The three men, Anthony Shreeve, Robert Kilmarx and Mark Herr, are Tennessee tea
party activists who were involved in the early stages of planning the convention
and say they resigned in protest after disputes with lead convention organizers
Judson and Sherry Phillips, who contend that the ex-allies were banned from the
group planning the event for incivility or indiscretion.
The disputes have since gone public and turned ugly. At their news conference �
which they plan to hold in the same sprawling hotel convention center that is
hosting the convention � the three �intend to challenge [the convention] on all
levels,� Shreeve said.
They announced the presser in a Friday night e-mail to local and national
reporters covering the convention, though Shreve admits he did not seek
permission from the hotel to use the facility. �If they run us out, we will have
it in the parking lot,� he said.
Since parting ways with the Phillipses, the three have formed a coalition of 34
tea party groups from across Tennessee, and have blasted the convention .....
]
The purges have begun !!!
--
Cliff
kinda' says it all, huh?
Can't stand it can you? You racist come up with a nice little racist
group, call it something cool.....and it all falls apart. Darn
liberals!!!!
Of course we liberals didn't do a thing, we just got our green lawn
chairs and watched you collapse. Now there are 35 groups just in
Tennessee! And they all hate each other!
And the real fun? This will be just like the term limits fiasco. A
lot of talk, a lot of pats on the back and then then you will find
yourself marching lock step with the repugs. They will do to you what
they have already done to the term limits people.
It's fun to watch one racist screw another!
Like Ray Nagin? Oh, wait. He screwed himself.
--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
The KKK is falling apart? Since when? You do know that its been a
solely Democrat organization for the majority of its history, right?
And yet you go into all sorts of blather trying to blame others for
being "racists"...while the history of the Democrat Party is wide open
for all to puke over.
Gunner
Whenever a Liberal utters the term "Common Sense approach"....grab your
wallet, your ass, and your guns because the sombitch is about to do
something damned nasty to all three of them.
Weren't the Democrats against the abolition of slavery? Or did I dream
that?
Steve
...in which Tawwwm demonstrates the quality of his thinking and the black
hole that exists where his human respect and basic decency are supposed to
reside.
As you say, Tawwwm, it says it all -- about you.
--
Ed Huntress
No, it was the conservatives who wanted to fight a war to keep slavery.
The same hill folk who don't want to change health care or anything
else. It's not a party thing it's a philosophy thing. The conservatives
are the group that has held back progress in the U.S. for as long as it
has been around. They are doing the same thing right now in many areas.
They have changed parties over the years but it's conservatives who are
to blame for our troubles whether it was in the 1800s or in the 21st
century. Every step of progress the country has made in its history has
been a story of overcoming conservative opposition. Conservatives are
the real douche bags no matter what party they say they belong to.
Hawke
Yup, times change. It's not rocket science if you'll just open your eyes.
Republicans, and Whigs, were the liberals of the 1800's pushing equality
for all. By the 1970's those Dixiecrats had moved to the Republican
Party flipping the traditional definition of Republicans. Democrats
cleaned their house (mostly) of Neanderthals, the same Neanderthals who
*now* represent the Republican Party.
In 1860 Republicans were Federalists, Democrats anti-Federalists. Today
Republicans are anti-Federalists and Democrats Federalists.
The historical roles of the Democrats and Republicans have been
reversed. Did you really require this lesson in American History?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's one reason there were two Democrat Party Candidates for
President in 1860. And the Democrats spit the vote, letting the new
Republican Party candidate get a plurality of votes, and a Majority of
Electoral Votes.
And in 1861, the Democrats pulled out of the Congress, leaving the
Senate and House in the control of the Republicans. Who then
proceeded to pass a lot of legislation which the Democrats had
opposed. The Homestead Act, for one.
-
pyotr filipivich
We will drink no whiskey before its nine.
It's eight fifty eight. Close enough!
>
Of course..and they solidly voted against the various Civil Rights Acts
of the 1960s.
The Democrats are a low minded group of bigots, biased racists and
buffoons..all controlled by Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kooks at the
top.
Really?
> The same hill folk who don't want to change health care or anything
> else.
Dummy. Hill folk didn't own slaves. That was a flat-lander
enterprise.
> It's not a party thing it's a philosophy thing. The conservatives
> are the group that has held back progress in the U.S. for as long as it
> has been around.
Thank goodness. You want health care? Go get a job and pay for it.
> They are doing the same thing right now in many areas.
Super!
> They have changed parties over the years but it's conservatives who are
> to blame for our troubles whether it was in the 1800s or in the 21st
> century.
Must be awful to be put down for more than two centuries. Maybe it's
just you.
