i BURST out laughing when i saw that on the news. was kinda cute though
huh?
b.w.
Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.
> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-hand/
> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And
> there
> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
> President.
> Wow...E
Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.
> Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.
Does Obama caress his legs and wink?
-Ramon
The body language does not lie. Check her out in the video.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2010/02/06/palin.tea.party.qa.cnn
Any psychologist will tell you that being questioned brought her back
to those tests in college. She resorted to the tricks that helped in
all the colleges from which she quit when the going got tough.
You can clearly see how she looks at the palm of her hand, looking for
the answers in a "cheating sheet" which in 2010 is not there. Still,
it is a comforting reflex.
What did she do if the professor noticed her cheating? Ah! Her
infallible defense, she turned on her sex appeal, bringing attention
to her legs.
Count how many times she caresses her lower extremities. After all,
why stop using the techniques which have never failed her?
-Ramon
> Liar, Obama is the one who demands
> pre-approved questions.
Fred, you do realize that your defense of Ms. Palin reflects on your
intelligence, correct?
It has been widely acknowledged -worldwide- that one of the main
factors in Obama's electoral victory was his superior debating and
oratory skills.
You obviously don't agree that for a person to "write" (yeah, right!)
a book it is a requirement that s/he must already read one?
When asked to mention one book or even magazine by Katie Couric, she
could not mention one.
But let's give her a break, maybe she was too nervous or taken by
surprise.
Let's give Sarah a year to review her performance at her most
notorious interview's and to recap something -anything!- that she has
read. Enters Oprah:
Oprah: "When Katie Couric inquired you read about your readings you
never answered... What books have you read? What magazine do you
follow?"
Ms. Palin: "I didn't answer because she was too pushy". (*)
The question remains unanswered. The mystery continues...
-Ramon
(*) started to wink, but then realized that Oprah doesn't go that way.
Who knows? But I bet you wink at him and would LOVE to caress his
legs. Do you still get the "tingly thighs" when Obama reades off the
teleprompter or has that patina worn off already??
Your Messiah and the progressive controlled congress are not only on
the road to self destruction but the planned destruction of the
fundamental framework of this country. They're making
inexcusable,inexplicable decisions that affect the safety of the
country. Yet you bedwetting,anklebiting PDS sufferers are focused on
whether Sarah Palin,a private citizen,wrote something on her hand to
help her make her talking points during an interview. Again you
progressives illustrate just how desperate you are and are completely
unable to defend what the progressives controlling the country are
doing. If Obama and congress were to move toward center they'd get a
helluva lot more support from the American people but they continue to
stick to the Saul Alinsky handbook and move even furter to the left.
I'll be their demise.
And where is her teleprompter?
Gunner
Whenever a Liberal utters the term "Common Sense approach"....grab your
wallet, your ass, and your guns because the sombitch is about to do
something damned nasty to all three of them.
> > Liar, Obama is the one who demands
> > pre-approved questions.
>
>Fred, you do realize that your defense of Ms. Palin reflects on your
>intelligence, correct?
>
>It has been widely acknowledged -worldwide- that one of the main
>factors in Obama's electoral victory was his superior debating and
>oratory skills.
Talk of course, is cheap.
Now about his policies as president? Utter failures each and ever one.
And you blither about the speaking abilities of a non president?
Shame on you Ramon..shame.
But then....Leftwingers are like that.
-Ramon
*************************************
Does Chris Matthews have something sticky running down his leg? Do you?
>The question remains unanswered. The mystery continues...
>
>-Ramon
Kinda' like Obammys records?
> And where is her teleprompter?
The whole argument is lame and pathetic. Lots of people use
teleprompters.
They were not allowed in the 2008 election debates and they won't be
allowed in the 2012 election debates. No pre-selected questions
either. No winking. No cheat sheets. No leg caressing.
-Ramon
Are you so foolish as to believe that new is always better?
--
God, guns and guts made America great.
And Janet Napolitano nervous.
Which should tell you all you need to know about Democrats. How can one
restore America to greatness if greatness makes you uncomfortable?
> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
Does anyone besides me find it absolutely fucking hilarious that the
libs have hitched their wagons to this story?
Talk about over the top hypocrisy. It's almost as funny as them
continuing to support the global warming scientists long after the
WMDs were never found...
