Faux & their proud teabaggng
Cliff
Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
http://www.conservativeblogwatch.com/2009/12/05/rachel-maddow-shows-video-of-man-being-teabagged-in-gay-bar/
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=teabagging
]
ArmyOfDorkness
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:j2slh5h0taf9l8t1i...@4ax.com...
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
> instead of having to deal with the facts.
The fact that they are fringe wackos
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>instead of having to deal with the facts.
http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
"Foxnews.com has published a screed taking the mainstream media to task for
their "orally charged" coverage of the tea parties: Namely, the repeated use of
the term "teabagging" ..."
<Snicker>
Great research department they have, right?
As usual.
No checking before planning their "parties" & deciding
what to call them.
Or were they just trying to steal & lie again?
--
Cliff
John Q Public
<Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> said:
Gee, fringe, wackos....
See how well those words gag in your widdle throats when the 2010
whupass descends
on the left now marginilizing the majority of America!
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>instead of having to deal with the facts.
http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
"Foxnews.com has published a screed taking the mainstream media to task for
their "orally charged" coverage of the tea parties: Namely, the repeated use of
the term "teabagging" ..."
"As we've noted, CNN's Anderson Cooper and MSNBC's David Shuster and Rachel
Maddow have been having been saying "teabagging" a lot�over and over and over
again!�in reference to yesterday's attempt by Fox News and its slackjawed
audience to re-enact Mike Judge's 2006 film Idiocracy at festivals nationwide
(think of it as their Rocky Horror Picture Show)."
<Snicker>
Great research department they have, right?
As usual.
No checking before planning their "parties" & deciding
what to call them.
Or were they just trying to steal & lie again?
"Moogs, would you buy it for a quarter?"
http://www.wattpad.com/111513-The-Marching-Morons-C-M-Kornbluth
"The Marching Morons" by C. M. Kornbluth
--
Cliff
ArmyOfDorkness
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:85ulh5lmi8sebllnr...@4ax.com...
> "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>The fact that they are fringe wackos
>
> You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
> the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
> facts.
But those things are true about todays republicans. The party of NO. Just
obstruct. Nothing constructive or in any way helpful. They don't use facts.
They try to keep people scared with talk of death panels and other nonsense.
Cliff
>You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
>the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
>facts.
First wingers would have to actually have facts instead of
stale old lies.
Will any of us live long enough for any of them to find any even by
accident?
John R. Carroll
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
> instead of having to deal with the facts.
Actually it's a term they took to themselves.
You might be able to argue that Glenn Beck branded them as such, however.
He began promoting the term as part of his, well, I'm not sure what.
Perhaps it was his self promotion at your expense.
Beck/Palin 2012!
Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
LOL
--
John R. Carroll
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>
>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
LOTS more !!!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagging&btnG=Google+Search
Ever hear of a winger thinking or researching?
Or anybody with Faux "news"?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagger&btnG=Search
HTH
--
Cliff
Cliff
>There are only so many words in any language.
>And fewer contractions, abbreviations, and nicknames.
So CLEARLY you would choose teabagger & teabagging (being
simple words for simple wingers) !!
The words were taken but what does that matter?
Ever hear of a winger (or Faux "news" being defamed as being "literate"?
OTOH many there DID manage to pass HS. Somehow. Someplace. Sometime.
--
Cliff
Aratzio
Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> got double secret probation for
writing:
>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>
>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
All sources are biased, you use it as a derogatory term only when they
disagree with you.
So, how stupid does that make you?
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>news:85ulh5lmi8sebllnr...@4ax.com...
>> "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>
>>>The fact that they are fringe wackos
>>
>> You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
>> the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
>> facts.
>
>But those things are true about todays republicans. The party of NO. Just
>obstruct. Nothing constructive or in any way helpful. They don't use facts.
>They try to keep people scared with talk of death panels and other nonsense.
>
Seems that the far left extermists have started denying their agendas
and calling what they wish to put into place..to be nonsense.
Doesnt speak well for the far left extremists does it?
Gunner
Aratzio
>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>
>Cliff wrote
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>>All sources are biased,
>
>Agreed, at least all most all of them.
Wow, one sentence and you contradict yourself. No sense in actually
taking a definitive stance when waffling is available.
>
>>you use it as a derogatory term only
>
>I did? YOU just said they are all biased. And that's NOT derogatory?
Yes, you did, yes I did and no, my use wasn't, you illiterate.
>
>>when they disagree with you.
>
>What was it I said that they "agree/disagree" with?
The dismissal of the source, by you. Or is your understanding of the
English language even less than I surmised?
>
>>So, how stupid does that make you?
>
>Ah, yes, personal attacks, vilification, and name calling ALWAYS
>proves ones point, doesn't it?
What attack, I asked you a question in hopes you could describe how
you see your stupidity. Is there anything in the relatively simple
English I used that did not confuse you?
Martin H. Eastburn
wail and yell no matter who has the reigns of power.
We will let Cliff pay for our share of the outrageous debt the left wing
of the Democrat party is forcing on the U.S.
Ignore people issues - keep on ranting about Left-winger ideals.
Use up our bandwidth and make usnet just crap. I pay for this ? - I think Cliff
owes me for wasting my bandwidth and running off good members.
Martin
ArmyOfDorkness
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:ef1mh5h1s68rp0fhd...@4ax.com...
> So says the leftist wingers. Bush's right whackos said his critics
> were Osama lovers and Terrorist lovers. Are you? Does the majority
> party saying it make it true?
>
> It's pretty hard to be constructive when you are excluded from the
> bill writing process. The only avenue that leaves is offering
> amendments.
Oh bullshit. Boehner was out there talking about party unity and promising
no YES votes long before there was any bills to look at.
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@lightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:jq5mh5pn3eet13055...@4ax.com...
If you still believe in death panels you're even more of an idiot than I
thought.
William Wixon
The World's Least Powerful Man
The Obama Puppet
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
It didn't take the Israel Lobby very long to bring President Obama to heel
regarding his prohibition against further illegal Israeli settlements on
occupied Palestinian land. Obama discovered that a mere American president
is powerless when confronted by the Israel Lobby and that the United States
simply is not allowed a Middle East policy separate from Israel's.
Obama also found out that he cannot change anything else either, if he ever
intended to do so.
The military/security lobby has war and a domestic police state on its
agenda, and a mere American president can't do anything about it.
President Obama can order the Guantanamo torture chamber closed and
kidnapping and rendition and torture to be halted, but no one carries out
the order.
