Re: Home of the Free, the Brave and the Gay
Burled Frau
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b91f4bbc-22ce-409c...@b35g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
> About time...it is only right that every conservative who wants to
> serve can serve without his sexual orientation being held against him.
Obviously 0bama is struggling to find anyone willing to fight in his name,
looks like he'll be sending the gays into Iran. Wait until Ahmedinajid gets
a hold of them, they'll all have nicely tailored suits, so it won't be that
bad. Just ask the brits.
Burled Frau
"HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b80080d3-f4bb-4d9b...@b36g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 2, 6:39 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> About time...it is only right that every conservative who wants to
>> serve can serve without his sexual orientation being held against him.
>>
>> Interesting how McCain disapproves while the rest of his family is for
>> it.
>>
>> And now the lying bastard is going back on his word that he would back
>> a change if the military said they wanted it changed.
>>
>> So what would you rather have....gays in the military or a draft?
>>
>> TMT
>
> Tool, now you have no exuse for not serving. Post your zip code and
> I'll post your nearest recruiter.
>
> Specify if you want Army, Navy, Air Force or Marine Corps. Uh, Sorry,
> I forgot the Coast Guard.
>
> Or, I'll post the nearest recruiter's office for all of them if you
> want to shop around for the best educational benefits, which you could
> really, really use.
>
> I'm waiting.
Don't forget to sign up his mommies. Both of them.
Burled Frau
<edi...@netpath.net> wrote in message
news:6737dcda-614e-47d7...@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> Get real. Only reason the Pentagon elite suddenly now support
> allowing open gays to enlist is that - in the midst of two long wars -
> the military has run out of straight guys and straight gals willing to
> be its cannon fodder and willing to fight wars for the elites of
> Manhattan. It's got nothing to do with any commitment to gay rights.
Almost correct. The military can't find enough guys willing to serve under
the big zero
Burled Frau
"Jack G." <jfgr...@live.com> wrote in message
news:ca2d0d44-1377-4975...@z10g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 2, 4:51 pm, "edi...@netpath.net" <edi...@netpath.net> wrote:
>> Get real. Only reason the Pentagon elite suddenly now support
>> allowing open gays to enlist is that - in the midst of two long wars -
>> the military has run out of straight guys and straight gals willing to
>> be its cannon fodder and willing to fight wars for the elites of
>> Manhattan. It's got nothing to do with any commitment to gay rights.
>>
>> http://www.Internet-Gun-Show.com- your source for hard-to-find stuff!
>
> The Army needs TMT or do the generals just want a fresh butt boy.
>
> Jack G.
Maybe they need his two mommies. After all, look at the good he's done for
rec.crafts.metalworking, the group that spawned him and Cliff. They should
enlist right away, 0zero is counting on them and he can't count too high,
doncha' know?
Burled Frau
"Henway" <hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c0b0d84f-2b1f-4d63...@v37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 2, 5:39 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> About time...it is only right that every conservative who wants to
>> serve can serve without his sexual orientation being held against him.
>>
>> Interesting how McCain disapproves while the rest of his family is for
>> it.
>>
>> And now the lying bastard is going back on his word that he would back
>> a change if the military said they wanted it changed.
>>
>> So what would you rather have....gays in the military or a draft?
>>
>> TMT
>>
>> Top uniformed officer: Gay ban should be lifted
>> By ANNE FLAHERTY and ANNE GEARAN, Associated Press Writers Anne
>> Flaherty And Anne Gearan, Associated Press Writers
>>
>> WASHINGTON � The military's top uniformed officer on Tuesday made an
>> impassioned plea for allowing gays to serve openly in uniform, telling
>> a Senate panel it was a matter of integrity and that it is wrong to
>> force people to "lie about who they are in order to defend their
>> fellow citizens."
>>
>> The comments by Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
>> Staff, set the stage for the Defense Department's yearlong study into
>> how the ban can be repealed without causing a major upheaval in the
>> military.
>>
>> Defense Secretary Robert Gates, appearing with Mullen before the Armed
>> Services Committee, announced plans to loosen enforcement rules
>> involving the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that has been in effect
>> since 1993.
>>
>> President Barack Obama has called for a repeal of the policy, although
>> he did little in his first year in office to advance that goal. If he
>> succeeds, it would mark the biggest shake up to military personnel
>> policies since President Harry S. Truman's 1948 executive order
>> integrating the services.
>>
>> "No matter how I look at the issue," Mullen said, "I cannot escape
>> being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces
>> young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their
>> fellow citizens." Noting that he was speaking for himself and not for
>> the other service chiefs, Mullen added: "For me, it comes down to
>> integrity � theirs as individuals and ours as an institution."
>>
>> Congress enacted the law that enshrined the "don't ask" policy, which
>> was intended to soften the previous blanket prohibition on gays in the
>> military. "Don't ask" says gays may serve so long as they kept their
>> sexuality private. Gay rights organizations have called that an insult
>> and have said it is a form of discrimination.
>>
>> Repeal of the ban would require a new law passed by Congress. Gates
>> and Mullen said their efforts are intended to make sure the Pentagon
>> is ready when that time comes.
>>
>> The hastily called session gave Obama high-level cover on a divisive
>> social issue complicated by the strains on an all-volunteer military
>> force of fighting two wars.
>>
>> Gates, who says he is a Republican, is the only member of former
>> President George W. Bush's Cabinet whom Obama asked to stay on. He has
>> gained a reputation for candor and caution. Mullen's words were a
>> forceful endorsement from a careful man, but his very appearance,
>> starched uniform and four stars on view, spoke as loudly.
>>
>> Gates drew unusually pointed and partisan criticism from Republicans
>> on the panel for saying that the review will examine how, not whether,
>> to repeal the ban.
>>
>> Arizona Sen. John McCain, the top Republican on the committee, icily
>> told Gates he was disappointed in his position. In sharp questioning,
>> McCain angrily suggested that the Pentagon was usurping Congress' job
>> in rewriting the law should it choose to do so.
