Women.....
Gunner Asch
T.Alan Kraus
Buerste
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vgmiq518m1qifiolg...@4ax.com...
No wonder the liberals are so pro-abortion! I'm rethinking my position...
RogerN
"Buerste" <bue...@buerste.com> wrote in message
news:hocb4s$f9e$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Actually it would be better to wait till they take a Democrat position then
abort them, late term abortion.
But how come all the pro-death ones in politics are dried up sorry old hags?
They really don't have a choice any more.
RogerN
Randy
wrote:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzrUztyd1Y&feature=player_embedded
>
>
>laugh laugh laugh
>
>Gunner
Who's that at 1:36?
Thank You,
Randy
Remove 333 from email address to reply.
Lewis Hartswick
I just know you will get accused of balot box stuffing
for the two of Sarah but there were to of Madeline and
Hillary also. I sure didn't recognize too many other
than those in politics. Think one was a TV "personality"
but not sure.
Cute though.
...Lew...
Gunner Asch
>On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:18:23 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzrUztyd1Y&feature=player_embedded
>>
>>
>>laugh laugh laugh
>>
>>Gunner
>
>Who's that at 1:36?
>
The black chick?
Condi Rice.
Special aide to Bush 2
>Thank You,
>Randy
>
>Remove 333 from email address to reply.
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
Steve B
Larry Jaques
<desertt...@dishymail.net> scrawled the following:
>Megyn Kelly .................... melt ..........................
Ooh, no kidding! http://fwd4.me/6Kg and http://fwd4.me/6Ku
Love that red dress.
--
If we attend continually and promptly to the little that we can do, we
shall ere long be surprised to find how little remains that we cannot do.
-- Samuel Butler
Steve B
"Larry Jaques" <lja...@diversify.invalid> wrote in message
news:lctmq55ttnma330p2...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:05:11 -0700, the infamous "Steve B"
> <desertt...@dishymail.net> scrawled the following:
>
>>Megyn Kelly .................... melt ..........................
>
> Ooh, no kidding! http://fwd4.me/6Kg and http://fwd4.me/6Ku
> Love that red dress.
She'd make burlap look good. I do not think I have been infatuated with a
woman in my life like I am with her. AND, she has a brain!
Steve
John&Michelle
hospitals, and the other deaths associated with back-alley abortions.
"RogerN" <re...@midwest.net> wrote in message
news:gsadnUWaFIxzdDTW...@earthlink.com...
Hang Dog
More right wing theft. Doubt they have permission to use any of the
photos, and definitely none of the music either. One would have thougt
that after McCain got caught stealing and having to pay big time, they'd
have learned their lesson. Chop their thieving fucking hands off its the
only thing they'll understand.
RogerN
"Hang Dog" <righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:81922u...@mid.individual.net...
What about the one showing better looking Democrat women and less outer
beauty, but more inner beauty, Republican women? Do you also thing the
Democrats that made it should have their hands cut off, or are you the
typical leftard hypocrite?
How about Obama, 7 lies in less than 2 minutes, if you are not a hypocrite
you should be saying he should have his tongue cut off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UErR7i2onW0
I'll bet you are against individuals making a video without permission to
use the photo's and songs, but it's probably OK with you that you're
President is an outright liar.
RogerN
Wes
I don't think Kimberly Guilfoyle belongs on the republican section of the video. She was
maried to Gavin Newsom.
Now Slaughter, someone I don't agree with politically, looks pretty damn good for a woman
that is 80 years old.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3b/Rep_Louise_Slaughter.jpg/160px-Rep_Louise_Slaughter.jpg
I didn't see Patty Anne Brown or or Catherine Herridge.
http://www.pattiannbrowne.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/PattiAnnBrowneplum164repro.jpg
Wes
John R. Carroll
Getting all wound up for church, I see.
Don't forget to kick your dog around a bit and slap the shit out of your
wife to show her the place she occupies in your universe Roger.
JC
--
John R. Carroll
RogerN
"John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote in message
news:Wp6dnSm3Xa_G-DLW...@giganews.com...
