Barbara Boxer meets her match
Buddy Beavers
Gunner Asch
<Bu...@Beavers.invalid> wrote:
>Libtardmania...
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixiYZ9DPk8o
Oh thats soooooo goood!!!
I am the Sword of my Family
and the Shield of my Nation.
If sent, I will crush everything you have built,
burn everything you love,
and kill every one of you.
(Hebrew quote)
Jim Chandler
wrote:
You just gotta love it. I hope she does go back to "Ma'am".
Jim
Shall not be infringed
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:34:50 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:44:18 -0500, "Buddy Beavers"
> ><Bu...@Beavers.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>Libtardmania...
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixiYZ9DPk8o
>
> >Oh thats soooooo goood!!!
>
> >I am the Sword of my Family
> >and the Shield of my Nation.
> >If sent, I will crush everything you have built,
> >burn everything you love,
> >and kill every one of you.
> > (Hebrew quote)
>
> You just gotta love it. I hope she does go back to "Ma'am".
>
Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
every elitist in Washington.
deepdudu
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>every elitist in Washington.
Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
real change for the better.
Tom Gardner
<Deep Dudu> wrote in message news:4cc60b76...@news.newsguy.com...
They need a new playbook, one that includes actual good things for America.
What they have presented so far is detrimental.
Shall not be infringed
> <Deep Dudu> wrote in messagenews:4cc60b76...@news.newsguy.com...
In every case Marxism has proven terminal.
deepdudu
Everything has been improving since Bush left office.
deepdudu
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 25, 7:36=A0pm, "Tom Gardner" <buer...@buerste.com> wrote:
>> <Deep Dudu> wrote in messagenews:4cc60b76...@news.newsguy.com...
>> > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>> > <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>> >>every elitist in Washington.
>>
>> > Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
>> > real change for the better.
>>
>> They need a new playbook, one that includes actual good things for Americ=
>a.
>> What they have presented so far is detrimental.
>
>In every case Marxism has proven terminal.
There is nothing Marxist about the Democrats you ignorant piece of
shit. Why don't you run and play and stop embarrassing yourself
because you know nothing.
Buddy Beavers
"Deep Dudu" wrote in message news:4cc624a0...@news.newsguy.com...
But, but, but...BUSH!
Michael A. Terrell
Buddy Beavers wrote:
>
> "Deep Dudu" wrote:
> >
> > Everything has been improving since Bush left office.
>
> But, but, but...BUSH!
There's no fool like an old leftist fool. :(
--
Politicians should only get paid if the budget is balanced, and there is
enough left over to pay them.
Jim Chandler
<hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Agreed. I don't know who would top that cow in arrogance.
Jim
Jim Chandler
The Dummycraps have been trying to "usher in some real change" for the
past several years, especially since Obummer was crowned and all they
have managed to do is fuck up the country even more than it was.
Personally, I don't care for socialism. Let everyone work for what
they get, just as I had to. The only ones who should be given
anything are those who can not make it on their own due to medical
reasons.
Jim
Jim Chandler
If it's not Marxist, what would you call taking what I earned as a
working person and giving it to those who will not work just to "level
the playing field"? Government intervention in industry (General
Motors, Chrysler, medical care) and making people dependant on the
government, and suppressing the right and will of the people to
protest their government isn't Marxist? You are the ignorant piece of
shit if you actually believe that.
Jim
deepdudu
wrote:
I suggest you read up on Marx and communism, and socialism, and try to
differentiate between "democratic socialism". Try to get some
education and not be like the rest of you rightarded people. It's
easy to see why conservatives are so anti-education.
>Jim
Rich Grise
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:36:05 -0400, "Tom Gardner"
>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>>>
>>>>every elitist in Washington.
>>>
>>> Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
>>> real change for the better.
>>
>>They need a new playbook, one that includes actual good things for America.
>>What they have presented so far is detrimental.
>>
> Everything has been improving since Bush left office.
On what planet?
Thanks,
Rich
Dan
Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy.
Why do you ask? Are we not on your map?
Dan
RBnDFW
Tom, you are exceedingly kind to them
--
I can see November from my front porch
Shall not be infringed
Sure there is.
Interesting how you cannot argue facts, resorting to personal
attacks.
Jim Chandler
You are incorreect, I am very PRO education. That is a good education
that will provide a good scientist or engineer, not the crap taught in
most liberal institutions. You know what I'm talking about. Masters
degrees in library book dust, underwater basket weaving, PhDs in belly
Button Lint Identification, etc.
Jim
Shall not be infringed
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:50:09 GMT, Deep Dudu wrote:
> >On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:38:32 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
> ><hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Oct 25, 7:36=A0pm, "Tom Gardner" <buer...@buerste.com> wrote:
> >>> <Deep Dudu> wrote in messagenews:4cc60b76...@news.newsguy.com...
> >>> > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
> >>> > <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> >>Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
> >>> >>every elitist in Washington.
>
> >>> > Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
> >>> > real change for the better.
>
> >>> They need a new playbook, one that includes actual good things for Americ=
> >>a.
> >>> What they have presented so far is detrimental.
>
> >>In every case Marxism has proven terminal.
>
> >There is nothing Marxist about the Democrats you ignorant piece of
> >shit. Why don't you run and play and stop embarrassing yourself
> >because you know nothing.
>
> If it's not Marxist, what would you call taking what I earned as a
> working person and giving it to those who will not work just to "level
> the playing field"?
Gotta "spread it around" a little.
> Government intervention in industry (General
> Motors, Chrysler, medical care) and making people dependant on the
> government, and suppressing the right and will of the people to
> protest their government isn't Marxist? You are the ignorant piece of
> shit if you actually believe that.
>
> Jim- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ignoramus12203
> You are incorreect, I am very PRO education. That is a good education
> that will provide a good scientist or engineer, not the crap taught in
> most liberal institutions. You know what I'm talking about. Masters
> degrees in library book dust, underwater basket weaving, PhDs in belly
> Button Lint Identification, etc.
I always wondered about this. If someone studies, say, underwater
basket weaving or its equivalent, what do they do when they graduate.
I mean, they have to make money somewhere.
Shall not be infringed
That might include 0bummer soon. Word on the street is that he's
about to flip out. Had to take another vacation.
Shall not be infringed
Arlen Specter told a lady at a town hall meeting, "Wait a minute, wait
a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute,
wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. I'm not being paid extra
to do this."
First he tries to talk over her, then he tells her that he isn't being
paid to attend his own meeting.
That is arrogance.
Buddy Beavers
"RBnDFW" <burkh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ia7imn$d12$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> I can see November from my front porch
It's so close, I can smell it.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
Neither Republicans nor Democrats are good for America but for different
reasons. Democrats are altruistic and well-meaning while Republicans are
spiteful, mean and just plain evil.
Neither represent America and neither have a grip of reality. Only your
wallet.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lest We Forget: Joesph Raymond McCarthy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Curly Surmudgeon
Same thing happens when you lance a boil. It continues draining pus for
a while and slowly improves no matter the rest of the body.
Curly Surmudgeon
> The Dummycraps...
Third grade insults identify you as an idiot, not someone worth reading.
Curly Surmudgeon
Uhm, Barbara Finestein, Sarah Palin, John Bohner, Newt Gringich, Karl
Rove... Boxer is a waste of skin, useless as tits on a boar hog, but
arrogance isn't one of her attributes.
