paypal wholesale all brand(UGGBOOTS,SHOES,CLOTHES,HANDBAG,WATCH,JEANS,JERSEY,T-SHIRT,SHIRTS,HOODY,EYEGLASS,CAP,SHAWL,WALLT) and so on.
huang xiang
paypal payment wholesale all brand
shoes(NIKE,ADIDAS,LV,GUCCI,CHANEL,PRADA,POLO,UGG BOOTS,D&G,DIOR )and
so on.
paypal payment wholesale all brand clothing(T-
SHIRT,JEANS,JERSEY,HOODIES,JACKETS,HARDY,SWEATER,SHIRTS )and so on .
http://picasaweb.google.com/peopletrade.shoes001/
http://picasaweb.google.com/peopletrade.clothing002/
paypal payment all brand
watch(ROLEX,OMEGA,CHANEL,LV,CARTIER,IWC,GUCCI,RADO )and so on.
paypal payment all brand
handbag(LV,GUCCI,CHANEL,PRADA,POLO,COACH,FENDI,CHLOE,BUBERRY,JUICY)
and so on.
paypal payment brand CAP,SHAWL,BELT,WALLET,UNDER WEAR)and so on.
More detail land,address: http://picasaweb.google.com/peopletrade.clothing001/
http://picasaweb.google.com/peopletrade.shoes002/
http://picasaweb.google.com/peopletrade.clothing003/
Dan Q very much
Doug Miller
>Spam, posted to shorten subject
Moron. Did you think the rest of us were unable to figure out for ourselves
that it's spam?
Dan Q very much
> In article <95ef6006-8ca9-4cd3-af2c-85ecaf162...@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, Dan Q very much <dque...@new.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >Spam, posted to shorten subject
>
> Moron. Did you think the rest of us were unable to figure out for ourselves
> that it's spam?
I guess you liked seeing spam with a multi-line subject mucking up the
thread list? This is what I get for trying to be helpful?
Do you have some other problem with me that you're so quick to label
what I did moronic? Or are you just a dick?
Nonshom Kapop
He is completely clueless - you are wasting your time.
He fails to recognize that anyone using a real newsfeed is seeing a new thread
called "spam" - thanks to him. His feeble attempt at "fixing" a problem just
creates more problems - and even MORE clutter in an already-cluttered newsgroup.
I would like Dan Q to cite ONE reference anywhere that condones his actions. Or
is he so original in his thought process that no one has thought of his
"solution" before?
He is a buffoon.
Dan L.
> In article <hoviev$kg...@news.eternal-september.org>, Doug Miller says...
>
>
>
> >In article <95ef6006-8ca9-4cd3-af2c-85ecaf162...@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> >Dan Q very much <dque...@new.rr.com> wrote:
> >>Spam, posted to shorten subject
>
> >Moron. Did you think the rest of us were unable to figure out for ourselves
> >that it's spam.
>
> He is completely clueless - you are wasting your time.
>
> He fails to recognize that anyone using a real newsfeed is seeing a new thread
> called "spam" - thanks to him. His feeble attempt at "fixing" a problem just
> creates more problems - and even MORE clutter in an already-cluttered newsgroup.
>
> I would like Dan Q to cite ONE reference anywhere that condones his actions. Or
> is he so original in his thought process that no one has thought of his
> "solution" before?
>
> He is a buffoon.
I condone his actions. If I see something marked 'spam' I generally
ignore it. You people need to lighten up.
Dan L.
John In WI
You mean you wouldn't have ignored the original topic then?
--
"Anything worth doing, is worth overdoing”
- Mick Jagger -
Tim N.
>
> - Show quoted text -
No way..... Uggboots at wholesale pricing?....Only a fool would not
look at the thread....
Dan L.
>
> > You mean you wouldn't have ignored the original topic then?
>
> > --
> - Show quoted text -
Yah, I would have ignored it. I'm not interested in Russian brides or
naked Indian chicks either. However, I wouldn't call someone a moron
for changing the subject line to 'spam'. Also, there is so much crap
that winds up on this group that it is pointless to get upset about
it. Just sayin...
Dan L.
Doug Miller
>On Mar 31, 9:24=A0am, spamb...@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote:
>> In article <95ef6006-8ca9-4cd3-af2c-85ecaf162...@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups=
>..com>, Dan Q very much <dque...@new.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Spam, posted to shorten subject
>>
>> Moron. Did you think the rest of us were unable to figure out for ourselves
>> that it's spam?
>
>I guess you liked seeing spam with a multi-line subject mucking up the
>thread list?
No, moron, when I see spam I *ignore* it. I don't jump up and down shouting
"Look, everyone! Spam!"
>This is what I get for trying to be helpful?
How, exactly, is it being "helpful" to reply to spam, just to label it as
spam?
