Re: {BS} Sarah Palin has her notes in her palm again
Aratzio
"Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2@lycos,com> Top Posting Fuck Stool:
>BO is still pissed that she has more executive experience than him and the
>VP combined. From what he has been doing thus far, is simply proving that
>he is our of his league when it comes to foreign relations. LOL
So, the socialist governor of a state with 700,000 people has
*executive* experience. What specific advantage does quitting 2 years
into a single term of the smallest population state give one over a
Senator that has spent 20+ years on the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee.
For example you ignorant stump:
During his first decade in the Senate, Biden focused on arms control
issues. In response to the refusal of the U.S. Congress to ratify the
SALT II Treaty signed in 1979 by Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and
President Jimmy Carter, Biden took the initiative to meet the Soviet
Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko, educated him about American concerns
and interests, and secured several changes to address objections of
the Foreign Relations Committee. When the Reagan administration
wanted to interpret the 1972 SALT I Treaty loosely in order to allow
the Strategic Defense Initiative to proceed, Biden argued for strict
adherence to the treaty's terms Biden clashed again with the Reagan
administration in 1986 over economic sanctions against South Africa,
leading to a heated exchange between the senator and Secretary of
State George P. Shultz.
Maybe you can explain travelling to multiple former soviet countries
to gather information on Conventional and WMD:
No complaints if I use the website of a sitting Republican Senator to
support my statement of fact?
http://lugar.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=278019
"Lugar and Obama traveled together to Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan
in August 2005 to oversee a number of Nunn-Lugar projects. Obama and
Lugar introduced the legislation in November 2005. "
Palin has barely travelled outside of the USA. Let alone met with
world leaders to NEGOTIATE Arms Control as both Biden and Obama have
done.
Palin has quit each and every job she ever had. Especially when it got
to the point she was going to have to actually work.
As for socialism:
So, what do you call taxing corporations on their earnings with a
special tax and then giving the money away to the people who did not
work for that money?
Does living in a form fitting, head to toe asbestos suit protect you
from reality?
--
Hachiroku explaining his *daddy* issues:
Message-ID: <homalb$usi$2...@news.eternal-september.org>
I just keep seeing a pudgy 50 year old with his nethers rattling against
his knees...
Chief Egalitarian
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1nnvr5llkau82dom0...@4ax.com...
> I'm just choking my chicken
He's dead, Jim.
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, "Chief Egalitarian"
<Egal@legal_egal.law> got double secret probation for writing:
So you got spanked, ran away and came back poast-editting.
How inventive.
Poik
news:1nnvr5llkau82dom0...@4ax.com:
Fuck Ratz, do you always have to keep stabbing them? He was dead after
the first blow.Anything after that is just sadistic. You cannot blame
them for hiding from reality. Black people scare them. Now there is one
on their intergalactic communion device every night talking all calm and
reasonable and it just fucks up their minds.
Cliff
>Palin has quit each and every job she ever had.
All of which have been off the public trough.
She could not get a job writing about basketball (what she was
"educated" to do) it seems.
Probably cannot write anyway, except on her hands (cheating
on tests I expect).
--
Cliff
Cliff
>Palin has quit each and every job she ever had.
All of which have been off the public trough.
spooge
privat.org:
You're probably too ignorant to know that what you've done with your snip
and run is the Usenet equivilent of flying a white flag while begging for
forgiveness for having had your ass handed to you on a platter.
Congratulations, you are the spankee of the month.
--
I'm a romantic adventure
And I'm a reptile, too
Cliff
>"Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> wrote in news:4bbfe64a@news.x-
>privat.org:
>
>>
>>
>> "Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1nnvr5llkau82dom0...@4ax.com...
>>> I'm just choking my chicken
>>
>> He's dead, Jim.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQwHwP0ojI
Chief Egalitarian (& other wingers): "Worse than dead ..."
>
>You're probably too ignorant to know that what you've done with your snip
>and run is the Usenet equivilent of flying a white flag while begging for
>forgiveness for having had your ass handed to you on a platter.
>
>Congratulations, you are the spankee of the month.
--
Cliff
Aratzio
<na...@narfpoik.pinky> got double secret probation for writing:
I dunno, I think the black thing is a bit overdone. Pretty sure those
are probably only semi-racist morons not full on racist scumbag
morons.
But then again...
