Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Dinner last night 7ndJan

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Peter Lucas

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 6:08:27 AM1/6/10
to
Metastasized tit pate. On toast.
God bless the poor security at the hospital waste bins!

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

If we are not meant to eat cock,
why are they made of meat?

PeterL

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 10:40:34 AM1/6/10
to
Peter Lucas <peta_l...@manlymail.net> wrote in news:366532a4-f839-4604-
8f81-157...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:

Reported to Google Groups.


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia


If we are not meant to eat animals,

ChattyCathy

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 2:50:30 PM1/6/10
to
PeterL wrote:

> Peter Lucas <peta_l...@manlymail.net> wrote in
> news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> 8f81-157...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Metastasized tit pate. On toast.
>> God bless the poor security at the hospital waste bins!
>

> Reported to Google Groups.

Oo-ooh, goo-oo-die...

Scar
--
Chatty Cathy

PeterL

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 3:13:38 PM1/6/10
to
ChattyCathy <cath...@mailinator.com> wrote in news:MP51n.28043$Gf3.3281
@newsfe22.iad:


Hey, it's helped in the past.

Quite a few of the previous forgers accounts with Google were cancelled,
which then forced it/them to open new accounts...... which were then
cancelled.

They may not reply to your every 'report', but they do act on them.

Bob Terwilliger

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 3:49:51 AM1/7/10
to
Peter blustered bootlessly:

>>> Peter Lucas <peta_l...@manlymail.net> wrote in
>>> news:366532a4-f839-4604-
>>> 8f81-157...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>>>
>>>> Metastasized tit pate. On toast.
>>>> God bless the poor security at the hospital waste bins!
>>>
>>> Reported to Google Groups.
>>
>> Oo-ooh, goo-oo-die...
>>
>> Scar
>
>
> Hey, it's helped in the past.
>
> Quite a few of the previous forgers accounts with Google were cancelled,
> which then forced it/them to open new accounts...... which were then
> cancelled.
>
> They may not reply to your every 'report', but they do act on them.


Why would they act on a report that someone is using the same handle as you?
If the person writing the spoofs was using the same *e-mail address* as you
are, that would be a violation of Google's TOS, but there's nothing which
says no two people can't have the same handle. The only way it would be a
violation (in more ways than one) would be if peta_l...@manlymail.net
really *is* your e-mail address. Is it?

Bob

Gregory Morrow

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 4:34:18 AM1/7/10
to
Bob Terwilliger wrote:


Yup, Bob...it's true...and anyways Google is NOTORIOUS for not taking
"action" against *anyone* - I mean look at the HUGE amount of spam that
emanates from them...

I'm afraid that we've caught PeterBreath in still *another* one of his
sordid lil' lies...

<snicker>


--
Best
Greg


Gregory Morrow

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 4:34:07 AM1/7/10
to
PeterBREATH Lucas SPEWED:

> ChattyCathy <cathy1...@mailinator.com> wrote in news:MP51n.28043$Gf3.3281
> @newsfe22.iad:
>
> > PeterL wrote:
>
> >> Peter Lucas <peta_luca...@manlymail.net> wrote in
> >> news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> >> 8f81-157fda325...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:


>
> >>> Metastasized tit pate. On toast.
> >>> God bless the poor security at the hospital waste bins!
>
> >> Reported to Google Groups.
>
> > Oo-ooh, goo-oo-die...
>
> > Scar
>
> Hey, it's helped in the past.
>
> Quite a few of the previous forgers accounts with Google were cancelled,
> which then forced it/them to open new accounts...... which were then
> cancelled.
>
> They may not reply to your every 'report', but they do act on them.


LIAR...


--
Best
Greg

Gregory Morrow

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 4:35:50 AM1/7/10
to
ChattyCathy wrote:

> PeterL wrote:
> > Peter Lucas <peta_luca...@manlymail.net> wrote in
> > news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> > 8f81-157fda325...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>

> >> Metastasized tit pate. On toast.
> >> God bless the poor security at the hospital waste bins!
>
> > Reported to Google Groups.
>
> Oo-ooh, goo-oo-die...
>
> Scar


Big Brave Peter is a Manly Man...he was in the Australian Special
Forces and all, ya know...!!!

;-)


--
Best
Greg

Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 5:36:56 AM1/7/10
to
On Jan 6, 7:40 am, PeterL <P...@brissie.aus> wrote:
> Peter Lucas <peta_luca...@manlymail.net> wrote in news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> 8f81-157fda325...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>
> > Metastasized tit pate. On toast.
> > God bless the poor security at the hospital waste bins!
>
> > --
> > Peter Lucas
> > Brisbane
> > Australia
>
> > If we are not meant to eat cock,
> > why are they made of meat?
>
> Reported to Google Groups.
>

How do you do that? Do they have a special Complaint Department? And
what do they do with your complaints?