Rich Grise
They become elders in the Church of Warmingism.
Cheers!
Rich
Hawke
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
> <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>> every elitist in Washington.
>
> real change for the better.
No kidding. Even with only 40 republican senators that has been enough
to keep progress from being made. 40 is enough to hold up any
legislation they want. I understand that there are hundreds of bills
that have already been passed by the House and would be signed by the
president but those 40 republicans won't let any of them become law. I
wonder if that is how the founding fathers intended their government to
work, to have a minority preventing the majority from passing laws and
allowing the will of the people to be thwarted. I kind of doubt it.
After seeing how the republicans operate I can't understand why the
Democrats have any reason to try to work with them on anything and
should return the favor to them when the shoe is on the other foot.
But they probably won't. Which is why I don't like Democrats. If I was
one of them I would return the republicans games with the same thing but
I'd give it back to them even worse. Oh well, I guess I'll have to be
content just to see Carly Fiorina lose to Boxer. At least that's better
than nothing.
Hawke
Hawke
Calling their opponents Marxist or Communists or Socialist is what the
ignorant folk always do. They don't know jack shit about any of those
political systems. None of them has ever even cracked a book on the
subject. But they do know the slogans and buzzwords of the propagandists
of the right wing. You know who they are; Beck, O'Reilly, Hannity,
Palin, Limbaugh, etc. Do you notice something they all have in common?
None of them has a real college education or even any expertise in
anything. Yet they are out there telling people the Democrats are
Commies, Marxists, or Socialists, when none of them has any education or
real knowledge of what those things are. So you have the blind leading
the blind. Right wing mouthpieces without educations are out on the
stump telling all the uneducated and ignorant right wing followers about
things things that neither of them know the first thing about. It's all
just a big bunch of boobs. They deserve each other. Too bad the rest of
the country has to pay the price when their stupidity causes us one
problem after another.
Hawke
Buddy Beavers
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:ia7sc3$443$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> Boxer is a waste of skin, useless as tits on a boar hog
Agree.
Hawke
Clearly you are not an educated man. You don't understand the value of
education. You believe that specific training in fields like science or
engineering are valuable but you really haven't the faintest notion of
what the value of a liberal arts education is. If you truly valued
education you would not think that way. You speak like an ignorant man
and an uneducated one. Once someone receives a real college education it
puts them far above the average person. Which is why so many people want
one. Not just so they can make more money. The unfortunate thing is that
the ordinary man, with no formal education never understands what he's
missing unless he gets educated. You have shown you are one of them.
Think of it like in the old days or in the movies when you heard an old
man say to the kids, why do you need a college education? I did fine in
life without one so if you ain't got one you can do just fine too? Get
it? Probably not.
Hawke
Hawke
Look at the statistics for people who graduate from college. Overall
they do a lot better in life than those without them. They make hundreds
of thousands of dollars more in their life than people without college
degrees. It has been shown that regardless of the specific area that one
received a degree in that person usually does better in all areas. Only
around 25% of Americans get a college degree. Regardless of what it's in
it usually pays to have one. Not only that, most people don't get a job
related to their college degree. You go to college to get educated. With
that education you go into your life better prepared than those who
don't. You will also notice that it is never educated people who say
negative things about people's degrees as being worthless or stupid.
It's always people who don't have an education who say things like that.
You know the type. The people who you can tell the minute they open
their mouths they don't have a college degree.
Hawke
Hawke
>
>
> "Deep Dudu" wrote in message news:4cc624a0...@news.newsguy.com...
>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:36:05 -0400, "Tom Gardner"
>>
>>>
>>> <Deep Dudu> wrote in message news:4cc60b76...@news.newsguy.com...
>>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>>>> <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>>>>> every elitist in Washington.
>>>>
>>>> Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
>>>> real change for the better.
>>>
>>> They need a new playbook, one that includes actual good things for
>>> What they have presented so far is detrimental.
>>>
>>>
>
What's the problem? Can't stand it that Obama has already done a better
job in office than Bush ever did? Nobody talks about Bush anymore anyway
except to use his as an example of how not to be the president. Obama is
busy making things better. Like I've told you repeatedly but you never
get, things are much better. In the business world it's earnings season.
Earnings of the corporations were up again last quarter. So's the stock
market. Housing sales up 10% in September. Yep, things are improving all
over. Way to go Obama. Can we now forget about that loser you voted for,
twice? What's his name? Puss? No, Boosh. Ha ha, you wingers are real
losers. I hope you get the majority in the House. Then when things go
wrong it'll be your fault, right? Nah, you'll just find a way to blame
others for your incompetence like you folks always do.
Hawke
Hawke
Counting those chickens before they've hatched, aren't you?
Hawke
Lewis Hartswick
>
> I always wondered about this. If someone studies, say, underwater
> basket weaving or its equivalent, what do they do when they graduate.
> I mean, they have to make money somewhere.
And don't forget every iteration a bit gets lost. :-)
...lew...
Buddy Beavers
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:ia86uf$teg$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Obama dug a hole and took a shit in the hole. Then he threw you in the hole
and you fell to the bottom, and that was bad. Then you tried to climb out
but fell back into the Obama shit again, and thought that it is really bad.
Then Obama crapped in the hole again and it hit you in the face. You try to
crawl out again, but then Obama takes a piss on you and you fall back into
the Obama shit again. Then Pelosi throws her smelly tampon into the hole and
it lands in your mouth while you are screaming for help.
Then the rest of the democrats shit in the hole and it starts to cover your
head. Eventually you dog paddle hard enough and are able to pull yourself up
on a ledge. Obama shits on you some more, but you hold on and don't fall in.
Yep, things are really getting better now, you're still in a hole and can't
get out, but you are able to hang on as Obama flings more crap at you. At
least Pelosi isn't throwing her kotex at you yet. Yep, it sure is better now
but it is better now. Except for the smell. And the flies.
Yeah, it's like that.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 4:02 PM, Deep Dudu wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>> <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>>> every elitist in Washington.
>>
>> Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
>> real change for the better.
>
>
> No kidding. Even with only 40 republican senators that has been enough
> to keep progress from being made. 40 is enough to hold up any
> legislation they want. I understand that there are hundreds of bills
> that have already been passed by the House and would be signed by the
> president but those 40 republicans won't let any of them become law. I
> wonder if that is how the founding fathers intended their government to
> work, to have a minority preventing the majority from passing laws and
> allowing the will of the people to be thwarted. I kind of doubt it.
Actually that *is* the way our founders intended government to work. We
cannot have bare majorities dictating to a huge majority. Republicans
know this and use it to their benefit. They're not stupid, just evil.
Democrats are not as mean or vicious as Republicans. That is why the
current Congress has been stymied. Democrats don't have the spine to
call the Republican filibuster bluff and force votes.
Both Reid and Pelosi suck. Not as bad as Boehner and McConnell but they
still suck. Ineffective, spineless weenies both.
Why is Guantanamo still open?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Iraq?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Afghanistan?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Peru?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Paraguay?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Bolivia?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Colombia?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Costa Rica?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Panama?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Israel?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Egypt?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Saudi Arabia?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Kuwait?
Why is the House and Senate still funding Lebanon?
Why is the House and Senate still funding abstinence only education?
