Vast Antarctic iceberg
Cliff
"Vast Antarctic iceberg 'threat to marine life'"
<Video at link>
[
A vast iceberg that broke off eastern Antarctic earlier this month could disrupt
marine life in the region, scientists have warned.
They say the iceberg, which is 78km long and up to 39km wide, could make it
harder for the area's colonies of Emperor Penguins to find food.
But British and Australian scientists disagree on whether it could also cause
major problems to our own weather patterns.
Tom Symonds reports.
]
sparky
wrote:
Nothing will change. The same amount of ice is floating around today
as there was a month ago. It is just not attached to the shore now.
ed wolf
> On Feb 27, 12:23 am, Cliff wrote:
> > A vast iceberg that broke off eastern Antarctic earlier this month could disrupt
> > marine life in the region, scientists have warned.
> > But British and Australian scientists disagree on whether it could also cause
> > major problems to our own weather patterns.
>
>
> Nothing will change. The same amount of ice is floating around today
> as there was a month ago. It is just not attached to the shore now.
Sounds like a fair guess, but he logic behind it does not usually
apply in crafts and metalworking, though. Here the same amount
of parts, but one loose, can make a difference. : )
regards
ed
Shall not be infringed
wrote:
5 miles by 2.5 miles. Big deal.
Jeff R.
"Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f0ee5b0f-a96a-4600...@g26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> 5 miles by 2.5 miles. Big deal.
Wow!
A genuine order-of-magnitude stuffup.
Well done, Mr infringed.
--
Jeff R.
Shall not be infringed
> "Shall not be infringed" <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:f0ee5b0f-a96a-4600...@g26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 27, 12:23 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
> wrote:
>
> >> They say the iceberg, which is 78km long and up to 39km wide,
> > 5 miles by 2.5 miles. Big deal.
>
> Wow!
> A genuine order-of-magnitude stuffup.
> Well done, Mr infringed.
Ooops! Thank you Mr. R.
Its bigger than Guam and nobody cares about Guam or claims that it
changes global climate.
cavelamb
Actually it changes constantly.
It is not a frozen monolithic ice cube.
--
Richard Lamb
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb/
Cliff
Thank you for the advanced math work, Mr. Winger.
--
Cliff
Cliff
Nobody said it would AFAIK.
But it's loss might allow Antarctic glaciers to flow faster into the sea ....
and that might.
--
Cliff
Curly Surmudgeon
Remember when the cockroach claimed to have worked in science on a daily
basis? Same accuracy shown here...
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republicans: Party Without a Conscious
Democrats: Party Without a Spine
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
leona...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ø March is already spring time in the Southern
Hemisphere. You will see the 'berg melting
in an accelerated fashion.
ed wolf
wrote:
> Ø March is already spring time in the Southern
> Hemisphere.
???
ed
leona...@gmail.com
> On 1 Mrz., 19:17, "leonard7...@gmail.com" <leonard7...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
Ø March is already autumn in the Southern
Hemisphere.
>
> ???
> ed
ø Thank you, ed!!
ø The issue is really irrelevant.
Nobody can control the wind
Nobody can control the rain or snow
Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
Global temps are within natural variations
Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation
Get used to it!!
— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural causes
leona...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Mar 1, 8:01 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:17:37 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
> > <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >Its bigger than Guam and nobody cares about Guam or claims that it
> > >changes global climate.
>
> > Nobody said it would AFAIK.
> > But it's loss might allow Antarctic glaciers to flow faster into the sea ....
> > and that might.
>
Hemisphere. You will may see the 'berg
touching back at home
Shall not be infringed
wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2:27 pm, ed wolf <eduartw...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > On 1 Mrz., 19:17, "leonard7...@gmail.com" <leonard7...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> Ø March is already autumn in the Southern
> Hemisphere.
>
> > ???
> > ed
>
> ø Thank you, ed!!
>
> ø The issue is really irrelevant.
> Nobody can control the wind
> Nobody can control the rain or snow
> Nobody (collectively) can control climate.
> Global temps are within natural variations
> Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation
> Get used to it!!
We built shelter to protect ourselves from the weather... and
climate. You should see Al Gore's home!!!
Shall not be infringed
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 07:59:31 -0500, Cliff
>
>
>
>
>
> <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:42:49 -0800 (PST), Shall not be infringed
> > <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Feb 27, 12:23 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
> >>wrote:
> >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8539198.stm
> >>> "Vast Antarctic iceberg 'threat to marine life'" <Video at link>
> >>> [
> >>> A vast iceberg that broke off eastern Antarctic earlier this month
> >>> could disrupt marine life in the region, scientists have warned.
>
> >>> They say the iceberg, which is 78km long and up to 39km wide, could
> >>> make it harder for the area's colonies of Emperor Penguins to find
> >>> food.
>
> >>> But British and Australian scientists disagree on whether it could
> >>> also cause major problems to our own weather patterns.
>
> >>> Tom Symonds reports.
> >>> ]
>
> >>5 miles by 2.5 miles. Big deal.
>
> > Thank you for the advanced math work, Mr. Winger.
>
> Remember when the cockroach claimed to have worked in science on a daily
> basis? Same accuracy shown here...
I made a mistake. Then I did something the climate scientists
couldn't do... I admitted it.
That's the diff between a climate scientist and a meteorologist.
So what's your excuse, Alberto Cur-Lee?
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Republicans: Party Without a Conscious
> Democrats: Party Without a Spine
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
sparky
Who do you expect to believe this lie ?
The same people who believe the other lies you post ?
Cliff
Just because it's getting warmer due to man-made CO2 & Methane
is no reason to lie about it.
>That's the diff between a climate scientist and a meteorologist.
Someone on the tvee with a background in reading
weather reports from the real professionals & computers?
Usually with a degree in "communications" or similar?
>So what's your excuse, Alberto Cur-Lee?
Not being ignorant?
--
Cliff
Shall not be infringed
wrote:
CO2 is a dangerous pollutant. Drink flat beer and soda.
> >That's the diff between a climate scientist and a meteorologist.
>
> Someone on the tvee with a background in reading
> weather reports from the real professionals & computers?
Do you mean numerical models?
> Usually with a degree in "communications" or similar?
No. Twenty years military weather support, upper air and remote
sensing.
But thanks for trying.
> >So what's your excuse, Alberto Cur-Lee?
>
> Not being ignorant?
Ummm, Cliffie. Alberto Cur-Lee said the earth's climate is a
>>>CLOSED<<< Sytem.
He has yet to make a correction.
Do you agree with Alberto Lee Scurmudgeon that the earth's climate is
a closed system?
It's NOT a trick question.
Curly Surmudgeon
Am I still stalking the cockroach?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republicans: Party Without a Conscious
Democrats: Party Without a Spine
------------------------------------------------------------------------------