Which one you prefer, with or without glass?
If you used glass, is there a specific type you prefer?
Thanks.
This has, of course, been discussed many times. I will just speak
personally. I cover all my pieces with non-glare glass. HTH.
--
Jim Cripwell.
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of one's life, any
time that is spent in stitching.
Adapted from a sign on The Cobb, Lyme Regis, England.
I'm not fussy on which type of glass. For more impressive pieces that I
don't mind spending money on, I'll go for UV protected glass - but it can be
$$$$. Alot of my pieces have standard glass, which is much less expensive -
but has more of a glare. Since none of my pieces go in direct sunlight, it
doesn't tend to be an issue. I specifically don't put them in direct
sunlight because of the awesome damage it can create. I learned that from
experience.
There are lots of valid arguements for and against framing with glass. My
choice was to protect my pieces from dust and pollution, and greasy fingers
touching them :) The few pieces I have without glass do get touched alot by
visitors who love the feel of stitches. But I only have to wash my walls,
or the glass on my existing pieces to realise how much dust and dirt is in
the air. Particularly since I recently moved into an "under construction"
subdivision.
Good luck !
Shannon L.
.
Depending upon the preciousness of the needlework being framed (do you
want it to last for generations), the amount of air pollution in your
environment (dust, pet dander, pet hairs, et al), that will determine
whether or not you should use glass. Depending upon lighting conditions
and your personal preference, you will either choose normal or non-glare
glass. The latter can dull colors, but in high "light" areas will make
it easier to actually view the piece.
If the piece is textural and you invite "touching", then obviously it
won't last for generations, but will be satisfying for you sans glass.
For longevity, if you use glass, make certain that the needlework
doesn't touch it. Numerous mats, or the use of spacers is necessary.
If you're talking about types of artwork other than needlework, I would
imagine the same rules apply: whatever suits your personal environment,
personal tastes, personal attitudes.
Dianne
I prefer glass, since I live in a dusty area.
--
"The universe is quite robust in design and appears to be
doing just fine on its own, incompetent support staff notwithstanding.
:-)" - the Dennis formerly known as (evil), MCFL
Lynne (in Ottawa)
mir...@actcom.co.il (Mirjam Bruck-Cohen) wrote in message news:<4019eccc...@ar.news.verio.net>...
--
Brenda Lewis Rhianno...@netscape.net
WIP: "Pink Baby" photo frame, Candamar
For me, that's easy to answer. The really pretty ones that took forever
and were so difficult I'd probably never do again: Go in pristine
storage to pull out and tell myself, "Yes, you CAN do this!"
Others that take a lot of time but I know I could do it again if I had
the energy go under glass if I need something on the wall. Otherwise,
storage. Or as gifts.
The fast ones that don't take so much time get used (bread covers,
needlecases, that sort of thing).
So much of what I do is experimental . . . well, let's just say my
storage drawers are full.
Dianne
>> Which one you prefer, with or without glass?
>> If you used glass, is there a specific type you prefer?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> This has, of course, been discussed many times. I will just speak
>personally. I cover all my pieces with non-glare glass. HTH.
Same here. I use glass to keep the dust off the pieces.
--
Deb
WIP: How Great Thou Art (Leisure Arts Greatest Hymns II)