she isn't legally married to Ian,
that when he dies, which will be long before the
other two, that there would be massive
inheritance taxes, so she devises a plan to
marry Ian, even though she's still married to
Ann, because in Missouri, the state does not
recognize her marriage to Ann.

Ann is fine with the idea, but again, she has a
condition. Winter has had a secret about her
past, and she had told Ian from the beginning
that she would never share her past with him.
She had, however, told Ann, and now Ann
insisted that she would only give the marriage
her blessing if Winter told Ian everything she,
Ann, knew. The way that Ann saw it, secrets
between only two of them was a lack of trust,
and made them unequal partners. Winter
agreed, but asked if she could tell him after
the holidays, because with the wedding, and
Christmas with the family, there was already
so much going on. Ann agrees.

Winter and Ian are married before the end
of the year, and several days later Winter
reveals her secret to Ian, but not to the
reader.
____________________
...............................Anniversary.................................
.
"Ian, I have something I need to speak with you about."
.
"What?"
.
"You know the thing about my past? The things I told you were private?"
.
"I know enough not to ask because it makes you uncomfortable."
.
"It doesn't really. I just made a promise, but Ann made me realize that I
shouldn't have secrets from you. I'm going to tell you everything,
because Ian, I trust you. I trust you with anything and everything because
you've never hurt me, and because you trust me."
.
"I do."
.
"This is the last thing I've kept from you, and Ann says that today will be
the day that she'll celebrate as our real anniversary, the one for the three
of us. She's so sweet, and it really is the three of us." Winter paused, and
took the traditional deep breath before saying, "Here goes."
.
She got to the central point without delay, then gave him the time line,
before circling back to fill in details. Ian listened, wide-eyed, without
interruption; he waited until she had announced, "That's it," before
responding.
.
He didn't actually speak, but just laughed, and Winter asked, "You know
how married people can sometimes read each others' minds?"
.
Ian continued to laugh, as he said, "Yeah."
.
"I think I know what you're thinking."
.
"Winter."
.
She smiled at him more sweetly than he could ever recall, then made her
bunny face, before asking, "Four words, right?"
.
Winter noticed Ian's mouth open slowly, the tip of his tongue extending so
slightly as Winter touched his lips, squelching the words that didn't need
to be said. Instead, he merely ran his tongue up her middle finger, and
added a tiny kiss.
.
"And now," said Winter, "I'm yours."
____________________
>
I broke the worst rule of all. I introduced a mystery early
in the book, and never revealed the secret.

> >
> >First Bryan should read many books.
> I've probably read a couple of thousand books and I'm still not a
> writer. Except in RFC, of course.
>
> Bryan's problem is also that he would only read books about... Bryan.
> And there ain't any.
>

You know, I have read a lot of books. What I don't read is newly
published adult fiction, at least not more than little snippets
while I'm at work. Starting with *Prisoner of Azkaban* (book 3),
I was a BN at midnight for every street date. One could also say
that I don't watch movies, because I almost never watch the type
of movies that I put on the shelves, but we do pay for a
subscription to https://www.criterionchannel.com/
In the past couple of weeks we've watched:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierrot_le_Fou
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_on_the_Nile_(1978_film)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_Fools
and others. We're planning on watching another one this
afternoon.

The suggestion was made upthread that I should read
books and pattern my work after them. Heck, if I did
that I could tell folks, "Hey you should read my book.
It's a lot like most other books."

--Bryan

[Ed Pawlowski]

On 2/19/2022 4:48 PM, Thomas Joseph wrote:

> I would like to see total honesty in people trying to get jobs or get elected to public office. Just come out with the truth and dish the dirt on yourself before your opponents have a chance to do it. Admit that although you have been married for years you sucked hundreds of cocks in your early years. Come out with everything. The people will love you for it. You will be elected on the basis of your insane truth with people clamoring for more. Before long it's a big parade of public officials and other job seekers laying themselves bare in a wild and wooly "Who's the Weirdest?" competition with some inventing extra outlandish stories about themselves in order to have a chance. I always took jobs on the basis of relative freedom. I did not want any job where I could not express my true opinion. Like in the cab, if someone got in and asked me how my day was going, believe me, they were going to hear it, especially if it was going bad.