>
>Do you have some other problem with me that you're so quick to label
>what I did moronic? Or are you just a dick?
No, you're just a dumbass. Hint: not everyone is as big a dumbass as you. Most
of us can spot spam without someone else telling us it's spam. You're not
helping. You're just adding noise.
Bye. You can reply if you wish; I won't see it. You're in my killfile now.
Doug Miller
>Yah, I would have ignored it. I'm not interested in Russian brides or
>naked Indian chicks either. However, I wouldn't call someone a moron
>for changing the subject line to 'spam'.
That's not why I called him a moron. I called him a moron for replying to it,
just to label it as spam as if the rest of us couldn't have figured that out
for ourselves.
Apparently you're just as clueless as he is.
Another one for the killfile, I guess... <sigh>
Tim N.
> In article <6e8cb6be-59be-4e3b-8d8d-24bea56b3...@z4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, "Dan L." <daniel.tr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >Yah, I would have ignored it. I'm not interested in Russian brides or
> >naked Indian chicks either. However, I wouldn't call someone a moron
> >for changing the subject line to 'spam'.
>
> That's not why I called him a moron. I called him a moron for replying to it,
> just to label it as spam as if the rest of us couldn't have figured that out
> for ourselves.
>
> Apparently you're just as clueless as he is.
>
> Another one for the killfile, I guess... <sigh>
Damn, if these guys make your killfile for this silly stuff, that bad
boy must be large enough to require an additional hard drive.....Hang
on, I will *Plonk* myself now...
Dan Q very much
> In article <hoviev$kg...@news.eternal-september.org>, Doug Miller says...
>
>
>
> >In article <95ef6006-8ca9-4cd3-af2c-85ecaf162...@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> >Dan Q very much <dque...@new.rr.com> wrote:
> >>Spam, posted to shorten subject
>
> >Moron. Did you think the rest of us were unable to figure out for ourselves
> >that it's spam.
>
> He is completely clueless - you are wasting your time.
>
> He fails to recognize that anyone using a real newsfeed is seeing a new thread
> called "spam" - thanks to him. His feeble attempt at "fixing" a problem just
> creates more problems - and even MORE clutter in an already-cluttered newsgroup.
>
> I would like Dan Q to cite ONE reference anywhere that condones his actions. Or
> is he so original in his thought process that no one has thought of his
> "solution" before?
>
> He is a buffoon.
And you, sir, are a coward, hiding behind this alias account.
If you can't ignore a thread called "spam" even if, oh noes, it comes
through on your obsolete newsreader as a new thread, then you are also
an idiot.
I can cite one reference condoning my action right here in this
thread. So shut up.
Michael A. Terrell
It's easier to just killfile Google Groups.
--
Lead free solder is Belgium's version of 'Hold my beer and watch this!'
U.R. Anal
Dan Q very much says...
>
>On Mar 31, 12:29=A0pm, (Nonshom Kapop) noth...@nottthere.com wrote:
>> In article <hoviev$kg...@news.eternal-september.org>, Doug Miller says...
>>
>>
>>
>ves
>> >that it's spam.
>>
>> He is completely clueless - you are wasting your time.
>>
>hread
>> called "spam" - thanks to him. =A0 His feeble attempt at "fixing" a probl=
>em just
>> creates more problems - and even MORE clutter in an already-cluttered new=
>sgroup.
>>
>> I would like Dan Q to cite ONE reference anywhere that condones his actio=
>ns. =A0Or
>> is he so original in his thought process that no one has thought of his
>> "solution" before?
>>
>
>And you, sir, are a coward, hiding behind this alias account.
>
>If you can't ignore a thread called "spam" even if, oh noes, it comes
>through on your obsolete newsreader as a new thread, then you are also
>an idiot.
>
>I can cite one reference condoning my action right here in this
>thread. So shut up.
Correcting subject line to avoid reader confusion.
Dan Q very much
wrote:
> In <33d5f70e-e7a2-4617-b882-4f1f04be2...@c13g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, on
> Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:27:07 -0700 (PDT), Dan Q very much, dque...@new.rr.com
> wrote:
>
> > I guess you liked seeing spam with a multi-line subject mucking up the
> > thread list?
>
> reply to it.
>
> > This is what I get for trying to be helpful?
>
>
> > Do you have some other problem with me that you're so quick to label
> > what I did moronic? Or are you just a dick?
>
> all that crap. If spam bothers you, you might consider
> doing the same.
>
> --
> ☯☯
> Unlimited webspace - Unlimited bandwidthhttp://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?74713
Well, thanks for dredging it back up then.
Didn't notice rcm in the groups list on the 2nd post, which I replied
to. My bad, but I didn't add it.
GG is no less "real" than an old style newsreader, plus you can search
the archives, half the reason I'm here.
(...and "road to hell"? Really?)