> Every step of progress the country has made in its history has
> been a story of overcoming conservative opposition.
Prohibition? NFA 34?
> Conservatives are
> the real douche bags no matter what party they say they belong to.
>
> Hawke
Are you still having problems determining how many gallons are in a 5
gallon carboy?
How does that help you plan the next coup in Argentina?
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yes, he probably does. But instead of wasting your time trying to teach
the unteachable it's simpler to just cut to the chase. Which is what I
said from the start, it's the conservatives who are the real douche bags
and I don't give a shit what political party they say they belong to. We
all know who they are. They used to be southern Democrats. Now they are
the republicans. It's their philosophy that is the problem. They oppose
everything that will bring about progress in the country. That also
explains why all our problems just keep festering and none of them get
solved. It's the conservatives, I mean douche bags that are blocking all
attempts to move forward.
Hawke
>>> Whenever a Liberal utters the term "Common Sense approach"....grab your
>>> wallet, your ass, and your guns because the sombitch is about to do
>>> something damned nasty to all three of them.
>>
>>Weren't the Democrats against the abolition of slavery? Or did I dream
>>that?
>>
>>Steve
>
>Cunter has been nailed over and over on the use of a political label
>versus the ideology that it adopts and espouses
>
>Southern conservatives were demcrats because the Northern Liberals
>just whoomped the shit out of them
That somehow doesnt escape from the fact that the Democrats took in
Southern Racists and made them as their own.
In fact...Democrats have historically been racist and in places other
than the South as well.
So Racist..arent you ashamed of yourself and your party for its long
long history of racism and bias?
Of course you arent. You are a Leftist and as such are proud of it.
But then.you only have 2 yrs left to live.
>On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:49:23 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>It's fun to watch one racist screw another!
>>
>>The KKK is falling apart? Since when? You do know that its been a
>>solely Democrat organization for the majority of its history, right?
>
>Were the KKK and/or Democrats from the south---Conservatives or
>Liberals, Cunter
>
>THis is an easy one---just for you
Thats easy!
They were Democrats.
And yet you try to muddy the issue to cover your ass.
It's because your idea of "Progress" and "Moving forward" aren't only wrong,
they are just plain evil. Anybody with any morals will fight it tooth and
nail.
> The Republicans are a low minded group of bigots,
> biased racists and buffoons..all controlled by
> Far Right-Wing Extremist Fringe Kooks at the top.
Corrected your spelling for you..
--No charge this time, Goober..
Yer Dad raised the flag of Dixie and fell over dead, you embarassed him so
bad in front of the Bush Klan.
Notice how the Douchbagger Libtards point fingers that seem to magically
switch parties take no responsibility for the continued enslavement of Black
people by keeping them on social programs and propping up the likes of
Jackson and Sharpton that promote victomhood and keep control over Blacks?
Ayup..his denial is sickening and displays his mental illness fully.
>On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:22:43 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Southern conservatives were demcrats because the Northern Liberals
>>>just whoomped the shit out of them
>>
>>That somehow doesnt escape from the fact that the Democrats took in
>>Southern Racists and made them as their own.
>
>Southern racists were Conservatives cunter.
Your error ridden opinion is again laughed at.
Laugh laugh laugh laugh!!!
Another Leftwinger trying desperately to hide his racism and biases
It's an inevitability in Argentina. Alberto Cur-Lee went to Argentina
to escape the dangers in America. Hi!
The mental illness you obviously suffer from is getting worse.
But ..shrug..you will be dead in less than 2 yrs..so no biggie.
>On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:23:41 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:32:13 -0700, smo...@board.net wrote:
>
>>>Were the KKK and/or Democrats from the south---Conservatives or
>>>Liberals, Cunter
>
>
>>They were Democrats.
>
>Once again
>
>Were the southern democrats (now southern republicans) Conservatives
>or liberals
Democrats of course!
Zell Miller is what? Nancy Pelosi is what?
Democrats
your repeated attempts at denial are getting rather pathetic and simply
show your mental issues strongly.
>On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:54:47 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Of course..and they solidly voted against the various Civil Rights Acts
>>of the 1960s.
>
>Who did, CUnter?
>
>Conservatives or liberals?
Democrats of course.
Your continued attempts to portray your bigotry and bias in a new light
continues to fail.
Nope, I enjoy every minute of your malignant narcissism.
It says volumes about your narrow-minded intolerance and
bigotry, which characterizes the extreme right-wingers..
Example follows..
> But ..shrug..you will be dead in less than 2 yrs..
Nope, but you'll be in prison. Be sure to write me..
--If you survive the initial encounter with the reality of that fact..