Essentially, Obama is irrelevant.
President Obama can promise that he is going to bring the troops home, and
the military lobby says, "No, you are going to send them to Afghanistan, and
in the meantime start a war in Pakistan and maneuver Iran into a position
that will provide an excuse for a war there, too. Wars are too profitable
for us to let you stop them."
And the mere president has to say, "Yes, Sir!"
Obama can promise health care to 50 million uninsured Americans, but he
can't override the veto of the war lobby and the insurance lobby. The war
lobby says its war profits are more important than health care and that the
country can't afford both the "war on terror" and "socialized medicine."
The insurance lobby says health care has to be provided by private health
insurance; otherwise, we can't afford it.
The war and insurance lobbies rattled their campaign contribution
pocketbooks and quickly convinced Congress and the White House that the real
purpose of the health care bill is to save money by cutting Medicare and
Medicaid benefits, thereby "getting entitlements under control."
Entitlements is a right-wing word used to cast aspersion on the few things
that the government did, in the distant past, for citizens. Social Security
and Medicare, for example, are denigrated as "entitlements." The right-wing
goes on endlessly about Social Security and Medicare as if they were welfare
give-aways to shiftless people who refuse to look after themselves, whereas
in actual fact citizens are vastly overcharged for the meager benefits with
a 15% tax on their wages and salaries.
Indeed, for decades now the federal government has been funding its wars and
military budgets with the surplus revenues collected by the Social Security
tax on labor.
To claim, as the right-wing does, that we can't afford the only thing in the
entire budget that has consistently produced a revenue surplus indicates
that the real agenda is to drive the mere citizen into the ground.
The real entitlements are never mentioned. The "defense" budget is an
entitlement for the military/security complex about which President
Eisenhower warned us 50 years ago. A person has to be crazy to believe that
the United States, "the world's only superpower," protected by oceans on its
East and West and by puppet states on its North and South, needs a "defense"
budget larger than the military spending of the rest of the world combined.
The military budget is nothing but an entitlement for the military/security
complex. To hide this fact, the entitlement is disguised as protection
against "enemies" and passed through the Pentagon.
I say cut out the middleman and simply allocate a percentage of the federal
budget to the military/security complex. This way we won't have to concoct
reasons for invading other countries and go to war in order for the
military/security complex to get its entitlement. It would be a lot cheaper
just to give them the money outright, and it would save a lot of lives and
grief at home and abroad.
The US invasion of Iraq had nothing whatsoever to do with American national
interests. It had to do with armaments profits and with eliminating an
obstacle to Israeli territorial expansion. The cost of the war, aside from
the $3 trillion, was over 4,000 dead Americans, over 30,000 wounded and
maimed Americans, tens of thousands of broken American marriages and lost
careers, one million dead Iraqis, four million displaced Iraqis, and a
destroyed country.
All of this was done for the profits of the military/security complex and to
make paranoid Israel, armed with 200 nuclear weapons, feel "secure."
My proposal would make the military/security complex even more wealthy as
the companies would get the money without having to produce the weapons.
Instead, all the money could go for multi-million dollar bonuses and
dividend payouts to shareholders. No one, at home or abroad, would have to
be killed, and the taxpayer would be better off.
No American national interest is served by the war in Afghanistan. As the
former UK Ambassador Craig Murray disclosed, the purpose of the war is to
protect Unocal's interest in the Trans-Afghanistan pipeline. The cost of the
war is many times greater than Unocal's investment in the pipeline. The
obvious solution is to buy out Unocal and give the pipeline to the Afghans
as partial compensation for the destruction we have inflicted on that
country and its population, and bring the troops home.
The reason my sensible solutions cannot be effected is that the lobbies
think that their entitlements would not survive if they were made obvious.
They think that if the American people knew that the wars were being fought
to enrich the armaments and oil industries, the people would put a halt to
the wars.
In actual fact, the American people have no say about what "their"
government does. Polls of the public show that half or more of the American
people do not support the wars in Iraq or Afghanistan and do not support
President Obama's escalation of the war in Afghanistan. Yet, the occupations
and wars continue. According to General Stanley McChrystal, the additional
40,000 troops are enough to stalemate the war, that is, to keep it going
forever, the ideal situation for the armaments lobby.
The people want health care, but the government does not listen.
The people want jobs, but Wall Street wants higher priced stocks and forces
American firms to offshore the jobs to countries where labor is cheaper.
The American people have no effect on anything. They can affect nothing.
They have become irrelevant like Obama. And they will remain irrelevant as
long as organized interest groups can purchase the US government.
The inability of the American democracy to produce any results that the
voters want is a demonstrated fact. The total unresponsiveness of government
to the people is conservatism's contribution to American democracy. Some
years ago there was an effort to put government back into the hands of the
people by constraining the ability of organized interest groups to pour
enormous amounts of money into political campaigns and, thus, obligate the
elected official to those whose money elected him. Conservatives said that
any restraints would be a violation of the First Amendment's guarantee of
free speech.
The same "protectors" of "free speech" had no objection to the Israel
Lobby's passage of the "hate speech" bill, which has criminalized criticism
of Israel's genocidal treatment of the Palestinians and continuing theft of
their lands.
In less than one year, President Obama has betrayed all of his supporters
and broken all of his promises. He is the total captive of the oligarchy of
the ruling interest groups.
Obama seems destined to be a one-term president. Indeed, the collapsing
economy will doom him.
The Republicans are grooming Palin. Our first female president, following
our first black president, will complete the transition to an American
police state by arresting critics and protesters of Washington's immoral
foreign and domestic policies, and she will complete the destruction of
America's reputation abroad.
Russia's Putin has already compared the US to Nazi Germany, and the Chinese
premier has likened the US to an irresponsible, profligate debtor.
Increasingly the rest of the world sees the US as the sole source of all of
its problems. Germany has lost the chief of its armed forces and its defense
minister, because the US convinced or pressured, by hook or crook, the
German government to violate its Constitution and to send troops to fight
for Unocal's interest in Afghanistan. The Germans had pretended that their
troops were not really fighting, but were were engaged in a "peace-keeping
operation." This more or less worked until the Germans called in an air
strike that murdered 100 women and children lined up for a fuel allotment.