You get what I'm saying.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
That's a gotcha!
Prove it
Where was Obama's when he destroyed the republicans?
That's not what he said.
Problem following the tread again?
>On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:19:07 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
><ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
>> > Liar, Obama is the one who demands
>> > pre-approved questions.
>>
>>Fred, you do realize that your defense of Ms. Palin reflects on your
>>intelligence, correct?
>>
>>It has been widely acknowledged -worldwide- that one of the main
>>factors in Obama's electoral victory was his superior debating and
>>oratory skills.
>
>
>Talk of course, is cheap.
>
>Now about his policies as president? Utter failures each and ever one.
None are complete. You're lying
>
>And you blither about the speaking abilities of a non president?
Even Faux News has said it, dumbass.
>
> "Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
> news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>> [
>> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-hand/
>> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And
>> there
>> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>> President.
>> Wow...E
>> ]
Almost as bad as a real president who does not have the word "corpsman" in
his vocabulary.
HEY, I JUST READ IT, I DON'T UNDERSTAND IT, PRONOUNCE IT CORRECTLY, OR HAVE
TO EXPLAIN IT.
Funny thing, too, that he translated a Creole dialect (no doubt with the
help of a staff of twelve), but has trouble with common American words and
phrases. And it's not the first time. Or the tenth time. Or the fiftieth
time. And this guy graduated from where? And his IQ is supposed to be
what? Any dumb ghetto Afro person who has spent time in the service knows
what a corpsman is, and how it is pronounced. But that would eliminate
Barry on two counts.
Steve
I'm having difficulty understanding what "tread" has to do with this
discussion.
Steve
The speaker can keep his/her head raised and their attention on the
audience.
Sarah "Palm Pilot" read her entire speech word for word from paper on the
lectern.
>
>
>Almost as bad as a real president who does not have the word "corpsman" in
>his vocabulary.
>
And just how should one pronounce "nuclear"?
Mark Rand
RTFM
>And just how should one pronounce "nuclear"?
Devastation ;)
The latest poll shows that only 17% of Americans consider her to be
Presidental material.
16.99% of those had to check their cheat notes before answering.
Laugh..laugh...laugh..
TMT
I wonder what she has written on her breasts...which direction to look
to see Russia?
laugh...laugh...laugh...
TMT
Must be a Democrat thing.
Steve
Well said.
Good analysis.
TMT
LOL...again well done.
That was my analysis too on that interview.
TMT
The Republican Party/Fox News is too damn cheap to supply one.
TMT
Talk is cheap Gunner...you prove it with every post.
TMT
How "shouting out" to grade school classes?
How about calling the opponent "Joe"?
How about seeing Russia from the podium?
TMT
No...but I find it hilarious that the Republicans have hitched their
walkers to Palin.
TMT
--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Pa...@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
"A doctor can bury his mistakes but an architect can only
advise his client to plant vines." -- Frank Lloyd Wright
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
>Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?
>
>Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of 0bama's
>meltdown?
Nah..she's just fucking hilarious!
Funny!
TMT
Snicker...Winston has a crush...Winston has a crush.
Just like the other 17% of those who think Palin is Presidential
material.
What does it for you Winston...the wink, the stoke of the leg or the
heaving breasts?
TMT
> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
> [
> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-
> hand/
> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And there
> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be President.
> Wow...E
> ]
Walking but dragging their knuckles.
--
Hint; Enjoy the moment !
>So are the Keystone Kops. Why doesn't Little Cliffy use them to
>divert us from the ObamaMess?
At the same point in Reagan's first time his numbers were LOWER than
Obama's. You still have to wait for 7 years before you judge Obama's
presidency.
LOL...Winston can't wait seven seconds.
He is a closet Republican.
TMT
Hmm...could it be that you just to her defense every time?
"Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?
Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of
0bama's
meltdown? "
You said...I didn't.
So what does it for you Winston...the wink, the stoke of the leg or
the
heaving breasts?
TMT
>
>"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
>we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
>doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.
A written speach is one thing.
IIRC Even Lincoln had written down his Gettysburg Address.
Simple Q & A is quite another.
Or are you claiming it was a put-up fraud & she could not even
remember four lines?