A lot of people don't want to hear honesty. The truth seems to upset
them. Fortunately, some do appreciate it. I've dealt with a lot of
customers over the years. Even cost us some business.

Quoted a job and said parts in 6 weeks. They responded, I need them in
4 and your competitions said they can do it. Lost order. I get a call
6 weeks later and they guy said he still does not have parts from the
other guy, can I help him? Sure, could have 6 weeks ago.

Exception is telemarketers. They ask me "how are you?" so I tell them.
They hang up on me when I give my story.

[Aumbax]

How long is your story?

[Thomas Joseph]

Gotcha. The LOL was good enough for me.

[Aumbax]

[Aumbax]

Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my not frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))

[Aumbax]

[Aumbax]

Pamela wrote:
> On 15:31 19 Feb 2022, Mike Duffy said:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:56:19 -0500, Gary wrote:
>>
>>> First Bryan should read many books. Good ones to see how they should
>>> be constructed with a conflict, quest and solution. Learn why those
>>> books were a success. Make a book outline (like a computer flow
>>> chart) before you start writing and follow it.
>>
>> JFC, Gary. I defined grammatical extensions AND wrote some javascript
>> routines to ensure a few new meta-grammatical rules to make my failed
>> e- book more readable. It's still a failed e-book. You & Pamela are
>> the only ones who admitted to reading even a part of it.

> Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my not frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))))))

> ISTR it was around the time I read some of Bryan's novel. I have to
> confess I haven't retained the details.
>
>> BTW (for new readers to the group), look in my headers for a link to
>> my failed free e-book on my personal not-for-profit web-site. There
>> is also an SMTP URL provided for discussing Bruce 'behind his back'.

[Thomas Joseph]

Ed Pawlowski wrote:

> A lot of people don't want to hear honesty. The truth seems to upset
> them. Fortunately, some do appreciate it. I've dealt with a lot of
> customers over the years. Even cost us some business.
>
> Quoted a job and said parts in 6 weeks. They responded, I need them in
> 4 and your competitions said they can do it. Lost order. I get a call
> 6 weeks later and they guy said he still does not have parts from the
> other guy, can I help him? Sure, could have 6 weeks ago.
>
> Exception is telemarketers. They ask me "how are you?" so I tell them.
> They hang up on me when I give my story.

I love the truth - when it suits me. No really, I'm all about the truth. When I was in my 20s I hung out in a poolroom and drank every day for a decade. But as I neared 30 I began to realize that not working was becoming a full-time job. So I had to break down and get a real one.

A block from the poolroom a new 7-11 was opening. I dreaded work but wanted an apartment I could actually pay for each month. I found out the guy who owned the store was from Allentown, Pa, my home town. That was a good sign.

So the guy is interviewing me and asking me the usual questions and I'm not lying in response to any of them. I said yes so many times in a row I almost got addicted to it. Then the guy said, "Ok, you'll be working the graveyard shift - 10pm to 6am. When the beer doors close at 2am will you be able to tell people they can't have any?"

I had responded with so many yeses in a row that I almost said it again. But I quickly backed up with what seemed to me a long pause, then said, "Uh, no, I don't think so." I felt relieved. The guy was grateful for my response. See, I lived in that neighborhood. I knew everybody. A lot of them down and outers just like me. It would not have been easy to turn them down after 2am. They were all boozers, just like me. It was funny the way he had me saying "Yes" so many times in a row that I almost said it again like a robot before actually thinking about it. Pretty funny I thought.

[Ed Pawlowski]

Pretty quick. Let's just say it is adult themed and may involve the
mother of the caller.

