I can't speak for everyone, and I'm surely no expert, but you can go
either way. Many use a contrasting wood for parts of the finial, so
that pretty much defines the turning and construction techniques.
Tight fitting is problematic for wood as it shrinks and swells with
humidity changes. Without a brass ring insert or similar, they
alternate between binding and somewhat loose over time. Of course,
some woods are better than others in this regard.
Granted, these are not excessively ornate, but...
This is a one tiny piece I turned from reclaimed cherry:
http://www.thevideodoc.com/images/TurnedMiniVessel01l.jpg
This is a multi part from various woods:
http://www.thevideodoc.com/images/cherry_pwalnut01l.jpg
Generally, the right answer is whatever works for you and achieves the
result you are after.
FWIW,
Greg G.
Hello Kevin,
Most small boxes are made with the grain parallel to the axis of
rotation on the lathe (or endgrain). One reason for this is that the
wood in this orientation does not change with the weather as much as
in the other orientation. That said, if you put a lid on it, it is a
box.
However, if you seal the wood properly when you finish it, there is
generally less change with the weather, because more moisture can't
get in and any moisture remaining in the box is pretty well retained
there.
Fred Holder
<http://www.morewoodturning.net>
Sorry Kevin,
I forgot to answer your question about finials. On side grain boxes
like you are making, it is always necessary to put on a finial with
the grain oriented in the spinal turning mode, otherwise they will
tend to break easily. You can turn a round knob on the lid, that will
generally stand up to use, but the fancy finials are all turned in
spindle fashion and attached after the box is completed.
Fred Holder
<http://www.morewoodturning.net>
As far as finials, you could use end grain on a flat grain box as the
finial is small, especially the tenon which you insert into a hole,
and movement will be very minimal. The thing I worry about is that
people tend to try to take the lid off using the finial. You do not
want a tight fit. You can make a finial out of one piece, but, if it
is flat grain, the finial will probably break before you finish
turning it as cross grain in a finial is weak. I do turn some simple
boxes where I make a knob for lifting the lid off, that is all from
one piece of wood. In most cases, finials are made from a contrasting
color of wood, which generally looks better.
robo hippy
I get from other information that you provided that you're not real sure
about wood movement - as the piece dries - and once dry, how it will
change with changes in temperature and humidity. Not accounting for
those changes can be a real problem when you add a lid to something,
be it a bowl or a lidded box - especially when the piece isn't turned
"end grain".
You might want to have a look at this stuff on SHRINKAGE I'm working
on as an article on the importance - or not - of UNIFORM WALL THICKNESS
- a Common Knowledge Rule - which seems to be not quite true.
http://web.hypersurf.com/~charlie2/Turning/BowlShrinkage/BowlShrinkageTOC.html
Comments, questions, suggestions for improving, missing critical
issues, flat out error detection, etc. would be appreciated.
Kevin here, the OP.
First off, thanks to all that replied.
To be completely honest, I did not think of cross grain versus
parallel grain finials, or at least not in terms of the former
breaking easier than the latter. The bowl is about 6" and perhaps 2"
high. The top would have, well not a finial but more of a small knob
on top with a neck (?) of no more than .25" in length. I tend to make
the tops for my bowls loose fitting just so folks can get to the
goodies inside. I am aware of movement, warpage, and the relationship
to drying and do try to keep a uniform wall thickness but most of the
wood I have has been in my basement are about 2-3" thick slabs and
were cut July 2007.
Thanks again for reminding me of the need to consider wood grain in
finials.
robo hippy