Any bets on all those colleges she went to to learn
about basketball?
Kicked out for cheating ....
>
>> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-hand/
>> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And
>> there
>> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>> President.
>> Wow...E
>
>Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.
That was bushco. He even used plants. You lie like a winger.
--
Cliff
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:29:27 -0500, Cliff
><Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> puked:
>
>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
>Does anyone besides me find it absolutely fucking hilarious that the
>libs have hitched their wagons to this story?
Even Faux carried it IIRC.
And she IS funny.
>Talk about over the top hypocrisy. It's almost as funny as them
>continuing to support the global warming scientists long after the
>WMDs were never found...
HUH?
>You get what I'm saying.
Your tinfoil beanie slipped?
--
Cliff
>I guess we now know what an Alaskan Palm Pilot looks like.
LOL
--
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
>Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?
She was too stupid not to show off her cheating ...
>Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of 0bama's
>meltdown?
Or are wingers all morons?
Pre-approved SIMPLE questions & she COLUD NOT even remember her lines.
Some Q&A press session.
--
Cliff
>So are the Keystone Kops.
She could play ... except they had skills.
>Why doesn't Little Cliffy use them to
>divert us from the ObamaMess?
Spoken like the winger that you are.
--
Cliff
How stupid.
--
Cliff
Perhaps cold makes for stupid.
--
Cliff
What notes. Looked like subjects to talk about without any help from a
teleprompter. Liberal are truly ignorant fools. Buckwheat has a lot more
than subjects wrote down on his teleprompter. Buckwheat could have had
any number of subjects wrote down on hand, paper etc. and he still
wouldn't have known what to say without his teleprompter.
> On Feb 8, 8:00 am, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 8, 7:15 am, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Cliff" <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>>
>>>news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>>>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
>>>we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
>>>doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.
>>
>>>>This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>>>>http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-note...
>>>>She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And
>>>>there
>>>>are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>>>>President.
>>>>Wow...E
>>
>> > Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.
>>
>
>
> > Does Obama caress his legs and wink?
>
> The body language does not lie. Check her out in the video.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2010/02/06/palin.tea.party.qa.cnn
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yhzet3n
>
> Any psychologist will tell you that being questioned brought her back
> to those tests in college. She resorted to the tricks that helped in
> all the colleges from which she quit when the going got tough.
>
> You can clearly see how she looks at the palm of her hand, looking for
> the answers in a "cheating sheet" which in 2010 is not there. Still,
> it is a comforting reflex.
>
> What did she do if the professor noticed her cheating? Ah! Her
> infallible defense, she turned on her sex appeal, bringing attention
> to her legs.
>
> Count how many times she caresses her lower extremities. After all,
> why stop using the techniques which have never failed her?
>
> -Ramon
You are an ignorant FOOL. There wasn't any resemblance to cheating wrote
on her hand what so ever. It was just subjects to talk about. You left
wing wackos are not even remotely able to use your brain. Buckwheat
would have had more than subjects on his teleprompter.
>
> "Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:lv90n5tnmo842imrm...@4ax.com...
>
>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:04:38 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
>> And where is her teleprompter?
>>
>> Gunner
>>
>> Whenever a Liberal utters the term "Common Sense approach"....grab your
>> wallet, your ass, and your guns because the sombitch is about to do
>> something damned nasty to all three of them.
>
> .
> .
> Sarah's not smart enough to use a teleprompter...she read her speech
> from paper...then in answering questions she wrote a crib on the palm of
> her hand....because she was very nervous the ink ran and spread all over
> her palm
> ..
> Tell Sarah she should join us in the 21st Century
Not if it's Buckwheat's idea of the 21st century.
> On Feb 8, 9:04 am, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:04:38 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
>>
>>
>>
>><ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Feb 8, 8:00 am, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Feb 8, 7:15 am, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>"Cliff" <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>>
>>>>>news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>>>>http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>>>>>>"Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>>>>>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
>>>>>we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
>>>>>doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.
>>
>>>>>>This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>>>>>>http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-note...
>>>>>>She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And
>>>>>>there
>>>>>>are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>>>>>>President.
>>>>>>Wow...E
>>
>>>>>Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.
>>
>>>>Does Obama caress his legs and wink?
>>
>>>The body language does not lie. Check her out in the video.