For what crime? Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
Hope and Change?
>
>--If you survive the initial encounter with the reality of that fact..
Ill be waiting.
<G>
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:57:06 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Ayup..his denial is sickening and displays his mental illness fully.
>
>Even a rudely educated 6th grader knows that southern racists were
>conservatives, not liberals you trolling fuckwit.
Even a retarded 3rd grader knows that they were Democrats!
Laugh laugh laugh!
Now Zell Miller and Pelosi are both Democrats..right?
Laugh laugh laugh laugh!
And so was the KKK for most of its history!
Laugh laugh laugh!!
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 02:41:57 -0500, "Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com> wrote:
>
>>Notice how the Douchbagger Libtards point fingers that seem to magically
>>switch parties take no responsibility for the continued enslavement of
>>Black people by
>
> Party's can switch ideologies, you mindless moron
>
> THat's why, when referring to whether they were good or bad, IDEOLOGY is
> relevant.
>
> No one disclaims that southern CONSERVATIVES had bad policy---but they
> were democrats because northern LIBERALS (republicans in the 19th
> century) kicked their ass
Quashing the dreams of the lizard who proudly claims T-Rex as his
ancestor may be cruel but is sometimes mandatory when the little bugger
nibbles on a sensitive organ.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sedition..
> >> Nope, but you'll be in prison. Be sure to write me..
> >
> > For what crime?
>
> Sedition..
>
Righties only consider this a crime if non-white people do it.
--
House GOP is now taking credit for the budget surpluses of the Clinton
years, surpluses fueled in part by the 1993 deficit reduction package
every single Republican in Congress voted against.
And Leftists only consider it "sedition"if a Republican speaks out
against their proposal to rewrite the country from the top down. Cie
l'vie, cie l'guerre.
-
pyotr filipivich
Most journalists these days couldn't investigate a missing chocolate cake
at a pre-school without a Democrat office holder telling them what to look for,
where, and what significance it all has.
Oh bummer.
-
pyotr filipivich.
Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel,
you find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.
Douche bag conservatives don't have any morals. Ethics either. You'll
notice we didn't move ahead at all during the Bush years. Nothing was
fixed or changed. Nothing improved but lots got worse. Just the way
cowardly conservatives want it. And they will lie, cheat, and stab you
in the back to keep from changing. Lucky for us they are the minority.
Hawke
Am I still stalking the cockroach?
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:hkr1me$17k$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Uhm, hey douche bag, in case you didn't know this, douche bags and cowards
are liberals. And if you weren't always turning around to suck the cock of
the guy behind you, you wouldn't confuse moving forward with moving
backwards. Get a compass or GPS. You obviously forgot how Obimbo decided to
'turn the ship around" when the idea was to "stay the course". Typical
libtard doesn't know which end is up.
Gummer is the perfect example of what a conservative is. Whether it is
an old fashioned conservative from the days of slavery, a more modern
conservative of the early 60s, or one of today's conservatives. They
never change. They remain the same shallow, ignorant, mean, and nasty
bigots they have always been. They have a habit of making fantastic
claims that are unsupportable by evidence. They lie. They cheat, and
they are the worst hypocrites you will ever come across in your life.
They are the bane of our country and have been for 200 years.
Unfortunately, nothing has come along to rid us of these noxious pests.
They are an irritating part of life just like ticks, fleas, rats, and
human waste. One can only wish they would find a place where they all
could live away from the rest of us. On the other hand, they are a real
nuisance so perhaps the best thing to do is cull them from the herd as
soon as possible.
Hawke
Clearly, Gummer doesn't know this.
Hawke
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:hkr2qo$312$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Gummer is the perfect example of what a conservative is.
Uh, idiot. he's a member of your party.
Not 'conservative' but a 'Conservative'.
>
> Hmmm
>
>
> Seems you ought look up "opinion" and "fact" definitions.
>
> Stupid fuckwit.
>
Here's a partial list of your shortcomings.
1. You don't understand that the desire to live apart from those
with which one disagrees may have nothing to do with race.
2. You don't understand that there are northern liberal racists.
3. You don't even know what conservative means with regards to
the Constitution.
>> Douche bag conservatives don't have any morals. Ethics either. You'll
>> notice we didn't move ahead at all during the Bush years. Nothing was
>> fixed or changed. Nothing improved but lots got worse. Just the way
>> cowardly conservatives want it. And they will lie, cheat, and stab you
>> in the back to keep from changing. Lucky for us they are the minority.