>>
>> "Has this policy been ideal? No, it has not," McCain said. "But it has
>> been effective."
>>
>> Mullen looked pained when Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., suggested that
>> Mullen had preordained the outcome of any study of the wisdom of
>> repeal by signaling his own opposition to the ban.
>>
>> "This is about leadership, and I take that very, very seriously,"
>> Mullen replied, tightlipped.
>>
>> Several other Republicans sided with McCain, warning Mullen and Gates
>> not to pursue a change at a time when the United States is fighting
>> two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and facing a continuing threat of
>> terrorism. Democrats said they would back a change in policy.
>>
>> Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and chairman of the committee, said a repeal
>> of the law might be slipped into a broader military policy bill that
>> authorizes defense spending.
>>
>> Democratic Sen. Mark Udall said his Colorado constituents pride
>> themselves on allowing others to live and let live.
>>
>> "You don't have to be straight to shoot straight," said Udall, quoting
>> libertarian Barry Goldwater.
>>
>> Gates suggested that lawmakers keep the intensity of debate in check
>> until the military can get a better handle on how to proceed. To sort
>> out the details, Gates has turned to Pentagon counsel Jeh Johnson and
>> Gen. Carter Ham, who leads Army forces in Europe.
>>
>> "Keep the impact it will have on our forces firmly in mind," the
>> secretary implored lawmakers
>>
>> Mullen said it was his sense that rank-and-file troops would support
>> the change.
>>
>> "I have served with homosexuals since 1968," he said in response to
>> questions from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. "There are a number of
>> things cumulatively that get me to this position."
>>
>> Ham is a former enlisted infantryman who rose through the ranks to
>> eventually command troops in northern Iraq in 2004 and hold senior
>> positions within the Joint Staff. Recently, he helped conduct an
>> investigation into the shootings by a soldier at the Fort Hood Army
>> base in Texas.
>>
>> As the Pentagon's top legal counsel, Johnson has played an integral
>> role into the effort to try to close the military prison in Guantanamo
>> Bay, Cuba.
>
> Why is it everytime a liberal/progressive gets in the Whitehouse one
> of the first things they do is try and pass laws that allow gays to
> OPENLY serve in the military?? Can one of you "highly edjikated"
> progressives explain that please??
TMT and his boyfriend (the one across the street who lives in the basement
of his two daddies) should both sign up right away. While they are at it,
they should be good citizens and report Curly and the Douchebag as being
ready to serve.
Burled Frau
"Strabo" <str...@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:6P3an.146388$uH1....@newsfe25.iad...
>
> Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>> About time...it is only right that every conservative who wants to
>> serve can serve without his sexual orientation being held against him.
>>
>
> Heterosexuals are conservative. Individuals who act otherwise are not
> conservative.
>
>
> <snipped>
Like the liberal mommies of TMT and that turkey baster faster of his.
HH&C
> "HH&C" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Ummm, probably won't happen. Obesity.
Burled Frau
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c234722f-36da-4014...@c10g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 2, 6:56 pm, Henway <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 2, 5:39 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > About time...it is only right that every conservative who wants to
>> > serve can serve without his sexual orientation being held against him.
>>
>> > Interesting how McCain disapproves while the rest of his family is for
>> > it.
>>
>> > And now the lying bastard is going back on his word that he would back
>> > a change if the military said they wanted it changed.
>>
>> > So what would you rather have....gays in the military or a draft?
>>
>> > TMT
>>
>> progressives explain that please??- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
TMT and his boyfriend (the one across the street who lives in the basement
of his two daddies) should both sign up right away. While they are at it,
they should be good citizens and report Curly and the Douchebag as being
ready to serve.
>
> Why is it everytime a conservative wingnut gets in the Whitehouse one
> of the first things they do is try and pass laws that deny gays the
> right to marry??
>
> Can one of you "highly edjikated" conservative nutjobs explain that
> please??-
>
> TMT
Lookout
wrote:
>
>
>"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:c234722f-36da-4014...@c10g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
>> On Feb 2, 6:56 pm, Henway <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 2, 5:39 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > About time...it is only right that every conservative who wants to
>>> > serve can serve without his sexual orientation being held against him.
>>>
>>> > Interesting how McCain disapproves while the rest of his family is for
>>> > it.
>>>
>>> > And now the lying bastard is going back on his word that he would back
>>> > a change if the military said they wanted it changed.
>>>
>>> > So what would you rather have....gays in the military or a draft?
>>>
>>> > TMT
>>>
>>> > Top uniformed officer: Gay ban should be lifted
>>> > By ANNE FLAHERTY and ANNE GEARAN, Associated Press Writers Anne
>>> > Flaherty And Anne Gearan, Associated Press Writers
>>>
>>> > WASHINGTON � The military's top uniformed officer on Tuesday made an
>>> > impassioned plea for allowing gays to serve openly in uniform, telling
>>> > a Senate panel it was a matter of integrity and that it is wrong to
>>> > force people to "lie about who they are in order to defend their
>>> > fellow citizens."
>>>
>>> > The comments by Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
>>> > Staff, set the stage for the Defense Department's yearlong study into
>>> > how the ban can be repealed without causing a major upheaval in the
>>> > military.
>>>
>>> > Defense Secretary Robert Gates, appearing with Mullen before the Armed
>>> > Services Committee, announced plans to loosen enforcement rules
>>> > involving the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that has been in effect
>>> > since 1993.
>>>
>>> > President Barack Obama has called for a repeal of the policy, although
>>> > he did little in his first year in office to advance that goal. If he
>>> > succeeds, it would mark the biggest shake up to military personnel
>>> > policies since President Harry S. Truman's 1948 executive order
>>> > integrating the services.
>>>
>>> > "No matter how I look at the issue," Mullen said, "I cannot escape
>>> > being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces
>>> > young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their
>>> > fellow citizens." Noting that he was speaking for himself and not for
>>> > the other service chiefs, Mullen added: "For me, it comes down to
>>> > integrity � theirs as individuals and ours as an institution."
Homosexuality really scares you. Why?
