Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: meow

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Aratzio

unread,
Apr 11, 2010, 12:42:36 PM4/11/10
to
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:15:39 -0400, in the land of
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS>
got double secret probation for writing:

>On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:21:22 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:36:01 -0400, in the land of
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> got
>> double secret probation for writing:
>>
>>>On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:26:27 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>
>>>> Toyotatard gets his arguments from his 24/7 fox feed.
>>>
>>>Once again proving, you don't know shit.
>>>
>>>I don't watch Fox very often. I don't listen to Limbaugh very often. More
>>>often than not, I watch NBC news. We all know how much they dislike
>>>Obama, right?
>>>
>>>Unlike you, I am able to take in information and process it for myself..
>>>Retard.
>>>
>>>
>> So do explain how you were espousing the exact same lies that Gingrich did
>> on Fox.
>
>
>Which 'lie' was that, Genius?
>
Go back and *read*, it was explained to you in detail with links. The
fact you cannot face your own lies is not the fault of the people
pointing them out.
Message-ID: <sp41s552kso63shts...@4ax.com>

You ran and hid from that one, coward. You could not face the fact
that those with whom you place so much of your belief had lied with
impunity.

Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich, Sean Hannity and Michelle Bachmann all
intentially lied about the NPR. You believed them without any
knowledge about the NPR. That is a "low information voter".

Pay very close attention, they don't care about you. They know they
can lie to you, all of them, because they know once they have your
fear level high enough you will believe anything they tell you. This
is exactly the same methodology used by the National Socialist Party
in 1932.

So who is actually the Nazi, people provably using Nazi political
tactics or people accused by the people using Nazi tactics?

So, now that you know what is the NPR, (you did go reqad the actual
transcript?) and the fact is is a legislatively mandated review of our
Nuclear Policy that must be made public, what does that do to your
arguments about releasing the NPR imformation, since that is
legislatively mandated too.

Do Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann and Newt Gingrich have more or less
information with regard to past & current US policy with regard to
Nuclear Posture and its effect upon US foreign releations than the
following people:

Commander-in-Cheif of US Armed forces. Responsible for authorizing the
use of Nuclear Weapons.

Former US Senator that worked on foreign relations committee for well
over 25 years and has personally negotiated with Gromyko on Arms
Control Treaties.

Secretary of State

Secretary of Energy (and nobel winning physicist)

Secretary of Defence (republican appointee)

Chariman of the Jint Chiefs of Staff.

Cmon, you claimed that Palin had some sort of chops, how does her
knowledge of foreign affairs and nuclear policy stack up against that
list?

Prepare to snip-n-run coward. Way too much verifiable fact for your
brain to actually process, especially since it goes against what fox
told you to think.

--

Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues:

Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2...@news.eternal-september.org>

I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against
his knees...

Aratzio

unread,
Apr 11, 2010, 12:58:57 PM4/11/10
to
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:16:52 -0400, in the land of

alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS>
got double secret probation for writing:

>On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:26:27 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>
>>Toyotatard gets his arguments from his 24/7 fox feed.
>>

>> If that is the new paradigm, we're fucked as a nation.
>
>With morons like you voting for people like Obama, we don't have to wait
>for the 'fucking'; it's already started.
>

Yeah, those two wars he started that will eventually suck over 3
trillion dollars from our economy with not even a build a bridge
across a small river here at home. Those dollars all going to his
cronies in corporations that are incorporated in Tax Havens so they do
not have to return a penny of their socialst hand outs.

The 1 trillion dollar *UNFUNDED* mandate of medicare part D that he
instituted.

The complete crash of our economy and the loss of over 500,000 jobs a
month he caused. And the over 1 trillion dollar loss in tax revenue
caused by the loss of tax monies.

Yeah, your heros were standing up for you and making sure that the
next administration would have no chance to succeed.

You want to return to the failed policies because you have been
programmed by fox to believe what ever they tell you.