Why isn't the House and Senate still funding stem cell research?
Why isn't the House and Senate investigating prior house and senate
members for financial gain, irregularities, failure to abide by oath of
office and lying?
> After seeing how the republicans operate I can't understand why the
> Democrats have any reason to try to work with them on anything and
> should return the favor to them when the shoe is on the other foot. But
> they probably won't. Which is why I don't like Democrats. If I was one
> of them I would return the republicans games with the same thing but I'd
> give it back to them even worse. Oh well, I guess I'll have to be
> content just to see Carly Fiorina lose to Boxer. At least that's better
> than nothing.
>
> Hawke
I'm ejoying NutMeg Whitman go down the toilet along with her
$160,000,000.00 campaign warchest.
Buddy Beavers
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:ia8ar9$ap9$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:56:46 -0700, Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2010 4:02 PM, Deep Dudu wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>>> <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>>>> every elitist in Washington.
>>>
>>> Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
>>> real change for the better.
>>
>>
>> No kidding. Even with only 40 republican senators that has been enough
>> to keep progress from being made. 40 is enough to hold up any
>> legislation they want. I understand that there are hundreds of bills
>> that have already been passed by the House and would be signed by the
>> president but those 40 republicans won't let any of them become law. I
>> wonder if that is how the founding fathers intended their government to
>> work, to have a minority preventing the majority from passing laws and
>> allowing the will of the people to be thwarted. I kind of doubt it.
>
> Actually that *is* the way our founders intended government to work. We
> cannot have bare majorities dictating to a huge majority. Republicans
> know this and use it to their benefit. They're not stupid, just evil.
>
> Democrats are not as mean or vicious as Republicans. That is why the
> current Congress has been stymied. Democrats don't have the spine to
> call the Republican filibuster bluff and force votes.
They're not as evil, just stupid.
>
> Both Reid and Pelosi suck. Not as bad as Boehner and McConnell but they
> still suck. Ineffective, spineless weenies both.
>
> Why is Guantanamo still open?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Iraq?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Afghanistan?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Peru?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Paraguay?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Bolivia?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Colombia?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Costa Rica?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Panama?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Israel?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Egypt?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Saudi Arabia?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Kuwait?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding Lebanon?
>
> Why is the House and Senate still funding abstinence only education?
>
> Why isn't the House and Senate still funding stem cell research?
>
> Why isn't the House and Senate investigating prior house and senate
> members for financial gain, irregularities, failure to abide by oath of
> office and lying?
Why is the House and Senate funding studies on Gay Sex in Argentina Bars?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/08/government-funds-study-gay-sex-argentina-bars/
All good questions that should keep Hack very busy for a while. I can't wait
for his answers.
robert bowman
> I'm ejoying NutMeg Whitman go down the toilet along with her
> $160,000,000.00 campaign warchest.
And to Governor Moonbeam no less. Generally off year elections are boring
but this one is fun.
Hawke
Yeah, it's like that. But only in a demented mind. In a rational mind
it's clear to see that the hole was dug all by the republicans who also
shit in it too. Then they bailed out and left it for someone else to
deal with. Keep pretending that Obama took a good country and made it
worse all you like. We know the truth. Obama took over a country that
was a basket case and has worked to fix it. You have to be a complete
kook to think that Obama is responsible for our problems. The problems
were there on his first day in office. Did you just forget? Nah, you
just made up a scenario that you can live with. One where all the good
goes to the credit of the right wing and all the crud is the fault of
the Democrats, even when the right wing ran things for nearly a decade.
Keep it up all you want. We know who gave us the shit sandwich on
2/20/09 and his name was Bush. Thanks again for giving us that piece of
crap, you moron. It's as much your fault the country sucks as anyone.
You voted in the republicans. You're to blame for our mess. You and your
right wing cronies. Now you want to do it again. You wouldn't know a
good president if he hit you in the mouth. Which he should for being
such a fool and putting republicans in charge. Which is like giving a
ten year old boy a gas can and a lighter. Just plain stupid.
Hawke
Hawke
Yeah, I have to agree the Democrats are real weenies. At least most of
them. If they had balls they would have kicked the republicans in the
teeth the day they took over the country. Instead the tried to work with
them. Talk about naive. You don't work with republicans you crush them
under your heel. Shit, all they are out to do is ruin you so why not
strike first and strike hard? Trying to play nice with them is stupid.
Which is why I am not a Democrat.
I'm laughing a lot about Meg losing all that money but she earned it,
right? Better that she has a billion to waste on a stupid campaign than
for ordinary working people to have it to live on. She's as stupid as so
many other business people. She hasn't got a minute of experience in
government and because of her ego she thinks she should be able to walk
in and by spending huge amounts of money get put in the highest
political position in the biggest state in the U.S. Talk about having an
unrealistic view of herself. No experience but wants to run the whole
state. Too bad for her. She's going down. I can't think of a sound I
like better than hearing a republican lost. Too bad it isn't going to
happen to all of them. I feel sorry for the people living in the states
where they win. They'll pay for it just like we all wound up paying for
having Bush in the White House. It does make you wonder why they never
learn from their mistakes, doesn't it?
Hawke
Libtardopia
Jim Chandler
I happen to have one. I have also been in the classroom for over
seven years as a substitute teacher before I retired and I have seen
the quality of education take a nose dive. A four year degree these
days is the equivalent to what a high school diploma used to be and a
high school diploma is basically useless as far as what the kids know
when they "graduate". Many of the kids who go on to college these
days are functionally illiterate. They don't read well, they can't
spell and their writing is atrocious. I fully agree with the premise
that not everyone needs a college education. Some people would be far
better off with an education in the old "vocational arts" classes and
specialized training after high school. College used to be a well
rounded education and even the scientists and engineers had some
exposure to the "liberal arts". We don't really need more poly sci
majors these days. Our standing among the rest of so called civilized
countries in education is something like 48th when it used to be near,
if not at, the top. College education isn't what it used to be.
Jim
Jim Chandler
If Obummer is the great messiah that you seem to think, why are his
approval ratings in the low 40s and getting lower? Why are even the
Democrat candidates shying away from him in this election? Why are
the Democrat candidates having such a tough time of getting
re-elected? Something doesn't add up here. I know, it's all Bush's
fault. Obummer and the Dummycraps have blamed everything else on him.
Jim
Jim Chandler
<CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:20:46 -0700, Jim Chandler <n4...@gte.net> wrote:
>
>> The Dummycraps...
>
>Third grade insults identify you as an idiot, not someone worth reading.
Then don't read it, asshole!
Jim
Jim Chandler
<davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
Lessee now, if it only takes 51 to pass something and the Dummycraps
have 60 that means that some of their own kind are assisting in
blocking whatever trash has been proposed. Even if they need 60 to
get something to pass and they have that number, it means that some of
their own are voting against it. Simple math.
Jim
Jim Chandler
I suppose you meant DIANE Feinstein. Any one who would sit there
during a hearing and demand that a general officer call her "senator"
instead of "ma'am" (a sign of respect from a gentleman) because she
had "worked so hard" for that title, is arrogant, and stupid.
Jim
Jeff M
[snip]
> If Obummer is the great messiah that you seem to think, why are his
> approval ratings in the low 40s and getting lower?