Actually, I don't think I've been to church 5 times in the last 10+ years.
I'm just simply pointing out facts and am happy that Obama is showing all
the fools that voted for him how stupid they were to believe his lies.
By chance did you watch the movie Evan Almighty? There was a perfect
example in a part of it that showed how liberals are. Two of every kind of
animal came around to board Evans ARC and the news reporter said something
like "With all these Species, what's will they do about the Feces". They
missed the big picture, why the animals were coming, they missed the sign
and all they could see was the animal poop. Hang Dogs response reminded me
of this, he ignores Obama's outright lies but thinks someone making a video,
obviously picking nice pictures of one party and bad pictures of another
party, should have their hands cut off. If what the maker of the video was
wrong why not just use the legal process? Is there a legal process for a
politician that lies? It would be the only bill with zero votes from either
party of the politicians :-)
Obama not only told a little lie, he is doing the exact opposite of what he
said he would do, he is doing what he said is wrong.
RogerN
Hang Dog
> "Hang Dog" <righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:81922u...@mid.individual.net...
>> Gunner Asch wrote:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzrUztyd1Y&feature=player_embedded
>>>
>>>
>> More right wing theft. Doubt they have permission to use any of the
>> photos, and definitely none of the music either. One would have thougt
>> that after McCain got caught stealing and having to pay big time, they'd
>> have learned their lesson. Chop their thieving fucking hands off its the
>> only thing they'll understand.
>
> What about the one showing better looking Democrat women and less outer
> beauty, but more inner beauty, Republican women? Do you also thing the
> Democrats that made it should have their hands cut off, or are you the
> typical leftard hypocrite?
I've not seen it but yeah if they haven't licensed the images and musics
chop their fucking hand off too.
>
> I'll bet you are against individuals making a video without permission to
> use the photo's and songs, but it's probably OK with you that you're
> President is an outright liar.
>
Quite right they should not be making videos with other peoples music
unless they've licensed to do so.
RogerN
Here's one you should enjoy then, simply a music video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdKmc9aBELM
RogerN
Hang Dog
>
> Here's one you should enjoy then, simply a music video.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdKmc9aBELM
>
Well done, though I'm pretty sure the tune has been nicked from
someplace else. In any case why do you think I'd be interested in any of
your whining bitch boy parochial nonsense any way?
RogerN
What Obama lie are you referring to? There are so many...
RogerN
Gunner Asch
Odd...according to you Marxists..there is no such thing as private
property.
So it appears that the video is effective if it causes you buffoons to
go out and start bitching about private property rights.
To the authors..Very well done!
Gunner
Gunner Asch
One simply cannot pass the fact that the Dog ignored the question can
one?
Laugh laugh laugh
Gunner
Gunner Asch
Cause your a whiny cunt.
Gunner
John R. Carroll
No, but I did see "Bruce Almighty".
>
> Obama not only told a little lie, he is doing the exact opposite of
> what he said he would do,
Hardly Roger.
The HC bills that just passed are good examples.
The bill the House passed was on line for 72 hours before they took it up
and once passed, wasn't signed by Obama for another two days. It was
actually publicly available for longer than promised.
There are better examples of Obama's brolen promises. Closing Gitmo comes to
mind. Why don't you find the actual instances rather than just making stuff
up?
--
John R. Carroll
Hang Dog
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:01:25 +0100, Hang Dog
> <righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>> Gunner Asch wrote:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzrUztyd1Y&feature=player_embedded
>>>
>>>
>> More right wing theft. Doubt they have permission to use any of the
>> photos, and definitely none of the music either. One would have thougt
>> that after McCain got caught stealing and having to pay big time, they'd
>> have learned their lesson. Chop their thieving fucking hands off its the
>> only thing they'll understand.
>
> Odd...according to you Marxists..there is no such thing as private
> property.
>
Where did you get the crap from?
> So it appears that the video is effective if it causes you buffoons to
> go out and start bitching about private property rights.
>
Hey now you are the libtard in this group. Whining and bitching about
property rights, yet so many of your type are simple thieves.
