On 2012-11-17 01:46:34 +0000, Nunya Bidnits said:
>>>> I noticed that you're really mean. Does it make you happy?
>>>
>>> I noticed you have a habit of claiming you don't know what's going
>>> on or why.
>>
>> I notice you proffer your observations as accusations.
>
> Accurate nonetheless.
They are observations that you consider accurate. I've met a lot of
people in life that were "mind readers" and knew what other people were
thinking. They claimed they were accurate, but I found they had worse
odds than flipping a coin.
>>> How would you respond to a sick wanker who is deliberately trying to
>>> ruin the group with a constant flood of nameshifted garbage?
>>
>> If they aren't amusing, I kill file them. What do you do? (That
>> quesion is not a claim that I don't have assumptions: I assume you
>> bitch and whine about how you don't like them. But maybe you reach out
>> to them through prayer, I can't be sure until you tell me.)
>
> I'm not given to superstition or assumption,
I see you are claiming that you aren't given to assumptions...
> ..and you don't understand that the dynamics of a hyper-agressive
> flooding troll are not simply made to vanish by putting the perp in a
> killfile. I thought you had enough NG experience to know that, but
> perhaps I'm wrong.
I have way more experience than you might assume, and know that
ignoring noise-makers, as well as the people who who need to give them
attention through more noise are both nuisances.
>> Now here's where my claims of not know what's going on (since I don't
>> follow this *particular* soap opera.): The guy got a job at UPS, how
>> the fuck is that Jihad-ready?
>
> Generally it's a good idea to take some time to learn what is going on
> in a NG before jumping into ongoing matters. In other words, if you had
> done that, you wouldn't be asking me that question.
It seems that answering the question would have been easier than all
that convoluted thinking.
> And if you did do that and still don't get it, no need wasting my time
> explaining something beyond your depth.
I can no longer follow your analysis but conclude it's engrained in
some vendetta the details of which are irrelevant to me. But I will do
my best to keep out of your slap-fights from now on. In this particular
case it was "Jammy Toe" that I was responding to. So if you are also
policing on behalf of too many others it might be more difficult.
But I'll try.