"President Obama�s approval ratings have jumped substantially, crossing
the magic halfway threshold to 54 percent, up from 48 percent in late
September, while the portion of respondents who disapprove of the
president dropped to 40 percent, the lowest disapproval rating in a
NEWSWEEK Poll since February 2010."
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/10/22/poll-obama-approval-jumps-dems-more-fired-up.html
Curly Surmudgeon
Yeah, I detest both of them however arrogance isn't Boxer's MO.
> Any one who would sit there during
> a hearing and demand that a general officer call her "senator" instead
> of "ma'am" (a sign of respect from a gentleman) because she had "worked
> so hard" for that title, is arrogant, and stupid.
>
> Jim
Boxer hasn't been in the military. Do not ascribe to arrogance what can
be explained by ignorance.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lest We Forget: Jeff Sessions
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ray Keller
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:19:53 -0700, Hawke
<davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
snip sewage
It is going to be so much fun watching his head explode tue night/wed
morning
Curly Surmudgeon
Ok, Bozo, off to the penalty box.
Dan
> On Oct 25, 11:18 pm, Jim Chandler<n4...@gte.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 25, 5:31 pm, Jim Chandler<n4...@gte.net> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:34:50 -0700, Gunner Asch<gunnera...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:44:18 -0500, "Buddy Beavers"
>>>>> <Bu...@Beavers.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Libtardmania...
>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixiYZ9DPk8o
>>
>>>>> Oh thats soooooo goood!!!
>>
>>>>> I am the Sword of my Family
>>>>> and the Shield of my Nation.
>>>>> If sent, I will crush everything you have built,
>>>>> burn everything you love,
>>>>> and kill every one of you.
>>>>> (Hebrew quote)
>>
>>>> You just gotta love it. I hope she does go back to "Ma'am".
>>
>>>> Jim-
>>
>>> Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>>> every elitist in Washington.
>>
>> Agreed. I don't know who would top that cow in arrogance.
>>
>
> Arlen Specter told a lady at a town hall meeting, "Wait a minute, wait
> a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute,
> wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute. I'm not being paid extra
> to do this."
>
> First he tries to talk over her, then he tells her that he isn't being
> paid to attend his own meeting.
>
> That is arrogance.
So is misstating what someone else said, as you just did.
Sad, but that is all you have on your side - misstatements and lies.
Dan
Shall not be infringed
Cite?
> Sad, but that is all you have on your side - misstatements and lies.
>
> Dan- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dan
You can't read??? That explains a lot, but is kind of sad...
I've shortened the exchange so you don't get lost. Hell, I'll even let
you move your lips when you read it again.
Dan
Shall not be infringed
So you have no proof that I've mistated what someone else said?
We are stuck with just your opinion?
Michael A. Terrell
'Opinion', written with a broken crayon.
--
Politicians should only get paid if the budget is balanced, and there is
enough left over to pay them.
Buddy Beavers
"Jeff M" <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote in message
news:K--dnWN2h-O7ylXR...@giganews.com...
Your Newsweek data is stale Jeff. Only Libtards get their stats from
Newsweek.
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows
that 27% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack
Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-five percent (45%) Strongly
Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -18 (see
trends).
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Gallup Daily: Obama Job Approval
Obama Job Approval
Approve 44%
Disapprove 48%
http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx
Everybody Hates Obama
By fitsnews on October 27, 2010
Two years ago, U.S. President Barack Obama enjoyed stratospheric approval
ratings and had virtually every Democrat and Independent voter in America
behind him.
Today? That script has been flipped.
According to a new Harris Interactive poll, Obama�s approval rating has
plunged to 37 percent � with 67 percent of Americans holding a negative
opinion of his policies. Most damning for Obama? Seventy percent of
independent voters disapprove of the job he�s doing � and 73 percent of all
voters disapprove of his economic policies, which have clearly failed to
�stimulate� anything.
http://www.fitsnews.com/2010/10/27/everybody-hates-obama/
President Obama Heads into Midterms at Lowest Approval Rating of Presidency
Two-thirds of Americans believe country going off on the wrong track
NEW YORK , N.Y. - October 25, 2010 - President Obama is spending the next
week crisscrossing the country in support of Democratic candidates before
this year's midterm elections. While the president may do a great job of
energizing the base, he may not be able to convert any Independents who have
yet to decide for whom they will vote. Currently, two-thirds of Americans
(67%) have a negative opinion of the job President Obama is doing while just
over one-third (37%) have a positive opinion. This continues the president's
downward trend and he is now at the lowest job approval rating of his
presidency.
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/Hi_assets/TopHitPageNews.html
RCP Poll Average
President Obama Job Approval
45.4 Approve
48.6 Disapprove
I never realized how hard a socialist will work to destroy our constitution
and the country that we Republicans love. Though I don�t believe he will be
happy until he is looked upon as the next Castro.
http://www.obamaapprovalblog.com/
Buddy Beavers
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:iaaasp$b26$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:13:54 -0700, Jim Chandler <n4...@gte.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:37:20 +0000 (UTC), Curly Surmudgeon
>> <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:20:46 -0700, Jim Chandler <n4...@gte.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Dummycraps...
>>>
>>>Third grade insults identify you as an idiot, not someone worth reading.
>>
>>
>> Then don't read it, asshole!
>
> Ok, Bozo, off to the penalty box.
Crap, poor guy has to spend 3 minutes with Curly's crazymother's pussy. Hold
your breath Jim!
mysterion
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:36:05 -0400, "Tom Gardner"
> <bue...@buerste.com> wrote:
>
>>
>><Deep Dudu> wrote in message news:4cc60b76...@news.newsguy.com...
>>> <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>>>>every elitist in Washington.
>>>
>>> real change for the better.
>>
>>America.
>>What they have presented so far is detrimental.
>>
>>
> Everything has been improving since Bush left office.
Tell that to people on social security.
Tell that to the people in Pakistan who've lost loved ones to Obama's drone
strikes.
Tell that to the people who's houses have been foreclosed on by banksters
who can't prove who holds the title.
Tell it to the hard core demonrat true believers who are running away from
Barky as fast as they can before he completely destroys the party.
Tell it to the people in the Gulf who are dying from what amounts to a slow
motion version of Ebola.
Or just keep telling that lie to yourself and maybe after a while even YOU
will start to believe it.
I'm curious deep douche, will you be casting your vote for Hitlery Clinton
in the 2012 primary?
--
"The Right is wrong, the Left is stupid."
"You do realize that the people in charge would rather you just die, don't
you?
"Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of
all industry and commerce, and when you realize that the entire system is
very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the
top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression
originate."--James A. Garfield, 20th U.S. president, two weeks before he was
assassinated in 1881.
Do you ever get the feeling that 99% of the world's inhabitants suffer from
an inescapable need to build ALL of their beliefs on the most easily
disproven lies available? - Jim Goad
Shall not be infringed
wrote:
He needs to pick up his crayons and put on his helmet.
The bus is here.
Michael A. Terrell
The helmet didn't help him very much, the last time he ws shoved
under the bus. :(
Jim Chandler
wrote:
>On 10/27/2010 11:12 AM, Jim Chandler wrote:
>[snip]
>> If Obummer is the great messiah that you seem to think, why are his
>> approval ratings in the low 40s and getting lower?
