Antigun Senator Shoots intruder!
Gunner Asch
?
Isn't it funny this sort of news usually doesn't get on the "main
media"? A while back Carl Rowan, a writer turned congressman and a
vocal anti-gun guy shot an intruder in his D.C. home. I wonder if
anyone ever thinks to ask if the guns were registered. Oh, to be among
the "elite"! Dick
Democratic Anti-Gun Senator Shoots Intruder
Looks like it took about three weeks to surface & start making the email
rounds. another one we didn't see on the National News.... Wonder Why?
Of course not!!
Anti-Gun Senator Shoots Intruder Elitism at its finest!
It appears that once again, what's good for the goose is not necessarily
good for the gander as far as liberals are concerned.. In other words,
they say one thing but mean two sets of rules:
one for them, the intellectual elite and another for the unwashed
masses.
This NC Democrat State Senator is a die-hard anti-gunner. He has voted
for every anti gun bill that has crossed his desk, but when someone
invaded his house, he picked up a gun for self defense.
Hypocrites!
Aug 24, 2009 "Long time Anti-Gun Advocate State Senator R. C. Soles,
74, shot one of two intruders at his home just outside Tabor City, about
5 p.m. Sunday", the prosecutor for the politician's home county said.
The victim, Kyle Blackburn, was taken to a South Carolina hospital, but
the injuries were not reported to be life-threatening, according to Rex
Gore, district attorney for Columbus, Bladen and Brunswick counties.
The State Bureau of Investigation and Columbus County Sheriff's
Department are investigating the shooting, Gore said.
Soles, who was not arrested, declined to discuss the incident Sunday
evening.
"I am not in a position to talk to you," Soles said by telephone.
"I'm right in the middle of an investigation."
Soles, a top-ranking Democrat and the longest-serving member of the
legislature, already was the subject of an SBI investigation over sexual
misconduct allegations with former male clients.
The Senator, who has made a career of being against gun ownership for
the general public, didn't hesitate to defend himself with his own gun
when he believed he was in immediate danger and he was the victim..
In typical hypocritical liberal fashion, the "Do As I Say And Not As I
Do" Anti-Gun Activist Lawmaker picked up his gun and took action in what
apparently was a self-defense shooting. Why hypocritical you may ask?
It is because his long legislative record shows that the actions that he
took to protect his family, his own response to a dangerous life
threatening situation, are actions that he feels ordinary citizens
should not have if they were faced with an identical situation.
It has prompted some to ask if the Senator believes his life and
personal safety are far more valuable than yours or mine.... But, this
is to be expected from those who believe they can run our lives, manage
our money, raise our kids, and protect our families better than we can.
HH&C
Hmmmm? Anti-gun and gay. How predictable.
SteveB
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:ghd3d5pppc7j0asb1...@4ax.com...
Hmmmmmm. Antigun, yet owns and keeps guns in his house.
Wait, wait! I know the answer to this one.
Steve
wmbjk...@citlink.net
<gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>It appears that once again, what's good for the goose is not necessarily
>good for the gander
The mind boggles. Supreme hypocrite gummer, who rails against
socialism day-in and day-out while he and his family accept more
handouts than an entire apartment house full of lesser deadbeats, is
now accusing somebody else of hypocrisy?! And how the heck did he
decide whether to post the article as a home defense anecdote, or as a
hypocritical indictment of hypocrisy anyway? Apparently he hates
"dems" more than he loves guns. LOL
Wayne
HH&C
A person would be stupid to not accept the handousts if they needed
them, especially if it not taking it meant dying, even if it conflicts
with their values.
That is what is so evil about the government taking on the role of day
to day charities.
My boss who is ALL ABOUT personal responsibility was the first in line
to get cash for clunkers. Go figure?
robert bowman
> I wonder if
> anyone ever thinks to ask if the guns were registered. Oh, to be among
> the "elite"!
I've found it ironic that Diane Scheissstein is a pistol packing mama. I
don't think she's shot anybody -- yet.
wmbjk...@citlink.net
<almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 11, 11:32�am, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:41:59 -0700, Gunner Asch
>>
>> <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>> >It appears that once again, what's good for the goose is not necessarily
>> >good for the gander
>>
>> The mind boggles. Supreme hypocrite gummer, who rails against
>> socialism day-in and day-out while he and his family accept more
>> handouts than an entire apartment house full of lesser deadbeats, is
>> now accusing somebody else of hypocrisy?! And how the heck did he
>> decide whether to post the article as a home defense anecdote, or as a
>> hypocritical indictment of hypocrisy anyway? Apparently he hates
>> "dems" more than he loves guns. �LOL
>>
>> Wayne
>
>A person would be stupid to not accept the handousts if they needed
>them, especially if it not taking it meant dying, even if it conflicts
>with their values.