[Bumbax]

lol

[Bumbax]

Bumbax wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 19:04:40 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>
>> On 2/19/2022 5:26 PM, Aumbax wrote:
>>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 17:13:47 -0500, Ed Pawlowski <e...@snet.xxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A lot of people don't want to hear honesty. The truth seems to upset
>>>> them. Fortunately, some do appreciate it. I've dealt with a lot of
>>>> customers over the years. Even cost us some business.
>>>>
>>>> Quoted a job and said parts in 6 weeks. They responded, I need them in
>>>> 4 and your competitions said they can do it. Lost order. I get a call
>>>> 6 weeks later and they guy said he still does not have parts from the
>>>> other guy, can I help him? Sure, could have 6 weeks ago.
>>>>
>>>> Exception is telemarketers. They ask me "how are you?" so I tell them.
>>>> They hang up on me when I give my story.
>>>
>>> How long is your story?
>>
>>
>> Pretty quick. Let's just say it is adult themed and may involve the
>> mother of the caller.
>
> lol
>

[Bumbax]

[Bumbax]

[Bumbax]

Thomas Joseph wrote:
> On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 4:44:00 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 13:41:14 -0800 (PST), Thomas Joseph
>> <jazee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wouldn't hire any of the rfc posters because most posters have mental, personality, developmental, problems that cause them to be mean, petty, envious, crazies that can't ever forget the past. Most of y'alls would get canned if your employers ever got a hold of your crazy, nasty, posts.
>>>

>>>Uhm, Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my not frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))

>>> I agree, most posters are mentally troubled lonely people in search of friendship they can't find in real life.
>> LOL. Mate, there's a wide variety of people posting to the group. I
>> certainly don't post here because I'm lonely. Nor do the majority of
>> people here.
>
> Gotcha. The LOL was good enough for me.
>

[Bumbax]

[Bumbax]

[Mike Duffy]

On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 07:03:37 +1100, Jeßus wrote:

> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 15:31:05 -0000 (UTC), Mike Duffy <mxd...@bell.net>
> wrote:
>
>

>>BTW (for new readers to the group), look in my headers for a link to my
>>failed free e-book on my personal not-for-profit web-site.
>

> Oh, OK. As I'm a 'new reader' I'll take a look...

No, you are 'grandfather'-claused prior to my appearance here. I believe
I saw your name a few times very early on before you took a mutli-month
hiatus.

>
>
>> There is also
>>an SMTP URL provided for discussing Bruce 'behind his back'.
>

> What for?

Just to piss him off. He once accused people of 'talking about him behind
his back' when they were, in fact, speaking about him openly using third
person pronouns.

His problem is his perspective. Being in front of him appears as behind
his back because he usually has his nose stuck up his own ass.

[Eumbax]

I'm so interesting. I understand y'all talk about me a lot. What else
would you do. Talk about yourselves? Lol, sorry, just kidding :)

[Mike Duffy]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 20:06:52 +0000, Pamela wrote:

> ISTR it was around the time I read some of Bryan's novel. I have to
> confess I haven't retained the details.

To be honest, I do not expect anyone here to like my book because it was
specifically written for an audience with a reading level 9 to 12.

I hope Michael can read it to his girl before she becomes too old. There
are some double entendres which only an adult can catch which are more
evident when audible.

[Dave Smith]

On 2022-02-19 8:29 p.m., Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 07:03:37 +1100, Jeßus wrote:

>>
>>> There is also
>>> an SMTP URL provided for discussing Bruce 'behind his back'.
>>
>> What for?
>
> Just to piss him off. He once accused people of 'talking about him behind
> his back' when they were, in fact, speaking about him openly using third
> person pronouns.

You have to appreciate the irony of the situation. He seemed to have
been upset about me talking behind his back after I filtered him. I had
indeed made comments about him,. Thanks to the the sock puppets that
relay posts by replying and quoting them, it seemed he was talking about
me. It seems to me that if he sees my publicly posted comments and then
replies to me, knowing that I have him filtered, he would be the one
talking behind my back.

>
> His problem is his perspective. Being in front of him appears as behind
> his back because he usually has his nose stuck up his own ass.

Some people have some very special issues.