Kasim Sulton
> Homosexuality really scares you. Why?
Because you faggots spread disease when your penises go from man-ass to
man-mouth, and back again, when you attempt to lick yourselves clean.
Why do you fear Heterosexuality?
You know.. the NORMAL thing! :)
It's not like you and yer butt buddy "TMT" are gonna have a girl when
you plook him in the ass.
Just because YOU came out the wrong hole when born, means nothing.
Lookout
wrote:
>Lookout wrote:
>
>> Homosexuality really scares you. Why?
>
>Because you faggots
Nope. Wrong again
>spread disease when your penises go from man-ass to
>man-mouth, and back again, when you attempt to lick yourselves clean.
And wrong again.
>
>Why do you fear Heterosexuality?
I don't. It's a stupid question but it's what I expect from you
>You know.. the NORMAL thing! :)
Doctors say homosexuality is normal. You're wrong again.
>
>
>It's not like you and yer butt buddy "TMT" are gonna have a girl when
>you plook him in the ass.
And you're lying again. Why do you lie so much?
>Just because YOU came out the wrong hole when born, means nothing.
Humans can only come out of one "hole". But as you use such immature
terms for a body orifice I could see how you're ignorance and
prejudice would confuse you.
Too_Many_Tools
LOL...was that the right question to ask!
The idiot doesn't understand that hetrosexual sex spreads more disease
because of the numbers involved.
He also forgets the fact that many spouses swing with same sex
partners without them knowing.
TMT
Larry Graham
> Doctors say homosexuality is normal.
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!
Look out!
Lookout's doctor has the cure!
Larry Graham
> On Feb 3, 2:01 pm, Kasim Sulton <Uto...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>Lookout wrote:
>>
>>>Homosexuality really scares you. Why?
>>
>>Because you faggots spread disease when your penises go from man-ass to
>>man-mouth, and back again, when you attempt to lick yourselves clean.
>>
>>Why do you fear Heterosexuality?
>>You know.. the NORMAL thing! :)
>>
>>It's not like you and yer butt buddy "TMT" are gonna have a girl when
>>you plook him in the ass.
>>
>>Just because YOU came out the wrong hole when born, means nothing.
>
>
> LOL...was that the right question to ask!
Your butt buddy "Lookout" just said that being a homo is normal!
No wonder you are scared stiff to show up and take my guns away!
Now I have more legal reasons to end your silly lives, IF you try to
enter my home illegaly.
You faggots have cooties, AND you want to commit burglary!
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
So when the SWAT team enter your home to search and seize, do you
think you will get off a shot before you are riddled with holes?
TMT
Beam Me Up Scotty
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
Sex with a conservative...you always regret it and you may end having
a bastard or bitch.
Dick Cheney and Sarah Palin are examples of the unnatural act.
TMT
Burled Frau
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dfojm5t8984cc6t4a...@4ax.com...
TMT wasn't born, he was shat. And his daddy was a turkey baster full of
sloth sperm. That explains it pretty well, doncha think?
Lookout
It's a fact. But you can't handle facts and the truth, can you? Why is
that?
Lookout
wrote:
>
>
Seems you got lost on the way to adding to the discussion.
Lookout
<Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>> On Feb 3, 2:01 pm, Kasim Sulton <Uto...@bass.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>Lookout wrote:
>>>
>>>>Homosexuality really scares you. Why?
>>>
>>>Because you faggots spread disease when your penises go from man-ass to
>>>man-mouth, and back again, when you attempt to lick yourselves clean.
>>>
>>>Why do you fear Heterosexuality?
>>>You know.. the NORMAL thing! :)
>>>
>>>It's not like you and yer butt buddy "TMT" are gonna have a girl when
>>>you plook him in the ass.
>>>
>>>Just because YOU came out the wrong hole when born, means nothing.
>>
>>
>> LOL...was that the right question to ask!
>
>Your butt buddy "Lookout" just said that being a homo is normal!
I said doctors have said that. You're lying again.
>No wonder you are scared stiff to show up and take my guns away!
No one ever said someone was going to. You're lying again.
>
>Now I have more legal reasons to end your silly lives, IF you try to
>enter my home illegaly.
Why would anyone do that?
>
>You faggots have cooties, AND you want to commit burglary!
You're afraid of your own sexuality.
tankfixer
5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
says...
> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>
Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
A homosexual couple cannot..
Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to not
be able to reproduce itself ?
Patriot Games
Species sometimes do things just for the fun of it, especially those
species that we consider more highly evolved.
You don't really believe that the existence of homosexuality threatens
the existence of any given species, do you? The vast majority of humans
are heterosexual yet humans, at present, have outstripped the planet's
ability to supply all with the basic necessities, such as clean water
and arable land. Clearly, homosexuality in humans has not been a
hindrance to the growth of the human population. Perhaps homosexuality
is just one of nature's means of curbing the unsustainable growth of the
human population. Perhaps homosexuality is not all that "unnatural".
Beam Me Up Scotty
> tankfixer wrote:
>> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>> 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
>> says...
>>> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>>>
>>
>> Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
>> A homosexual couple cannot..
>>
>> Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to not
>> be able to reproduce itself ?
>
> Species sometimes do things just for the fun of it, especially those
> species that we consider more highly evolved.
>
Name one.... what Genetic evolutionary trait is purely for natures
fun(in any animal on the planet)? Meaning it is not even entertaining
but just natures joke on us.
> You don't really believe that the existence of homosexuality threatens
> the existence of any given species, do you? The vast majority of humans
Being a mutation that is not directed towards reproduction but against
it, means that it won't "help" the human species survive. That trait is
defeating the progress and sustainability of humanity.
> are heterosexual yet humans, at present, have outstripped the planet's
> ability to supply all with the basic necessities, such as clean water
> and arable land. Clearly, homosexuality in humans has not been a
> hindrance to the growth of the human population.
That doesn't make it "normal"
> Perhaps homosexuality
> is just one of nature's means of curbing the unsustainable growth of the
> human population. Perhaps homosexuality is not all that "unnatural".