Gummer has no values. He only says that he does. The issue at hand has
nothing to do with anyone being stupid to refuse handouts, but
everything to do with a handful of readers being stupid enough to
believe a word he says. In fact, the word stupid doesn't quite cut it.
For example, he sits at his keyboard, frequently cranking out hundreds
of posts per day, many of them claiming that he's a hard worker. If
you believe crap like that over your own two eyes, then you have no
right to call anyone else stupid, ever.
>That is what is so evil about the government taking on the role of day
>to day charities.
There's nothing inherently evil about government charity. What's evil
is phonies, secure in the belief that their bennies won't be cut off
because they trust in the good nature of taxpayers, lobbying in the
hope of taking from others what they themselves are getting. What's
also evil is you and gummy and other nitwits scapegoating others when
you know damned well that people like him are a large part of the real
problem. Consider that if a family of 4 normal deadbeats was receiving
$1000 each per month, it would take them 73 years to collect as much
as gummy's family has leeched thus far. Consider also that at 5%, the
interest on the gummer fandamily's handouts thus far is nearly $15,000
per *month*. Yet quitting his nicotine and Dew diet to limit future
handouts, or even stopping his self-destructive Usenet addiction, are
"sacrifices" that phony survivalist gummer just can't seem to manage.
He, and you, have a friggin dump-truck load of gall to be blaming
anybody else for anything. If you A-holes want to do something useful
instead of making a career of advertising your moronic blowhard
natures, then start lobbying to reduce the cost of medical care.
>My boss who is ALL ABOUT personal responsibility was the first in line
>to get cash for clunkers. Go figure?
I figure there could be some hypocrisy involved, but not necessarily.
The idea of your boss investing in a subsidized new car was to promote
vehicle sales and stimulate the economy, both of which it did. I'm not
in a position to judge the program's cost-effectiveness yet, and
neither are you. Particularly since you always support your whacked
positions with horseshit that only makes sense to other crackpots.
Now, get you butt over to Youtube and watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ery7RZ4tZ2Y. Hear what that
straight-talker said about bacon and getting out of the way? It's
asshats like you and gummer that he's talking about.
Wayne
HH&C
Everything about the government taking over charity is evil. Don't
make me say that again.
What's evil
> is phonies, secure in the belief that their bennies won't be cut off
> because they trust in the good nature of taxpayers, lobbying in the
> hope of taking from others what they themselves are getting. What's
> also evil is you and gummy and other nitwits scapegoating others when
> you know damned well that people like him are a large part of the real
> problem. Consider that if a family of 4 normal deadbeats was receiving
> $1000 each per month, it would take them 73 years to collect as much
> as gummy's family has leeched thus far. Consider also that at 5%, the
> interest on the gummer fandamily's handouts thus far is nearly $15,000
> per *month*. Yet quitting his nicotine and Dew diet to limit future
> handouts, or even stopping his self-destructive Usenet addiction, are
> "sacrifices" that phony survivalist gummer just can't seem to manage.
> He, and you, have a friggin dump-truck load of gall to be blaming
> anybody else for anything. If you A-holes want to do something useful
> instead of making a career of advertising your moronic blowhard
> natures, then start lobbying to reduce the cost of medical care.
>
> >My boss who is ALL ABOUT personal responsibility was the first in line
> >to get cash for clunkers. Go figure?
>
> I figure there could be some hypocrisy involved, but not necessarily.
> The idea of your boss investing in a subsidized new car was to promote
> vehicle sales and stimulate the economy, both of which it did. I'm not
> in a position to judge the program's cost-effectiveness yet,
The hell you aren't. Do you pay taxes???
and
> neither are you.
I pay taxes, and I don't pay them to buy my boss a new car... or at
least I dind't prior to OBAMA.
> Particularly since you always support your whacked
> positions with horseshit that only makes sense to other crackpots.
Scuse me, but my "whacked" positions are correct.