[John Kuthe]

On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> Look at his sloppiness in writing, with misspellings, fucked
> up sentence structure, and exclamation marks after more
> than half of his sentences.
>
> Look at his ranting, and his inability to deal with situations
> that most folks just skate through. His list of things that he
> says suck is long, but it never includes the real reason why
> he has so many crappy interactions with the world around
> him, and that is that it is he, himself, who sucks.
>
> Any "agency" who places this nutcase is taking a great risk
> in doing so. His education is out of date, as is his work
> experience, and everyone here knows that his mind has
> significantly deteriorated since he began posting here. If he
> were to fuck up, a plaintiff's lawyer would surely discover
> his posts here, and could make the case that the agency had
> failed to vet him before placing him in a skilled nursing role.
> Any settlement against the agency could be huge.
>
> Everyone here knows that all this is true, and yet some still
> encourage him, even though I doubt that anyone here, if they
> had an invalid child in need of skilled home health care,
> knowing him through his posts here, would allow him
> anywhere near their child.
>
> --Bryan

NO ONE reads this shit, Bryan!

Fuck off!

John Kuthe. RN, BSN...

[Eumbax]

[John Kuthe]

On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:

...
> --Bryan

Bryan, YOU are the Pervert! Letting me and Steve have sex with you and Shira at Novelty Studios!


John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

[Fumbax]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 20:46:11 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-02-19 8:29 p.m., Mike Duffy wrote:
>>
>> Just to piss him off. He once accused people of 'talking about him behind
>> his back' when they were, in fact, speaking about him openly using third
>> person pronouns.
>
>You have to appreciate the irony of the situation. He seemed to have
>been upset about me talking behind his back after I filtered him. I had
>indeed made comments about him,. Thanks to the the sock puppets that
>relay posts by replying and quoting them, it seemed he was talking about
>me. It seems to me that if he sees my publicly posted comments and then
>replies to me, knowing that I have him filtered, he would be the one
>talking behind my back.

LOL. You killfile someone, they talk about you and then you complain
that they're talking about you behind your back? That's a whole new
level of lunacy. Good one, Pickleball :)

[Fumbax]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 18:21:09 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe <jwk...@bjc.org>
wrote:

>On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
>...
>> --Bryan
>
>Bryan, YOU are the Pervert! Letting me and Steve have sex with you and Shira at Novelty Studios!

Finally we're getting to the crux of the matter: Bryan and John had
sex and now Bryan has lifelong PTSD.

[Fumbax]

[Fumbax]

[Fumbax]

Uhm, Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe. This is my not frogger. Yes. Ghe Ghe Ghe :)))))

[John Kuthe]

The males in our little soire never had sex with each other, but we all had sex with the female as she let us!

Bryan is the Pervert, though. Not me!


John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

[Thomas Joseph]

On Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 9:31:15 PM UTC-5, Fumbax wrote:

> Finally we're getting to the crux of the matter: Bryan and John had
> sex and now Bryan has lifelong PTSD.

I was born with PTSD.

[Jeßus]

On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 01:29:07 -0000 (UTC), Mike Duffy

Apologies, I read it as being for Kuthe, for some reason. I'll take
another look at this URL.

[Jeßus]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 20:46:11 -0500, Dave Smith
<adavid...@sympatico.ca> wrote:

>On 2022-02-19 8:29 p.m., Mike Duffy wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 07:03:37 +1100, Jeßus wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> There is also
>>>> an SMTP URL provided for discussing Bruce 'behind his back'.
>>>
>>> What for?
>>
>> Just to piss him off. He once accused people of 'talking about him behind
>> his back' when they were, in fact, speaking about him openly using third
>> person pronouns.
>
>You have to appreciate the irony of the situation. He seemed to have
>been upset about me talking behind his back after I filtered him. I had
>indeed made comments about him,. Thanks to the the sock puppets that
>relay posts by replying and quoting them, it seemed he was talking about
>me. It seems to me that if he sees my publicly posted comments and then
>replies to me, knowing that I have him filtered, he would be the one
>talking behind my back.

Yes, it's the same logic.

>> His problem is his perspective. Being in front of him appears as behind
>> his back because he usually has his nose stuck up his own ass.
>
>
>Some people have some very special issues.

He certainly does. Most people eventually figure out to not be a
serial asshole 365 days a year if they wish to be respected, or even
listened to by their peers. But not him.

[Fumbax]

Is your mother's name Bryan by any chance?

