That binaries thing.
Chemiker
prepare. Kili's last days have been documented in images,
totally appropriate, IMHO. They can't be posted here.
OK. There is a NG alt.food.binaries, which Verizon no
longer carries. What are the pros and cons of posting
binary files? Must all binary posts go to a.b.c? I noice some
of you use tinyurl or something like that. Is that the way
to go?
On this topic, I'm a newbie, admitted.
But there has to be some easy way to see images
that relate to the group. I think they could add a
lot.
Thoughts?
Alex
Scott
I noice some
> of you use tinyurl or something like that.
tinypic
Pete C.
Binaries such as pictures can only be posted to binary newsgroups,
attempts to post binaries to other newsgroups are rejected by most news
servers. Links / URLs to pictures posted on other sites / servers such
as the noted tinypic can be posted in any newsgroup. The advantage to
binary groups is the pictures are inline and you don't have to open
other browser / reader windows to view them. The newsgroup is
alt.binaries.food BTW.
Nancy Young
> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
> prepare. Kili's last days have been documented in images,
> totally appropriate, IMHO. They can't be posted here.
>
> OK. There is a NG alt.food.binaries, which Verizon no
> longer carries. What are the pros and cons of posting
> binary files? Must all binary posts go to a.b.c? I noice some
> of you use tinyurl or something like that. Is that the way
> to go?
Yes, either tinypic.com or put your pictures on some photo
website so you can post the url. Not everyone has a
newsserver that will allow them to download binaries, or
live in places where downloading binaries would be a hassle.
nancy
Chemiker
of redirect so the pix are off group. OK, that works. I'll have
to go there and investigate. I guess there's some registration
or something involved....
Alex
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:58:24 -0600, "Pete C." <aux3....@snet.net>
wrote:
Chemiker
Alex
Peter Lucas
news:bvtcm49kiv6743m49...@4ax.com:
> I think I see. I need to set up something with tinypic as a sort
> of redirect so the pix are off group. OK, that works. I'll have
> to go there and investigate. I guess there's some registration
> or something involved....
>
Nope, no registration involved. Just go to.....
Browse to find your pic file, Upload and copy the URL that it assigns
for that pic.
Or, as Nancy said, there are websites like Photobucket, Flickr, etc,
etc, were you register and are able to upload pics so that they stay on
the website.
Such as.........
http://s199.photobucket.com/albums/aa216/PeterL_2007/
IIRC, they give you about 5Gb of 'space' to use, so be aware of the size
of the pics that you put in there.
--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing.
Edmund Burke.
Peter Lucas
> Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:bvtcm49kiv6743m49...@4ax.com:
>
> > I think I see. I need to set up something with tinypic as a sort
> > of redirect so the pix are off group. OK, that works. I'll have
> > to go there and investigate. I guess there's some registration
> > or something involved....
ANOTHER FORGERY FROM THE STALKER TROLLS PLEASE IGNORE
--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
If we are not meant to eat dick, why are they made of meat?
Peter Lucas
news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com:
> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
> prepare.
As just about everyone here does.
It's only one pretentious little twat, who doesn't even post any pics
itself, that's kicking up a stink. Ignore it.
--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Edmund Burke.
Nancy Young
> Thank you Nancy. As always,you are a *rock*!
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:02:20 -0500, "Nancy Young"
> <rjyn...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Yes, either tinypic.com or put your pictures on some photo
>> website so you can post the url. Not everyone has a
>> newsserver that will allow them to download binaries, or
>> live in places where downloading binaries would be a hassle.
(laugh) I'll take that as a compliment.
nancy
Chemiker
>Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
>news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com:
>
>> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
>> prepare.
>
>
>As just about everyone here does.
>
>It's only one pretentious little twat, who doesn't even post any pics
>itself, that's kicking up a stink. Ignore it.
Peter, you seem to be a decent mate on a.b.c.
I have no issues with you.
I like your work, FWOFW. I'd like to see more. There's
a lot of good stuff here.
BTW: I'm cleaning up my fotos from the Danube trip.
I'd like to post them, but .man, I don't know how! That's
why this f**king post.
Ale
Jeßus
> Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com:
>
>> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys prepare.
>
>
> As just about everyone here does.
>
> It's only one pretentious little twat, who doesn't even post any pics
> itself, that's kicking up a stink.
PKB x power of 10.
> Ignore it.