>>
>>>http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2010/02/06/palin.tea.party....
>>
>>>http://tinyurl.com/yhzet3n
>>
>>>Any psychologist will tell you that being questioned brought her back
>>>to those tests in college. She resorted to the tricks that helped in
>>>all the colleges from which she quit when the going got tough.
>>
>>>You can clearly see how she looks at the palm of her hand, looking for
>>>the answers in a "cheating sheet" which in 2010 is not there. Still,
>>>it is a comforting reflex.
>>
>>>What did she do if the professor noticed her cheating? Ah! Her
>>>infallible defense, she turned on her sex appeal, bringing attention
>>>to her legs.
>>
>>>Count how many times she caresses her lower extremities. After all,
>>>why stop using the techniques which have never failed her?
>>
>>>-Ramon
>>
>
> > And where is her teleprompter?
>
> The whole argument is lame and pathetic. Lots of people use
> teleprompters.
>
> They were not allowed in the 2008 election debates and they won't be
> allowed in the 2012 election debates. No pre-selected questions
> either. No winking. No cheat sheets. No leg caressing.
>
> -Ramon
What about lying? That's all Buckwheat is capable of.
What an ignorant fool, You still think Tina Fey is Sarah Palin, don't you?
It's funny how some Rightards will buy into this sort of spin. Ignorant
people who are so gullible and eager to unquestioningly swallow and
regurgitate lies and spin, such as the birther scam, which is why
corporate manipulation of the electorate with sophisticated and heavily
funded media campaigns is such a worry. Slickly packaged and endlessly
repeated lies will drown out both truth and reason, being far more
palatable and digestible to the intellectually hapless and easily misled
voters they are targeted to, i.e., those who are simply unprepared and
unequipped to sort out the facts from the coming tidal wave of lies.
> On Feb 8, 7:15 am, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>"Cliff" <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>>
>>news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
>>we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
>>doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.
>>
>>
>>>This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>>>http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-note...
>>>She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions. And
>>>there
>>>are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>>>President.
>>>Wow...E
>>
>
> > Liar, Obama is the one who demands
> > pre-approved questions.
>
> Fred, you do realize that your defense of Ms. Palin reflects on your
> intelligence, correct?
>
> It has been widely acknowledged -worldwide- that one of the main
> factors in Obama's electoral victory was his superior debating and
> oratory skills.
What's funny is when Buckwheat's teleprompter breaks down and he starts
talkin gobbledygook.
>On 8 Feb 2010 07:15:01 -0600, "Fred B. Brown" <fredb...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>>news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
>>we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
>>doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.
>
> A written speach is one thing.
> IIRC Even Lincoln had written down his Gettysburg Address.
> Simple Q & A is quite another.
>
> Or are you claiming it was a put-up fraud & she could not even
>remember four lines?
Have you EVER done any public speaking?
>
> "Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:7t11n551nucgrgiuf...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:28:19 -0600, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>
>>>"Sid9" <si...@belsouth.net> wrote in
>>>news:hkpdcb$2ei$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:lv90n5tnmo842imrm...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 06:04:38 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
>>>>> <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Feb 8, 8:00 am, Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 7:15 am, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > "Cliff" <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>>>>>> > message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>> > > http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=2814749780362
>>>>>>> > > 26
>>>>>>> > > "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain
>>>>>>> > jackass we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter.
>>>>>>> > At least Palin doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere
>>>>>>> > she goes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > > This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>>>>>>> > >http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-
>>>>>>> > >not e...
>>>>>>> > > She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved
>>>>>>> > > questions. And
>>>>>>> > > there
>>>>>>> > > are actually human beings walking around who think she should
>>>>>>> > > be President.
>>>>>>> > > Wow...E
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Does Obama caress his legs and wink?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The body language does not lie. Check her out in the video.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2010/02/06/palin.tea.party.q
>>>>>>a.c nn
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://tinyurl.com/yhzet3n
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Any psychologist will tell you that being questioned brought her back
>>>>>>to those tests in college. She resorted to the tricks that helped in
>>>>>>all the colleges from which she quit when the going got tough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You can clearly see how she looks at the palm of her hand, looking
>>>>>>for the answers in a "cheating sheet" which in 2010 is not there.