What organism genetically disrupts normal reproduction its self, to
prevent over population?
Besides... people are too fat and we aren't running out of land or water
and the earth is able to produce enough food to feed all the humans on
the planet, the only problem is distribution through the war lords and
stopping the communists/Leftists from starving their people via
ignorance and megalomania.
I don't buy your argument.
Larry Graham
I know that you and "TMT" are faggots.
Larry Graham
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:17:38 -0500, Larry Graham
> <Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>
>>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Feb 3, 2:01 pm, Kasim Sulton <Uto...@bass.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Lookout wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Homosexuality really scares you. Why?
>>>>
>>>>Because you faggots spread disease when your penises go from man-ass to
>>>>man-mouth, and back again, when you attempt to lick yourselves clean.
>>>>
>>>>Why do you fear Heterosexuality?
>>>>You know.. the NORMAL thing! :)
>>>>
>>>>It's not like you and yer butt buddy "TMT" are gonna have a girl when
>>>>you plook him in the ass.
>>>>
>>>>Just because YOU came out the wrong hole when born, means nothing.
>>>
>>>
>>>LOL...was that the right question to ask!
>>
>>Your butt buddy "Lookout" just said that being a homo is normal!
>
>
> I said doctors have said that. You're lying again.
>
>
>>No wonder you are scared stiff to show up and take my guns away!
>
>
> No one ever said someone was going to. You're lying again.
Your Butt buddy "TMT" said exactly that.
And HE said that you were his friend!
>>Now I have more legal reasons to end your silly lives, IF you try to
>>enter my home illegaly.
> Why would anyone do that?
Because that is what normal people like me try to do, when you silly
freaks break into the homes of us normal people.
First I say "Stop! Follow my orders, or die!"
Then I shoot you anyway.
>>You faggots have cooties, AND you want to commit burglary!
> You're afraid of your own sexuality.
Why would I be afraid of being a normal man, defending my normal female
wife, in our normal home?
"TMT" said he was coming to my house to take my guns away, with his friends.
Then he said he would bring his "friends."
YOU are listed as being one of his friends.
YOU just insinuated that you are very gay.
Do the math, buttercup.
Larry Graham
> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
So your and "Lookout's" homosexuality is considered "normal" instead of
just tolerated?
> So when the SWAT team enter your home to search and seize, do you
> think you will get off a shot before you are riddled with holes?
Why would I shoot at the police, strawman?
They have no reason to search my home.
The locals and I are very good friends.
I said I would shoot to stop _YOU_, (Killing you in the process is an
bonus!) if you enter my home illegally, like you said you would.
Larry Graham
How EVIL!
Both are married to the Opposite sex!!!
And you and lookout are pumping splooge into each others bottoms and
throats to make a world class Democrat?
Curly Surmudgeon
<Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
Pig Brick/Basil Karlo/Libby Loo morphed another alias...
Buh-bye!
--
Regards, Curly
--------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beam Me Up Scotty
Here is where you tell us we are all having homosexual feelings and we
are scared to accept that we are GAY.....
Somehow you Gays think everyone is gay, somehow you are incensed that
someone would consider that we are all heterosexual and gays are just
confused, yet Gays find it absolutely acceptable to say we are
homosexual and some are just not accepting it. The problem is that we
heterosexuals, *aren't* all gay deep down inside, go on and tell us how
we are homophobic because we are really gay and we are just scared to
admit it.
This psycho babble from gays is spewed over and over.... the typical
Liberal-Progressive premise is to cast doubt and then change the
definitions of the words or make up new words like HOMOPHOBIC to attack
the status quo and try to get their agenda to have a foot in the door
and then make it sound like their new agenda is and has been the
unrecognized status quo all along.
You know... like Gays and gay marriage has always been around.... and if
you don't love gays then you are homophobic, which is now a hate crime,
and now when you say negative things about gays it's illegal too.
RD (The Sandman)
@news.bytemine.net:
Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Some points to ponder:
Why is it good if a vacuum cleaner really sucks?
Why is the third hand on a clock called the "second hand"?
Why did Kamikaze pilots wear helmets?
Why do we sing "Take me out to the ballgame" when we are already
there?
tankfixer
Sandman)" says...
>
> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d400b64cea72b7fb0
> @news.bytemine.net:
>
> > In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
> > 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
> > says...
> >> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
> >>
> >
> > Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
> > A homosexual couple cannot..
> >
> > Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to
> not
> > be able to reproduce itself ?
> >
>
> Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
> Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
Pleasure wasn't the issue..
Furthering the species is.
I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
"normal"
John Redthorn
> On 2/4/2010 1:24 AM, Patriot Games wrote:
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>>> 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
>>> says...
>>>> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>>>>
>>> Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
>>> A homosexual couple cannot..
>>>
>>> Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to not
>>> be able to reproduce itself ?
>> Species sometimes do things just for the fun of it, especially those
>> species that we consider more highly evolved.
>>
>
> Name one.... what Genetic evolutionary trait is purely for natures
> fun(in any animal on the planet)? Meaning it is not even entertaining
> but just natures joke on us.
>
>> You don't really believe that the existence of homosexuality threatens
>> the existence of any given species, do you? The vast majority of humans
>
> Being a mutation that is not directed towards reproduction but against
> it, means that it won't "help" the human species survive. That trait is
> defeating the progress and sustainability of humanity.
How? By not breeding in the face of unsustainable population growth?
Yikes, you wingnuts have mush fer brains.
HH&C
Alberto Curl-Lee complains about other people being anonymous?
> --
> Regards, Curly
> --------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------
> The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Redthorn
Blowjobs and eatin' pussy are not directed toward procreation.
Therefore, by yer standards, blowjobs and eatin' pussy are not normal. I
guess you, being a normal guy, have never had a blowjob or eaten any pussy.
Lookout
<Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
>Lookout wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:17:38 -0500, Larry Graham
>> <Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Feb 3, 2:01 pm, Kasim Sulton <Uto...@bass.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Lookout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Homosexuality really scares you. Why?