Telling everyone what to do again pete?
ROTSPL...
--
"Some days we don't let the line move at all. We call those weekdays"
Patty and Selma Bouvier, 1996
Peter Lucas
news:vd4dm45qk4aahk6u4...@4ax.com:
> On
>
>>Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
>>> prepare.
>>
>>
>>As just about everyone here does.
>>
>>It's only one pretentious little twat, who doesn't even post any pics
>>itself, that's kicking up a stink. Ignore it.
>
> Peter, you seem to be a decent mate on a.b.c.
Thanks.
Some idiots here don't seem to realise that if you speak nasty to
someone, expect to get nasty back. And when they talk nasty to me, and
they cop it back, they get all weepy and 'woe is me' and label *me* an
asshole!! LOL!!
Nice gets nice in return. Nasty gets nasty back.
>
> I have no issues with you.
Me neither.
>
> I like your work, FWOFW.
FWOFW???
> I'd like to see more. There's
> a lot of good stuff here.
Thanks.
>
> BTW: I'm cleaning up my fotos from the Danube trip.
> I'd like to post them, but .man, I don't know how! That's
> why this f**king post.
If you have a lot of photo's, use one of the online 'storage' websites
like Photobucket.
You can arrange your snaps into different folders.
They also have a bulk uploader.
Melba's Jammin'
Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote:
> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
> prepare. Kili's last days have been documented in images,
> totally appropriate, IMHO. They can't be posted here.
>
> OK. There is a NG alt.food.binaries, which Verizon no
> longer carries. What are the pros and cons of posting
> binary files? Must all binary posts go to a.b.c? I noice some
> of you use tinyurl or something like that. Is that the way
> to go?
tinypic/tinypics (?)
I don't use it and wonder if all pictures uploaded become their
property. I don't know--I'm just wondering.
>
> On this topic, I'm a newbie, admitted.
>
> But there has to be some easy way to see images
> that relate to the group. I think they could add a
> lot.
> Thoughts?
>
> Alex
A couple of us have blogs with pics. Mine has lots of boring stuff on
it. :-)
--
-Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ
<http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor>
December 27, 2008, 7:30 a.m.: "I have fixed my roof,
I have mended my fences; now let the winter winds blow."
Peter Lucas
3F7327.190...@news.iphouse.com:
> In article <q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com>,
> Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
>> prepare. Kili's last days have been documented in images,
>> totally appropriate, IMHO. They can't be posted here.
>>
>> OK. There is a NG alt.food.binaries, which Verizon no
>> longer carries. What are the pros and cons of posting
>> binary files? Must all binary posts go to a.b.c? I noice some
>> of you use tinyurl or something like that. Is that the way
>> to go?
>
> tinypic/tinypics (?)
> I don't use it and wonder if all pictures uploaded become their
> property. I don't know--I'm just wondering.
>
6. Proprietary Rights in Content on TinyPic.
6.1 TinyPic does not claim any ownership rights in the text,
files, images, photos, video, sounds, musical works, works of
authorship, applications, or any other materials (collectively,
"Content") that you post on or through the TinyPic Services. By
displaying or publishing ("posting") any Content on or through the
TinyPic Services, you hereby grant to TinyPic and other users a non-
exclusive, fully paid and royalty-free, worldwide, limited license to
use, modify, delete from, add to, publicly perform, publicly display,
reproduce and translate such Content, including without limitation
distributing part or all of the Site in any media formats through any
media channels. Content will be publicly available, and TinyPic and
other Users may copy or display Content outside of the TinyPic Services
through the quick link feature or through any other display mechanisms.
The tinypic url eventually expires, also.
Melba's Jammin'
Peter Lucas <Peter...@brissie.com> wrote:
Might as well become their property ‹ and any and everyone else's too.
Peter Lucas
Yep.
Funny thing is, tinypic is owned by Photobucket.
Peter Lucas
> Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com:
>
> > I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
> > prepare.
>
>
> As just about everyone here does.
>
> It's only one pretentious little twat, who doesn't even post any pics
> itself, that's kicking up a stink. Ignore it.
YET ANOTHER FORGERY FROM THE STALKER TROLLS PLEASE IGNORE
PLEASE CHECK HEADERS!!!!!!!! HOW HARD CAN IT BE?!?!
--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
If we are not meant to eat dick, why are they made of meat?
marsha
wrote:
> Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:vd4dm45qk4aahk6u4...@4ax.com:
>
>> On
>>
>>>Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>>news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
>>>> prepare.
