A message for Ole' Kicking, Too Many Tools, Tom Swift, WY The Canuck, MI Wakefield and the good people in general

[Ramon F. Herrera]

Guys:

I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.

-Ramon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
reelected.

You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.

If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
do their job.

[Tom Swift Sr.]

On Nov 9, 12:38 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
> Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
> Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means.  Enforcement of immigration laws.
> If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB.  Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste. This guy's mind mind is wasted.


-----
-----
Please Note:

In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka
Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of Sockpuppets -- and the
winner of alt.usenet.kook's K00K of the Month Award for September
2012.

We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
psychotic interruption.
------
------

[Barbarian Mutual]

On Nov 9, 12:38 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

> Guys:
>
>I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>
> -Ramon

>Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
>
>If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.

Ramon, I still liked Michelle Bachmann's own statement about herself a
little better:

"President O'Bachmann"

[Too_Many_Tools]

LOL...I still can't quit laughing.

More like "If you see a suspicious old fat white racist, report the
SOB."

TMT

[Ramon F. Herrera]

On Nov 8, 11:38 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

------------------------

Gentlemen:

Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
your conservative fellow below (and the one above, if it is not too
much to ask). Your readers would appreciate it.

Gracias!

-Ramon

------------------------------

Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics, sci.physics
From: BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 10 2012 10:11 pm
Subject: Darwin: Blacks Are Soul Less Apes

The modern negro has an arrested intelligence
on par with a primitive pre-ape. He has a micro
brain and is usually very lazy. The negro is ever
sexualized and known to try and copulate with
white women, cattle, white boys, even zebra's.
An excess of animal hormones, combined with
an IQ that is 3 Standard Deviations below human."
-- Darwin 'On the Negro Stunted Evolution'.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>your conservative fellow below

Why are you too stupid to know my position, you stupid spamming
fuckwit?

[Too_Many_Tools]

On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Don't let Klaus bother you..he is just worried about having to sell
his guns to pay his new taxes under President Reelect Obama.

Laugh..laugh..laugh...

TMT

[Ramon F. Herrera]

On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Esteemed Mr. Schadenfreude:

I am a Google user, performing a search in the archives, and you are
there. We have technology to post into the past!!

Well, several of us are curious about the year 2012.

Care to answer Mr. Herrera's question? Shouldn't you condemn those 2
extremely hateful posts?

For they are, after all, reflecting VERY badly on your party and
conservatives in general.

-Signed: Google Users from the Year 2020

ps: Guns are still around (I was told that I had to include something
like that, or else pay a unrelated post fee. It is VERY easy to avoid
the fee).

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> >Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>> >your conservative fellow below
>>
>> Why are you too stupid to know my position, you stupid spamming
>> fuckwit?
>
>Don't let Klaus bother you.

Klaus doesn't bother me. Thanks for your concern.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> >Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>> >your conservative fellow below
>>
>
> > Why are you too stupid to know my position,
> > you stupid spamming fuckwit?
>
>Esteemed Mr. Schadenfreude:
>
>I am a Google user, performing a search in the archives, and you are
>there. We have technology to post into the past!!
>
>Well, several of us are curious about the year 2012.
>
>Care to answer Mr. Herrera's question? Shouldn't you condemn those 2
>extremely hateful posts?

Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem to be
relieved of that responsibility?

Are you handicapped?

[Ramon F. Herrera]

On Nov 11, 8:46 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem
> to be relieved of that responsibility?

Not all. Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
extreme conservatives know -in no uncertain ters- that their behavior
is not tolerated. The future of your party is at stake here.

Additionally, the condemned post must be hateful of PEOPLE (since
hating ideas is fine, we are supposed to hate some ideas - It is human
nature).

Furthermore, if you see a poster insulting another poster (even his
family) you may abstain as well. We do that here all the time.
Something like "I hate Ramon! He is such an imbecile!" falls in that
category.

-Ramon

"The left hates ideas (which is fine!!!)...
... the Right, people" -Moi

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Nov 11, 8:46 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
> > Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem
> > to be relieved of that responsibility?
>
>Not all.

So why is it my job to condemn ANY?

>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>extreme conservatives

What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.

Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?

Is THAT what you're telling us, Ramon?

Not a single one?

Really?

[chuckle]

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

[deep]

On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>extreme conservatives
>
>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.

You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.

>
>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?

Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
others".

How appropriate.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>extreme conservatives
>>
>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>
>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.

Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
of mental deficiency?

>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>
>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>others".
>
>How appropriate.

Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?

"Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round through each
eyeball and one between your front teeth, scan it in and email it back
to you."
Message-ID: <7jd0d7tbu7sm3th4j...@4ax.com>

[deep]

On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:33:06 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude

<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
>><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>>extreme conservatives
>>>
>>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>>
>>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
>
>Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
>dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
>of mental deficiency?
>
>>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>>
>>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>>others".
>>
>>How appropriate.
>
>Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?

You just can't keep up with the players, even with a program, can you?

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:33:06 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>>>extreme conservatives
>>>>
>>>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>>>
>>>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
>>
>>Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
>>dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
>>of mental deficiency?
>>
>>>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>>>
>>>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>>>others".
>>>
>>>How appropriate.
>>
>>Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?
>
>You just can't keep up with the players, even with a program, can you?

So you're saying it DOESN'T relate, you just some ass-kicking from
Klaus this morning, huh?

[chuckle]

[Gray Guest]

"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in news:be1e6bb7-1cc6-4f59-
93db-97e...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:

Actually stupid, it means that your compatriots may find themselves
targeted during the coming troubles. Bit what the Hell as long as a great
nation is destroyed, right?

--
Refusenik #1

Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.

Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Ramooooooooooooooooooooooooooon!

Anything yet?

[chuckle]

[Scout]

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6272a8dlio1mvog12...@4ax.com...

Hey, if he can't find appropriate newsgroups, do you really expect him to be
able to find a post?

[Michael A. Terrell]

Scout wrote:
>
> Hey, if he can't find appropriate newsgroups, do you really expect him to be
> able to find a post?

All he needs is a mirror...

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Ramon, haven't seen your reply yet.

Are you really THAT afraid of taking the Schadenfreude Challenge?

[deep]

You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
socialists. You think everything bad in the world is socialist and
everything good in the world is fascist, even though you've proven
regularly that you don't even understand the difference.

[Derek Smalls]

"deep" wrote in message news:oa25a8pucr42dc8p8...@4ax.com...

>^^^^^

One in the same, YOU SHOOTER of little girls during Halloween!

[Gunner]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:

>
>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>socialists.

Nazis ARE Socialists. Just like Democrats,,,or the Far Leftwing
Extremist Fringe kook variety. Like the ones controlling the DNC

They even push gun control like the Nazis did. Using the same forms


"The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be
reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and
controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced,
if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again
learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

(Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 B.C.)

[Derek Smalls]

"Gunner" wrote in message
news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:

>
>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>socialists.


Nazis ARE Socialists.

>^^^

I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!

[Gunner]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:30:15 -0500, "Derek Smalls"

<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:

>
>
>"Gunner" wrote in message
>news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
><Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>>socialists.
>
>
>Nazis ARE Socialists.
>
>>^^^
>
>I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
>LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!

What..you didnt like the backup?

Or dont you think its true?

Speak your piece, paleface.

Gunner

The methodology of the left has always been:

1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

Wow.

Three lies in one post. You're on a roll!

http://klaus.webege.com/dudu/dudu.htm
Deep Dudu's FORTRESS OF LIES
Now With Over 276 Documented
Lies, Falsehoods, Fabrications, Distortions, and Deceptions!

[Derek Smalls]

"Gunner" wrote in message
news:92b5a890t0lddpj99...@4ax.com...

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:30:15 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:

>
>
>"Gunner" wrote in message
>news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
><Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>>socialists.
>
>
>Nazis ARE Socialists.
>
>>^^^
>
>I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
>LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!

What..you didnt like the backup?

>^^^

What back up?
You are a known moron, and I would NEVER want to be associated with the
likes of you, you retard.

[Scout]

"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
news:oa25a8pucr42dc8p8...@4ax.com...

First you tell us he hasn't condemned them....then you admit that he has.

Really Dudu, you should expose your lie in the next sentence, make you look
just stupid, and by that I mean more so than usual.

[Scout]

"Derek Smalls" <Spin...@bass.gov> wrote in message
news:50a29fc5$0$9804$607e...@cv.net...

Actually...the fault, if any, is largely yours. Failing to properly quote
and relying on a line of asterisks to indicate your reply isn't a good
practice.

1) The person may not read down far enough to run into your line of
asterisks
2) Some news readers automatically snip everything below a line of asterisks
as part of a signature.

If you are going to continue using Live and think it's a big issue because
others get confused due to the failure of YOUR choice of newsreader, then
may I make a suggestion?