>>>>>
>>>>>Because you faggots spread disease when your penises go from man-ass to
>>>>>man-mouth, and back again, when you attempt to lick yourselves clean.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why do you fear Heterosexuality?
>>>>>You know.. the NORMAL thing! :)
>>>>>
>>>>>It's not like you and yer butt buddy "TMT" are gonna have a girl when
>>>>>you plook him in the ass.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just because YOU came out the wrong hole when born, means nothing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>LOL...was that the right question to ask!
>>>
>>>Your butt buddy "Lookout" just said that being a homo is normal!
My butt buddy? More 3rd grade insults?
No..I said that you dork. And every psychiatric and medical
organization says the same thing.
>>
>>
>> I said doctors have said that. You're lying again.
>>
>>>No wonder you are scared stiff to show up and take my guns away!
I have no way of doing that. I don't know if you have any guns...I
doubt you do. I am not local law enforcement and if you do have guns
they may be legal.
So why are you making shit up again? I never said I was going to. Why
do you lie so much>
>>
>> No one ever said someone was going to. You're lying again.
>
>Your Butt buddy "TMT" said exactly that.
>And HE said that you were his friend!
He can say whatever he wants. I have him filtered so I don't see his
posts.
>>>Now I have more legal reasons to end your silly lives, IF you try to
>>>enter my home illegaly.
>
>> Why would anyone do that?
>
>Because that is what normal people like me try to do, when you silly
>freaks break into the homes of us normal people.
Can you prove any of this?
>First I say "Stop! Follow my orders, or die!"
>Then I shoot you anyway.
You've never shot anyone. You're lying again.
>>>You faggots have cooties, AND you want to commit burglary!
>
>> You're afraid of your own sexuality.
>
>Why would I be afraid of being a normal man, defending my normal female
>wife, in our normal home?
You don't know what normal is.
>"TMT" said he was coming to my house to take my guns away, with his friends.
>Then he said he would bring his "friends."
>
>YOU are listed as being one of his friends.
Again..I don't care what he says.
>
>YOU just insinuated that you are very gay.
Nope. Lying again.
>
>Do the math, buttercup.
You sound very afraid of anyone sexuality and you use gun metaphors to
try to show off. Very immature.
Lookout
Who are you talking to>
Lookout
wrote:
>In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
>says...
>> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>>
>
>Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
>A homosexual couple cannot..
True
>
>Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to not
>be able to reproduce itself ?
That's not the question. You're making up you're own question to
answer your own question. Nice try. In a debate with me you wouldn't
last 5 minutes
John Redthorn
In my book, "furthering the species" does not imply, or equate to,
increasing the population of the species, not when the population of the
species is expanding at an unsustainable rate.
It seems to me that you are just hungering for a scapegoat to beat up
fer all that you think is wrong with "the species".
If you really want to "further the species" try blowing yer brains out.
Lookout
<Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>On 2/4/2010 1:24 AM, Patriot Games wrote:
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>>> 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
>>> says...
>>>> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
>>> A homosexual couple cannot..
>>>
>>> Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to not
>>> be able to reproduce itself ?
>>
>> Species sometimes do things just for the fun of it, especially those
>> species that we consider more highly evolved.
>>
>
>Name one.... what Genetic evolutionary trait is purely for natures
>fun(in any animal on the planet)? Meaning it is not even entertaining
>but just natures joke on us.
Masturbation.
>> You don't really believe that the existence of homosexuality threatens
>> the existence of any given species, do you? The vast majority of humans
>
>Being a mutation
Ahh..it's NOT a mutation. You're wrong so all the rest of you
incoherent babbling is useless
that is not directed towards reproduction but against
>it, means that it won't "help" the human species survive. That trait is
>defeating the progress and sustainability of humanity.
>
>> are heterosexual yet humans, at present, have outstripped the planet's
>> ability to supply all with the basic necessities, such as clean water
>> and arable land. Clearly, homosexuality in humans has not been a
>> hindrance to the growth of the human population.
>
>That doesn't make it "normal"
Medical science says it is. Do you really think anyone thinks you know
more than the combined intelligence in the medical community?
>
>> Perhaps homosexuality
>> is just one of nature's means of curbing the unsustainable growth of the
>> human population. Perhaps homosexuality is not all that "unnatural".
>
>What organism genetically disrupts normal reproduction its self, to
>prevent over population?
A stupid question. It's meaningless
>Besides... people are too fat and we aren't running out of land or water
>and the earth is able to produce enough food to feed all the humans on
>the planet, the only problem is distribution through the war lords and
>stopping the communists/Leftists from starving their people via
>ignorance and megalomania.
>
>I don't buy your argument.
Science and medicine don't buy yours
Lookout
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d400b64cea72b7fb0
>@news.bytemine.net:
>
>> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>> 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
>> says...
>>> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>>>
>>
>> Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
>> A homosexual couple cannot..
>>
>> Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to
>not
>> be able to reproduce itself ?
>>
>
>Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
>Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
He didn't know that but I won't change his argument. He's already made
up his mind and he'll continue to put together phrases and sentences
to try and prove his point. He's lost....and maybe gay.
Lookout
wrote:
Nope. That's a useless inclusion in the debate. It means nothing.
>
>I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
>"normal"
No one will convince you because you're too stupid to figure it out.
Lookout
<Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
>Lookout wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:10:13 -0500, Larry Graham
>> <Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lookout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Doctors say homosexuality is normal.
>>>
>>>BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!
>>>
>>>Look out!
>>>
>>>Lookout's doctor has the cure!
>>
>>
>> It's a fact. But you can't handle facts and the truth, can you? Why is
>> that?
>
>I know that you and "TMT" are faggots.
The go a head and prove it.
Lookout
<Slyandt...@bass.gov> wrote:
>Too_Many_Tools wrote:
>
>> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>
>So your and "Lookout's" homosexuality is considered "normal" instead of
>just tolerated?
Uhh..you haven't proved anyone is a homosexual.
>
>
>> So when the SWAT team enter your home to search and seize, do you
>> think you will get off a shot before you are riddled with holes?
>
>Why would I shoot at the police, strawman?