>>>
>>>
>>>As just about everyone here does.
>>>
>>>It's only one pretentious little twat, who doesn't even post any pics
>>>itself, that's kicking up a stink. Ignore it.
>>
>> Peter, you seem to be a decent mate on a.b.c.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Some idiots here don't seem to realise that if you speak nasty to
> someone, expect to get nasty back. And when they talk nasty to me, and
> they cop it back, they get all weepy and 'woe is me' and label *me* an
> asshole!! LOL!!
>
> Nice gets nice in return. Nasty gets nasty back.
ROFL - Peter Lucas feewings been hurt. You don't have a clue what nasty is
you illiterate twink. You live in ignorance. You will always be ignorant.
Ophelia
> Peter Lucas wrote:
>> Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
>> news:q9rcm41j1lu4ug3f4...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> I, for one, would like to see some of the dishes you guys
>>> prepare.
>>
>>
>> As just about everyone here does.
>>
>> It's only one pretentious little twat, who doesn't even post any pics
>> itself, that's kicking up a stink. Ignore it.
>
> YET ANOTHER FORGERY FROM THE STALKER TROLLS PLEASE IGNORE
> PLEASE CHECK HEADERS!!!!!!!! HOW HARD CAN IT BE?!?!
BECAUSE WE ARE NOT INTERESTED AND DOING THIS, YOU ARE AS BAD AS THEM!!!!
Christine Dabney
wrote:
>
>
>BECAUSE WE ARE NOT INTERESTED AND DOING THIS, YOU ARE AS BAD AS THEM!!!!
>
>
Agreed. Just stop responding Peter. Please, for the sake of RFC.
Please.
Christine.
--
http://nightstirrings.blogspot.com
Christine Dabney
<arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:45:34 -0000, "Ophelia" <Oph...@Nix.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>BECAUSE WE ARE NOT INTERESTED AND DOING THIS, YOU ARE AS BAD AS THEM!!!!
>>
>>
>
>Agreed. Just stop responding Peter. Please, for the sake of RFC.
>Please.
>
>Christine.
And Peter, you are risking getting into a lot of killfiles that people
are not wanting to put you in. Just cause.
That is now ending. You are driving this vendetta...and it aint
pretty.
I for one, am reaching my tolerance for this. For the sake of rfc,
please halt this. Please.. Those of us who can read and are
intelligent, we know how to read headers, and we know when it is you.
But lately we don;t care if it is you, cause we are sick and tired of
you chasing this down.
Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
Christine
--
http://nightstirrings.blogspot.com
PeterL
news:0lbem4pchhp0e402i...@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:53:51 -0700, Christine Dabney
> <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:45:34 -0000, "Ophelia" <Oph...@Nix.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>BECAUSE WE ARE NOT INTERESTED AND DOING THIS, YOU ARE AS BAD AS
THEM!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Agreed. Just stop responding Peter. Please, for the sake of RFC.
>>Please.
>>
>>Christine.
>
> And Peter, you are risking getting into a lot of killfiles that people
> are not wanting to put you in. Just cause.
'Just cause' you can't read headers?
>
> That is now ending. You are driving this vendetta...and it aint
> pretty.
>
> I for one, am reaching my tolerance for this. For the sake of rfc,
> please halt this. Please.. Those of us who can read and are
> intelligent, we know how to read headers,
> and we know when it is you.
Oh you do, do you???
Is this me.......????
From: Peter Lucas <nh...@orcon.net.nz>
Have a **close** look at the email ID.
Here is *my* email ID....
Peter Lucas <Peter...@brissie.com>
The one that is *always* at the top of any post I make.
Yeah, you know how to read headers alright!!
> But lately we don;t care if it is you, cause we are sick and tired of
> you chasing this down.
As soon as you, and quite a few others, spend about 2 seconds of your
life looking at a header, you might just see how silly you look at the
moment, blaming me for the forgers posts.
*How many* times do I have to point it out to you people???
FFS!!!!!!!
--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing.
Edmund Burke.
blake murphy
he thinks he's some kind of usenet warrior. funny in a pathetic kind of
way.
your pal,
blake
Omelet
Tinypic links work for most of us.
I sometimes use private webspace links, but not often.