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS>
got double secret probation for writing:
>On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:13:34 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>But at least she can speak without a teleprompter giving her every word.
>>
>> You poor sad fuckwit. Do you imagine that having to give literally
>> hundreds of speeches a year that you could keep each and every speech in
>> your head?
>
>I could probably speak to 6th graders without one.
Too bad that was used for the prepared statement to reporters about
"Race ToThe Top". As reported by the people there.
Do you have anything that is based upon fact and not based upon
hysterical lies? I think it was said, "you need to be lied too"
>
>>Seriously, name a president since the invention of the teleprompter
>>that did not use a teleprompter.
Hrmm, no response.
>>
>>Go ahead explain how using a teleprompter is indicative of anything
>>other than a desire for accuracy.
Hrmm, no response.
>>
>>Explain why the republicans have been using them the last few days in
>>New Orleans.
Hrmm, No response.
>>
>>Now, once you have all your stupid in line, explain the 17 minutes off
>>the cuff answer given in Virginia the other day. You know the same
>>answer you halfwit wingnuts thinks was too long. Do you think that was
>>on a teleprompter?
Hrmm, No response.
>>
>>How about when he was at the Republican House retreat and kicked their
>>asses, verbally. Nope, no teleprompter.
Hrmm, no response.
>>
>>Maybe the debates with McCain. Nope, none there either.
hrmm, no response.
>>
>>Are you really so stupid that you imagine that spewing some moronic
>>talking point that is so easily refuted with such obvious facts makes
>>you look like you have actually paid any attention to anything other
>>than Rush Limbaugh or Drudge?
How did that work out for you, coward?
>>
>>Explain how having the most BASIC information "cut taxes" is
>>indicative of intelligence.
Hands good, teleprompter bad.
>>
>>>
>>>She blasted Obungler for telling our enemies if they attack us we won't
>>>use nukes against them.
>>
>>Not even close. The statement is that if we are attacked by a
>>signatory of the non proliferation treaty will not use nukes in
>>response to a non-nuclear attack. Proportioned response. Exactly the
>>concept espoused by Reagan. The same Ronald Reagan that desired the
>>elimination of ALL nuclear weapons in the world.
Yeah, I knew you would snip that. Can't have actual facts involved
when discussing the grifter.
>>
>>Anyone with even an iota of sense knows that our conventional forces,
>>with few exceptions, can lay waste to a government so stupid as to
>>have attacked us directly. As do the counties that would attack us.
>>The most likely threat is terrorists, I suppose you would nuke some
>>country because a terrorist came from their country?
Why do you hate our military?
>>
>>The idea of using nukes against an innocent civilian society because
>>of the actions of a handful of government employees is criminal.
>>Targeted response that eliminates the threat is the method that is
>>accepted by the Military and the SecDef. I suppose you, like the
>>quitter, know more about military response that they do.
So, are you and Palin smarter and better educated than the SecDef &
The Joint Chiefs about Nuclear Policy?
>>
>>I'll make a bet you never actually served, did you.
So, did you serve?
>>
>>You would believe like Bachmann that a cyber attack is also reason for
>>use of nukes too?
Cyber Attack is reason for nuke?
>>
>>Maybe you should actually study the issues rather than repeat blindly
>>the mouthings of halfwits that are smarter than you.
Too much work to actually know anything, you would rather live in a
cacoon of lies and pretend that the black guy is stupid and you "iz
smard".
>>
>>>
>>>He said she was drawing on her vast wealth of information on nuclear
>>>weapons.
>>
>>Specifically, what is her *qualification*?
Well?
>>
>>>
>>>What an empty suit. He's in way over his head.
>>
>>Yeah, 2006 and those trips he and Sen. Lugar took to Russian, Ukraine
>>and various *stans* to gather the information for the Lugar-Obama Act
>>in 2006 which built upon the Lugar-Nunn act of 1992.
Don't you hate when Republican Senators agree with the President and
make you look like an idiot?
>>
>>What part of it being the single biggest issue upon which he worked
>>during his time in the Senate that you fail to understand?
I am guessing, everything.
>>
>>May, 2006:
>>"The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is the number one
>>national security threat that confronts the United States today,"
>>Obama said. Under Senator Lugar’s leadership, the Nunn-Lugar program
>>has safely disposed of literally thousands of weapons of mass
>>destruction which, had they fallen into the wrong hands, could have
>>been used against America with catastrophic results. The Lugar-Obama
>>bill will build on this success by helping other nations find and
>>eliminate conventional weapons that have been used against our own
>>soldiers in Iraq and sought by terrorists all over the world.