The British are investigating their leading criminal, former prime minister
Tony Blair, and his deception of his own cabinet in order to do Bush's
bidding and provide some cover for Bush's illegal invasion of Iraq. The UK
investigators have been denied the ability to bring criminal charges, but
the issue of war based entirely on orchestrated deception and lies is
getting a hearing. It will reverberate throughout the world, and the world
will note that there is no corresponding investigation in the US, the
country that originated the False War.
Meanwhile, the US investment banks, which have wrecked the financial
stability of many governments, including that of the US, continue to
control, as they have done since the Clinton administration, US economic and
financial policy. The world has suffered terribly from the Wall Street
gangsters, and now looks upon America with a critical eye.
The United States no longer commands the respect it enjoyed under President
Ronald Reagan or President George Herbert Walker Bush. World polls show that
the US and its puppet master are regarded as the two greatest threats to
peace. Washington and Israel outrank on the most dangerous list the crazy
regime in North Korea.
The world is beginning to see America as a country that needs to go away.
When the dollar is over-inflated by a Washington unable to pay its bills,
will the world be motivated by greed and try to save us in order to save its
investments, or will it say, thank God, good riddance.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan
administration. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good
Intentions.<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0307396061/counterpunchmaga>
His new book, How the Economy was Lost, will be published in January by AK
Press / CounterPunch. He can be reached at:
PaulCrai...@yahoo.com<mailto:PaulCrai...@yahoo.com>
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> [
> Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
>
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=teabagging
> ]
Anderson Cooper must, since he first used it
Gunner Asch
If you still believe in death panels.. you will be killed by the People
in less than 3 yrs.
And I hope you do.
Gunner
Cliff
>They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the American
>Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simple a leftist winger
>attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear. Damn, you guys
>ARE good at what you do.
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>>>instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>> LOTS more !!!
>
>Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources.
Google is now a "leftist wingers "news" source" just
like a dictionary or a fact?
>I'm quite sure
>you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to rule them
>all.
YOU asked for more.
I then gave you lots more and yet you still whine like a busted winger.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagging&btnG=Google+Search
Ever hear of a winger thinking or researching?
Or anybody with Faux "news"?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagger&btnG=Search
THEN you got confused about
http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2003/f_lorw-p1.php
--
Cliff
Cliff
Not hard to be smarter than a winger & know about the meaning of "words"
(clearly a liberal invention/plot them "words" thingies).
Have you guys discovered the rock or the club yet?
--
Cliff
�n�hw��f
thought with news:fvulh55pkk6g03vgg...@4ax.com:
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns
>>-the-definition-of-teabagging
>> "Foxnews.com has published a screed taking the mainstream media
>> to task for
>>their "orally charged" coverage of the tea parties: Namely, the
>>repeated use of the term "teabagging" ..."
>>
>> <Snicker>
>>
>> Great research department they have, right?
>> As usual.
>>
>> No checking before planning their "parties" & deciding
>>what to call them.
>>
>> Or were they just trying to steal & lie again?
>
> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the
> American Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simple a
> leftist winger attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a
> smear. Damn, you guys ARE good at what you do.
No, pinhead. Whats *funny* is that as usual the repugs tried to co-
opt a word that had a meaning already assigned to it in modern
parlance without researching it before hand. You dumb fucks charge
ahead blindly. Always.
Jus Sayin[tm]
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> Beck/Palin 2012!
> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>
> LOL
A fine example of leftist hate speech....
�n�hw��f
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith
>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit
>>>>>them instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>> LOTS more !!!
>
> Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources. I'm quite
> sure you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to
> rule them all.
>
Nice conspiracy theory, k00ky.
So whos this alleged "ruler-of-news"?
LULZ
�n�hw��f
> Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, in the land of
>>alt.usenet.kooks, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>
> Cliff wrote
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>>All sources are biased,
>
> Agreed, at least all most all of them.
>
>>you use it as a derogatory term only
>
> I did? YOU just said they are all biased. And that's NOT
> derogatory?
>
>>when they disagree with you.
>
> What was it I said that they "agree/disagree" with?
>
>>So, how stupid does that make you?
>
> Ah, yes, personal attacks, vilification, and name calling ALWAYS
> proves ones point, doesn't it?
>
Said the pinhead watching Fox Noise.
LULZ!
Aratzio
"�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> clouded the waters of pure
>thought with news:8k4mh5lggg3904obg...@4ax.com:
>
>> Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, in the land of
>>>alt.usenet.kooks, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>>
>> Cliff wrote
>>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>>
>>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>>
>>>All sources are biased,
>>
>> Agreed, at least all most all of them.
>>
>>>you use it as a derogatory term only
>>
>> I did? YOU just said they are all biased. And that's NOT
>> derogatory?
>>
>>>when they disagree with you.
>>
>> What was it I said that they "agree/disagree" with?
>>
>>>So, how stupid does that make you?
>>
>> Ah, yes, personal attacks, vilification, and name calling ALWAYS
>> proves ones point, doesn't it?
>>
>
>Said the pinhead watching Fox Noise.
>
>LULZ!
Republicans are the eternal irony generator.
Cliff
>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> clouded the waters of pure
>thought with news:cf4mh591gtqv7h520...@4ax.com:
>
>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit
>>>>>>them instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>>
>>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>>
>>> LOTS more !!!
>>
>> Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources. I'm quite
>> sure you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to
>> rule them all.
>>
>
>Nice conspiracy theory, k00ky.
>
>So whos this alleged "ruler-of-news"?
>
>LULZ
Faux "invented" teabaggers, right?
--
Cliff
Cliff
Why do YOU hate Beck & Palin?
Palin is funny!
And Beck is just another lying winger idiot that claims
to have a HS diploma (and is hence qualified to tell
you what to do & think).
--
Cliff
Gray Ghost
news:wradnV1nOf5pqIbW...@giganews.com:
That would be because the Dems were still writing the bills and not letting
the Repubs in on it.
--
Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent Global Warming.
"Hide the Decline"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk
31,486 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, don't agree the
science is settled.
http://www.petitionproject.org/
What it appears to be all about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEZszGJHbK4&feature=video_response
Gray Ghost
news:8frlh55dafsrajnmg...@4ax.com:
> [
> Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
No, for the most part they are decent folks. And frankly it looks
uncomfortable.
Gray Ghost
news:5qmnh55euci6il02j...@4ax.com:
Indeed I'm sure liberals invented teabagging.
John R. Carroll
When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
What then?
I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in America the
freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
--
John R. Carroll
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:00:54 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >
> >
> >> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>
> >> LOL
> >
> >A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>
> Why do YOU hate Beck & Palin?