Delete Live V15 from your system. Install Live V14....and everything will
work as it should.
PS...you should even need to restore your settings, files, emails, etc as
they should port over automatically when you install V14 but you should back
them up just in case.

So...until you get your news reader to quote properly, I won't be pointing
fingers.

[Scout]

"Derek Smalls" <Spin...@bass.gov> wrote in message

news:50a2ae20$0$9832$607e...@cv.net...

Right now...I not seeing how you look much, if any better than he does.

[Scout]

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2bb5a8toboku0s8o9...@4ax.com...

Three?

I counted up to eight.

1) You don't condemn Nazis
2) You are a liar
3) You are a pig
4) You simply call Nazis socialists
5) You think everything bad in the world is socialist
6) You think everything good in the world is fascist
7) You've proven you don't understand the difference
8) You've done so regularly.

Pretty good for only 3 sentences. That could be up to 2.66 lies per sentence

[Derek Smalls]

"Scout" wrote in message news:k7ud8d$j3o$1...@dont-email.me...

>^^^^

I'm the cute and adorable one that is always correct.

[Derek Smalls]

"Scout" wrote in message news:k7ud6n$ipi$1...@dont-email.me...

"Derek Smalls" <Spin...@bass.gov> wrote in message
news:50a29fc5$0$9804$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
> "Gunner" wrote in message
> news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
> <Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>>socialists.
>
>
> Nazis ARE Socialists.
>
>>^^^
>
> I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
> LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!

Actually...the fault, if any, is largely yours. Failing to properly quote
and relying on a line of asterisks to indicate your reply isn't a good
practice.

>^^^^^^
Bullshit!

I posted properly and AT the bottom, AFTER someone else!
See? You are on TOP.
I posted AFTER you, and underneath.

THAT is proper Netiquette , as far as my software allows.

[Gunner]

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:31:30 -0500, "Derek Smalls"

<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:

>
>
>"Gunner" wrote in message
>news:92b5a890t0lddpj99...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:30:15 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
><Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Gunner" wrote in message
>>news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
>>
>>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
>><Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>>>socialists.

Should I have condemned what are obviously a poor and now largely dead
group of socialists? I thought history did that well enough. No?

>>
>>
>>Nazis ARE Socialists.
>>
>>>^^^
>>
>>I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
>>LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!
>
>What..you didnt like the backup?
>
>
>>^^^
>
>What back up?
>You are a known moron, and I would NEVER want to be associated with the
>likes of you, you retard.
>

Ah poor Derweck..such a schnookums!!



Snicker!

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:57:38 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
>><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>>
>>>>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>>>>extreme conservatives
>>>>>
>>>>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>>>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>>>>>
>>>>>Is THAT what you're telling us, Ramon?
>>>>>
>>>>>Not a single one?
>>>>>
>>>>>Really?
>>>>>
>>>>>[chuckle]
>>>>
>>>>Ramooooooooooooooooooooooooooon!
>>>>
>>>>Anything yet?
>>>>
>>>>[chuckle]
>>>
>>>Ramon, haven't seen your reply yet.
>>>
>>>Are you really THAT afraid of taking the Schadenfreude Challenge?

Well, Ramon? Still having trouble?

[chuckle]

[deep]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:02:00 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude

HAHAHAHAHAAA.

You are SUCH a fucking moron and you SO need a life!

You personify the word pathetic.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

Another standard Dudu response.

Boring.

Maybe you could help Ramon do his search, if you only knew how to use
the computer.


Lies 278, 279, & 280

http://klaus.webege.com/dudu/dudu.htm
Deep Dudu's FORTRESS OF LIES

Now With Over 280 Documented

[deep]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:19:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Maybe you could help Ramon do his search, if you only knew how to use
>the computer.

Maybe you could get a life you sociopathic bitch.

[Gunner]

Federalizing the Election Process [Excerpts]
OK Politechs | 11/13/12 | Charles M. Phipps

On election day there were long lines in some states and many people
waited hours to vote.

There have already been calls by some in Congress (all Democrats, so
far) to have Congress intervene to "normalize" voting nationwide and
avoid the long delays of last Tuesday.

Eliminating lines and streamlining the voting process sounds great,
but elections are run by the states and the federal government has no
authority to step in. The notion that these are federal elections is
a misnomer because all but the president and vice president represent
individual states or districts. Even the vote for president is not
really a vote for the candidate, but for the electors from the state
who will vote for that candidate at a later date.

