An international research team led by paleoanthropologist Tim White at the
University of California, Berkeley, unveiled on Thursday remains from 36 males,
females and young of an ancient prehuman species called Ardipithecus ramidus,
unearthed in the Awash region of Ethiopia starting in 1994. The creatures take
their scientific name from the word for "root" in the local Afar language. They
aren't the oldest known fossils of hominids -- as prehuman species and their
relatives are called -- but constitute the most complete set discovered so far.
"It is not a chimp, and it is not human," said Dr. White. "It gives us a new
perspective on our origins. We opened a time capsule from a time and place that
we knew nothing about."
]
Fundies will still claim that water flows uphill .....
Looks a lot like gummer.
--
Cliff
Looks a lot like gummer & other wingers.
" ... small-brained creatures ..."
--
Cliff
> "It is not a chimp, and it is not human," said Dr. White. "It gives us a
> new perspective on our origins. We opened a time capsule from a time and
> place that we knew nothing about."
> ]
>
> Fundies will still claim that water flows uphill .....
And Libs will still claim Lucy was the mother of us all...
> "It is not a chimp, and it is not human," said Dr. White. "It gives us a
> new perspective on our origins. We opened a time capsule from a time and
> place that we knew nothing about."
As I understand it, the fossil is not a new species but rather a more
complete example of an earlier finding that was just part of a foot or leg
bone.
But it does display some type of transition to homosapiens sapiens.
--
Later,
Darrell
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125440678661956317.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories
>
>>"It is not a chimp, and it is not human," said Dr. White
>
>It's probably a lib that led it's tribe to extinction.
Clearly some wingers survived, fed & cared for by the liberals.
Sadly the education plans gang aft agley.
--
Cliff
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125440678661956317.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories
>
>>"It is not a chimp, and it is not human," said Dr. White
>
> It's probably a lib that led it's tribe to extinction.
If that is true than Christian nations are doomed. Joshua was as liberal as
he could be. According to the story, he was even hung on a stake for his
political/social liberalism.
Therefore if you live in the US, you can be thankful we are not a Christian
nation, else according to your opinion we will become extinct.
--
Later,
Darrell
>Are you sure "J" wasn't an undercover plant of the power brokers of
>the day? I mean he was famous for saying things like: give to Caeser
>what is Caeser's, turn the other cheek, don't worry about material
>possessions, and bide your time for your reward comes later.
A famed wino?
Always with the wine !!!
No beer?
--
Cliff
Will NBC be surprised??*
Here's your chance to let the media know where the people stand on our
faith in God, as a nation..
NBC is presently taking a poll on "In God We Trust" to stay on our
American currency.
Please send this to every Christian you know so they can vote on this
important subject.
Please do it right away, before NBC takes this off their web page.
Poll is still open so you can vote:
Good find. Thanks for posting it.
> Fundies will still claim that water flows uphill .....
Really? I'll watch this thread and see if your prediction comes true.
Damn, Winston!!! You sure have gotten butch lately... distancing
yourself from libs like that.
History shows otherwise.
Note that it was Bush that led to the extinction of the Republican
Party.
TMT
Well the liberals needed to have some pets around.
I do find it entertaining to teach new tricks to the wingers here.
TMT
Will you be voting to make water flow uphill too?
--
Cliff
Ever read the Treaty of Tripoli ratified by Congress? The NBC deal is a
public opinion poll. Opinion does not necessarily equal fact. If they
were around in 1200 and took a PUBLIC opinion poll about whether the earth
was a spheroid or flat, how do you suppose it would turn out? Would that
opinion have been a true fact?
Because the public might be ignorant of US history does not make their
opinion correct.
--
Later,
Darrell
??
Wingers are linear thinkers with blinders on. They can't tell the
difference between some imagined straight line of descent from the bush
(tree) of life as espoused by evolution.
--
Later,
Darrell
>Cliff inscribed forevermore utilizing silicon chips::
>
>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:21:51 +0200, Monika Eggers
>> <monik...@expires-2009-09-30.arcornews.de> wrote:
>>
>>>Darrell Stec wrote:
>>>
>>>> But as to liberalism, divorce was one of those things allowed by god and
>>>> the
>>>> divorce proceedure is described in the bible. But unlike Roman culture,
>>>> Jewish culture had absolutely no provisions for divorced women. They
>>>> were
>>>> not allowed to work and they were not allowed to inherit. There were
>>>> two
>>>> things left to the Jewish divorced woman. One was to beg in the
>>>> streets.
>>>> The other was to become a prostitute. So Joshua came along and said to
>>>> ignore god, and do the socially moral thing.
>>>
>>>Which was what? To prohibit divorces?
>>>
>>>Monika.
>>
>> And I thought Jewish property rights were mostly matrilinial?
>
>Different times, different customs. Remember at one time Hebrews were
>polytheistic, then it changed to worship of one god, Yahweh and then by the
>second century CE they invented a hero and made the one god nameless
>because Yahweh had a bad rep supported by prodigious documentation called
>the holy scriptures.
>
>Remember the story of Abraham and Sarah? Abraham passed off his wife as his
>sister
Those holy guys, always bearing false witness & telling whoppers ...
>and the King "entertained" her in his private chambers (with his
>privates). From a moral standpoint this did not make sense since the
>storytellers went to great length to portray Abraham as a righteous man.
>This was a huge thorn for scholars for millenia.
And now?
>About 20 years ago, archaeologists dug up some Hittite tablets which shed a
>floodlight on the subject. It seems that when a man adopted his wife as
>his sister he gained many rights including that of inheritance. But during
>the many centuries the story was passed down but the reason for the
>adoption and the adoption itself was lost in history.
>
>So we see flip flopping depending on the times. In modern times one is
>Jewish if the mother is Jewish.
When did they manage to turn the tables on the men?
How?
Does this explain banquers?
--
Cliff
Since JFK and Clinton, it is known as being "Presidential."
Being kicked out of your country (circa 134 CE) under penalty of death can
produce remarkable changes, including inventing Christianity.
> Does this explain banquers?
--
Later,
Darrell