>>>>>>Still, it is a comforting reflex.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What did she do if the professor noticed her cheating? Ah! Her
>>>>>>infallible defense, she turned on her sex appeal, bringing attention
>>>>>>to her legs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Count how many times she caresses her lower extremities. After all,
>>>>>>why stop using the techniques which have never failed her?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-Ramon
>>>>>
>>>>> And where is her teleprompter?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gunner
>>>>>
>>>>> Whenever a Liberal utters the term "Common Sense approach"....grab
>>>>> your wallet, your ass, and your guns because the sombitch is about to
>>>>> do something damned nasty to all three of them.
>>>> .
>>>> .
>>>> Sarah's not smart enough to use a teleprompter...she read her speech
>>>> from paper...then in answering questions she wrote a crib on the palm
>>>> of her hand....because she was very nervous the ink ran and spread all
>>>> over her palm .. Tell Sarah she should join us in the 21st Century
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Are you so foolish as to believe that new is always better?
>>
>> That's not what he said.
>> Problem following the tread again?
> .
> .
> New is better.
>
> The speaker can keep his/her head raised and their attention on the
> audience.
>
> Sarah "Palm Pilot" read her entire speech word for word from paper on the
> lectern.
>
>
I bet she can pronounce corpse-man correctly, though. 8)
--
God, guns and guts made America great.
And Janet Napolitano nervous.
Which should tell you all you need to know about Democrats. How can one
restore America to greatness if greatness makes you uncomfortable?
Look how many Palin posts are generated, and she's just some broad on
FOX News. You people are ridiculous.
> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:29:27 -0500, Cliff
><Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> puked:
>
>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>
> Does anyone besides me find it absolutely fucking hilarious that the
> libs have hitched their wagons to this story?
It's pretty much all they have. The big O has been notable for his losses
over the past year. The Olympics, Copenhagen, 3 elections, health care
"deform". Guy seems to pull a black cloud along with him whereever he goes.
Under the circumstances, grasping at straws against potential opponents is
about all the left has. There certainly isn't anything substantial and
positive they can talk about. So childish stupidity is about all they have.
Well, that and lies.
> Talk about over the top hypocrisy. It's almost as funny as them
> continuing to support the global warming scientists long after the
> WMDs were never found...
>
> You get what I'm saying.
> --
> lab~rat >:-)
> Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
--
> Sarah "Palm Pilot" read her entire speech word for word from paper on the
> lectern.
Typically, that's what Obama does too -- read his speech. Difference
is, he can speak intelligently off the cuff too. Imagine Palin having
a sit down with Democrats askin her hard questions.
Tater
> The whole argument is lame and pathetic. Lots of people use
> teleprompters.
>
> They were not allowed in the 2008 election debates and they won't be
> allowed in the 2012 election debates. No pre-selected questions
> either. No winking. No cheat sheets. No leg caressing.
>
> -Ramon
You kidding? Of course they'll have cheat sheets. They always do. And
she'll be allowed to wink and ham it up all she wants, and her
supporters will eat it up.
Tater
> > How "shouting out" to grade school classes?
>
> > How about calling the opponent "Joe"?
>
> > How about seeing Russia from the podium?
>
> > TMT
>
> What an ignorant fool, You still think Tina Fey is Sarah Palin, don't you?
Palin done all them things.
Tater
Excuse me, but who is this "Buckwheat" you keep referring to?
>"lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote in
>news:01o0n5dt5veqolotq...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:29:27 -0500, Cliff
>><Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> puked:
>>
>>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>> Does anyone besides me find it absolutely fucking hilarious that the
>> libs have hitched their wagons to this story?
>
>It's pretty much all they have. The big O has been notable for his losses
>over the past year. The Olympics, Copenhagen, 3 elections, health care
>"deform". Guy seems to pull a black cloud along with him whereever he goes.
>
>Under the circumstances, grasping at straws against potential opponents is
>about all the left has. There certainly isn't anything substantial and
>positive they can talk about. So childish stupidity is about all they have.
>Well, that and lies.
>
I love how they've even gone to the "blame Bush" well too many times
for it to be effective. I guess the next state of the union will be
the same set of platitudes, only this time a few Sarah Palin jokes and
maybe a Glenn Beck one...