>>
>>
>
> Uhm, hey douche bag, in case you didn't know this, douche bags and
> cowards are liberals. And if you weren't always turning around to suck
> the cock of the guy behind you, you wouldn't confuse moving forward with
> moving backwards. Get a compass or GPS. You obviously forgot how Obimbo
> decided to 'turn the ship around" when the idea was to "stay the
> course". Typical libtard doesn't know which end is up.
The cowards are the conservatives. Look at their record. They held down
women, they held down blacks, they held down working people. They are
the first to recommend fighting but the last to actually do it. They
volunteer you and me to do it for them. And since conservatives are both
hypocrites and cowards they take it up the ass but pretend to be
straight. I just knew you were a conservative.
Hawke
>> Gummer is the perfect example of what a conservative is.
>
> Uh, idiot. he's a member of your party.
I'm not a member of any party, numbnuts. You stupid douche bag.
Hawke
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:hkvn4i$8pb$2...@speranza.aioe.org...
Actually the record shows the exact opposite of what you state. Again, no
support for anything you've stated. You still haven't provided your list of
Obingo's accomplishments as President. Why don't you list them here. Not all
of them, that would be too much. Maybe just 6 or 7. List them right here ->
"Hawke" <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote in message
news:hkvn8b$8pb$3...@speranza.aioe.org...
Ah, sorry. You're the President of the Douche bags. What an honor.
O Bommer.
> > -
> > pyotr filipivich.
> > Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel, you
> > find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.
>
> Am I still stalking the cockroach?
You're still avoiding the honest discourse that you promised.
> --
> Regards, Alberto Cur-Lee
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You're still misrepresenting words and events, cockroach, stop nym-
shifting and stalking me.
Or as Observer put it, get your nose out of my ass.
>> --
>> Regards, Alberto Cur-Lee
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bible: Slavery good. Gays bad. Snakes talk.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:17:24 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Even a rudely educated 6th grader knows that southern racists were
>>>conservatives, not liberals you trolling fuckwit.
>>
>>Even a retarded 3rd grader knows that they were Democrats!
>
>Party label isn't relevant
>
>Were they Liberal or conservative?
ROFLMAO....!!!!
And SmogAssBoard brags about being a Leftist.
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:07:48 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>For what crime? Be specific. Use as much white space as necessary.
>
>No, Cunter he's not correct
>
>You can't be jailed for being stupid
>
>Else you'd have been gone a long time ago.
So are you still on parole?
Indeed. Im a Democrat.
Gunner
Care to define "sedition" for the readers?
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:21:37 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Southern racists were Conservatives cunter.
>>
>>Your error ridden opinion is again laughed at.
>
>Stom thurnond wasn't a southern conservative racist?
>
>Hmmm
>
>Seems you ought look up "opinion" and "fact" definitions.
>
>Stupid fuckwit.
Senior Senator Robert Bryd (D) was Grand Kleagle of the Klu Klux Klan
for many years..
Thats a fact.
Deal with it.
And deal with the fact ....he isnt a Conservative.
Laugh laugh laugh!!
Well, you sure take government entitlements like a republican. While
denouncing government handouts to the poor (that's you, by the way).
>On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:35:44 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Were the southern democrats (now southern republicans) Conservatives
>>>or liberals
>>
>>
>>Democrats of course!
>>
>>Zell Miller is what? Nancy Pelosi is what?
>
>They had no vote on the Civil rights act of 1965 stupid
>
>ONce again
>
>What ideology supported slavery, Jim Crow and segregation, Cunter
Democrats of course, you dumb fuck.
>On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:35:07 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>--If you survive the initial encounter with the reality of that fact..
>>
>>Care to define "sedition" for the readers?
>
>Isn't that diarrhea of your mouth, Cunter?
No.
But it was an "interesting" try.
For a retard.
Now about that sedition thingy?
>On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:34:06 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>No, Cunter he's not correct
>>>
>>>You can't be jailed for being stupid
>>>
>>>Else you'd have been gone a long time ago.
>>
>>So are you still on parole?
>
>Evasion noted.
Indeed it was. <G>
So when will you answer?
Gunner
>On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:32:54 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Were they Liberal or conservative?
>>
>>ROFLMAO....!!!!
>>
>>And SmogAssBoard brags about being a Leftist.
>
>Your laughter has an echo from that shit-hole you dug for yourself,
>halfwit
>
>Even a nitwint like you can't use a 5th grade evasion to deny that the
>racist south was entirely conservative---
Even a twit such as yourself knows they were Democrats. You simply try
to avoid admitting to it.
<G>
>On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:55:04 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Senior Senator Robert Bryd (D) was Grand Kleagle of the Klu Klux Klan
>>for many years..
>
>Is the KKK a liberal or conservative organization, Cunter
>
>Waiting
Good question. So you are claiming that Byrd is a Republican?
