Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

A Dream Ticket for Oil Companies

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Cliff

unread,
Jan 9, 2010, 7:13:31 AM1/9/10
to
http://www.pr-inside.com/us-election-watch-john-mccain-and-r1658818.htm
" .... Sarah Palin - A Dream Ticket for Oil Companies - new report ..."

Cliff

unread,
Jan 10, 2010, 8:16:45 AM1/10/10
to
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:10:54 -0800 (PST), Sueki Tartridge
<hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Jan 9, 6:13�am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>wrote:
>> �http://www.pr-inside.com/us-election-watch-john-mccain-and-r1658818.htm


>> � " .... Sarah Palin - A Dream Ticket for Oil Companies - new report �..."
>

>Your header should read: If Palin was President we'd already be
>working to make ourselves independent of foreign oil

CLUE: The US has no such oil deposits left.
Alaska might have about 4 months worth of US supply. Which
would take about 30 years to get & use.
We use about two *cubic miles* of the stuff each year.

>instead of using
>every ounce of political credibility to shove a montrous healthcare
>"reform" bill down the throats of the American taxpayers which the
>vast majority don't want.

Hence the rethugs/wingers/party of NO lost in a landslide.
--
Cliff

Cliff

unread,
Jan 10, 2010, 8:17:59 AM1/10/10
to
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:20:22 -0800 (PST), Sueki Tartridge
<hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Jan 9, 8:27�am, John Q Public <my2ce...@me.com> wrote:


>> On 2010-01-09 09:10:54 -0500, Sueki Tartridge <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> said:
>>
>> > On Jan 9, 6:13 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>> > wrote:
>> >>http://www.pr-inside.com/us-election-watch-john-mccain-and-r1658818.ht
>> > m

>> >> " .... Sarah Palin - A Dream Ticket for Oil Companies - new report
>> > ..."
>>

>> > Your header should read: If Palin was President we'd already be

>> > working to make ourselves independent of foreign oil instead of using


>> > every ounce of political credibility to shove a montrous healthcare
>> > "reform" bill down the throats of the American taxpayers which the
>> > vast majority don't want.
>>

>> Yep, he can't have any of those new high paying sustainable jobs and the boost
>> to economy cheaper oil would give us.
>> He only likes those tax sucking non sustainable govt. jobs which will
>> cost us more and more
>> as the graft goes round!
>
>And T-Bone Picken's sits on a $BILLION worth of wind powered "bird
>cuisinarts" that nobody wants in their backyard.

Nope.
--
Cliff

Cliff

unread,
Jan 10, 2010, 8:27:52 AM1/10/10
to
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:44:35 -0500, "vinny" <vi...@vp3d.net> wrote:

>
>"Sueki Tartridge" <hoofhe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:2880721c-58ae-4ffd...@a15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...


>On Jan 9, 8:27 am, John Q Public <my2ce...@me.com> wrote:
>> On 2010-01-09 09:10:54 -0500, Sueki Tartridge <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com>
>> said:
>>
>> > On Jan 9, 6:13 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
>> > wrote:
>> >>http://www.pr-inside.com/us-election-watch-john-mccain-and-r1658818.ht
>> > m

>> >> " .... Sarah Palin - A Dream Ticket for Oil Companies - new report
>> > ..."
>>

>> > Your header should read: If Palin was President we'd already be
>> > working to make ourselves independent of foreign oil instead of using
>> > every ounce of political credibility to shove a montrous healthcare
>> > "reform" bill down the throats of the American taxpayers which the
>> > vast majority don't want.
>>
>> Yep, he can't have any of those new high paying sustainable jobs and the
>> boost
>> to economy cheaper oil would give us.
>> He only likes those tax sucking non sustainable govt. jobs which will
>> cost us more and more
>> as the graft goes round!
>
>And T-Bone Picken's sits on a $BILLION worth of wind powered "bird
>cuisinarts" that nobody wants in their backyard.
>

>**********
>Oil is extremely efficient and cheap.

As it costs about US$ 18 to conserve a barrel of oil what
do they want to sell you?

>For what you get out of a gallon as
>far as energy goes, it's very low on the pollution scale.

Hence all the regulations & costs ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPdTH-jqv6Y

>We use oil to
>control nations from south America to the Middle east, and even canada.
> So I say we stay on gasoline, they just found out there's as much oil as
>oceans.
> Besides, we will not get off our "oil addiction" by simply creating wind
>turbines. Energy is just one part of what we do with oil. Everything we use
>is plastic..or oil. The roads are paved in oil. The resins, and the building
>materials made out of oil will still be used.
>
> It's just another bunch of crap used to scare people.

Unlike winger lies ....
--
Cliff

HH&C

unread,
Jan 10, 2010, 4:26:32 PM1/10/10
to
On Jan 10, 8:17 am, Cliff <Clhuprichguessw...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om>
wrote:

No, what? Even the environmentalists don't like wind power anymore.
Mascerates birds and bats.

DockScience

unread,
Jan 11, 2010, 3:57:03 PM1/11/10
to

"Cliff" <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote in message
news:iskjk55kvp1njmfl6...@4ax.com...

How's that wind powered car working for you Cliff.
I mean someone of your sensitivity wouldn't be driving a fossil fueled one
would you?

Didn't think so.


Cliff

unread,
Jan 11, 2010, 6:45:08 PM1/11/10
to

Pickens bailed when he could not get handouts it looked like.
He has no such $BILLION worth of wind powered ....
--
Cliff

0 new messages