I don't "hate" anyone...
> Palin is funny!
> And Beck is just another lying winger idiot that claims
> to have a HS diploma (and is hence qualified to tell
> you what to do & think).
Care to answer an honest question ?
If they are so irrelevant then why do they scare you so much ?
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> > nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >
> >
> >> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>
> >> LOL
> >
> > A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>
> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
> What then?
His family will continue to care for him.
You have a better solution ?
Perhaps a final one ?
>
> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in America the
> freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced to
pay for it.
�n�hw��f
> Well, now that you have definitively proven your point
> I'm forced to believe you. You credibility is
> just that high now.
Sure, the Tea Party shtick was all just astroturf:
"Tea Party: The Documentary" -- Attending a Bizarre Movie Premiere
for Right-Wingers in Washington
By Adele M. Stan, AlterNet. Posted December 4, 2009.
Presented by FreedomWorks, the front group that organized the 9/12
March, a new documentary on the tea parties attempts to suggest that
the protests were spontaneous.
The movement's stars were out in force at the Washington D.C.,
premiere of "Tea Party: The Documentary." Before the Wednesday night
screening, presentations by former House Majority Leader Dick Armey,
Senator Jim DeMint and Rep. Joe "You Lie" Wilson of South Carolina,
Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Rep. Tom Price of Georgia --
all Republicans -- got the half-full auditorium in the Ronald Reagan
Building humming.
Price, who chairs the Republican Study Committee, presented each of
the film's "stars" -- five movement participants characterized as
"regular citizens" by director Pritchett Cotten -- with a plaque
bearing the text of a resolution introduced in the House of
Representatives thanking Tea Party activists for their participation
in the September 12th march on Washington.
The film conveys the stories of five activists chosen to represent
the movement's everyman and everywoman -- the kind of people who were
motivated by Washington D.C.-based lobbying groups to shout down
members of Congress at town-hall meetings in their districts this
summer. "I think it's a compelling story," Matt Kibbe, president of
FreedomWorks, told me after the screening. "Here's real people in it
with real beliefs. It sort of debunks the whole astroturf thing."
What Astroturfing?
Kibbe apparently saw no irony in his comments, or in the fact that
the premiere was sponsored by FreedomWorks, an organization chaired
by Armey that's known as an astroturfing outfit for its campaign to
foment discontent among those regular citizens nationwide.
FreedomWorks was instrumental in orchestrating the disruption of
town-hall meetings on health care reform called by members of
Congress during the August recess. (You can find the FreedomWorks
town-hall action kit here in a PDF file; this famous memo [PDF] on
how to disrupt a town-hall meeting was distributed by the Tea Party
Patriots Google Groups listserv, which was managed at the time by
FreedomWorks staffer Florida State Chairman Tom Gaitens
Also involved in creating our summer of discontent was Americans For
Prosperity, whose consultant, Joel Aaron Foster, wrote the script for
the Tea Party documentary, and is listed as the press contact on the
movie media kit [PDF]. Throughout the film, AFP's ubiquitous "Hands
Off My Health-Care" signs, which feature a bloody handprint, bob up
and down at Tea Party rallies. Despite circumstantial evidence that
the two groups work together, I've never seen their two logos on the
same event at the same time; they function like the alter-egos of
some malevolent superhero. (UPDATE: FreedomWorks Press Secretary Adam
Brandon told me that AFP was not invited to participate in the
September 12 march because of AFP's support for the Troubled Assets
Relief Program, or TARP.)
"Tea Party: The Documentary" may not earn a nod from Oscar, but it's
a slickly produced piece of cinema that will likely serve as an
effective organizing tool for FreedomWorks and other like-minded
organizations -- and make a bit of dough for its producers, Ground
Floor Video, the company owned by executive producer Luke Livingston,
and Riddled With Bullets, director Cotten's production company.
Ground Floor Video is selling DVDs of the film. When you consider
that 70,000 people came to the march, and tens of thousands more are
involved in the movement, DVD sales could yield a pretty penny. This
is, after all, a movement that purports to be all about capitalism.
FreedomWorks' Kibbe is quick to say that the film is an enterprise
separate from his organization, though FreedomWorks is listed as a
"contributor" to the film, as are Americans For Prosperity, Tea Party
Patriots and Tea Party Express.
The film's everyperson stars all hail from the Atlanta area, which is
also home base to Americans For Prosperity President Tim Phillips,
whose last gig was as a partner with Ralph Reed in the Atlanta-based
Century Strategies, an astroturfing and lobbying group implicated in
the Jack Abramoff bribery scandal. The main characters are identified
on screen only by their first names. There's Jenny Beth -- that's
Jenny Beth Martin, a former GOP consultant, who leads Tea Party
Patriots, a group that names FreedomWorks as a partner on its Web
site. Dr. Fred makes an appearance -- that's Dr. Fred Shessel, vice
president of a group called Docs For Patient Care that opposes health
care reform, and a partner in Georgia Urology. William Temple, an
historical reenactor, provides what comic relief there is in the
film. Temple was chosen to lead the 9/12 March dressed in full
Revolutionary War regalia, which he also donned for the premiere.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Next time dont play post edit with me, boyo.
^_^
�n�hw��f
of pure thought with
news:m9rnh5h910mp0f6dq...@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:02:15 -0600, "�n�hw��f"
> <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> clouded the waters of pure
>>thought with news:cf4mh591gtqv7h520...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit
>>>>>>>them instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-le
>>>>>>ar ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>>>
>>>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>>>
>>>> LOTS more !!!
>>>
>>> Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources. I'm quite
>>> sure you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to
>>> rule them all.
>>>
>>
>>Nice conspiracy theory, k00ky.
>>
>>So whos this alleged "ruler-of-news"?
>>
>>LULZ
>
> Faux "invented" teabaggers, right?
The concept was a FreedomWorks idea AFAIK:
"sponsored by FreedomWorks, an organization chaired by Armey that's
known as an astroturfing outfit for its campaign to foment discontent
among those regular citizens nationwide. FreedomWorks was
instrumental in orchestrating the disruption of town-hall meetings on
health care reform called by members of Congress during the August
recess. (You can find the FreedomWorks town-hall action kit here in a
PDF file;
http://www.freedomworks.org/files/FW_July%204%20Recess%20Action%
20Kit_6-26-09.pdf
this famous memo [PDF]
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-
content/uploads/2009/07/townhallactionmemo.pdf
on how to disrupt a town-hall meeting was distributed by the Tea
Party Patriots Google Groups listserv, which was managed at the time
by FreedomWorks staffer Florida State Chairman Tom Gaitens"
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/anti-health-care-reform-
group-yeah-were-packing-and-disrupting-the-health-care-town-halls.php
�n�hw��f
with news:u6qnh55mmgrdv38o4...@4ax.com:
The Wingnut Wurlitzer.