PeterL1

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 9:16:30 AM1/7/10
to
"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_be...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:2c022412-cdb5-43f7...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:

Plonk.

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

"People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it is safer to
harrass rich women than motorcycle gangs."

Message has been deleted

pavane

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 11:24:28 AM1/7/10
to

"Kent Brockman" <bigc...@kbbl.com> wrote in message
news:hi4uu9$7e7$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

|
| On 7-Jan-2010, Gregory Morrow <gregor...@earthlink.net> wrote:
|
| > Big Brave Peter is a Manly Man...he was in the Australian Special
| > Forces and all, ya know...!!!
|
| Is that the same as what we in the US call Special Olympics?

Yes but without a low IQ limitation.

pavane


Dan Abel

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 1:30:12 AM1/8/10
to
In article
<2c022412-cdb5-43f7...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_be...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 6, 7:40�am, PeterL <P...@brissie.aus> wrote:
> > Peter Lucas <peta_luca...@manlymail.net> wrote in news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> > 8f81-157fda325...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:

[deleted]

> > Reported to Google Groups.
> >
>
> How do you do that? Do they have a special Complaint Department? And
> what do they do with your complaints?

Looking at your very own headers:

X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com

If they find that someone has violated their TOS (terms of service),
they will cancel that person's Google account. If the posts are
offensive, they may delete them from their archives.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
da...@sonic.net

sf

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 1:59:23 AM1/8/10
to
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:30:12 -0800, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:

>X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>
>If they find that someone has violated their TOS (terms of service),
>they will cancel that person's Google account. If the posts are
>offensive, they may delete them from their archives.

Hm. I wonder if they do that very often.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.

Steve Pope

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 2:15:48 AM1/8/10
to
sf <sf.u...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:30:12 -0800, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:

>>X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com

>>If they find that someone has violated their TOS (terms of service),
>>they will cancel that person's Google account. If the posts are
>>offensive, they may delete them from their archives.

>Hm. I wonder if they do that very often.

No. Almost never. They may use these complaints for some
sort of predictive, statistical purpose, but they don't
act on them individually.

Steve

Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 6:33:44 AM1/8/10
to
On Jan 7, 10:30 pm, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:
> In article
> <2c022412-cdb5-43f7-9ee9-c6bea9d75...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

>  "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 6, 7:40 am, PeterL <P...@brissie.aus> wrote:
> > > Peter Lucas <peta_luca...@manlymail.net> wrote in news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> > > 8f81-157fda325...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>
> [deleted]
>
> > > Reported to Google Groups.
>
> > How do you do that? Do they have a special Complaint Department? And
> > what do they do with your complaints?
>
> Looking at your very own headers:
>
> X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
>
> If they find that someone has violated their TOS (terms of service),
> they will cancel that person's Google account.  If the posts are
> offensive, they may delete them from their archives.
>

How do you expect Goggle Groups, the most pathetic organisation, to
help?

First of all, Google Groups is only one of many ways to post to
Usenet. So, if Google Groups blocks you from posting through Google
Groups, you can go to any other Usenet reader, like Outlook (afaik).
Moreover, if Google Groups blocks you from posting through Google
Groups but you insist on staying with them, you can just change your
IP address and your nickname - and you are in again.

Second, for many years, we at soc.culture.russian were inundated by
hundreds of spam anti-semitic posts per day from some crazy Muslim
Bosnian-American madman from Florida called Amigocabal . He destroyed
our group. All I wanted is for Google Groups to stop displaying his
new posts, so that they would not drown relevant posts. But not only
does Google Groups continue to display all posts, no matter how
abusive the author is, but Google Groups do not give you any facility
to create killfiles. In other words, in addition to numerous other
atrocities and stupidities that Google has introduced ever since
buying up Dejanews (I have a feeling that Google has exactly one
employee working on Google Groups and this employee was hired as an
affirmative action for people with IQ under 70) and turning it into
the Google Groups, Google Groups goes out of its way to make it
difficult for the user to block spam.


Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 6:38:44 AM1/8/10
to
On Jan 7, 11:15 pm, spop...@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote:

> sf  <sf.use...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:30:12 -0800, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:
> >>X-Complaints-To: groups-ab...@google.com

> >>If they find that someone has violated their TOS (terms of service),
> >>they will cancel that person's Google account.  If the posts are
> >>offensive, they may delete them from their archives.
> >Hm.  I wonder if they do that very often.
>
> No.  Almost never.  They may use these complaints for some
> sort of predictive, statistical purpose, but they don't
> act on them individually.
>

Once in awhile you can still find Usenet posts saying something like:
"I am going to report this spammer/slanderer to the Usenet owners and
they will revoke your posting privileges". To some people, it is hard
to understand the distributed nature of Usenet and that there are no
exclusive owners/operators of Usenet.