> What's funny is when Buckwheat's teleprompter breaks down and he starts
> talkin gobbledygook.
It's pathetic, not funny. A college educated law professor who has no
original thoughts, but who must repeat what is fed to him on a teleprompter.
Max Headroom was a better automated speaker. Where is all the intelligence
and knowledge this man is SUPPOSED to possess?
Imagine him being YOUR lawyer on a serious case, and doing his jury
summation.
On second thought, forget that. I can't imagine it, therefore it would be
wrong to ask you to imagine it.
Steve
Tater
I've heard him speak "off the cuff". I hear very little intelligence there.
I hear very little original thought. Clich�s and verbose combinations of
words that are just Newspeak.
Here's my take on sitting the two of them down for hard questions. Palin
would answer as a normal person, maybe not the most eloquent of the two.
Buckwheat would go on into the ozone on literary painting trips, splashing
his literary pallet all over the place, except on the answer.
Steve
Ask him to pronounce "corpsman". IMO he sounded about as stupid and
uneducated as an inner city dropout.
> On 8 Feb 2010 07:15:01 -0600, "Fred B. Brown"
> <fredb...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in
>>message news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=2814749780362
>>> 26 "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain
>>jackass we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At
>>least Palin doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she
>>goes.
>
> A written speach is one thing.
> IIRC Even Lincoln had written down his Gettysburg Address.
> Simple Q & A is quite another.
>
> Or are you claiming it was a put-up fraud & she could not even
> remember four lines?
>
> Any bets on all those colleges she went to to learn
> about basketball?
> Kicked out for cheating ....
>
THis pretty much says it all:
http://www.pavlovianobeisance.com/palin_cheatsheet.htm
"breathe"
LULZ!
>
>>
>>> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>>> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-
>>> notes-on-her-hand/ She had to do this, despite only accepting
>>> pre-approved questions. And there
>>> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>>> President.
>>> Wow...E
>>
>>Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved questions.
>
> That was bushco. He even used plants. You lie like a winger.
Remember that fake news reporter Jeff Gannon?
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jeff_Gannon
Major LULZ!
--
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
>On 8 Feb 2010 07:15:01 -0600, "Fred B. Brown" <fredb...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
>>news:s7mvm59ig2tga227k...@4ax.com...
>>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>
>>Six words, stupid. A good speaker uses notes, not like a certain jackass
>>we know who can't give a speech without a TelePrompter. At least Palin
>>doesn't need to lug one of those around everywhere she goes.
>
> A written speach is one thing.
> IIRC Even Lincoln had written down his Gettysburg Address.
> Simple Q & A is quite another.
>
> Or are you claiming it was a put-up fraud & she could not even
>remember four lines?
That's exactly what happened.
> Any bets on all those colleges she went to to learn
>about basketball?
> Kicked out for cheating ....
>
>
>>
>On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:06:20 -0500, Cliff
I have. I used to MC promotion and retirement parties while in the
Army. Never once had to write something on my hand. In fact It think
it's an utterly juvenile thing to do. When my daughter was young she'd
write phone numbers on her had and I made her stop. It's an absolutely
asinine thing to do.
And to be honest the cheaters in school did it easily when ever they
wanted. The DUMB kids wrote on their hands and got caught. And that's
what she is..the dumb kid in class who got caught cheating.
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:26:20 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>
>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:04:35 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>>>
>>>>Ah, yes. Palin again. Just what is your fascination with her?
>>>>
>>>>Could it simply be that she is a good foil to take the heat of 0bama's
>>>>meltdown?
>>>
>>>Nah..she's just fucking hilarious!
>>
>>So are the Keystone Kops.
>
> She could play ... except they had skills.
>
Ya...they knew how to take a fall. All she can do it quit
I bet bush still can't pronounce nuclear but that never bothered you.
Why are you so two faced? Were you brought up this way..learned it
from you're parents or did you become a shallow little ignorant
lemming all by yourself?
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:aaeac756-ef7b-40fd...@j31g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:3c55218d-325d-45ea-a713-
Does Obama caress his legs and wink?
-Ramon
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gp11n59tp6gdef5u2...@4ax.com...
> Liar, Obama is the one who demands pre-approved
questions.