Hang Dog
I have no idea what you are talking about, explain.
Hang Dog
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 17:46:25 +0100, Hang Dog
> <righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>> RogerN wrote:
>>> Here's one you should enjoy then, simply a music video.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdKmc9aBELM
>>>
>> Well done, though I'm pretty sure the tune has been nicked from
>> someplace else. In any case why do you think I'd be interested in any of
>> your whining bitch boy parochial nonsense any way?
>
>
> Cause your a whiny cunt.
>
Shouldn't you be off somewhere telling the military that they ought to
be glad to be killed on active service rather than being killed for joy
riding.
RogerN
"John R. Carroll" <nu...@bidness.dev.nul> wrote in message
There are youtube videos of Obama telling his campaign promises of
transparency, etc.. He said what the Clintons did wrong with healthcare was
trying to do it all behind closed doors, in back rooms, etc.. And then what
does he do, backroom policy, bribes, and so on. I'd like to see his special
deals made to the "NO" Democrats on C-Span!
Here's some videos with Obama saying something one thing during his campaign
but what he has done a president has been the opposite.
The Great Reneger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdKmc9aBELM
7 Lies in under 2 minutes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UErR7i2onW0&feature=related
Obama the liar has stuff about Clintons and how Obama would do differently.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOrncxhTTiw&feature=related
RogerN
Gunner Asch
<righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote:
Shouldnt you be figuring out what your Obamassiahs lies are?
Gunner Asch
<righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>> Odd...according to you Marxists..there is no such thing as private
>> property.
>>
>
>
>Where did you get the crap from?
The long history of Marxism in your dialectic of course.
>
>
>> So it appears that the video is effective if it causes you buffoons to
>> go out and start bitching about private property rights.
>>
>
>
>Hey now you are the libtard in this group. Whining and bitching about
>property rights, yet so many of your type are simple thieves.
Im whining? Did you have a sudden head injury? Or did you just toke up
a nice big bowl of crack?
Gunner
Gunner Asch
wrote:
>Hang Dog <righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote:
>>Gunner Asch wrote:
>
>>> Odd...according to you Marxists..there is no such thing as private
>>> property.
>>
>>Where did you get the crap from?
>
>Ah, let me think, let me think. Oh yes. From Marx.
>
>It's the first of the ten planks of Marx's 1848 Communist Manifesto.
>
>Let me guess, are you a recent public school graduate.
>
>
>http://www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html
>You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property.
>But in your existing society, private property is already done away
>with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is
>solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You
>reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of
>property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the
>non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.
>
>__
>WS in a.s and m.s
>Two parties, not a dimes worth of difference.
Bingo!
Gunner Asch
wrote:
>Hang Dog <righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote:
>>Gunner Asch wrote:
>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzrUztyd1Y&feature=player_embedded
>>
>>More right wing theft. Doubt they have permission to use any of the
>>photos, and definitely none of the music either.
>
>Fair use.
>
Indeed.
Fascinating the lengths and perfidities the Left will stoop to when they
have no actual response to something that makes them look like the
undermenschen that they actually are.
Utterly fascinating.
Gunner
Hang Dog
>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzrUztyd1Y&feature=player_embedded
>> More right wing theft. Doubt they have permission to use any of the
>> photos, and definitely none of the music either.
>
>
Explain how it is fair use? There is nothing in that video that is a
fair use of the images or the music. People pay a lot of money for music
soundtracks to videos. And as McCain found out, unless there is an
immmediate and direct connection between the music and the political
statement you are making, you cannot claim fair-use even in a
presidential election campaign:
http://thresq.hollywoodreporter.com/2009/07/jackson-browne-john-mccain-settlement.html
ie you can take a bit of gangsta music to make a political statement or
comment on gangsta music, but not add the same soundtrack to make a
wider political statement.
Chief Egalitarian
"Hang Dog" <righ...@wobble.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:81922u...@mid.individual.net...
Holy fucking crap! Stolen or not, those democrat women are FUGLY! My freekin
eyes hurt!