Dan Abel

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 1:00:14 PM1/8/10
to
In article
<61bad610-f849-415a...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com>,

"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_be...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 7, 10:30�pm, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <2c022412-cdb5-43f7-9ee9-c6bea9d75...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> > �"Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr." <ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 6, 7:40 am, PeterL <P...@brissie.aus> wrote:
> > > > Peter Lucas <peta_luca...@manlymail.net> wrote in
> > > > news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> > > > 8f81-157fda325...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
> >
> > [deleted]
> >
> > > > Reported to Google Groups.
> >
> > > How do you do that? Do they have a special Complaint Department? And
> > > what do they do with your complaints?
> >
> > Looking at your very own headers:
> >
> > X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
> >
> > If they find that someone has violated their TOS (terms of service),
> > they will cancel that person's Google account. �If the posts are
> > offensive, they may delete them from their archives.
> >
>
> How do you expect Goggle Groups, the most pathetic organisation, to
> help?

You asked a question, and I answered it. I have never complained to
GoogleGroups, but many have complained that they don't act on most
complaints.



> First of all, Google Groups is only one of many ways to post to
> Usenet.

True.

> So, if Google Groups blocks you from posting through Google
> Groups, you can go to any other Usenet reader, like Outlook (afaik).

No. Outlook is a client. It doesn't work unless you give it a news
server. Google Groups does not accept posts except through its own web
interface. You must pay for access to a server, in some fashion. My
ISP has its own server.

> Moreover, if Google Groups blocks you from posting through Google
> Groups but you insist on staying with them, you can just change your
> IP address and your nickname - and you are in again.

It certainly isn't hard to get back in.

> Second, for many years, we at soc.culture.russian were inundated by
> hundreds of spam anti-semitic posts per day from some crazy Muslim
> Bosnian-American madman from Florida called Amigocabal . He destroyed
> our group. All I wanted is for Google Groups to stop displaying his
> new posts, so that they would not drown relevant posts. But not only
> does Google Groups continue to display all posts, no matter how
> abusive the author is, but Google Groups do not give you any facility
> to create killfiles. In other words, in addition to numerous other
> atrocities and stupidities that Google has introduced ever since
> buying up Dejanews (I have a feeling that Google has exactly one
> employee working on Google Groups and this employee was hired as an
> affirmative action for people with IQ under 70) and turning it into
> the Google Groups,

Many good arguments for not using Google Groups for posting to these
groups.

> Google Groups goes out of its way to make it
> difficult for the user to block spam.

Spam is not quite the same as abusive posting. Over the last several
years, I have made it pretty clear that Google is the biggest spammer of
all. Why would anybody expect that they would be vigilant in stopping
spam, other than to eliminate competition?

projectile vomit chick

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 2:28:17 PM1/8/10
to

PeterL1

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 4:50:14 PM1/8/10
to
spo...@speedymail.org (Steve Pope) wrote in news:hi6m34$l0f$1
@blue.rahul.net:


And you know this how? You work for Google?? I think not.

If you don't have 100% certainty, you really shouldn't sit there with the
"Bullshit baffles brains" mentality.


Having past experience with Google (because of the many weird little
scared weasels that need to emulate someone they adore ...me)...... and
yes, I even got a return email from Google.... they *do* look at reports
of abuse and they *do* action them.

There was some pathetic prick here in Oz, who lives/lived in Melbourne. It
eneded up creating about 100 different accounts because Google kept
shutting them down all the time. It also happened to another weasel, who
then went 'offshore' to a European ISP that doesn't penalize it's paying
customers. It searched long and hard,worldwide, to find that ISP too!!


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

Pain is your friend, your ally, it will tell you when you are seriously
injured, it will keep you awake and angry, and remind you to finish the
job and get the hell home. But you know the best thing about pain?

It lets you know you're not dead yet!

PLucas

unread,
Jan 12, 2010, 11:47:13 PM1/12/10
to
On Jan 7, 7:13 am, PeterL <P...@brissie.aus> wrote:
> ChattyCathy <cathy1...@mailinator.com> wrote in news:MP51n.28043$Gf3.3281
> @newsfe22.iad:

>
> > PeterL wrote:
>
> >> Peter Lucas <peta_luca...@manlymail.net> wrote in
> >> news:366532a4-f839-4604-
> >> 8f81-157fda325...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
>
> >>> Metastasized tit pate. On toast.
> >>> God bless the poor security at the hospital waste bins!
>
> >> Reported to Google Groups.
>
> > Oo-ooh, goo-oo-die...
>
> > Scar
>
> Hey, it's helped in the past.
>
> Quite a few of the previous forgers accounts with Google were cancelled,
> which then forced it/them to open new accounts...... which were then
> cancelled.
>
> They may not reply to your every 'report', but they do act on them.

Oh, I agree completely!

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

If we are not meant to eat cock,

0 new messages