"DAMN THISE FACTS!"
>>
>>>
>>>THREE MORE YEARS! THREE MORE YEARS!
>>>
>>
>>Then you can vote for someone that has to write her basic talking
>>points on her hand.
Aratzio
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS>
got double secret probation for writing:
>On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:13:34 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>She blasted Obungler for telling our enemies if they attack us we won't
>>>use nukes against them.
>>
>> Not even close. The statement is that if we are attacked by a signatory of
>> the non proliferation treaty will not use nukes in response to a
>> non-nuclear attack. Proportioned response. Exactly the concept espoused by
>> Reagan. The same Ronald Reagan that desired the elimination of ALL nuclear
>> weapons in the world.
>
>Is your comprehension that bad? It amounts to the same thing, doesn't it?
>
>However, you don't TELL your adversaries what you're going to do, genius.
>It should have been kept internal.
The NPR is a document REQUIRED by law and must be made public, you
moron.
You believe that someone will attack us simply because rather than
nuking them we will lay waste to them with conventional weapons.
Your opinion is that our conventional forces are incompetent and the
SecDef & the Joint Chiefs are ignorant tools. That the only viable
deterrent is to kill indiscriminately just like terrorists.
Why do you hate America and our freedoms.
>
>If you were a rogue state planning an attack on the US using biological
>weapons, and the leader of the country said, "We won't wipe you off the
>face of the planet if you use biological weapons against us." it kind of
>opens new doors to you, doesn't it?
Seriously, do you know how stupid that statement is? The idea that
they would only fear a nuclear response is ridiculous.
>Now, instead of dreading a nuclear
>attack as retaliation, you now know you can draw the US into what could be
>a long, protracted conventional war, further drawing down the resources of
>the United States, and possibly bringing in your allies, or even youe
>enemies who also hate the US (the enemy of my enemy; remeber Iraq/Iran?)
Well, there you go, if you are going to kill 100s of thousands of
innocent civilians it is better to do it in bulk than piecemeal.
So you believe we should have nuked Iraq?
Oh, the statement that was made about rogue states, you ill informed
retard:
Obama:
" First, the United States will continue to hold accountable any
state, terrorist group or other non-state actor that supports or
enables terrorist efforts to obtain or use weapons of mass
destruction, whether by facilitating, financing, or providing
expertise or safe haven for such efforts. "
SecDef Gates:
So if there is a message for Iran and North Korea here, it is that if
you're going to play by the rules, if you're going to join the
international community, then we will undertake certain obligations to
you, and that's covered in the NPR. But if you're not going to play by
the rules, if you're going to be a proliferation, then all options are
on the table in terms of how we deal with you.
Yeah, that is such a bitch that your whole argument is refuted in the
original statement.
>
>Obama was an idiot for bringing this out in the open, and you're as much
>of an idiot for not recognizing it. Obama should have kept his mouth shut,
>and you should have, too. Now we know how little thought you actually put
>into things you say.
>
So you have not the single clue and all your information came from
either ignorant and uninformed or liars on Fox.
http://www.defense.gov/npr/
:The Nuclear Posture Review is a legislatively-mandated review that
:establishes U.S. nuclear policy, strategy, capabilities and force posture
: for the next five to ten years.
"Legislatively-mandated" You do know what that means?
Read the transcript:
http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4599
When you are done, ask yourself why the people you trust knew you
would not read the transcript and that they could lie to you with
impunity.
Fox news has a lot of respect for your intelligence.
Chief Egalitarian
"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
news:4ub0s55d00ngnppu2...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 06:45:01 +0000 (UTC), spooge <spo...@databasix.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> wrote in news:4bbfe64a@news.x-
>>privat.org:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1nnvr5llkau82dom0...@4ax.com...
>>>> I'm just choking my chicken
>>>
>>> He's dead, Jim.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQwHwP0ojI
> Chief Egalitarian (& other wingers): "Worse than dead ..."
Cliff confirms firsthand knowledge that Aratzio choked his chicken to death.
CNN would be proud.
Cliff
>>>>She blasted Obungler for telling our enemies if they attack us we won't
>>>>use nukes against them.