And although it has not been mentioned by proponents of federalizing
the election process, I believe an eventual goal of doing so would be
the elimination of the Electoral College. There are many people who
believe we should elect the president on a popular vote. This also
goes against the intentions of the Founders and the federal system
they created.

The national popular vote is a misguided movement that ignores the
original intent of the Founders when they drafted the Constitution.
The federal coalition of the United States was designed with the
intent that the states, not the direct vote of the people, would
select the President.

The United States was created as a republic; not a democracy.

A Republic is representative government ruled by law (the
Constitution).

A Democracy is direct government ruled by the majority (mob rule).

A Republic recognizes the inalienable rights of individuals while
democracies are only concerned with group wants or needs (the public
good).

Lawmaking is a slow, deliberate process in our Constitutional Republic
requiring approval from the House, Senate, Executive (President or
Governor), The Supreme Court, and individual jurors.

Lawmaking in our unlawful democracy occurs rapidly requiring approval
from the whim of the majority as determined by polls and/or voter
referendums.

Democracies always self-destruct when the non-productive majority
realizes that it can vote itself handouts from the productive minority
by electing the candidate promising the most benefits from the public
treasury. To maintain their power, these candidates must adopt an
ever-increasing tax and spend policy to satisfy the ever-increasing
desires of the majority. As taxes increase, incentive to produce
decreases, causing many of the once productive to drop out and join
the non-productive. When there are no longer enough producers to fund
the legitimate functions of government and the socialist programs, the
democracy will collapse, always to be followed by a dictatorship.

The Founders knew full well the differences between a Republic and a
Democracy. They repeatedly and emphatically said that they had founded
a Republic.

Article IV Section 4, of the Constitution "guarantees to every state
in this union a Republican form of government"... Conversely, the word
Democracy is not mentioned even once in the Constitution.


Our military training manuals used to contain the correct definitions
of Democracy and Republic. The following comes from Training Manual
No. 2000-25 published by the War Department, November 30, 1928.

DEMOCRACY:

A government of the masses.
Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of
"direct" expression.
Results in mobocracy.
Attitude toward property is communistic--negating property rights.
Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall
regulate, whether is be based upon deliberation or governed by
passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to
consequences.
Results in demogogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.

REPUBLIC:

Authority is derived through the election by the people of public
officials best fitted to represent them.
Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord
with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard
to consequences.
A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be
brought within its compass.
Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy.
Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment,
and progress.
Is the "standard form" of government throughout the world.

The manuals containing these definitions were ordered destroyed
without explanation by President Franklin D. Roosevelt early in his
administration.


A classic American movie example of "Republic vs.Democracy" is the
town sheriff holding a prisoner for trial against a lynch mob. The
Sheriff represents "Rule of Law"; the Lynch Mob "Majority Rule".

[Scout]

"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message

news:5mg7a89kv1ci7v4aj...@4ax.com...

Says the person who spends his time typing lies to Usenet.

[Scout]

"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message

news:nnh7a85kgjfspp25n...@4ax.com...

Oops, looks like Klaus hit the nail on the head....and such hostility and
anger there Dudu.

[Scout]

"Deucalion" <som...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:9ns7a85nb2h9i270k...@4ax.com...

> You really should not disparage people for spending time posting to
> Usenet.

No, I disparage Dudu for spending his time posting lies to Usenet.

http://klaus.webege.com/dudu/dudu.htm

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

it's the only way he knows how to respond when he gets proven a liar.

Too bad I couldn't hear it, what with him running away with his skirt
pulled over his head and all.

I call this the DUDU DECEPTION DOPPLER effect.

His lies don't sound as bad if he's running away from you.

[chuckle]

[max headroom]

Scout <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in news:k80ofe$bof$4...@dont-email.me:

Just more love from the left... ya know, the inclusive, tolerant bunch.

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

I guess Ramon is NOT going to accept the challenge. We'll just accept
him as the lying stooge he is and move on.........................

[Jeff M]

On 11/11/2012 8:41 AM, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
> On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>

> wrote:
>>> "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

>>> Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>>> your conservative fellow below
>>
>> Why are you too stupid to know my position, you stupid spamming
>> fuckwit?
>
> Don't let Klaus bother you..he is just worried about having to sell
> his guns to pay his new taxes under President Reelect Obama.
>
> Laugh..laugh..laugh...

Do you really think he's capable of earning enough to pay much or
anything at all in income taxes?

[Klaus Schadenfreude]

>Jeff M <NoS...@NoThanks.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :

I probably pay my accountant more than you earn every year.

[chuckle]