^_^
John R. Carroll
> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>
>>>
>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>
>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>> What then?
>
> His family will continue to care for him.
Did they discuss this matter and agree?
That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
Selfish even.
> You have a better solution ?
> Perhaps a final one ?
>
>>
>> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
>> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
>
> I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced to
> pay for it.
Great.
Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't feel
put out, will you.
--
John R. Carroll
tankfixer
>
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
> > nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>
> >> tankfixer wrote:
> >>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>>>
> >>>> LOL
> >>>
> >>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
> >>
> >> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
> >> What then?
> >
> > His family will continue to care for him.
>
>
>
> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
I don't know if they did or not.
But regardless what business is it of yours or mine ?
> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
So is old age.
What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
that burden ?
> Selfish even.
So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
>
> > You have a better solution ?
> > Perhaps a final one ?
> >
> >>
> >> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
> >> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
> >
> > I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced to
> > pay for it.
>
> Great.
> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't feel
> put out, will you.
You sure are one to tell other people how and what to do with their
lives when you claim to support choice..
John R. Carroll
> In article <L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com>,
> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>
>>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>>>
>>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>>>> What then?
>>>
>>> His family will continue to care for him.
>>
>>
>>
>> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
>
> I don't know if they did or not.
> But regardless what business is it of yours or mine ?
Because if they didn't discuss and agree, this kid will end up as a
responsibility of the public.
That means I'll pay.
>
>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>
> So is old age.
> What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
> that burden ?
Let him die, alone and miserable. That would teach the Palin's of the world
a lesson.
>
>> Selfish even.
>
> So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
I am old .
>
>>
>>> You have a better solution ?
>>> Perhaps a final one ?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
>>>> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
>>>
>>> I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced
>>> to pay for it.
>>
>> Great.
>> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you
>> won't feel put out, will you.
>
> You sure are one to tell other people how and what to do with their
> lives when you claim to support choice..
I'd just like all factors to be considered when that choice is made is all.
Sarah Palin is little more than a contestant.
She competes for the accolades, not the job.
It's the real work without glamour that she abhor's and that's what her life
looks like.
She isn't really a quitter, she's just in it for Sarah.
--
John R. Carroll
tankfixer
>
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com>,
> > nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>
> >> tankfixer wrote:
> >>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
> >>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>>>
> >>>> tankfixer wrote:
> >>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LOL
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
> >>>>
> >>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
> >>>> What then?
> >>>
> >>> His family will continue to care for him.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
> >
> > I don't know if they did or not.
> > But regardless what business is it of yours or mine ?
>
>
> Because if they didn't discuss and agree, this kid will end up as a
> responsibility of the public.
Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
condition.
> That means I'll pay.
Seems fair if that happens, you are free with others money..
>
> >
> >> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
> >
> > So is old age.
> > What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
> > that burden ?
>
> Let him die, alone and miserable. That would teach the Palin's of the world
> a lesson.
So your mock compassion for the pregnant is just another example of
leftist hypocrisy.
>
> >
> >> Selfish even.
> >
> > So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
>
> I am old .
So you complain all the while you impose the burden of old age on your
children and onto society..
>
> >
> >>
> >>> You have a better solution ?
> >>> Perhaps a final one ?
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
> >>>> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
> >>>
> >>> I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced
> >>> to pay for it.
> >>
> >> Great.
> >> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you
> >> won't feel put out, will you.
> >
> > You sure are one to tell other people how and what to do with their
> > lives when you claim to support choice..
>
> I'd just like all factors to be considered when that choice is made is all.
You don't know that didn't occur, you just assume so.
> Sarah Palin is little more than a contestant.
> She competes for the accolades, not the job.
>
> It's the real work without glamour that she abhor's and that's what her life
> looks like.
> She isn't really a quitter, she's just in it for Sarah.
YOu sure are judgemental of others, for a leftist..
Cliff
NOW they want quickie death panels.
Well, not panels, exactly. Just deaths (of others, naturally), as usual.
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&source=hp&q=republican+%22long+term+care%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn
They tried to ban long term medical care.
Perhaps all the sick non-rethugs get at a hospital would be
an asprin (US$ 10,000) and a band-aid (US$ 15,000) before
being sent home or kicked out on the streets to die ....
Meanwhile the RNC gets full coverage including abortions on
demand.
--
Cliff
Cliff
Ghost) wrote:
>That would be because the Dems were still writing the bills and not letting
>the Repubs in on it.
The same rethugs saying "No" while taking all
that special interest money?
The same ones that tried to exempt States with the letter "U" in their name?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>"�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>No, pinhead. Whats *funny* is that
>
>>You dumb fucks charge
>
>Well, now that you have definitively proven your point with ad hominid
>attacks, I'm forced to believe you. You credibility is just that high
>now.
Way better than any rethug's or winger's !!!
--
Cliff
Cliff
>Presented by FreedomWorks, the front group that organized the 9/12
>March, a new documentary on the tea parties attempts to suggest that
>the protests were spontaneous.
Like the Faux "news" "million doctor march" which
actually was about three off-duty nurses (perhaps looking
for an icecream stand)?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>
>So is old age.
>What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
>that burden ?
The rethugs have the answer for you !!!
The Quickie !!
NOW the rethugs want quickie death panels.
Cliff
>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>
>So is old age.
>What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
>that burden ?
The rethugs have the answer for you !!!
Cliff
Ghost) wrote:
>That would be because the Dems were still writing the bills and not letting
>the Repubs in on it.
The same rethugs saying "No" while taking all
Cliff
>
>> Selfish even.
>
>So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
Like all those elderly teabaggers protesting against their socialized medicare
& socialized social security & socialized VA medical care & socialized pension
plans?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>> That means I'll pay.
>
>Seems fair if that happens, you are free with others money..
Like you claim Palin is with her kids & their futures & earnings?
--
Cliff
pandora
Cliff
Since when are clowns & fools irrelevant?