>They have no reason to search my home.
>The locals and I are very good friends.
>
>
>I said I would shoot to stop _YOU_, (Killing you in the process is an
>bonus!) if you enter my home illegally, like you said you would.
Nah...you're smarter than that. And you're a chickenshit
Lookout
But what about Cheney's daughter?
>
>And you and lookout are pumping splooge into each others bottoms and
>throats to make a world class Democrat?
Still waiting for you to prove it.
>
Too_Many_Tools
> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
> 5c83d77af...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_many_to...@yahoo.com
> says...
>
> > Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>
> Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
> A homosexual couple cannot..
>
> Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to not
> be able to reproduce itself ?
When was the military's mission reproduction of the species?
Please stay on topic.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
dog.com> wrote:
> On 2/4/2010 1:24 AM, Patriot Games wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > tankfixer wrote:
> >> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>
> - Show quoted text -
Homosexual behavior is seen in many species.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
So Larry...how do you "know" anyone is a "faggot"?
Are you saying that anyone who acknowledges that homosexuals have
rights and should be allowed to serve are "faggots"?
Perhaps you could run that opinion past the top military man in the
land...the same one who says it should happen.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
>
>
>
>
>
> > tankfixer wrote:
> >> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>
> - Show quoted text -
You are proving yourself an idiot.
Are you one of the too fat ones?
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
Even among conservative idiots, you stand out.
The Republican Party must be very proud of you.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
Perhaps the "locals" are good friends because you are under
observation?
It would be easy for them to monitor your Usenet habits.
It would be even easier for any of us to make them aware of your
threats.
I doubt you would get off a shot before the SWAT team riddled you with
bullets.
I take that back...you might have a moment to crap your pants before
you die in a hail of bullets.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah...a real loser who feels he needs new nyms to be heard.
He is one who can ramble on forever and not say a thing.
It is apparent that anyone around cannot stand him...including his
family.
I feel sorry for his family...they are stuck with him.
Thankfully we are not. ;<)
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> In article <Xns9D1590CC9BE1Fhopew...@216.196.97.130>, "RD (The
> Sandman)" says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d400b64cea72b7fb0
> > @news.bytemine.net:
>
> > > In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
> > > 5c83d77af...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_many_to...@yahoo.com
> > > says...
> > >> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>
> > > Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
> > > A homosexual couple cannot..
>
> > > Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to
> > not
> > > be able to reproduce itself ?
>
> > Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
> > Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
>
> Pleasure wasn't the issue..
> Furthering the species is.
>
> I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
>
> - Show quoted text -
Review the science...the norm is both homo and hetro.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> > Sandman)" says...
> >> tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d400b64cea72b7fb0
> >> @news.bytemine.net:
>
> >>> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
> >>> 5c83d77af...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_many_to...@yahoo.com
> >>> says...
> >>>> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>
> >>> Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
> >>> A homosexual couple cannot..
>
> >>> Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to
> >> not
> >>> be able to reproduce itself ?
>
> >> Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
> >> Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
>
> > Pleasure wasn't the issue..
> > Furthering the species is.
>
> > I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
> > "normal"
>
> Blowjobs and eatin' pussy are not directed toward procreation.
> Therefore, by yer standards, blowjobs and eatin' pussy are not normal. I
>
> - Show quoted text -
Likely the 77 year old virgin...shooting for the 78 year record.
TMT
Gray Ghost
september.org:
Well, vulgarity once again displays itself.
Normal people refer to it as foreplay, dullard. And I rahter doubt you've
ever eaten any pussy so not being familiar with it you shouldn't talk about
it.
--
God, guns and guts made America great.
And Janet Napolitano nervous.
Which should tell you all you need to know about Democrats. How can one
restore America to greatness if greatness makes you uncomfortable?
Gray Ghost
september.org:
And there you have people, compassionate liberalism. My, my, my the great
cull is sure going to be messy. We'll need bulldozers to cleanup like the
Marines used on the Japanese in WWII and the Army used in Vietnam. For
sanitary reasons, of course.
>
>
>> I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
>> "normal"
>
--
Too_Many_Tools
wrote:
> John Redthorn <noem...@nomail.com> wrote innews:hkg6k6$a29$1...@news.eternal-
> september.org:
>
>
>
>
>
> > tankfixer wrote:
> >> In article <Xns9D1590CC9BE1Fhopew...@216.196.97.130>, "RD (The
> >> Sandman)" says...
> >>> tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d400b64cea72b7fb0
> >>> @news.bytemine.net:
>
> >>>> In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
> >>>> 5c83d77af...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_many_to...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
The Great Cull?
Oh...you mean the ongoing slaughter of the Conservative Movement where
the Rpublican Party has lost millions of members and where the
Democrats control the White House and Congress.
Laugh...laugh...laugh..
TMT
Jeremy Moore
news:ou6nm59o7rn6dqjc1...@4ax.com:
> My butt buddy? More 3rd grade insults?
>
You don't understand plain english? You're one of Obama's boys, of course
you have a butt buddy.
Jeremy Moore
news:hkg6bh$brl$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
> Blowjobs and eatin' pussy are not directed toward procreation.
Neither are felching and fisting. Let's see you gay boys dodge bullets
and pull that kind of shit in a firefight.
WangoTango
paul.c...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
> > Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
>
> Pleasure wasn't the issue..
> Furthering the species is.
>
> "normal"
>
>
They sure are prevalent, AND they don't make babies.
Homosexuality must have a purpose, or it would have been selected out
eons ago.
Beam Me Up Scotty
IN RAHM'S words..... so are retards....
does that mean that having a stagnated "normal development" or having
alternate streams of intellectual or sexual development is normal and
equal?
Beam Me Up Scotty
*So the military has a mission* , and you say that mission is more
important than social functions like reproduction?
Doesn't that mean that anything including making Gays happy, and
reproduction of heterosexuals are NOT the mission and therefore the
Military is not obliged to make any special social allowances for
reproduction sexual behavior or NON reproductive sexual behavior that
would in any way disrupt or impede any part of the MISSION of keeping
America safe.