>On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:56:04 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>
>>>What ideology supported slavery, Jim Crow and segregation, Cunter
>>
>>Democrats of course, you dumb fuck.
>
>BWHAHAHAHAHA
>
>Democrats is a "ideology"?
>
>You simply gotta be one of the stupidest morons on the usenet.
And I bow before you, King of the Buffoons
Laugh laugh laugh!!
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dsk2p5t99i1id8lm2...@4ax.com...
LOL, the silence is deafening. Was it really fair to shut him down so
quickly though? :)
>
>
The pissant is fighting Facts desperately...and Im just about ready to
put him in the Bozo Bin. Leftards who demonstrate that much denial are
obviously mentally ill and Id rather not trouble myself with the brain
damaged.
>On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:55:41 -0800, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Is the KKK a liberal or conservative organization, Cunter
>>>
>>>Waiting
>>
>>Good question. So you are claiming that Byrd is a Republican?
>
>Party label is a secondary consideration when the issue is the
>ideology it assumes
>
>Now--what was the IDEOLOGY of southern democrats in the latter 19th
>century?
>
>Waiting.
Democrat of course.
You have worn out your welcome trying to deeply deny the harm the
Democrat party has caused America for much of its history.
So off to the Bozo Bin you go..Subsector "Mentally Ill Leftards"
Its sound proofed and quite secure so people around me can sleep well
each night, no matter how much blithering and buffoonery you continue to
chant after the hatch has been closed.
<plink>
<Gn...@cold.com> wrote in message
news:bcp3p5tiu7sp0am9t...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:41:22 -0600, "Burled Frau" <ach...@jawol.jah>
> wrote:
>
>>LOL, the silence is deafening. Was it really fair to shut him down so
>>quickly though? :)
>
> You did notice that he (and you) refuse to answer whether or not the
> antebellum south was liberal or conservative
>
> You avoid answering a direct question as to the political ideology of
> the south then and now
>
> And you fail (almost pathologically) to run from any answer that you'd
> have to correctly name the ideology (liberal or conservative) that set
> in motion and defended Jim Crow and slavery, opposed civil rights act
> and eventually was adopted by a republican PARTY.
I thought his answer was more than sufficient, for anyone who possesses a
brain, that is!
Indeed it is interesting!
Tell us why, when and where the KKK was formed.
Wrong. Another crossposting troll tossed to the alligators. Enjoy. plink
*
Thanks for the time. I wanted to know the extent of your ignorance.
>
> The KKK was formed to intimidate those "liberal" forces and policies
>
> I'm going to assume you're smart enough not to use "party label" to
> evade the fact that IDEOLOGY of the KKK was Conservative.
>
> Right?
>
Wrong. I'm not that smart.
GARYLOON (smor…@board) agrees with AND defends his racist prick buddy
EVERLOON, thusly...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:58:07 -0800 (PST) everonlyn...@yahoo.com wrote
and on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:12:58 -0800 (PST), knicklas@click (Gary
Roselles) DEFENDED:
"Yeah, they sold out their own in an attempt to be a minority in the
GOP so they could achieve to places they never would have elsewhere.
Ironically, Ward Connerly and Thomas Sowell say they are against race
quotas, and they also say they are against political correctness.
Since they are liars and scandals, and don't like political
correctness, I will call them niggers right here and now.
NIGGERS,
NIGGERS, NIGGERS."
As if they shared the same racist brain, Gary concurred, thusly:
What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (Distinguished African-
American Scholar, Thomas) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never
having
worked a day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?" -- Gary
Roselles
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/652f875e53203e8e?hl=en&
"Both are traitors to their race" -- White Supremacist, Race Loyalist
Gary Roselles slurs the acclaimed, distinguished African-American
scholars Dr. Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/90646e9b4da37793
"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking people
is going to gain anything with real minorities?" -- Gary Roselles,
Racist
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater/msg/1b116fa0999182fb
(see header)
"Them brown niggers need to be taken out" -- Gary Roselles, Racist
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.republicans/msg/421a0f9263435ca4
"He (African-American scholar Thomas Sowell) goes against his own
kind." Race loyalist Gary Roselles, insisting once again that “them
blacks” should "stick
to their own kind"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/17fcf97abe2e4ee2?dmode=source
It was formed in the south right after the Civil War and the founder was
the famous confederate general Nathan Bedford Forrest. Different people
will give different reasons why it was formed. Some say it was to stop
northern carpetbaggers, others say it was to keep the freed slaves under
white control. But it was always a racist group so the reasons aren't
that important. What was important was what they did, which was to
intimidate, murder, and control black people.
Hawke