Have you ever tried telling a clown that?
--
Cliff
tankfixer
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:45:26 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <1crnh5h8oug946op5...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >>
> >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:00:54 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >> >nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >> >> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >> >>
> >> >> LOL
> >> >
> >> >A fine example of leftist hate speech....
> >>
> >> Why do YOU hate Beck & Palin?
> >
> >I don't "hate" anyone...
> >
> >
> >> Palin is funny!
> >> And Beck is just another lying winger idiot that claims
> >> to have a HS diploma (and is hence qualified to tell
> >> you what to do & think).
> >
> >Care to answer an honest question ?
> >If they are so irrelevant then why do they scare you so much ?
>
> Since when are clowns & fools irrelevant?
> Have you ever tried telling a clown that?
I figured you couldn't/wouldn't answer that question honestly.
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
When did I claim any such thing ?
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
can you answer the question ?
Or are you just full of meaningless slogans your handlers send you ?
John R. Carroll
"Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
condition."
Right there.
--
John R. Carroll
Cliff
>In article <auooh5938ro4chd3i...@4ax.com>,
>Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>>
>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:40:04 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> Selfish even.
>> >
>> >So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
>>
>> Like all those elderly teabaggers protesting against their socialized medicare
>> & socialized social security & socialized VA medical care & socialized pension
>> plans?
>
>can you answer the question ?
Can you gibber in English?
>Or are you just full of meaningless slogans your handlers send you ?
You must have missed Faux "news" & their teabaggers.
And Palin fans being asked what it's all about <VBG>.
--
Cliff
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
I said may.. not must..
Why are you leftists so concerned about others lives ?
Is it because yours are so miserable ?
Cliff
Just how mentally impaired are you?
Perhaps she already has him on socialized care though.
Seen her nursing on any private plane flights or at
any book nursings?
BTW, She stopped calling me (I'm on the DO NOT CALL lists !!!)
asking that I come to see her & buy her book.
Is she still in Texas or AZ?
--
ClIff
Cliff
What part of "Palin is funny!" seemed unclear?
Was it the "is"?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>In article <QdCdnfR92Ms_54HW...@giganews.com>,
>nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>
>> tankfixer wrote:
>> > In article <m5poh5dv34kpp737a...@4ax.com>,
>> > Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:46:54 -0800, tankfixer
>> >> <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> That means I'll pay.
>> >>>
>> >>> Seems fair if that happens, you are free with others money..
>> >>
>> >> Like you claim Palin is with her kids & their futures & earnings?
>> >
>> > When did I claim any such thing ?
>>
>> "Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
>> him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
>> condition."
>>
>> Right there.
>
>I said may.. not must..
You SAID
"Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
condition."
Who takes care of you?
>Why are you leftists so concerned about others lives ?
So NOW you want him on socialized care at taxpayer
expense?
>Is it because yours are so miserable ?
Are YOU paying?
--
Cliff
tankfixer
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:41:24 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <auooh5938ro4chd3i...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >>
> >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:40:04 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Selfish even.
> >> >
> >> >So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
> >>
> >> Like all those elderly teabaggers protesting against their socialized medicare
> >> & socialized social security & socialized VA medical care & socialized pension
> >> plans?
> >
> >can you answer the question ?
>
> Can you gibber in English?
No, but you seem to do just fine at it so go on....
>
> >Or are you just full of meaningless slogans your handlers send you ?
>
> You must have missed Faux "news" & their teabaggers.
> And Palin fans being asked what it's all about <VBG>.
I'm not obsessed.. like you seem to be..
tankfixer
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 20:15:56 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <QdCdnfR92Ms_54HW...@giganews.com>,
> >nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>
> >> tankfixer wrote:
> >> > In article <m5poh5dv34kpp737a...@4ax.com>,
> >> > Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:46:54 -0800, tankfixer
> >> >> <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>> That means I'll pay.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Seems fair if that happens, you are free with others money..
> >> >>
> >> >> Like you claim Palin is with her kids & their futures & earnings?
> >> >
> >> > When did I claim any such thing ?
> >>
> >> "Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
> >> him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
> >> condition."
> >>
> >> Right there.
> >
> >I said may.. not must..
>
> You SAID
> "Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
> him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
> condition."
Yup. A family decision..
>
> Who takes care of you?
I take care of myself..
Why ?
Do you think everyone gets special care becasue you have a ward
attendent ?
>
> >Why are you leftists so concerned about others lives ?
>
> So NOW you want him on socialized care at taxpayer
> expense?
You can't answer a question, can you ?
>
> >Is it because yours are so miserable ?
>
> Are YOU paying?
Unlike you I earn enough that I can pay taxes...
tankfixer
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:37:25 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <m5poh5dv34kpp737a...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >>
> >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:46:54 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> That means I'll pay.
> >> >
> >> >Seems fair if that happens, you are free with others money..
> >>
> >> Like you claim Palin is with her kids & their futures & earnings?
> >
> >When did I claim any such thing ?
>
> Just how mentally impaired are you?
>
> Perhaps she already has him on socialized care though.
> Seen her nursing on any private plane flights or at
> any book nursings?
>
> BTW, She stopped calling me (I'm on the DO NOT CALL lists !!!)
> asking that I come to see her & buy her book.
>
> Is she still in Texas or AZ?
You really are obsessed..
I'd be suprised if they havn't gotten a restraining order on you already
John R. Carroll
"Leftists"?
A true "leftist" wouldn't trust a woman with a choice. They'd want a law
dictating behavior - sortof like the God, guns and guts crowd.
I think every woman ought to have the same choices Sarah Palin did.
--
John R. Carroll
tankfixer
Gray Ghost
news:L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com:
> tankfixer wrote:
>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>
>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>>
>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>>> What then?
>>
>> His family will continue to care for him.
>
>
>
> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
> Selfish even.
More selfish than killing him?
>
>
>> You have a better solution ?
>> Perhaps a final one ?
>>
>>>
>>> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
>>> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
>>
>> I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced to
>> pay for it.
>
> Great.
> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't
> feel put out, will you.
>
>
>
--
Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent Global Warming.
"Hide the Decline"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk
31,486 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, don't agree the
science is settled.
http://www.petitionproject.org/
What it appears to be all about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEZszGJHbK4&feature=video_response
�n�hw��f
of pure thought with
news:ieooh51i417cobjpm...@4ax.com:
Was that Yet Another Video Footage "mixup"?