Prove it
--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.
"Wes" <clu...@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:un1cn.130350$tq1....@en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com...
Mark Rand <ra...@internettie.co.uk> wrote:
>And just how should one pronounce "nuclear"?
Devastation ;)
She tried that with Katie Couric and ABC's Gibson..and we all got to
see exactly what she can do when speaking off the cuff. She's a
fucking idiot.
"pre-approved journalists", not questions.
--
John R. Carroll
>Tater Gumfries <ta...@kernsholler.net> wrote in news:bf627b5c-82bd-4341-9e9d-
>02552e...@l26g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>
>> On Feb 8, 4:03�pm, "Sid9" <s...@belsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Sarah "Palm Pilot" read her entire speech word for word from paper on the
>>> lectern.
>>
>> Typically, that's what Obama does too -- read his speech. Difference
>> is, he can speak intelligently off the cuff too. Imagine Palin having
>> a sit down with Democrats askin her hard questions.
>>
>> Tater
>>
>
>Ask him to pronounce "corpsman". IMO he sounded about as stupid and
>uneducated as an inner city dropout.
You never complained when bush screwed up nuclear. Why?
Maybe if the speech changes from time to time, a few bullet points
might be in order. But congratulations on being some kinda version of
the Sham-Wow guy.
> Stormin Mormon wrote:
>>
> http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2009/02/12/obamas-pre-appr
> oved-press-list-last-getting-notice
>
> "pre-approved journalists", not questions.
>
And you point is what? That the sheep will challenge the shepherd?
No.
Obama selectively calls on journalists, unlike Palin, who cribs answers to
pre-approved questions from a single group of friendly questioners.
--
John R. Carroll
> No-bammer wrote:
>
>> Cliff wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978036226
>>> "Sarah Palin Reads Cheat Notes Off Her Hand:"
>>> [
>>> This would be funny if it weren't also pretty sad:
>>> http://beltwayblips.dailyradar.com/video/sarah-palin-reads-cheat-notes-on-her-hand/
>>>
>>> She had to do this, despite only accepting pre-approved questions.
>>> And there
>>> are actually human beings walking around who think she should be
>>> President.
>>> Wow...E
>>> ]
>>
>>
>> What notes. Looked like subjects to talk about without any help from a
>> teleprompter. Liberal are truly ignorant fools. Buckwheat has a lot
>> more than subjects wrote down on his teleprompter. Buckwheat could
>> have had any number of subjects wrote down on hand, paper etc. and he
>> still wouldn't have known what to say without his teleprompter.
>
>
> It's funny how some Rightards will buy into this sort of spin. Ignorant
> people who are so gullible and eager to unquestioningly swallow and
> regurgitate lies and spin, such as the birther scam, which is why
> corporate manipulation of the electorate with sophisticated and heavily
> funded media campaigns is such a worry. Slickly packaged and endlessly
> repeated lies will drown out both truth and reason, being far more
> palatable and digestible to the intellectually hapless and easily misled
> voters they are targeted to, i.e., those who are simply unprepared and
> unequipped to sort out the facts from the coming tidal wave of lies.
I believe you are describing left wing wackos like yourself.
I think you know.
> I thought it was the union thugs, and the Acorn crooks.
> Silly me.
>
What is "it"?
Sarah Palin absolutely DID NOT say she could see Russia from her house.
Tina Fey is the one that said that.
You can spin reality however you like. Reality is what it is and noone
beleives you and your kind anymore.
As compared to Obama only selectively calling on journalists who he knows
are friendly to him? ;)
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Some points to ponder:
Why is it good if a vacuum cleaner really sucks?
Why is the third hand on a clock called the "second hand"?
Why did Kamikaze pilots wear helmets?
Why do we sing "Take me out to the ballgame" when we are already
there?
It's only significant in the context of the OP's remark and cite.
Requiring the submission of questions in advance isn't the same thing as
excluding FOX from pool.
About the only thing Obama and Palin have in common is their citizenship.
--
John R. Carroll
A distinction without a difference.
> About the only thing Obama and Palin have in common is their citizenship.
Well, now there does seem to be some disagreemtn on that, now doesn't there?
Perhaps.
Has anyone seen Palin's birth certificate?
--
John R. Carroll