If the DNR and the EPA and other Government agencies are willing to take
years to do a study an owl or a rat to secure their safety and then ban
any improvement that would risk the goal of their reproduction and
survival.... then we deserve at least the same consideration before you
force the MILITARY to allow GAYS and GAY marriages, and Gay sex in the
Barracks, and GAY parades, in the military.
RD (The Sandman)
@news.bytemine.net:
> In article <Xns9D1590CC9...@216.196.97.130>, "RD (The
> Sandman)" says...
>>
>> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:MPG.25d400b64cea72b7fb0
>> @news.bytemine.net:
>>
>> > In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>> > 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
>> > says...
>> >> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having
sex..
>> > A homosexual couple cannot..
>> >
>> > Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to
>> not
>> > be able to reproduce itself ?
>> >
>>
>> Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
>> Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
>
> Pleasure wasn't the issue..
> Furthering the species is.
>
> I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me
it's
> "normal"
>
Go back to what I said. I said many species indulge in homosexual
behaviour. Now, humans are just one of those species.
Besides, what is considered "normal" depends on your viewpoint and
experiences. Since homosexuality is really a rather small sector of the
human species and is ingrained in most of those individuals, I have no
problem with it. I also have no interest in it other than fairness.
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Some points to ponder:
Why is it good if a vacuum cleaner really sucks?
Why is the third hand on a clock called the "second hand"?
Why did Kamikaze pilots wear helmets?
Why do we sing "Take me out to the ballgame" when we are already
there?
WangoTango
Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> says...
You see that's the problem with a phobia, it is an irrational fear.
When you get down to it, humans mate at anytime. Even when the female
is not in season, or when she is biologically unable to reproduce at
all, so the idea that sex is only for reproduction is flawed from the
get go. We use sex to bond with our mates a lot more than we use it to
make little versions of ourselves, and we don't stop heterosexual
couples, that are incapable of bearing offspring, from having sex with
each other.
Gray Ghost
@news.east.earthlink.net:
It isn't a completely self defeating mutation. Homosexuala can in fact
reproduce. They just don't like it. Some become active homosexuals after
reprodcing, some before.
RD (The Sandman)
news:4b6c496f$0$6035$ec3e...@unlimited.usenetmonster.com:
Gays have been in the military for decades. Hell I was in the military
in the 50s and early 60s, gays were there. We mostly didn't give a damn
as long as they could cover our six. If they could do that and shoot
straight, we didn't care if they were green, black, white, hetero or
homo. We did joke about the "Velvet Club" but as long as it stayed to
itself, no problem. Kind of an informal "Don't ask, don't tell",
although we always had a pretty good idea who was a member and who
wasn't.
RD (The Sandman)
news:MPG.25d62f682...@news.east.earthlink.net:
Exactly. I have no problem with homosexuality as long as it isn't pushed
into the public domain. Of course, I feel the same way about a
heterosexual couple having sex on the courthouse lawn......been there,
done that....wouldn't do it now.
WangoTango
grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com says...
> WangoTango <Asga...@mindspring.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d608ed2c37477b98aee7
> @news.east.earthlink.net:
>
> > In article <MPG.25d529c...@news.bytemine.net>,
> > paul.c...@gmail.com says...
> >> >
> >> > Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
> >> > Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
> >>
> >> Pleasure wasn't the issue..
> >> Furthering the species is.
> >>
> >> I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
> >> "normal"
> >>
> >>
> > Oral sex and masturbation aren't "normal"?
> > They sure are prevalent, AND they don't make babies.
> > Homosexuality must have a purpose, or it would have been selected out
> > eons ago.
> >
>
> It isn't a completely self defeating mutation. Homosexuala can in fact
> reproduce. They just don't like it. Some become active homosexuals after
> reprodcing, some before.
>
>
the fecundity of the group. Maybe by spurring the heterosexual
individuals in the group to mate more often to prove their virility/
non-homosexual nature. If that were the case, homosexuality offers an
improved chance to get the family gene into the next generation, so by
proxy the homosexual's gene's get passed on too.
WangoTango
RD (The Sandman)
news:MPG.25d6407d2...@news.east.earthlink.net:
Not quite.....I am a do as I say now, not a do what I did then kinda'
guy. ;)
Gray Ghost
news:MPG.25d63ffd9...@news.east.earthlink.net:
Was that study authored by Timothy Leary? On a particularly colorful day?
Gray Ghost
@news.east.earthlink.net:
It isn't a matter of stopping someone from copulating with a consenting
partner, it's a matter of getting the homos to shut the fuck up about it.
The love that dare not speak it's name now won't shut the fuck up.
WangoTango
WangoTango
grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com says...
As soon as you can get the bible thumpers to shut the fuck up about
their religious hang up about it, maybe they will.
tankfixer
@b10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com says...
>
> On Feb 3, 11:53 pm, tankfixer <paul.carr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
> > 5c83d77af...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_many_to...@yahoo.com
> >
> > > Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
> >
> > Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
> > A homosexual couple cannot..
> >
> > Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to not
> > be able to reproduce itself ?
>
Never seen a ships crew after a 6 months at sea have you ?
> Please stay on topic.
Please go pound sand
tankfixer
Sandman)" says...
>
Pretty much how it works nowdays.
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:00:59 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <Xns9D1590CC9...@216.196.97.130>, "RD (The
> >Sandman)" says...
> >>
> >> @news.bytemine.net:
> >>
> >> > In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
> >> > 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
> >> >> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
> >> > A homosexual couple cannot..
> >> >
> >> > Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to
> >> not
> >> > be able to reproduce itself ?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
> >
> >Pleasure wasn't the issue..
> >Furthering the species is.
>
It only means you won't be having kids..
> >
> >I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
> >"normal"
>
> No one will convince you because you're too stupid to figure it out.
I thought you were ignoring me..
Another of your lies ?
tankfixer
Gray Ghost
news:MPG.25d673877...@news.east.earthlink.net:
Well I don't know anyone who thumps his bible but I have known many
Christians that subscrube to love the sinner, hate the sin. Of course that
doesn't fulfill the stereotype so it is usually ignored.