> Now, get you butt over to Youtube and watch this videohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ery7RZ4tZ2Y. Hear what that
wmbjk...@citlink.net
You're a blithering idiot spouting your ill-considered "beliefs". That
makes you as bad as any religious fanatic.
> Don't
>make me say that again.
Nobody can or should stop you. Some people like Huntress think that
it's worth trying to talk some sense into you, but all I see is a
punching bag when I occasionally read your posts.
>What's evil
>> is phonies, secure in the belief that their bennies won't be cut off
>> because they trust in the good nature of taxpayers, lobbying in the
>> hope of taking from others what they themselves are getting. What's
>> also evil is you and gummy and other nitwits scapegoating others when
>> you know damned well that people like him are a large part of the real
>> problem. Consider that if a family of 4 normal deadbeats was receiving
>> $1000 each per month, it would take them 73 years to collect as much
>> as gummy's family has leeched thus far. Consider also that at 5%, the
>> interest on the gummer fandamily's handouts thus far is nearly $15,000
>> per *month*. Yet quitting his nicotine and Dew diet to limit future
>> handouts, or even stopping his self-destructive Usenet addiction, are
>> "sacrifices" that phony survivalist gummer just can't seem to manage.
>> He, and you, have a friggin dump-truck load of gall to be blaming
>> anybody else for anything. If you A-holes want to do something useful
>> instead of making a career of advertising your moronic blowhard
>> natures, then start lobbying to reduce the cost of medical care.
What, no smart-ass comments? Not gonna' explain why society should
drop 15 grand a month to keep one of your compatriots in fighting
<snorf> trim?
>> >My boss who is ALL ABOUT personal responsibility was the first in line
>> >to get cash for clunkers. Go figure?
>>
>> I figure there could be some hypocrisy involved, but not necessarily.
>> The idea of your boss investing in a subsidized new car was to promote
>> vehicle sales and stimulate the economy, both of which it did. I'm not
>> in a position to judge the program's cost-effectiveness yet,
>
>The hell you aren't. Do you pay taxes???
>
>and
>> neither are you.
>
>I pay taxes, and I don't pay them to buy my boss a new car... or at
>least I dind't prior to OBAMA.
You're deluded. You, like most of the entire world, paid for every
stupid decision of the prior 8 years. And now you're going to pay to
try to fix it. If you had half a brain, then you'd be hoping for
success instead of lobbying to encourage failure and fantasizing that
it's somehow going to be good for you.
>> Particularly since you always support your whacked
>> positions with horseshit that only makes sense to other crackpots.
>
>Scuse me, but my "whacked" positions are correct.
I've never seen a single logically-argued post from you. As far as I
can tell your mind is as deep a black hole as gummy's. BTW, one of the
other crackpots believed that his positions were correct as well.
Remember his invisible June revolution? Of course not, you morons
never get it.
>> Now, get you butt over to Youtube and watch this videohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ery7RZ4tZ2Y. Hear what that
>> straight-talker said about bacon and getting out of the way? It's
>> asshats like you and gummer that he's talking about.
Not gonna' comment on that video either, huh? Couldn't you think of
something stupid to say about his tie or something? Oh well, gummer
and the other asshats should be along soon to give you your talking
points.
Wayne
wmbjk...@citlink.net
<du...@spamherelots.com> wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> Now, get you butt over to Youtube and watch this video
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ery7RZ4tZ2Y. Hear what that
>> straight-talker said about bacon and getting out of the way? It's
>> asshats like you and gummer that he's talking about.
>
>Love that guy.... Let's hope we get a lot more like him in 2010.
Looks like the asshats gave up on trying to demonize him after round
1. What a contrast with their standard-bearers like whacko Bachman.
Wayne
Curly Surmudgeon
>>> There's nothing inherently evil about government charity.
>>
>>Everything about the government taking over charity is evil.
>
> You're a blithering idiot spouting your ill-considered "beliefs". That
> makes you as bad as any religious fanatic.
>
>> Don't
>>make me say that again.
>
> Nobody can or should stop you. Some people like Huntress think that it's
> worth trying to talk some sense into you, but all I see is a punching
> bag when I occasionally read your posts.
Or most people who simply kill file the cockroach. That drives it nuts
and into a flurry of aliases to escape. Watching it's little head
explode is better than watching Jackass...