>
>"President Obama�s approval ratings have jumped substantially, crossing
>the magic halfway threshold to 54 percent, up from 48 percent in late
>September, while the portion of respondents who disapprove of the
>president dropped to 40 percent, the lowest disapproval rating in a
>NEWSWEEK Poll since February 2010."
>http://www.newsweek.com/2010/10/22/poll-obama-approval-jumps-dems-more-fired-up.html
Not according to the daily Gallop poll which, yesterday, showed him to
be at 48% DISapprove and only 43% approve. Of course, I don't really
trust polls anyway. I do, however, in the course of discussion with
others find that even those who voted for him are becoming
disillusioned and turning away.
Jim
Jeff M
> [snip]Of course, I don't really
> trust polls anyway.
It's a very inexact science, and the results are often intentionally
distorted on behalf of the pollster's client.
> I do, however, in the course of discussion with
> others find that even those who voted for him are becoming
> disillusioned and turning away.
I think that's pretty obviously true.
Hawke
> Bu-Bye libtards!
Bye, bye, retard!
Hawke
Yeah, I know what you mean. People keep blaming Hitler for WWII too. I
don't understand it. Why blame him? Maybe because he's the guy who did
it? Maybe people blame Bush because it was his right wing policies, that
he put in place with his republican congress, that caused the country's
problems. Yeah, maybe that's why people blame him. Because he was the
man responsible.
It wasn't Obama who deregulated everything. It wasn't Obama who put in
the tax cuts that put us in debt. It wasn't Obama who started wars in
two countries. It wasn't Obama who let the health care system decay for
eight years. It wasn't Obama who made the U.S. a country the rest of the
world looked at as a pariah. Nope it wasn't Obama who did any of those
things or who put in place the policies that put us in a recession. That
stuff was all done by Bush.
What Obama has done is pass health care changes and a stimulus bill to
try to get the country back on its feet. That's about it. Unfortunately,
he has not been able to make very many real changes so far. But when
you're busy trying to fix a country that is in horrible shape what do
you expect? He's is just one man, not a messiah, and nobody could have
fixed the mess we were in when he took over in less than two years. It
took more than two years to screw things up so you can believe it's
going to take more than that to get things right again. But if
republicans get power again just expect things to go backward again.
Last, the reason his popularity is down is simple. Unemployment is still
too high. So a lot of people are down in the dumps and they are
disappointed that Obama hasn't got them back to work. Jobs are the last
thing to come back in a recession. In a year or so when employment is up
so will be Obama's popularity. Just in time for the next presidential
election. Bad news republicans.
Hawke
Hawke
It's going to be fun hearing you whine when the republicans don't get
the landslide you have already counted on.
Hawke
Hawke
Sorry sucker, but I don't need to tell any of those people you mentioned
anything. I just reported that facts. Yesterday the airline industry
just reported record profits. You want to tell them that things aren't
better than they were two years ago? Housing sales of existing homes and
of new homes were both up in September. You want to deny that? The stock
market is way up from two years ago. Business profits are way up across
the board too. The facts speak for themselves, which is why you don't
like to acknowledge them. They make you look like an idiot. Things are
so obviously better after a year and a half of Obama in the White House
anyone with eyes can see it. Caterpillar is hiring people. So are quite
a few other companies. So as much as you would like to be able to say
Obama has done nothing to improve things the facts say the opposite. In
two years things will be even better. Too bad for you because that means
a sure victory for Obama is 2012. Good for the country bad for right
wing ignorant crackers.
Hawke
Hawke
Jim, come into the 21st century. It takes 60 votes to pass anything in
the Senate. That's because the republicans filibuster every bill the
Democrats put forward. Try getting 60 out of 100 people to go along with
anything, especially Democrats. Ever hear the term Blue Dog Democrats?
Try getting them to go along with everything Pelosi wants. All it takes
is one senator to defect and the republicans can stop a bill. Look at it
that way. You have to have unanimous consent among the Democrats for
anything to pass and they are a contentious and unorthodox group of
people. There is almost always at least one or two Democrats who don't
go along because they are almost as conservative as republicans.
Senators like Lieberman is a good example. If he doesn't want to go
along with the other 59 senators then the bill doesn't pass. They need
to change the rules on filibusters. It should only take 51 to pass a
bill in the senate. That's how the founders set it up. That's how it
should be. Are you against the founders on this too?
Hawke
Jim Chandler
<davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>It wasn't Obama who deregulated everything. It wasn't Obama who put in
>the tax cuts that put us in debt. It wasn't Obama who started wars in
>two countries. It wasn't Obama who let the health care system decay for
>eight years. It wasn't Obama who made the U.S. a country the rest of the
>world looked at as a pariah. Nope it wasn't Obama who did any of those
>things or who put in place the policies that put us in a recession. That
>stuff was all done by Bush.
You are proving yourself to be a bigger moron every day. Do you not
understand that the supposed "tax cuts" have absolutely NOTHING to do
with the debt? OVERSPENDING is the cause of the debt. If the
Congress would stoop spending everything they can get their hands on
through taxation and borrowing, the debt would eventually go away.
Obama has more than DOUBLED the debt left by Bush. Do you not
understand that? Of course not, you're a freaking liberal who thinks
that the great Obamassiah can do no wrong. It no longer matters what
Bush did, Obummer has been in charge, along with a Democrat House and
Senate for two years now and things have only gotten worse. He has
done none of the things that he promised to do. His biggest lie was
that his presidency would be "transparent" and the American public
would be more informed about the happenings in the White House. How
has he made his reign "transparent"? By sealing ALL records of his
past including the birth certificate, school records and records of
any accomplishments while practicing law. He's "transparent" alright.
People are now beginning to see through him and his regime and will
soon change at lest some of it.
Jim
Jim Chandler
<davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
I know that it takes 60 votes to pass anything. The fact that I
pointed out, and you so graciously affirmed, is that the Republicans
are not solely responsible for anything that is blocked. The
Democrats have the 60 votes. They can't even convince their own that
what ever it is is worthwhile. You are showing yourself to be dumber
by the day. You still believve that the great Obamassiah is going to
deliver the country from the hands of those evil people who want to
make a profit with their businesses.
Jim
Jeff M
Both Reagan and Bush's doubled the bet, too. Of course the debt is the
product of both reduced revenue and increased spending. It's simply
irrational to assert otherwise. But you've demonstrated your
irrationality by demanding that Obama produce his already produced and
verified birth certificate. So, how does it no longer matter what Bush
did as President in the preceding administration (i.e., crashing the
economy), but Obama's private records are matters of compelling public
concern?
Buddy Beavers
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:iacgfn$pib$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Hack is Deep Douche? That figures!
Hawke
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:39:31 +0000 (UTC), Curly Surmudgeon
> <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:18:26 -0700, Jim Chandler<n4...@gte.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>>> <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:34:50 -0700, Gunner Asch<gunnera...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:44:18 -0500, "Buddy Beavers"
>>>>>> <Bu...@Beavers.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Libtardmania...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixiYZ9DPk8o
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh thats soooooo goood!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am the Sword of my Family
>>>>>> and the Shield of my Nation.
>>>>>> If sent, I will crush everything you have built, burn everything you
>>>>>> love,
>>>>>> and kill every one of you.
>>>>>> (Hebrew quote)
>>>>>
>>>>> You just gotta love it. I hope she does go back to "Ma'am".