--
Peace! Om
"Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive." -- Dalai Lama
Dan Abel
Christine Dabney <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:53:51 -0700, Christine Dabney
> <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:45:34 -0000, "Ophelia" <Oph...@Nix.co.uk>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>BECAUSE WE ARE NOT INTERESTED AND DOING THIS, YOU ARE AS BAD AS THEM!!!!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Agreed. Just stop responding Peter. Please, for the sake of RFC.
> >Please.
> >
> >Christine.
>
> And Peter, you are risking getting into a lot of killfiles that people
> are not wanting to put you in. Just cause.
>
> That is now ending. You are driving this vendetta...and it aint
> pretty.
This is pretty silly, Christine. You and Ophelia are preaching to the
stalker. If you put them in your kill file, Peter will be happy.
> I for one, am reaching my tolerance for this. For the sake of rfc,
> please halt this. Please.. Those of us who can read and are
> intelligent, we know how to read headers, and we know when it is you.
> But lately we don;t care if it is you, cause we are sick and tired of
> you chasing this down.
>
> Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
You really should check to see who you are replying to before you post
this much.
Another handy hint, is that not only is the stalker posting using a
different address, they have been using the following .sig:
If we are not meant to eat dick, why are they made of meat?
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
da...@sonic.net
Default User
> In article <0lbem4pchhp0e402i...@4ax.com>,
> Christine Dabney <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
>
> You really should check to see who you are replying to before you
> post this much.
Just boggles my mind that some regulars are unable to tell the
difference at this stage of the game.
Brian
--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
PeterL
You don't have to point anything out asswipe. People are just tired of the
bullshit which you bring with you. What you would like to do is have
everyone do a full header check before responding to a post? FOAD moron.
The only way to stop this shit is for you to go away.
PeterL
> In article <0lbem4pchhp0e402i...@4ax.com>,
> Christine Dabney <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:53:51 -0700, Christine Dabney
>> <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:45:34 -0000, "Ophelia" <Oph...@Nix.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>BECAUSE WE ARE NOT INTERESTED AND DOING THIS, YOU ARE AS BAD AS THEM!!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Agreed. Just stop responding Peter. Please, for the sake of RFC.
>>>Please.
>>>
>>>Christine.
>>
>> And Peter, you are risking getting into a lot of killfiles that people
>> are not wanting to put you in. Just cause.
>>
>> That is now ending. You are driving this vendetta...and it aint
>> pretty.
>
> This is pretty silly, Christine. You and Ophelia are preaching to the
> stalker. If you put them in your kill file, Peter will be happy.
What is pretty silly, and insulting, is you telling posters, as Lucas does,
who to put in their kill files or who they should respond to. A futile
effort at best. Who do you think you are? The President of Usenet? Maybe
you and Lucas should get a room.
>
>> I for one, am reaching my tolerance for this. For the sake of rfc,
>> please halt this. Please.. Those of us who can read and are
>> intelligent, we know how to read headers, and we know when it is you.
>> But lately we don;t care if it is you, cause we are sick and tired of
>> you chasing this down.
>>
>> Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
>
> You really should check to see who you are replying to before you post
> this much.
Another you should do this, you should do that. *YOU* should disappear.
>
> Another handy hint, is that not only is the stalker posting using a
> different address, they have been using the following .sig:
>
> If we are not meant to eat dick, why are they made of meat?
DUH!!!
Peter Lucas
He is a sad little person. His greatest fear right now is having the
really bad stuff he's pulled exposed in this newsgroup. The best is yet to
come for Lucas.
Cheryl
"Omelet" <ompo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ompomelet-81B99...@news.giganews.com...
>
> Tinypic links work for most of us.
> I sometimes use private webspace links, but not often.
I'm not uploading pics on any of those webspace links again. I had a
boatload of pics on Yahoo and when it went to Flickr they took hostage of
quite a few albums and the only way I get them back is to subscribe to a pay
service.
sf
wrote:
>Dan Abel wrote:
>
>> In article <0lbem4pchhp0e402i...@4ax.com>,
>> Christine Dabney <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> > Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
>>
>> You really should check to see who you are replying to before you
>> post this much.
>
>Just boggles my mind that some regulars are unable to tell the
>difference at this stage of the game.
>
That's not the real point... that the stalkers haven't been KFed by
this time. They are pretty easy to notice. I've been fooled, but
it's the old "fool me twice" thing. Hopefully if I was fooled a third
time, I noticed and kill filed the bloomin bastid.