So if you actually care about the USA, lets get back to the basicis:

Where were you when the wars started?

Where were you when Medicare Part D was passed?

Where were you when they took hundreds of billions of dollars in
surplus and trippled the US Deficit by cutting taxes for the rich?

Did you complain that Bush & Cheney were ruining the country and
support the people who opposed those efforts to destroy our country
and economy since the days of Reaganomics and "trickle down"?

You could not care less about this country. You could not care less
that our education system is becoming a farce. You could not care less
that the SEC did not have enough people or enough will to actually
find or prosecute a Bernie Madoff because they had been gutted by
Bush.

None of that matters, all that matters to you is that a democrat was
elected by the largest vote margin in history, a black man to boot,
and that all of the MEMEMEMEME policies that you supported are being
torn down because they failed.

Aratzio

unread,
Apr 11, 2010, 1:08:40 PM4/11/10
to
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:20:21 -0400, in the land of

alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS>
got double secret probation for writing:

>On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:22:15 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>Even some of the 'independants' that voted for him are beginning to wake
>>>up. Hopefully, he can't do too much damage in his one term as President.
>>
>> So what was the NPR and how does it affect our nuclear posture with regard
>> to Iran?
>

<Hachoo completely confused, thinking "the NPR" is a radio show>
>HUH?!?!? What was the NPR?!?!? Are you fucking serious, Genius?!?!
>OMFG.
>

Just more proof that you believe anything Fox tells you and when
pressed about national policy you are completely uninformed. So
anything else you spew with regard to politics is formed in the same
manner.

You claimed claimed elsewhere that he would not attack "a rogue
country" that used biological weapons on the US with nukes.

I am still awaiting your response to the quotes I provided you from
Adm.Mullen stating that specifically was untrue, in the original NPR
briefing.

:More significant is that the “ban” specifically excludes countries designated as not in compliance
:with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The US officially considers North Korea and Iran
:as not in compliance, although Iran has not been so designated by the UN agency,
:the International Atomic Energy Agency, that enforces the treaty. North Korea withdrew from the NPT
:before carrying out its first successful nuclear weapons test in 2006.

Now, runaway from the facts again.

Aratzio

unread,
Apr 11, 2010, 3:40:48 PM4/11/10
to
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:52:58 -0400, in the land of

alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS>
got double secret probation for writing:

>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:18:09 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>The NPR I was talking about was National Public Radio. That's the
>>>reference in the post before Bonehead's.
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks for the link though. I needed yet another source to tell me how
>>>great the Messiah is.
>>
>> Except the point was about "the NPR" made by me. Feel free to point out
>> in your quoted paragraph where you mention ":the NPR"..

<restore the predicted snip-n-run>
>>That was
>>used to demonstrate your ability to process information that does not
>>come from right wing sources does not exist.
>>
>>http://www.defense.gov/npr/
>>
>>Now support your claim that the NPR will do damage using the actual
>>NPR.
>>

<see predicted you would right below>
>>You will now snip-n-run.
>
>blut...blut...blut...rada...rada...rada...
>
>Baaaaaackpedal. I meant NPR, National Public Radio. Remember where I
>mentioned my news sources?

Like I said, you would snip-n-run and hide from your own error in
reading.

Try to have your reading make sense.

>
>You took that ball...and ran the wrong way with it.
>
>
I asked you about "THE NPR". You couldn't read and now that is my
fault, again.

I added a bunch of wingnut groups in hopes of getting you some support
for your talking points.

Cliff

unread,
Apr 13, 2010, 5:04:45 AM4/13/10
to
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:42:36 -0700, Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>Do Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann


http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/04/palin-breaks-out-the-palm-at-bachmann-rally-kicking-it-oldschool.html
[
Campaigning today for Rep. Michele Bachmann in Minneapolis, Palin marveled at
the fact that Bachmann, R-Minn., has fostered 23 children. She said she Googled
that fact and thought so much of it that she inked it on her left palm.
]

0 new messages