<snicker>
�n�hw��f
> NOW they want quickie death panels.
> Well, not panels, exactly. Just deaths (of others, naturally),
> as usual.
>
>
> http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&source=hp&q=republican+%22long+te
> rm+care%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn
> They tried to ban long term medical care.
> Perhaps all the sick non-rethugs get at a hospital would be
> an asprin (US$ 10,000) and a band-aid (US$ 15,000) before
> being sent home or kicked out on the streets to die ....
>
Its either fearmongering or an attempt to make the public option so
unpalatable that its killed. I'm predicting Epic Failure from the
spinless dems.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32225671/ns/politics-capitol_hill/
> Meanwhile the RNC gets full coverage including abortions on
> demand.
Of course. The oligarchy gets first pickins at the table.
^_^
�n�hw��f
thought with news:MPG.25862f3...@news.bytemine.net:
>
> Unlike you I earn enough that I can pay taxes...
KILL KILL KILL
The POOR
KILL KILL KILL KILL
The POOR
-Dead Kennedys
Michael A. Terrell
tankfixer wrote:
>
> I'd be suprised if they havn't gotten a restraining order on you already
And miss their chance for a clean head shot on a wacko?
--
Offworld checks no longer accepted!
John R. Carroll
> "John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote in
> news:L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com:
>
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>
>>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>>>
>>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>>>> What then?
>>>
>>> His family will continue to care for him.
>>
>>
>>
>> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>> Selfish even.
>
> More selfish than killing him?
You don't "kill" a Zygote.
>>
>>> You have a better solution ?
Sure.
Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't feel
put out, will you.
You could put your resources where your mouth is then. Works for me.
LOL
--
John R. Carroll
Ed Huntress
"John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote in message
news:Ws-dnYB_5NQ2D4DW...@giganews.com...
> Gray Ghost wrote:
>> "John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote in
>> news:L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com:
>>
>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>>
>>>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>>>>
>>>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>>>>> What then?
>>>>
>>>> His family will continue to care for him.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
>>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>>> Selfish even.
>>
>> More selfish than killing him?
>
> You don't "kill" a Zygote.
You spread it on a microscope slide, and then slip a cover glass over it.
--
Ed Huntress
tankfixer
snuh...@yahoo.com says...
>
> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure
> thought with news:MPG.25862f3...@news.bytemine.net:
>
> >
> > Unlike you I earn enough that I can pay taxes...
>
> KILL KILL KILL
> The POOR
> KILL KILL KILL KILL
> The POOR
> -Dead Kennedys
Whatever floats your boat I suppose..
Me I'd rather help them learn a good trade so they not be poor
anymore...
Gray Ghost
> Gray Ghost wrote:
>> "John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote in
>> news:L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com:
>>
>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>>
>>>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>>>>
>>>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>>>>> What then?
>>>>
>>>> His family will continue to care for him.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
>>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>>> Selfish even.
>>
>> More selfish than killing him?
>
> You don't "kill" a Zygote.
Let's see, it's alive and developing then it's not.
Then again you can also say that you don't "kill" liberals. You terminate
them to save the planet.
>>>
>>>> You have a better solution ?
>
> Sure.
> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't
> feel put out, will you.
> You could put your resources where your mouth is then. Works for me.
> LOL
>
>
>
Since ther is a down's syndrome person in our family and he is well cared
for, I'd say you are an asshole.
�n�hw��f
So long as they dont try and form a UNION, sure.
LULZ!
Or complain when their jobs are inevitably shipped overseas to avoid
paying a Living Wage.
^_^
HH&C
wrote:
> "John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote innews:Ws-dnYB_5NQ2D4DW...@giganews.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Gray Ghost wrote:
> >> "John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote in
> >>news:L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com:
>
> >>> tankfixer wrote:
> >>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>
> >>>>> tankfixer wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbWnZ2dnUVZ_jedn...@giganews.com>,
> >>>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>
> >>>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >>>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>
> >>>>>>> LOL
>
> >>>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>
> >>>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
> >>>>> What then?
>
> >>>> His family will continue to care for him.
>
> >>> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
> >>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
> >>> Selfish even.
>
> >> More selfish than killing him?
>
> > You don't "kill" a Zygote.
>
> Let's see, it's alive and developing then it's not.
>
> Then again you can also say that you don't "kill" liberals. You terminate
> them to save the planet.
Lessee. We've created whole government bureacracies, non-profits and
industries to save snail darters, skippers and butterflies because of
some undiscovered potential that they may have, but to save a human
life???
Is there no potential in a human life?
For all we know, the human that was to solve AIDS has been aborted.
> >>>> You have a better solution ?
>
> > Sure.
> > Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't
> > feel put out, will you.
> > You could put your resources where your mouth is then. Works for me.
> > LOL
>
> Since ther is a down's syndrome person in our family and he is well cared
> for, I'd say you are an asshole.
>
> --
> Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent Global Warming.
>
> "Hide the Decline"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk
>
> 31,486 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, don't agree the
> science is settled.http://www.petitionproject.org/
>
> What it appears to be all abouthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEZszGJHbK4&feature=video_response- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
tankfixer
>
> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure thought
> with news:MPG.25875d1...@news.bytemine.net:
>
> > In article <Xns9CDA63425F23B...@216.196.97.142>,
> > snuh...@yahoo.com says...
> >>
> >> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure
> >> thought with news:MPG.25862f3...@news.bytemine.net:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Unlike you I earn enough that I can pay taxes...
> >>
> >> KILL KILL KILL
> >> The POOR
> >> KILL KILL KILL KILL
> >> The POOR
> >> -Dead Kennedys
> >
> > Whatever floats your boat I suppose..
> > Me I'd rather help them learn a good trade so they not be poor
> > anymore...
> >
>
> So long as they dont try and form a UNION, sure.
Why would they want to engage in organized crime ?
>
> LULZ!
>
> Or complain when their jobs are inevitably shipped overseas to avoid
> paying a Living Wage.
> ^_^
The result of Unions...
Gray Ghost
news:va4uh55imt57h500d...@4ax.com:
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:36:21 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>No, pinhead. Whats *funny* is that
>>>
>>>>You dumb fucks charge
>>>
>>>Well, now that you have definitively proven your point with ad hominid
>>>attacks, I'm forced to believe you. You credibility is just that high
>>>now.
>>
>> Way better than any rethug's or winger's !!!
