Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Mounting Conundrum, Revisited

Received: by 10.224.219.144 with SMTP id hu16mr9295540qab.1.1352869943386;
        Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.93.229 with SMTP id cx5mr50586vdb.19.1352869943363; Tue, 13
 Nov 2012 21:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Path: gf5ni56274882qab.0!nntp.google.com!u2no1037664qal.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.crafts.metalworking
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:12:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ptSdnZpX6KzoTz_NnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@web-ster.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.39.122.70; posting-account=AV0MqAkAAADlJksbcZkncjfN3da_-33U
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.39.122.70
References: <ptSdnWNU6KzZAj_NnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@web-ster.com>
 <548408c3-7f1d-436d-afe1-dff852bdaedd@googlegroups.com> <qo-dna9a1_x_Ij_NnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@web-ster.com>
 <1747d2fd-18ff-479e-8144-9ed3f93d6e3d@googlegroups.com> <ptSdnZpX6KzoTz_NnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@web-ster.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <bd558f00-14e2-4380-8184-d1059a95afcd@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Mounting Conundrum, Revisited
From: rangerssuck <rangerss...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 05:12:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:06:29 PM UTC-5, Tim Wescott wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:02:26 -0800, rangerssuck wrote:
>=20
[trimmed]
>=20
> > How about mounting the pot semi-ridgedly on kinked or s-bent pieces of
> > bus wire? Pretty much free (except for 30 seconds or so of extra=20
> > assembly) and easily repairable. If the pot really has very low
> > rotational friction, the wires shouldn't bed in normal usage, but will=
=20
> > give enough to prevent damage. You could even try some springy piano=20
> > wire.=20
>=20
> Hmm.  Good thought, but it'd take a lot more than 30 seconds.  It's a =20
> surface-mount part, so mounting it as designed is very quick while=20
> mounting it just about any other way isn't so.

If you mount the pot on a separate little board, it would be easy. If you'r=
e making printed circuit boards, just add the little pot board to the layou=
t with either a score line or a tab route separating them. If you're going =
to breadboard this (as in your photos), just make up a bunch of little boar=
ds that hold nothing but the pot and four mounting wires.

IIRC, you were talking about small (20-100/year) quantities. Even if it too=
k an extra three minutes per assembly (which it won't), you're only talking=
 1 - 5 hours PER YEAR. I personally have probably a half hour into this pro=
ject already, between reading and writing.

Just sayin'