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim-
>>>>
>>>> elitist in Washington.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Uhm, Barbara Finestein, Sarah Palin, John Bohner, Newt Gringich, Karl
>> Rove... Boxer is a waste of skin, useless as tits on a boar hog, but
>> arrogance isn't one of her attributes.
>
>
> during a hearing and demand that a general officer call her "senator"
> instead of "ma'am" (a sign of respect from a gentleman) because she
> had "worked so hard" for that title, is arrogant, and stupid.
>
> Jim
What happens in the military when superiors are not addressed properly
by insubordinates? They don't like it much do they? Try calling a senior
officer mister if you're a private and see if they make anything of it.
You know very well if you don't address officers properly it's a bid
deal. But when a U.S. senator, which happens to be a lot higher
government official than even a general, simply asks to be called by the
proper title you find something wrong with that?
I saw that exchange live, by the way. The truth is it wasn't the least
bit insulting or condescending by Boxer. She simply told the man how he
should address her as a senator. He wasn't talking to anyone in the
military so calling her Ma'am was not proper for the circumstances. All
Boxer did was tell the guy how he should address any senator. He didn't
act the least bit offended or put down either. It really wasn't that big
a deal. Unless you're a right winger. Then it was some kind of giant
offense. Well, it wasn't.
Hawke
Hawke
Ho, ho, ho, ha, ha, ha. So you couldn't come up with a single word to
disprove the facts that I just put up proving that things are much
better. You need to throw in the towel bro. I just put up one fact after
another proving the improvements in the country and you couldn't refute
any of it. So just admit it. You've been proven wrong. Things are a lot
better now that we have Obama in the White House. I know you hate to say
that but it is the truth. If the truth and right wingers weren't such
enemies you would just face the facts and admit I'm right. But then,
that would take a man to do that. Which I how I know you won't do it. I
know what you'll do. You'll act like a weasel.
Hawke
Hawke
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:37:14 -0700, Hawke
> <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>
>> It wasn't Obama who deregulated everything. It wasn't Obama who put in
>> the tax cuts that put us in debt. It wasn't Obama who started wars in
>> two countries. It wasn't Obama who let the health care system decay for
>> eight years. It wasn't Obama who made the U.S. a country the rest of the
>> world looked at as a pariah. Nope it wasn't Obama who did any of those
>> things or who put in place the policies that put us in a recession. That
>> stuff was all done by Bush.
>
Let me show you how you're wrong.
> You are proving yourself to be a bigger moron every day. Do you not
> understand that the supposed "tax cuts" have absolutely NOTHING to do
> with the debt?
Tax cuts have lots to do with the debt. Cuts in tax revenue are half of
the equation of income and spending. If you cut taxes you reduce
revenue. You can cut spending to maintain equilibrium if you want or you
can continue the same level of spending, in which case you increase the
debt. It's a matter of choice what a government does. But to say there
is no connection between tax cuts and debt is a very dumb thing to say.
Because they are clearly connected.
OVERSPENDING is the cause of the debt.
Or is it under taxing? Both add to debt. But there is no such thing as
overspending. There is simply not collecting enough in taxes. Which
causes a deficit, and that may or may not be a bad thing.
If the
> Congress would stoop spending everything they can get their hands on
> through taxation and borrowing, the debt would eventually go away.
Except that the spending they do is what their constituents want them to
do. Every dime spent goes to someone and they all want their money to
keep coming to them. It may be the military, or the seniors, or the
doctors and nurses, or businesses. All want the money they get to
continue. Ask them all to take a 25% cut and see how fast we cut the
debt. Problem is none of them wants a penny cut from what they get.
> Obama has more than DOUBLED the debt left by Bush. Do you not
> understand that?
Of course, but the problem is Obama had to spend because the recession
demanded it. He had to deficit spend because the economy was in the
worst recession since 1930. The government has to spend in that
situation. He didn't want to because we were already in big debt from
Bush but the emergency demanded it.
Of course not, you're a freaking liberal who thinks
> that the great Obamassiah can do no wrong.
That's wrong too. I've said numerous times that I have a quite a few
things I think Obama has handled badly and made the wrong choices. So
you're definitely wrong on that count too.
It no longer matters what
> Bush did, Obummer has been in charge, along with a Democrat House and
> Senate for two years now and things have only gotten worse.
It does matter because the mistakes that Bush made and the problems he
caused for the country didn't just stop the day he stopped being
president. He dug the hole the country is in. You don't fill a hole that
deep in a few months. If Bush had only made a few minor problems I'd
agree with you. But he didn't. He left the country in dire straights,
and that's why Obama should get credit for what he's done so far. Rome
wasn't built in a day.
He has
> done none of the things that he promised to do.
Oh yes he has. He's been doing all kinds of the things he said he would
do in his campaign. Like pass health care reform for one.
His biggest lie was
> that his presidency would be "transparent" and the American public
> would be more informed about the happenings in the White House. How
> has he made his reign "transparent"? By sealing ALL records of his
> past including the birth certificate, school records and records of
> any accomplishments while practicing law. He's "transparent" alright.
> People are now beginning to see through him and his regime and will
> soon change at lest some of it.
All of Bush's records are sealed too. Bush put in place extremely
restrictive controls over what anyone could get access to. The level of
secrecy in the Bush administration was unprecedented. Obama is far more
transparent than that. But Obama has gone along with the secrecy the
same way Bush did. I think Obama is wrong in doing that. See, there's
another example of me disagreeing with an Obama decision. The birth
certificate is bogus. Obama's birth certificate is public knowledge.
Only the ignorant still think that issue hasn't been resolved. Most of
us have seen it. I know I have. I saw Chris Matthews hold up a copy of
it on his show, Hardball. So try again. The birth certificate is moot.
Hawke
mysterion
news:iaddia$bj8$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I wonder just how many of these fools are sharing the same brain.
It sure explains a lot.
Jim Chandler
wrote:
>On 10/28/2010 5:42 PM, Jim Chandler wrote:
Sorry, but you are wrong. I am not demanding that Obummer produce his
birth certificate. What he produced is an easily obtainable
Certificate of Live Birth, not a birth certificate which lists the
mother, father, admitting hospital and doctor in attendance. I simply
pointed out that the Great Obummer has sealed ALL his records
including his real birth certificate, his colllege transcripts and any
records of his law practice. If he has nothing to hide, why did he do
that? Of course, reagan and Bush increased the debt, as did Carter,
Ford and Clinton. The national debt has increased every year in the
recent past. The fact is, however, that the Obamassiah has more than
DOUBLED the debt which Bush left, due to his massive spending taking
over GM and Chrysler, and his "stimulous package" which has failed
miserably. Now he has managed to shove through "Obummer Care" which
few have read and even fewer understand and which is going to destroy
our health care system. Sorry you believe in him so strongly. He's a
loser.
Jim
Jim Chandler
Of course they are connected. Nobody said differently. However, to
blame the tax cuts, which are a very small part of the equation, for
the entire problem, as the Dummycraps are trying to do, is ridiculous.
Your statement that if you cut taxes you can lower spending to
equalize is absolutely correct. The pproblem is, the politicians have
never met a spending bill they didn't like. They don't know how to
cut any government spending, even when that spending is beyond the
means of their income. If you tried to live like the politicians try
to run the government, you would be bankrupt very quickly.