>>>
>>> Not even close. The statement is that if we are attacked by a signatory of
>>> the non proliferation treaty will not use nukes in response to a
>>> non-nuclear attack. Proportioned response. Exactly the concept espoused by
>>> Reagan. The same Ronald Reagan that desired the elimination of ALL nuclear
>>> weapons in the world.
>>
>>Is your comprehension that bad? It amounts to the same thing, doesn't it?
>>
>>However, you don't TELL your adversaries what you're going to do, genius.
>>It should have been kept internal.
>
>The NPR is a document REQUIRED by law and must be made public, you
>moron.
>
>You believe that someone will attack us simply because rather than
>nuking them we will lay waste to them with conventional weapons.
>
>Your opinion is that our conventional forces are incompetent and the
>SecDef & the Joint Chiefs are ignorant tools. That the only viable
>deterrent is to kill indiscriminately just like terrorists.
>
>Why do you hate America and our freedoms.
And the rethugs & neocons imposed socialist universal healthcare on Iraq
at gunpoint .....
If it's good enough for Palin & her family ....
BTW, Karl Malden was "actor in residence" at Kalamazoo College ...
http://dspace.nitle.org/handle/10090/9710
http://dspace.nitle.org/handle/10090/9651
--
Cliff
Cliff
wrote:
>
>
>"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>news:4ub0s55d00ngnppu2...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 06:45:01 +0000 (UTC), spooge <spo...@databasix.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> wrote in news:4bbfe64a@news.x-
>>>privat.org:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1nnvr5llkau82dom0...@4ax.com...
>>>>> I'm just choking my chicken
>>>>
>>>> He's dead, Jim.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJQwHwP0ojI
>> Chief Egalitarian (& other wingers): "Worse than dead ..."
>
>
>Cliff confirms firsthand knowledge that Aratzio choked his chicken to death.
>CNN would be proud.
Why would winger media care about your lack of brains & sense?
--
Cliff
Chief Egalitarian
"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
news:fsh3s5hcqjoe8hiob...@4ax.com...
What? nStill haven't found your brain yet? Did you try looking up your
asshole?
Aratzio
"Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> got double secret probation
for writing:
>
>
It is called English. If you had graduated 3rd grade it would have
made sense.
>nStill haven't found your brain yet? Did you try looking up your
>asshole?
Wingnuts and their affection for everything anal.
Chief Egalitarian
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:1v14s550gfnlrn586...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:31:54 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> It is called English. If you had graduated 3rd grade it would have
> made sense.
How did your palm get so hairy? Nevermind. I'd rather not know.
Aratzio
"Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> got double secret probation
for writing:
>
>
Have you thought about having that cognitive dissonance checked out?
Sharx35
"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
news:srf3s5dmtc65ndonh...@4ax.com...
Betcha YOU dream about having YOUR dick in Palin's palm!
Aratzio
"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
>Betcha YOU dream about having YOUR dick in Palin's palm!
And the typical right wing projection.
So you think that having a woman fondle your dick to be a negative or
a positive.
Chief Egalitarian
"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4hpwn.1327$z%6.132@edtnps83...
Cliff's the dickless wonder.
Aratzio
"Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> got double secret probation
for writing:
>
>
>"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4hpwn.1327$z%6.132@edtnps83...
>>
>>
>>
>> Betcha YOU dream about having YOUR dick in Palin's palm!
>>
>>
>
>Cliff's the dickless wonder.
Anyone wish to guess to which political party those two belong?
See .sig for another shining example.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
Mor(m)ons will believe most anything. After all, they believed Bush,
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Ashcroft, Blair, Gonzalez, Pearl, Libby,
Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, Coulter, Weiner(Savage), Fleischer, Snow, Palin
and men in dresses.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dante's 9th Circle: http://tinyurl.com/573eq
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shall not be infringed
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:03:39 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 10 Apr 2010 05:07:23 GMT, in the land of alt.autos.toyota, Poik
>
> >>Aratzio <a6ahly...@sneakemail.com> wrote in
The groups most ardent homosexual supporter now has a problem with men
in dresses. Go figure.
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dante's 9th Circle:http://tinyurl.com/573eq
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Lookout
Ed Huntress
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:qvj6s5tu4k1stqs96...@4ax.com...