[Fumbax]

[Fumbax]

Maybe you're not one of my peers :)

[Alex]

That's not what you typed.  Do you lack attention to detail or are you a
liar?

[Gary]

You certainly do, Davers.
Once you killfile/filter someone out you should never talk about them to
anyone else either. Didn't you want that person to be gone? If so, stop
talking about them - even to others.

You did the same with.... JULIE!

[GM]

You should remind JILL of this, too, Gary...

--
GM

[Gary]

Eh-oh! Old secrets revealed?

[John Kuthe]

On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:

....

YOU are the Pervert, Bryan!

Never forget it!

Fucker!


John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

[Bryan Simmons]

You're getting desperate, John. I wasn't there when
you and Steve did what you did, you know, your
"first kiss" and all. Maybe you aren't so much lying
as deluding yourself. Maybe you WISH that I had
been there, just like you WISH that you had gotten
to have sex with the 3rd and 4th grade girls. That
would probably be a more fun false memory, so
you should focus on that.

"I WISH I could have had sex with several girls
in my 3rd and 4th grade classes."
--John Kuthe

--Bryan

[Bryan Simmons]

On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 6:44:27 AM UTC-6, jwk...@bjc.org wrote:
> On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> ....
>
> YOU are the Pervert, Bryan!
>
> Never forget it!
>
> Fucker!
>

I'm not the one who wants to work as a pedo nurse.
But yes, I am a fucker, whereas you are a beat-offer,
and today is your day to shine! Maybe you could
squirt on the teenage Jill pic, make her your AnJill
of this morning.
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

--Bryan

[GM]

GADS, now I feel like up - chucking my
breakfast porridge...!!!

:O

--
GM

[%]

But it's OK for you to talk about Kuthe, right hypocrite?

[Janet]

In article <6e924c88-1d1f-4092...@googlegroups.com>,
jwk...@bjc.org says...

>
> On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
> > --Bryan
>
> Bryan, YOU are the Pervert! Letting me and Steve have sex with you and Shira at Novelty Studios!
>

So John, you finally outed yourself as Bryan's sleazy sex partner last
century. That explains your endless failed attempts to re-ingratiate
yourself with him.

Apparently Bryan has moved on. He does not reciprocate. He's made it
blindingly clear he has zero interest in rekindling any kind of
physical, sexual, emotional relationship with you.

You're dumped, you're done, it's OVER FOREVER. With Bryan and everyone
else you ever cared about.

Get over yourself. Get a dog or a cat. Just shut up.

Janet UK

[Bryan Simmons]

On Sunday, February 20, 2022 at 8:35:57 AM UTC-6, Janet wrote:
> In article <6e924c88-1d1f-4092...@googlegroups.com>,
> jwk...@bjc.org says...
> >
> > On Thursday, February 17, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM UTC-6, bryang...@gmail.com wrote:
> > ...
> > > --Bryan
> >
> > Bryan, YOU are the Pervert! Letting me and Steve have sex with you and Shira at Novelty Studios!
> >
> So John, you finally outed yourself as Bryan's sleazy sex partner last
> century.
>

We were never sex partners. John and another friend
got my GF to let them lick her asshole, which is the
first time he ever kissed a girl. I found out afterward.
There was nothing to be done. I was mostly just glad
to be with the kind of girl who would do something
like that.
As far as sex went, she was like a goddess to me.
When she broke up with me after about 3-1/2 years
together, I was absolutely devastated. I am totally
lousy at being single. Fortunately, I'm in a great 31
year marriage that keeps getting better.
Speaking of marriage, we saw a truly bizarre movie
yesterday.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Bonheur_(1965_film)
>
> Janet UK

--Bryan

[Jeßus]

On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 14:35:47 -0000, Janet <nob...@hame.cock> wrote:


> Get over yourself. Get a dog or a cat.

You sure that's a good idea?

>Just shut up.

Now that's a good idea.

[Humbax]

Dave's also always complaining about the people who go on and on about
John Kuthe (Jill, Joan etc). And then he joins in.

[Humbax]

[Jumbax]

[Jumbax]