Did you know that a cockroach can live a month without a head?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beats the Rose Parade: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVjBdnyiy-M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HH&C
> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:08:43 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>
>
>
>
>
Wayne, your biggest problem with me seems to be that I haven't been
indocrinated in nor do I embrace socialist ideas. Sorry.
wmbjk...@citlink.net
<almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Wayne, your biggest problem with me seems to be that I haven't been
>indocrinated in nor do I embrace socialist ideas. Sorry.
You're every bit as indoctrinated as all the other crackpots - blind
to reality and eager to rationalize stupidity with ever more
stupidity. Look at what you got into this thread to say - that a
career of deadbeatitis equals survivalism. And you defended that by
claiming that all of your positions are "correct". You're not a whit
different from a patient at a mental institution asserting that he's
qualified for release.
Wayne
Dan
> This NC Democrat State Senator is a die-hard anti-gunner. He has voted
> for every anti gun bill that has crossed his desk, but when someone
> invaded his house, he picked up a gun for self defense.
All zero of them...
> Hypocrites!
You sure are.
Dan
Dan
> Hmmmm? Anti-gun and gay. How predictable.
Hmmmm? Stupid and illiterate. How predictable.
Dan
Cliff
wrote:
>Isn't it funny this sort of news usually doesn't get on the "main
>media"? A while back Carl Rowan, a writer turned congressman and a
>vocal anti-gun guy shot an intruder in his D.C. home.
"columnist Carl Rowan dies at age 75', CNN, 23 September 2000"
Cliff
<almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 11, 11:32�am, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:41:59 -0700, Gunner Asch
>>
>> <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>> >It appears that once again, what's good for the goose is not necessarily
>> >good for the gander
>>
>> The mind boggles. Supreme hypocrite gummer, who rails against
>> socialism day-in and day-out while he and his family accept more
>> handouts than an entire apartment house full of lesser deadbeats, is
>> now accusing somebody else of hypocrisy?! And how the heck did he
>> decide whether to post the article as a home defense anecdote, or as a
>> hypocritical indictment of hypocrisy anyway? Apparently he hates
>> "dems" more than he loves guns. �LOL
>>
>> Wayne
>
>A person would be stupid to not accept the handousts
And loving them. He told others to beg at churches & etc.
>if they needed
>them, especially if it not taking it meant dying, even if it conflicts
>with their values.
WHAT "values"?
>That is what is so evil about the government taking on the role of day
>to day charities.
>
>My boss who is ALL ABOUT personal responsibility was the first in line
>to get cash for clunkers. Go figure?
Did gummer get rid of his? Did jb?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>Gummer has no values. He only says that he does. The issue at hand has
>nothing to do with anyone being stupid to refuse handouts, but
>everything to do with a handful of readers being stupid enough to
>believe a word he says. In fact, the word stupid doesn't quite cut it.
>For example, he sits at his keyboard, frequently cranking out hundreds
>of posts per day, many of them claiming that he's a hard worker.
I gather he sometimes takes the money in advance but leaves
the work unfinished.
--
Cliff
Cliff
> or even stopping his self-destructive Usenet addiction
After all, it's not as if he has a business, a business plan,
a job or any intent of getting any.
But he has plenty of funds for guns, ammo & toys.
Just not taxes or health care or ....
Plus all the big bucks he rakes in as a PE, right?
--
Cliff
Cliff
<almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Everything about the government taking over charity is evil.
What part of social insurance seems unclear?
Governments should help their people, not just
enrich a few special interests that paid rethugs
(and for lots of BS & winger lies).
--
Cliff
Cliff
<almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Scuse me, but my "whacked" positions are correct.
So say all the best nutcases.
"Now, get you butt over to Youtube and watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ery7RZ4tZ2Y."
--
Cliff
HH&C
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:37:17 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>
> >Wayne, your biggest problem with me seems to be that I haven't been
> >indocrinated in nor do I embrace socialist ideas. Sorry.
>
> You're every bit as indoctrinated
Perhaps. My indoctrination included pointing a weapon at the enemies
of my nation. Mostly socialist, communist, and fascist nations.
Thanks for asking.
Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
So, does that include assassinating domestic enemies of the Constitution?
Thanks,
Rich
wmbjk...@citlink.net
<almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 13, 11:02�am, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:37:17 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>>
>> <almostcutmyhairto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> >Wayne, your biggest problem with me seems to be that I haven't been
>> >indocrinated in nor do I embrace socialist ideas. �Sorry.