>
>
> Come on Cliff. If all you are going to deal in is cute quips, we
> expect much better from you.
No, not really.
�n�hw��f
> In article <Xns9CDB64D12B6D6...@216.196.97.142>,
> snuh...@yahoo.com says...
>>
>> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure
>> thought with news:MPG.25875d1...@news.bytemine.net:
>>
>> > In article <Xns9CDA63425F23B...@216.196.97.142>,
>> > snuh...@yahoo.com says...
>> >>
>> >> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> clouded the waters of pure
>> >> thought with news:MPG.25862f3...@news.bytemine.net:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Unlike you I earn enough that I can pay taxes...
>> >>
>> >> KILL KILL KILL
>> >> The POOR
>> >> KILL KILL KILL KILL
>> >> The POOR
>> >> -Dead Kennedys
>> >
>> > Whatever floats your boat I suppose..
>> > Me I'd rather help them learn a good trade so they not be poor
>> > anymore...
>> >
>>
>> So long as they dont try and form a UNION, sure.
>
> Why would they want to engage in organized crime ?
>
Because the government *hates* the competition, sure.
>>
>> LULZ!
>>
>> Or complain when their jobs are inevitably shipped overseas to
>> avoid paying a Living Wage.
>> ^_^
>
> The result of Unions...
>
The result of "Free Trade" bullshit.
NAFTA, CAFTA, all that shit fucked the middle class.
tankfixer
Thank Bill Clinton for those next time he surfaces...
Cliff
>> The result of "Free Trade" bullshit.
>>
>> NAFTA, CAFTA, all that shit fucked the middle class.
>
>Thank Bill Clinton for those next time he surfaces...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bush+NAFTA
"Bush, who had worked to "fast track" the signing ..."
"Bush's Trade Policy: The NAFTA Express"
"The Effect of George Bush's NAFTA on American Workers"
"Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway"
"Bush praises Nafta at summit meeting"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bush+CAFTA
"Bush Says CAFTA Will Save Jobs"
Etc.
HTH
--
Cliff
�n�hw��f
Clinton hired Rob Rubin straight from wall street and they removed
Glass-Stegall legislation. That led to all this current crap-economy.
Credit where credits due I say. Bush fucked the Bill of Rights,
Habeus Corpus, and Posse Comitatus. Obviously, they all suck cocks in
hell.
Fuck em, the whole sorry lot of em.
Word.
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>instead of having to deal with the facts.
You are an expert on the subject?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>"ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>The fact that they are fringe wackos
>
>You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
>the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
>facts.
What "facts" did Faux lie to you about this time?
>BushBots asked critics "why do you hate America so much" when they had
>no reply. ObamaBots have just kept using the same tactics - discredit
>instead of rebuttal. Two parties, not a dimes worth of difference.
"Rebut" what, exactly?
Wingers lie. That seems to be both a given & the easy way
to spot them. Plus they cannot learn.
--
Cliff
Cliff
>"ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>news:85ulh5lmi8sebllnr...@4ax.com...
>>> "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>
>>>>The fact that they are fringe wackos
>>>
>>> You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
>>> the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
>>> facts.
>>
>>But those things are true about todays republicans. The party of NO. Just
>>obstruct. Nothing constructive or in any way helpful. They don't use facts.
>>They try to keep people scared with talk of death panels and other nonsense.
>
>So says the leftist wingers. Bush's right whackos said his critics
>were Osama lovers and Terrorist lovers. Are you? Does the majority
>party saying it make it true?
>
>It's pretty hard to be constructive when you are excluded from the
>bill writing process.
The "Party of NO" helps it's self to full helpings of No then
spreads as many lies as possible.
You have no need to buy them, do you?
>The only avenue that leaves is offering
>amendments.
Like excluding States with the letter U in their names?
>They are summarily rejected by the leftist wingers
>without the bother of a vote.
Like the ones that were voted down?
>Remember leftist wingers during Bush's
>years demanding they be give up or down votes on all things?
Not really. But after debate that is the way votes tend to
go, is it not?
For or against.
Should Faux "news" get several half or quarter votes?
How many should SureShot, DeadEye Dick, Rush &
Coulter get?
>NOW you
>don't believe in that do you? Basically the leftist wingers are
>afraid to go on the record and then have to explain it to the folks
>back in their districts.
Like the liars in the Party of NO?
>Then the leftist power brokers get on their little podiums and tell
>the world that they will force legislation though without even the
>participation of a party that represents nearly half of Americans.
Half have an IQ less than 101 too.
>When the Ds of eight years ago and the Rs of today are presented with
>a fait accompli, with just a yes or no choice, you call them the party
>of no. Leftist wingers set it up so they can make that charge and the
>entire country suffers for your petty political tricks.
Too bad the Dems cannot seem to all march in line
under orders like the rethugs.
>Remember how leftist wingers cried, howled, and stamped their little
>left feet when Bush's rubber stamp Republican Congress threatened
>procedural tricks to choke off the one remaining tool, the filibuster.
>NOW the leftist wingers are themselves making just that same threat
>and they may actually do it.
>
>You tell me how either party has ANY credibility if you are not one of
>their loyalist bots?
There are always Faux & Rush to tell you about it, right?
--
Cliff
Cliff
Ghost) wrote:
>"ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>news:wradnV1nOf5pqIbW...@giganews.com:
>
>>
>>
>> "Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>> news:ef1mh5h1s68rp0fhd...@4ax.com...
>>> "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:85ulh5lmi8sebllnr...@4ax.com...
>>>>> "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>>>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The fact that they are fringe wackos
>>>>>
>>>>> You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
>>>>> the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
>>>>> facts.
>>>>
>>>>But those things are true about todays republicans. The party of NO. Just
>>>>obstruct. Nothing constructive or in any way helpful. They don't use
>>>>facts. They try to keep people scared with talk of death panels and other
>>>> nonsense.
>>>
>>> So says the leftist wingers. Bush's right whackos said his critics
>>> were Osama lovers and Terrorist lovers. Are you? Does the majority
>>> party saying it make it true?
>>>
>>> It's pretty hard to be constructive when you are excluded from the
>>> bill writing process. The only avenue that leaves is offering
>>> amendments.
>>
>> Oh bullshit. Boehner was out there talking about party unity and promising
>> no YES votes long before there was any bills to look at.
>>
>>
>>
>
>That would be because the Dems were still writing the bills and not letting
>the Repubs in on it.
Don't they have to learn to read first?
--
Cliff