Jim
Jim Chandler
What Boxhead did was STUPID. She, if she had a grain of common sense
(which she doesn't) would have simply gone on with the hearing and
overlooked the "Ma'am" comment. There was no disrespect in his saying
that. she is simply an arrogant fool who will, hopefully, be
unemployed come next Tuesday. I don't think I've ever heard a male
senator stop a hearing to admonish someone for saying "Yes, sir"
instead of "Yes, Senator". Face it Boxer is a dumbass, kinda like
you.
Jim
dca...@krl.org
> What happens in the military when superiors are not addressed properly
> by insubordinates? They don't like it much do they? Try calling a senior
> officer mister if you're a private and see if they make anything of it.
> You know very well if you don't address officers properly it's a bid
> deal. But when a U.S. senator, which happens to be a lot higher
> government official than even a general, simply asks to be called by the
> proper title you find something wrong with that?
>
>
> Hawke
Were you ever in the military? I was and found the officers were
humans. A few were hung up with their rank, but most would be not be
offended if you called them " Mister " or by their first name.
Dan
Rich Grise
> On Oct 28, 11:39 pm, Hawke <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
>
>> What happens in the military when superiors are not addressed properly
>> by insubordinates? They don't like it much do they? Try calling a senior
>> officer mister if you're a private and see if they make anything of it.
>> You know very well if you don't address officers properly it's a bid
>> deal. But when a U.S. senator, which happens to be a lot higher
>> government official than even a general, simply asks to be called by the
>> proper title you find something wrong with that?
>
> humans. A few were hung up with their rank, but most would be not be
> offended if you called them " Mister " or by their first name.
>
some young'un what time it is, or when the bus is due, and they call
me "sir."
In the USAF, I was enlisted, and we were fond of saying "Don't call me
sir! My parents are married!" (you were required to call officers "sir"
or address them by their rank or rank and name.)
Cheers!
Rich
Hawke
Why play dumb? You know that if a subordinate addresses an officer
improperly he gets in a lot of hot water. I'm sure you would agree that
showing proper respect for a superior officer is important. But when a
senator requests to be addressed in the proper manner that's "arrogant".
The truth is Boxer corrected the military guy because he did not use
proper etiquette for the circumstances. You have to be an ass to see
anything wrong with that. I guarantee if Jim Demint did the same thing
Boxer did in the same situation you wouldn't have even mentioned it.
That's because you're "Double Standard Jim".
Hawke
Hawke
> In the USAF, I was enlisted, and we were fond of saying "Don't call me
> sir! My parents are married!" (you were required to call officers "sir"
> or address them by their rank or rank and name.)
Exactly! But when Boxer asks for the same kind of respect she's
arrogant. Not a chance. Like I said, I was watching that hearing. She
didn't act arrogantly in the least. She just told the guy how she wanted
him to address her. After all she is a U.S. senator and that does
justify some level of respect, especially from people in the military.
Hawke
Hawke
> Sorry, but you are wrong. I am not demanding that Obummer produce his
> birth certificate. What he produced is an easily obtainable
> Certificate of Live Birth, not a birth certificate which lists the
> mother, father, admitting hospital and doctor in attendance. I simply
> pointed out that the Great Obummer has sealed ALL his records
> including his real birth certificate, his colllege transcripts and any
> records of his law practice. If he has nothing to hide, why did he do
> that? Of course, reagan and Bush increased the debt, as did Carter,
> Ford and Clinton. The national debt has increased every year in the
> recent past. The fact is, however, that the Obamassiah has more than
> DOUBLED the debt which Bush left, due to his massive spending taking
> over GM and Chrysler, and his "stimulous package" which has failed
> miserably. Now he has managed to shove through "Obummer Care" which
> few have read and even fewer understand and which is going to destroy
> our health care system. Sorry you believe in him so strongly. He's a
> loser.
>
> Jim
I pointed out that Bush sealed all his records too. So did Kerry. We
didn't get access to any of their college records. I don't blame any of
them from wanting to keep a few things out of the public domain. The
fact of the matter is Obama has more information about him available
than just about anyone ever in the White House. There are biographies on
him by reputable authors, there is his own autobiography, he ran for
president and for U.S. senator, so he was checked out and investigated
probably more than any man in history. He's an open book. There is
virtually no part of his life that isn't a public record. If there is
anything about him you don't know it's only your own fault. Because if
you want you can find out just about anything you could possibly want
about him.
You also don't seem to know much about the budget process. Do you know
how many budgets have been submitted under Obama's authority? One! When
Obama took over in '09 he was operating under Bush's last budget. That
one was appx. 1.3 trillion in debt. Obama's first budget was for the
fiscal year 2010 and it was about the same as Bush's last one. But
Obama's first budget had to deal with the worst recession in history and
an unprecedented amount of deficit spending to deal with it. His second
budget is for 2011. If you would just hold your panties for a while and
give him some more time he will get the economy going and that will
bring down the debt.
As to the stimulus bill it has worked. I know you are just repeating
what you have heard but the bill did a lot of good. Did you know that
300 billion of it went to the public in the form of tax cuts? That
helped stabilize the economy, by the way. Another 300 billion went to
the states to allow them to keep people on the job like firemen and
police officers and teachers. That also helped keep the economy from
tanking. The TARP money the government spent to stop the financial
industry from failing has almost been completely paid back too. So if
you knew the facts you would have a different opinion than you do now.
Well, maybe not.
But for me it's not that I believe in him so much as I believe that the
direction he is going in is the right one. We had to do something about
health care or go bankrupt. He's taken the first steps to getting that
under control. Once the economy is back on track Obama will have to
address the deficit. That will mean dealing with things like Social
Security and Medicare. Now that will be tough sledding because nobody
wants any cuts that affect them. Do you? Do you get anything from the
government? Want it cut 25 or 35 per cent? I don't get a dime from the
government but my parents get both Medicare and Social Security? You
think I want to see them get their benefits cut by a third? So cutting
spending as you like will not be so easy to do.
Hawke
Hawke
>>> Sorry sucker, but I don't need to tell any of those people you mentioned
>>> anything. I just reported that facts. Yesterday the airline industry just
>>> reported record profits. You want to tell them that things aren't better
>>> than they were two years ago? Housing sales of existing homes and of new
>>> homes were both up in September. You want to deny that? The stock market
>>> is way up from two years ago. Business profits are way up across the
>>> board too. The facts speak for themselves, which is why you don't like to
>>> acknowledge them. They make you look like an idiot. Things are so
>>> obviously better after a year and a half of Obama in the White House
>>> anyone with eyes can see it. Caterpillar is hiring people. So are quite a
>>> few other companies. So as much as you would like to be able to say Obama
>>> has done nothing to improve things the facts say the opposite. In two
>>> years things will be even better. Too bad for you because that means a
>>> sure victory for Obama is 2012. Good for the country bad for right wing
>>> ignorant crackers.
>>>
>>> Hawke
>>>
>>
>> Hack is Deep Douche? That figures!
>
> I wonder just how many of these fools are sharing the same brain.
> It sure explains a lot.
What we share in common is that we can read and comprehend the English
language. That's why we all are well aware of how much better things are
than they were two years ago. Here's another one, private businesses are
sitting on 1.8 trillion dollars in cash. That's a record amount of money
just waiting to be put to work. Instead of businesses being in trouble
they are chock full of money to spend and are making excellent profits.