>>
>> You're every bit as indoctrinated
>
>Perhaps.
There's no "perhaps" about it. You have an aversion to reality.
>My indoctrination included pointing a weapon at the enemies
>of my nation.
They didn't force you to be an idiot. You were either born as one or
sought it out. Either way, reveling in it elevates you to deluded
crackpot.
> Mostly socialist
On the front lines at a tea party one presumes, fighting against
Social Security and Medicare. LOL
>, communist, and fascist nations.
You sound exactly like windbag gummer, and just as (in)credible. No
wonder your double standards extend to making excuses for him.
Wayne
Edward A. Falk
Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>
>?
>Isn't it funny this sort of news usually doesn't get on the "main
Oh, I remember that incident. He shot a tresspasser who snuck in to
use his swimming pool IIRC. Total hypocrite. I thought that the judge
should have read his column, and given him the maximum sentence that
he himself had advocated.
It happened 21 years ago. You really dug that far back?
--
-Ed Falk, fa...@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/
HH&C
Assassination? You have the military confused with the CIA.
We were never trained in that, and I think Posse Comitatus warns
against it.
HH&C
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:39:01 -0700, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
I was.
> He may have
> pointed a weapon, but I seriously doubt that he has ever actually
> killed anyone.
I guess pointing it was enough.
Bob, what were your dates of service again?
Strabo
> In article <ghd3d5pppc7j0asb1...@4ax.com>,
> Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>> ?
>> Isn't it funny this sort of news usually doesn't get on the "main
>> media"? A while back Carl Rowan, ...
>
> Oh, I remember that incident. He shot a tresspasser who snuck in to
> use his swimming pool IIRC. Total hypocrite. I thought that the judge
> should have read his column, and given him the maximum sentence that
> he himself had advocated.
>
> It happened 21 years ago. You really dug that far back?
>
Hypocrisies are timeless.
Edward A. Falk
Strabo <str...@flashlight.net> wrote:
>Edward A. Falk wrote:
>>
>> It happened 21 years ago. You really dug that far back?
>>
>
>Hypocrisies are timeless.
He died nine years ago. I wouldn't really call that timeless.
Henry
> This NC Democrat State Senator is a die-hard anti-gunner. He has voted
> for every anti gun bill that has crossed his desk, but when someone
> invaded his house, he picked up a gun for self defense.
> Hypocrites!
Did he vote against the right of law abiding citizens to
own guns, or for measures to help keep them out of the
hands of people who are unfit to own them?
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org
Cliff
So gummer is lying yet again?
>
>We were never trained in that, and I think Posse Comitatus warns
>against it.
??
Does SuerShot still have his death squads running?
--
Cliff
Cliff
wrote:
>In article <ghd3d5pppc7j0asb1...@4ax.com>,
>Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>>
>>?
>>Isn't it funny this sort of news usually doesn't get on the "main
>>media"? A while back Carl Rowan, ...
>
>Oh, I remember that incident. He shot a tresspasser who snuck in to
>use his swimming pool IIRC. Total hypocrite. I thought that the judge
>should have read his column, and given him the maximum sentence that
>he himself had advocated.
Probably. Shooting a trespasser using his pool ???
But perhaps a bit senile by then too.
And 'twas his daughter's gun IIRC. Raises some
questions ...
>
>It happened 21 years ago. You really dug that far back?
gummer "thought" it was NEWS.
--
Cliff
Cliff
>On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:41:59 -0700, Gunner Asch
><gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>?
>>Isn't it funny this sort of news usually doesn't get on the "main
>>media"? A while back Carl Rowan, a writer turned congressman and a
>>vocal anti-gun guy shot an intruder in his D.C. home. I wonder if
>>anyone ever thinks to ask if the guns were registered. Oh, to be among
>>the "elite"! Dick
>>
>>Democratic Anti-Gun Senator Shoots Intruder
>
>I have to recall the lovely Jane Fonda popped a few shots off at an
>intruder with the handgun she kept in her night stand.
Was it an anti-aircraft gun?