> Maybe if she wrote them on her tits I'd pay more attention to her.
Don't defile those tits! They're the best thing the Republicans have going
for them. Well, that and her ass.
--
Ed Huntress
Sharx35
"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:n3n4s551dbfa40r1h...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:45:45 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
> "Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> got double secret probation
> for writing:
>
>>
>>
>>"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:4hpwn.1327$z%6.132@edtnps83...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Betcha YOU dream about having YOUR dick in Palin's palm!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Cliff's the dickless wonder.
>
> Anyone wish to guess to which political party those two belong?
Probably the DEMONrats/DUMBocrats.
Lookout
HAHAHAHA
Shall not be infringed
> Maybe if she wrote them on her tits I'd pay more attention to her.
You should suggest Tina Fey do such a parody.
Then people will think Palin actually did it and start paying
attention to her.
Shall not be infringed
> "Lookout" <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Nice legs, too. MmMmmmm.
Ed Huntress
"Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a036457d-5c2d-4d71...@u21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>Nice legs, too. MmMmmmm.
What more could a redneck want? Hell, she'll get 30% of the vote on T&A and
legs alone. If she ever says anything that makes some sense, who knows?
Maybe 32%.
--
Ed Huntress
Lookout
AHAHAHHA They ya go!
Lookout
Oh ya. As a married man all I can do is look.
Lookout
Wow..tough question
>Maybe 32%.
Ok..I'll go with that. But..you have to take in consideration those
who back her wouldn't know a good idea if it hit them in the balls.
Chief Egalitarian
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:h8b7s5h2bk64e9ml2...@4ax.com...
Doesn't your husband get jealous when you do?
Aratzio
"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
>
>
>"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>news:n3n4s551dbfa40r1h...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:45:45 -0500, in the land of alt.autos.toyota,
>> "Chief Egalitarian" <Egal@legal_egal.law> got double secret probation
>> for writing:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4hpwn.1327$z%6.132@edtnps83...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Betcha YOU dream about having YOUR dick in Palin's palm!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Cliff's the dickless wonder.
>>
>> Anyone wish to guess to which political party those two belong?
>
<Typical Wingnut AUTOFLAME>
>Probably the DEMONrats/DUMBocrats.
>
You do understand you were one of "those"
Gawd save this country from the illiterate morons.
Cliff
>>nStill haven't found your brain yet? Did you try looking up your
>>asshole?
>
>Wingnuts and their affection for everything anal.
A lack of proper potty training & personal hygiene.
Takes too many brains to use TP or soap or toothpaste.
--
Cliff
Cliff
Cliff
wrote:
>Cliff's the dickless wonder.
Lie, run & hide.
--
Cliff
Chief Egalitarian
"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
news:jtb8s5d6ln688q696...@4ax.com...
Can't say I blame you. It must have been traumatizing.
Cliff
wrote:
>
>
>"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>news:jtb8s5d6ln688q696...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:45:45 -0500, "Chief Egalitarian"
>> <Egal@legal_egal.law>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Cliff's the dickless wonder.
>>
>> Lie, run & hide.
>
>Can't say I blame you. It must have been traumatizing.
Your lies always show, they are so simple.
Get them from Rush & Faux, do you?
--
Cliff
Shall not be infringed
> "Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:a036457d-5c2d-4d71...@u21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 12, 12:58 pm, "Ed Huntress" <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > "Lookout" <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:qvj6s5tu4k1stqs96...@4ax.com...
>
> > > Maybe if she wrote them on her tits I'd pay more attention to her.
>
> > Don't defile those tits! They're the best thing the Republicans have going
> > for them. Well, that and her ass.
>
> > --
> > Ed Huntress
> >Nice legs, too. MmMmmmm.
>
> What more could a redneck want? Hell, she'll get 30% of the vote on T&A and
> legs alone. If she ever says anything that makes some sense, who knows?
> Maybe 32%.
So for a person so unlikely to win, shouldn't the press just sit back
and be quiet and hope she gets the republican nomination?
But they're not doing that, are they?
I think they're scared shitless that she'll topple 0bama.
> --
> Ed Huntress
Shall not be infringed
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:59:41 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:a036457d-5c2d-4d71...@u21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> >On Apr 12, 12:58 pm, "Ed Huntress" <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >> "Lookout" <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:qvj6s5tu4k1stqs96...@4ax.com...