That says things are going to be much better ahead. But poor you, the
figures, the facts, and all the important information, is unknown by
you. That's what you get when you only watch Foxnews and listen to right
wing talk radio. Next time you really want to know the facts about the
business climate let me know. I'll be glad to inform you about what is
going on.
Hawke
Buddy Beavers
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:iacf1a$l7j$2...@speranza.aioe.org...
> On 10/27/2010 12:51 AM, Libtardopia wrote:
>> Bu-Bye libtards!
>
>
>
> Bye, bye, retard!
>
Hack waves bye to his daddy.
Shall not be infringed
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:08:43 -0700, Hawke
>
>
>
>
>
> <davesmith...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
> >On 10/28/2010 3:42 PM, Jim Chandler wrote:
> >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:37:14 -0700, Hawke
Perhaps he's already been foreclosed on.
Buddy Beavers
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:iafkk1$gmt$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
You are being disingenuous in your statement about Bush and Kerry sealing
records. Bush sealed Presidential records and Kerry sealed his divorce
records. As far as school records go, it's no secret what Bush or Kerry's
school records showed... Bush's grades were higher than Kerry's.
Obama claims to have gone to kindergarten in Hawaii. Why are his
kindergarten sealed? Students need to submit a birth certificate to start
kindergarten in Hawaii. Where is the birth certificate? Did he really attend
kindergarten in Hawaii? Let's see the grades.
Obama claims to have been a "B" student in high school and even played on
the basketball team. Let's see his report card. What? He doesn't have a
report card? Why is that?
In his book he mentions attending Occidental College on a scholarship. Where
are his financial aid records? Report card? Attendance record. Yearbook
photo. Anything?
He says he went to Columbia University next. They never heard of him. Where
are his transcripts? What?
Well, of course we know he went to Harvard, but guess what, no records!
Don't tell us he scored even lower than Kerry! That would rank the three as
Bush, Kerry, Obama. Laugh, laugh, laugh!
Where's his passport?
Where's his medical records?
Where's his Illinois State Bar Association records?
Where's his Baptism records?
Where's his parent's Obama/Dunham marriage license?
Where's his parent's Obama/Dunham divorce documents?
Where's his adoption records?
Where's his freakin' birth certificate?
Hack is hypnotized by Obama's big black dick and can't even think about any
other credential. Hack has his own credential, and it's dripping off his
chin.
Buddy Beavers
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:iadg3n$qkp$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
So, you don't deny being the douche then, which was the subject of my
statement. Why dance, just admit you were busted. Another douche bag
libtard.
Buddy Beavers
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:iafl01$h9b$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Watch how much better it gets, starting next week.
Just for the record, today's close...
Dow Jones 11,118.49
S&P 500 1,183.26
Nasdaq 2,507.41
Buddy Beavers
"Jim Chandler" <n4...@gte.net> wrote in message
news:38slc6th8fv0tm5oo...@4ax.com...
She could have just crossed her legs and that smell of carp would have
subsided as well.
Buddy Beavers
<dca...@krl.org> wrote in message
news:2768f1a7-817a-41d9...@g13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
Hack was kicked out of the campfire girls because his bobs were bigger than
the rest of the troop.
Buddy Beavers
"Buddy Beavers" <Bu...@Beavers.invalid> wrote in message
news:iafslp$q2r$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
his boobs too
Michael A. Terrell
He had Cliff and Dan with him?
--
Politicians should only get paid if the budget is balanced, and there is
enough left over to pay them.
Hawke
>>> I wonder just how many of these fools are sharing the same brain.
>>> It sure explains a lot.
>>
>>
>> What we share in common is that we can read and comprehend the English
>> language. That's why we all are well aware of how much better things
>> are than they were two years ago. Here's another one, private
>> businesses are sitting on 1.8 trillion dollars in cash. That's a
>> record amount of money just waiting to be put to work. Instead of
>> businesses being in trouble they are chock full of money to spend and
>> are making excellent profits. That says things are going to be much
>> better ahead. But poor you, the figures, the facts, and all the
>> important information, is unknown by you. That's what you get when you
>> only watch Foxnews and listen to right wing talk radio. Next time you
>> really want to know the facts about the business climate let me know.
>> I'll be glad to inform you about what is going on.
>>
>> Hawke
>>
>
> Watch how much better it gets, starting next week.
>
> Just for the record, today's close...
>
> Dow Jones 11,118.49
> S&P 500 1,183.26
> Nasdaq 2,507.41
>
>
It better. Because if it doesn't I know who to blame. The republican
congress. From now on everything that's wrong is going to be their
fault. Just like you have been blaming everything on the Democrats since
they got the majority in 2006, from now on I'll be blaming the
republicans for everything starting Nov. 3rd. Then we'll see how much
you like it when the shoe is on the other foot. My guess is not very well.
Hawke
Hawke
>>> Hack is Deep Douche? That figures!
>>
>>
>> Ho, ho, ho, ha, ha, ha. So you couldn't come up with a single word to
>> disprove the facts that I just put up proving that things are much
>> better. You need to throw in the towel bro. I just put up one fact
>> after another proving the improvements in the country and you couldn't
>> refute any of it. So just admit it. You've been proven wrong. Things
>> are a lot better now that we have Obama in the White House. I know you
>> hate to say that but it is the truth. If the truth and right wingers
>> weren't such enemies you would just face the facts and admit I'm
>> right. But then, that would take a man to do that. Which I how I know
>> you won't do it. I know what you'll do. You'll act like a weasel.
>>
>> Hawke
>
> So, you don't deny being the douche then, which was the subject of my
> statement. Why dance, just admit you were busted. Another douche bag
> libtard.
All you have to do is say something that's right for me to admit it's
true. But you never do that. You never get anything right. That tells me
that you're just a dumb blond cunt. An ugly, stinking one at that. No
wonder you're always talking about douches and black cocks. They're your
two favorite things.
Hawke
Gunner Asch
>On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:50:09 GMT, Deep Dudu wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:38:32 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>><hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Oct 25, 7:36=A0pm, "Tom Gardner" <buer...@buerste.com> wrote:
>>>> <Deep Dudu> wrote in messagenews:4cc60b76...@news.newsguy.com...
>>>> > On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:39:43 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
>>>> > <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>Even though she might not be the most arrogant, it's time to dump
>>>> >>every elitist in Washington.
>>>>
>>>> > Starting with all the Republicans so the Democrats can usher in some
>>>> > real change for the better.
>>>>
>>>> They need a new playbook, one that includes actual good things for Americ=
>>>a.
>>>> What they have presented so far is detrimental.
>>>
>>>In every case Marxism has proven terminal.
>>
>>There is nothing Marxist about the Democrats you ignorant piece of
>>shit. Why don't you run and play and stop embarrassing yourself
>>because you know nothing.
>
>
>If it's not Marxist, what would you call taking what I earned as a
>working person and giving it to those who will not work just to "level
>the playing field"? Government intervention in industry (General
>Motors, Chrysler, medical care) and making people dependant on the
>government, and suppressing the right and will of the people to
>protest their government isn't Marxist? You are the ignorant piece of
>shit if you actually believe that.
>
>Jim
"From each according to his abilities, to those according to their
needs"
1875, Karl Marx