>Too bad she
>was also anti-gun and assured all us great unwashed they are bad and
>no one needs one. I wonder why she didn't just call the cops and
>wait?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:32:20 -0700, wmbjk...@citlink.net wrote:
>>On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:41:59 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:
>
>>>It appears that once again, what's good for the goose is not necessarily
>>>good for the gander
>>
>>The mind boggles. Supreme hypocrite gummer, who rails against
>>socialism day-in and day-out
>
>What's socialism have to do with self defense? Other than socialists
>don't want us to have any.
When were you last attacked by a socialist?
>
>>while he and his family accept more
>>handouts than an entire apartment house full of lesser deadbeats, is
>>now accusing somebody else of hypocrisy?! And how the heck did he
>>decide whether to post the article as a home defense anecdote,
>
>Ahh, because it IS about home defense.
POOL defense !!!
>
>>or as a
>>hypocritical indictment of hypocrisy anyway? Apparently he hates
>>"dems" more than he loves guns. LOL
>>
>>Wayne
>
>Apparently you love your socialist principles more than you love your
>life. Oh, well. Your call.
You helping gummer to make death threats?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>Gunner Asch wrote:
>
>> This NC Democrat State Senator is a die-hard anti-gunner. He has voted
>> for every anti gun bill that has crossed his desk, but when someone
>> invaded his house,
Nobody invaded his house.
You lie again.
As usual.
>>he picked up a gun for self defense.
>> Hypocrites!
>
> Did he vote against the right of law abiding citizens to
>own guns, or for measures to help keep them out of the
>hands of people who are unfit to own them?
--
Cliff
HH&C
Hey, Bob, I asked you a question.
HH&C
wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:20:23 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>
>
>
>
>
> <almostcutmyhairto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 13, 7:39 pm, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
> ><freedom_...@example.net> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:54:06 -0700, HH&C wrote:
> >> > On Oct 13, 11:02 am, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:37:17 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>
> >> >> <almostcutmyhairto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >Wayne, your biggest problem with me seems to be that I haven't been
> >> >> >indocrinated in nor do I embrace socialist ideas. Sorry.
>
> >> >> You're every bit as indoctrinated
>
> >> > Perhaps. My indoctrination included pointing a weapon at the enemies of
> >> > my nation. Mostly socialist, communist, and fascist nations.
>
> >> > Thanks for asking.
>
> >> So, does that include assassinating domestic enemies of the Constitution?
>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rich
>
> >Assassination? You have the military confused with the CIA.
>
> So gummer is lying yet again?
Dunno. Or you could be lying again.
> >We were never trained in that, and I think Posse Comitatus warns
> >against it.
>
> ??
> Does SuerShot still have his death squads running?
> --
> Cliff
Do you ever post anything legitimate?
HH&C
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:54:06 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>
Wayne, were you born stupid or were you dropped on your head as an
adult?
Doesn't really matter... you're stupid either way.
Observer
<almostcutm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 14, 2:25 pm, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:20:23 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <almostcutmyhairto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 13, 7:39 pm, Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
>> ><freedom_...@example.net> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:54:06 -0700, HH&C wrote:
>> >> > On Oct 13, 11:02 am, wmbjkREM...@citlink.net wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:37:17 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
>>
>> >> >> <almostcutmyhairto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >Wayne, your biggest problem with me seems to be that I haven't been
>> >> >> >indocrinated in nor do I embrace socialist ideas. Sorry.
>>
>> >> >> You're every bit as indoctrinated
>>
>> >> > Perhaps. My indoctrination included pointing a weapon at the enemies of
>> >> > my nation. Mostly socialist, communist, and fascist nations.
>>
>> >> > Thanks for asking.
>>
>> >> So, does that include assassinating domestic enemies of the Constitution?
>>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Rich
>>
>> >Assassination? You have the military confused with the CIA.
>>
>> So gummer is lying yet again?
>
>Dunno. Or you could be lying again.
Dunno... Gunner lying *OR* anyone else on earth lying. I'd have to
assume Gunner to be the liar. Unless of course, the alternatives were
Cheese-Bob, Tool, Klinton, Bush... Then it'd be tougher to determine.
>> >We were never trained in that, and I think Posse Comitatus warns
>> >against it.
>>
>> ??
>> Does SuerShot still have his death squads running?
>> --
>> Cliff
>
>Do you ever post anything legitimate?
Too funny, Tool
__
The last official act of any government is the looting of the nation.
HH&C
Wrong again. The choices presented are Gunner lying or Cliffie lying.
I'll give you one more try.