>
> >> > Maybe if she wrote them on her tits I'd pay more attention to her.
>
> >> Don't defile those tits! They're the best thing the Republicans have going
> >> for them. Well, that and her ass.
>
> >> --
> >> Ed Huntress
>
> >>Nice legs, too. MmMmmmm.
>
> >What more could a redneck want? Hell, she'll get 30% of the vote on T&A and
> >legs alone. If she ever says anything that makes some sense, who knows?
>
> Wow..tough question
>
> >Maybe 32%.
>
> Ok..I'll go with that. But..you have to take in consideration those
> who back her wouldn't know a good idea if it hit them in the balls.
You're being unrealistic. No good idea ever hit anyone in the balls,
Mr Masochist.
Gunner Asch
Indeed they are.
<VBG>
Gunner
>
>> --
>> Ed Huntress
Ed Huntress
Sarah is the most entertaining thing going on in the Tea Party. Run a story
on her, and you get both her supporters and her detractors to read. It's
like having a new story on Tiger Woods nearly every day.
>
>I think they're scared shitless that she'll topple 0bama.
The fact that you think that is entertaining, too. d8-)
--
Ed Huntress
Shall not be infringed
> "Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:f3d6a324-d3f0-4701...@u21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
Keep detracting from her. It says a lot about you.
Ed Huntress
And supporting her for high office, or even for being a spokesperson for
anyone brighter than the all-purpose malcontents, says a lot more about you.
You and your compadres are as much the story as she is.
--
Ed Huntress
Lookout
She's LOSING in her own party and she's been running longer than any
of them.
>
>
>> --
>> Ed Huntress
Lookout
wrote:
She's LOSING in her own party, dip shit.
The best she's done is TIED for 3rd.
Lookout
True. The proverbial train wreck.
>
>>
>>I think they're scared shitless that she'll topple 0bama.
>
>The fact that you think that is entertaining, too. d8-)
She's LOSING in her own party straw polls. As of right now she can't
even get the nomination.
Jeff M
[snip]
> She's LOSING in her own party straw polls. As of right now she can't
> even get the nomination.
Ms. Palin demonstrably isn't interested in serving in elected office.
The work is too hard and the pay is too low. She's made $12M since
quitting her governor job, for not much real work.
Lookout
wrote:
Her problem is her 15 minutes ends if she doesn't run. Once she says
"no thanks" then the ones running take over the focus and she fades
into the sunset.
Gunner Asch
Which really pisses off you Leftists doesnt it? When she was
Governor...you Leftards had put her in hock to several million dollars
trying to defend herself from bogus lawsuits.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/06/us/06palin.html
Legal Bills Swayed Palin, Official Says
By THE NEW YORK TIMES
Published: July 5, 2009
Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell of Alaska said Sunday that Gov. Sarah Palin�s
decision to resign was largely prompted by the personal legal costs of
the ethics investigations against her.
Ms. Palin announced on Friday that she would quit her job near the end
of the month and turn the reins of state government over to Mr. Parnell,
who like the governor is a Republican.
At the news conference, Ms. Palin cited numerous reasons for quitting,
including more than $500,000 in legal fees that she and her husband,
Todd, have incurred because of 15 ethics complaints filed against her
during her two and a half years as governor. She said all of the
complaints had been dismissed, but she still had to pay lawyers to
defend her.
Mr. Parnell said Ms. Palin called him into her office on Wednesday night
to tell him she was resigning.
�I think what I heard from the governor,� Mr. Parnell said on �Fox News
Sunday,� �really had to do with the weight on her, the concern she had
for the cost of all the ethics investigations and the like � the way
that that weighed on her with respect to her inability to just move
forward Alaska�s agenda on behalf of Alaskans in the current context of
the environment. So that�s what I saw.�
Mr. Parnell, who is scheduled to take over for Ms. Palin on July 26,
said it was costing the State of Alaska about $2 million just to pay for
the staff to deal with the records requests from the ethics complaints.
So now you guys cant sue her into oblivion...<VBG>..and she can ride
roughshod over your sorry asses.
<VBG>
You Leftards were never very smart...were you......
Gunner
Lookout
wrote:
>On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:57:19 -0500, Jeff M <nos...@nothanks.org> wrote:
>
>>Lookout wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>> > She's LOSING in her own party straw polls. As of right now she can't
>>> even get the nomination.