--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that
interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.
Mae West
sf
> On 9 Jan 2009 21:14:43 GMT, "Default User" <defaul...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Dan Abel wrote:
>>
>>> In article <0lbem4pchhp0e402i...@4ax.com>,
>>> Christine Dabney <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
>>>
>>> You really should check to see who you are replying to before you
>>> post this much.
>>
>>Just boggles my mind that some regulars are unable to tell the
>>difference at this stage of the game.
>>
> That's not the real point... that the stalkers haven't been KFed by
> this time. They are pretty easy to notice. I've been fooled, but
> it's the old "fool me twice" thing. Hopefully if I was fooled a third
> time, I noticed and kill filed the bloomin bastid.
You're the brightest bulb in the pack aren't you?
Jeßus
> If we are not meant to eat dick, why are they made of meat?
Ask peter lucas - he's an authority on the topic.
HTH.
PLucas
news:xQU9l.14314$H12....@newsfe12.iad:
No hassles, no worries.
PLucas
> "Cheryl" <jlhs...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xQU9l.14314$H12....@newsfe12.iad:
>
> >
> > "Omelet" <ompo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:ompomelet-81B99...@news.giganews.com...
> >>
> >> Tinypic links work for most of us.
> >> I sometimes use private webspace links, but not often.
> >
> > I'm not uploading pics on any of those webspace links again. I had a
> > boatload of pics on Yahoo and when it went to Flickr they took hostage
> > of quite a few albums and the only way I get them back is to subscribe
> > to a pay service.
> >
> >
>
>
> www.photobucket.com
>
>
> No hassles, no worries.
YET ANOTHER FORGERY FROM THE STALKER TROLLS PLEASE IGNORE
PLEASE CHECK HEADERS!!!!!!!! HOW HARD CAN IT BE?!?!
--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia
If we are not meant to eat dick, why are they made of meat?
Terry
"PLucas" <Peter...@brissie.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9B8FBABC59C75P...@210.8.230.25...
> "Cheryl" <jlhs...@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xQU9l.14314$H12....@newsfe12.iad:
>
>>
>> "Omelet" <ompo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ompomelet-81B99...@news.giganews.com...
>>>
>>> Tinypic links work for most of us.
>>> I sometimes use private webspace links, but not often.
>>
>> I'm not uploading pics on any of those webspace links again. I had a
>> boatload of pics on Yahoo and when it went to Flickr they took hostage
>> of quite a few albums and the only way I get them back is to subscribe
>> to a pay service.
>>
>>
>
>
> www.photobucket.com
>
>
> No hassles, no worries.
>
Will Peter Lucas stop at nothing to avoid your killfiles?
(Peter-Lucas, PeterLucas, PeterL, now....Plucas) Sounds like pukas...LOL
sf
And you're an asshole many times over.
Chemiker
<Peter...@brissie.com> wrote:
>Chemiker <prussia...@verizon.net> wrote in
>news:vd4dm45qk4aahk6u4...@4ax.com:
>> I like your work, FWOFW.
>
>
>FWOFW???
>
Well, damn! I forgot what that stands for!. Well, they say
that memory is the second thing to go. I forgot what the
first thing was, but I think it was important, somehow.
Alex
Chemiker
Correction. Wife tells me is wasn't important....
Alex
Jeßus
Yep. He aint gonna get to run away from his past <G>
sf
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:54:34 -0600, sf <sf.u...@geemail.con> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:44:03 -0800, in rec.food.cooking, sf wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 Jan 2009 21:14:43 GMT, "Default User" <defaul...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dan Abel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <0lbem4pchhp0e402i...@4ax.com>,
>>>>> Christine Dabney <arti...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Just stop. You are losing whatever friends you ever had here....
>>>>>
>>>>> You really should check to see who you are replying to before you
>>>>> post this much.
>>>>
>>>>Just boggles my mind that some regulars are unable to tell the
>>>>difference at this stage of the game.
>>>>
>>> That's not the real point... that the stalkers haven't been KFed by
>>> this time. They are pretty easy to notice. I've been fooled, but
>>> it's the old "fool me twice" thing. Hopefully if I was fooled a third
>>> time, I noticed and kill filed the bloomin bastid.
>>
>>You're the brightest bulb in the pack aren't you?
>
> And you're an asshole many times over.
How many times is that?