Lookout
wrote:
>In article <0m7nm513shf5m1krh...@4ax.com>,
>mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:00:59 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <Xns9D1590CC9...@216.196.97.130>, "RD (The
>> >Sandman)" says...
>> >>
>> >> tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d400b64cea72b7fb0
>> >> @news.bytemine.net:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <b7a5d4f6-1ca1-4167-bfc1-
>> >> > 5c83d7...@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, too_man...@yahoo.com
>> >> > says...
>> >> >> Both homo and hetrosexuality are normal...check the science.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Last time I checked a hetrosexual couple can reporduce by having sex..
>> >> > A homosexual couple cannot..
>> >> >
>> >> > Do you think it normal a species would evolve in such a manner as to
>> >> not
>> >> > be able to reproduce itself ?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
>> >> Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
>> >
>> >Pleasure wasn't the issue..
>> >Furthering the species is.
>>
>> Nope. That's a useless inclusion in the debate. It means nothing.
>
>It only means you won't be having kids..
I have a 22 year old daughter and a granddaughter. Wrong again
dickhead.
>
>> >
>> >I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
>> >"normal"
>>
>> No one will convince you because you're too stupid to figure it out.
>
>I thought you were ignoring me..
>Another of your lies ?
I never said that. You're lying again.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
>WangoTango <Asga...@mindspring.com> wrote in news:MPG.25d608ed2c37477b98aee7
>@news.east.earthlink.net:
>
>> In article <MPG.25d529c...@news.bytemine.net>,
>> paul.c...@gmail.com says...
>>> >
>>> > Be careful there, Tank. Many species indulge in homosexual behaviour.
>>> > Not for procreation of course, but they do indulge.
>>>
>>> Pleasure wasn't the issue..
>>> Furthering the species is.
>>>
>>> I can care less what people do for fun but don't try to convince me it's
>>> "normal"
>>>
>>>
>> Oral sex and masturbation aren't "normal"?
>> They sure are prevalent, AND they don't make babies.
>> Homosexuality must have a purpose, or it would have been selected out
>> eons ago.
>>
>
>It isn't a completely self defeating mutation.
Wrong. It's not a mutation. I've already corrected you once and you
ignored it because you know you're wrong. Again
Lookout
wrote:
And how would you know?
Lying dipshit
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
Since I am currently serving and you are not who would you think knows ?
> Lying dipshit
Well sure you are, the world knows that.
tankfixer
Lookout
tankfixer
Lookout
wrote:
Never heard of it. I've been out since 85.
tankfixer
Then you arn't nearly as smart as you think you are..
AKO, Army Knowledge Online
https://www.us.army.mil/
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
Why should USAF, Navy, Marine or Coast Guard personnel be aware of Army
shit?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
And the security certificate cannot be validated. Not that validation
failure is anything new to USG websites. Therefore I test such using
lynx under OpenBSD where even a malicious site cannot harm me.
As I suspected, Army only. Why would you think other services would know
about AKO?
Lookout
wrote:
We've proved you're an idiot and a liar.
>
>AKO, Army Knowledge Online
>https://www.us.army.mil/
>
And why would I need to know that?
Lookout
Failed for me too.
I was Army but I got out in 85 and never looked back. I keep in touch
with old Army friends on Classmates.com
Curly Surmudgeon
You can accept the security certification manually. This is pretty
common with US Government secure websites.
I was USAF and didn't have a clue about AKO either...
Lookout
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
I'm still waiting for some PROOF that allowing gays to serve is a
problem. Anecdotal evidence (in this case lies from assholes who never
served) isn't proof.
tankfixer
CurlySu...@live.com says...
yet it opens just fine in Chrome...
And Firefox..
Pity you can't go educate yourself.
>
> As I suspected, Army only. Why would you think other services would know
> about AKO?
Since I know about their portals I would expect they would be aware of
how the army dissiminates information.
Or are you saying the other services are idiots ?
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
You are still waiting for something you never asked for..
I've told you they currently serve under the don't ask don't tell policy
with few issues..
And you yourself have said they served back when you were in with few
issues even though they could be kicked out nearly on a whim..
There is a half way even chance I'll be at Redstone at the end of
April...
I'd invite you to lunch ..
tankfixer
CurlySu...@live.com says...
Only the stupid ones ignore what other services are doing.
Shall we include you in that count ?
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
Then you should be able to tell us, without looking it up, what the
AIM-9X is for, define the E-8C J-STARS program and the purpose of DD Form
2900 is.
It is stupid to assume others have the same intimate knowledge as
specialized personal. You've shown your stupidity repeatedly. I do not
care to be categorized with your ilk.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
Dunno about Google's Chrome but it does *not* open in Firefox unless
you've disabled security protection.
> Pity you can't go educate yourself.
Assumptions exemplify your stupidity.
>> As I suspected, Army only. Why would you think other services would
>> know about AKO?
>
> Since I know about their portals I would expect they would be aware of
> how the army dissiminates information. Or are you saying the other
> services are idiots ?
No, I'm saying that *you* are an idiot.
tankfixer
CurlySu...@live.com says...
AIM-9X is the latest version of the Sidewinder missle. It uses an all
aspect sensor and IIRC has a range of around 10 or 12 NM
The E-8 program is an offshoot of the AWACS concept that allows the USAF
to provide ground surveillance over a large area.
A prototype was used in Desert Storm to provide movement info on Iraqi
forces.
Don't know the form, most soldiers, sailors or airmen don't know the
forms used by their service unless they happen to personally use it.
But a DD form would cover all components..
You obviously looked up what it is since it's not a form that would have
been in use during your service.
> It is stupid to assume others have the same intimate knowledge as
> specialized personal. You've shown your stupidity repeatedly. I do not
> care to be categorized with your ilk.
What is stupid is to assume that service members don't know of where to
go find the information they need.
Right at the bottom of the AKO login page are links to the other
branches..
And at the bottom of THEIR login pages are links to each service.