>>
>>Ms. Palin demonstrably isn't interested in serving in elected office.
>>The work is too hard and the pay is too low. She's made $12M since
>>quitting her governor job, for not much real work.
>
>Which really pisses off you Leftists doesnt it? When she was
>Governor...you Leftards had put her in hock to several million dollars
>trying to defend herself from bogus lawsuits.
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/06/us/06palin.html
She's still in hock, you idiot. She can be sued for up to 3 years
AFTER leaving office.
>
>
>Legal Bills Swayed Palin, Official Says
>
>
>By THE NEW YORK TIMES
>Published: July 5, 2009
>
>Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell of Alaska said Sunday that Gov. Sarah Palin’s
>decision to resign was largely prompted by the personal legal costs of
>the ethics investigations against her.
No facts to back it up. It's here say...worthless.
>
>Ms. Palin announced on Friday that she would quit her job near the end
>of the month and turn the reins of state government over to Mr. Parnell,
>who like the governor is a Republican.
Yup. She's a QUITTER
Chief Egalitarian
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fb3ks5ddelp7j73sq...@4ax.com...
> for the cost of all the ethics investigations and the like - the way
> that that weighed on her with respect to her inability to just move
> forward Alaska's agenda on behalf of Alaskans in the current context of
> the environment. So that's what I saw."
>
> Mr. Parnell, who is scheduled to take over for Ms. Palin on July 26,
> said it was costing the State of Alaska about $2 million just to pay for
> the staff to deal with the records requests from the ethics complaints.
>
> So now you guys cant sue her into oblivion...<VBG>..and she can ride
> roughshod over your sorry asses.
>
> <VBG>
>
> You Leftards were never very smart...were you......
>
They never were.
Cliff
Palin vs. the Three Stooges: The Stooges knew what they
were saying & doing.
Meanwhile the rethugs vs. the Keystone Cops ... Cops win every time.
--
Cliff
Cliff
wrote:
She could sell one colour of lipstick?
>You and your compadres are as much the story as she is.
But few would buy.
--
Cliff
Cliff
In the US stupid & no skills now pays.
--
Cliff
Shall not be infringed
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:20:33 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com>
Shhhh!
Shall not be infringed
> "Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:5733a491-bb72-4cd1...@r27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
I like her legs. Who said I supported her for high office?
Says a lot about you detracting from her and assuming that I support
her for president.
Shall not be infringed
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:48:05 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
As of right now, no one can. Thanks for stating the obvious, then
making it a slam on Palin.
Scared shitless is unattractive on you.
Shall not be infringed
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:39:35 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:57:19 -0500, Jeff M <nos...@nothanks.org> wrote:
>
> >>Lookout wrote:
>
> >>[snip]
>
> >> > She's LOSING in her own party straw polls. As of right now she can't
> >>> even get the nomination.
>
> >>Ms. Palin demonstrably isn't interested in serving in elected office.
> >>The work is too hard and the pay is too low. She's made $12M since
> >>quitting her governor job, for not much real work.
>
> >Which really pisses off you Leftists doesnt it? When she was
> >Governor...you Leftards had put her in hock to several million dollars
> >trying to defend herself from bogus lawsuits.
>
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/06/us/06palin.html
>
> She's still in hock, you idiot. She can be sued for up to 3 years
> AFTER leaving office.
You talk like one of those 25 attorneys that the DNC/Soros sent to
Alaska when Sarah burst on to the scene.
You have Sarah's collitch records. Let's see 0bama's.
Shall not be infringed
wrote:
You still get paid to spam this newsgroup, don't you?
Ed Huntress
>I like her legs.
So do I! There was a great photo of her when she was campaigning with
McCain, taken from about ankle height and looking all the way up. She was
wearing a skirt. I immediately fell in love with those legs.
Are there any good upskirt photos of her around the Web?
> Who said I supported her for high office?
Well, now that you mention it, I don't think you did. You're a credit to
your species, then, Infringed.
>Says a lot about you detracting from her and assuming that I support
>her for president.
My apology for assuming I thought you supported her. You restore my faith in
humanity.
--
Ed Huntress
Lookout
What I said is fact.
>
>You have Sarah's collitch records. Let's see 0bama's.
I have no need to see them.
And they are NOT a requirement for the office.
End of problem.