Newsgroups: rec.crafts.metalworking
From: Larry Jaques <ljaq...@invalid.diversifycomm.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:27:02 -0700
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: Libertarians - still hoping for "The Man on a White Horse" to come and make them free - was Re: 12 v. power source
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 01:18:34 -0700, Gunner <gunnera...@gmail.com>
wrote: >On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:39:57 -0700, Larry Jaques
Libertarians are not well liked by the status quo.
><ljaq...@invalid.diversifycomm.com> wrote: >>On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:54:58 -0700, pyotr filipivich
>>>Larry Jaques <ljaq...@invalid.diversifycomm.com> on Mon, 08 Oct 2012
>>>>>>>>>Bank on it.
>>>>>>>>I'm certain it -will- happen. That's why I want Ron Paul to win. It
>>>>>>>Never happen, not in a million years.
>>>>>> Isn't Ron Paul being reelected as a Republican?
>>>>Yes, but he's a Libertarian at heart.
>>> So why doesn't he run for Congress as a Libertarian?
>>He ran for President in '88 as a Libertarian.
>And lost by a landslide
>>> Bernie Sanders runs as a Socialist, and he gets elected and
I noticed that, and cheered it on.
>>>re-elected. Of course, he is the only openly Socialist in the >>>Democrat caucus (the rest just are too bashful to admit it.) >>>>>> And how much impact has he had on the House of Representatives?
>>>>>Damned little
>>>>As a co-worker. But he is being felt and listened to more now.
>>> Because of his efforts, or because the TEA party has caused a sea
>>Probably both. Tell me about this "sea change". >We take it you didnt notice the number of Republicans that were voted
>RINOS...had to go.
>>>>>> And why do the Libertarians feel that if they elect a Libertarian
And that's our hope for Paul next month.
>>>>>>as President, he can dictate policy, laws and budgets to the Congress >>>>>>of the US? Or do they expect him to rule by Executive Order? >>>>>Excellent question and one they have no answer for. These same
>>>>>> Have not these Libertarians understood the Constitution, that the
>>>>>Evidently not. >>>>Kennedy gave us the moon... He had the people behind him.
>>> Nice response, but it does not answer the questions: Do these
>>I think they do. People in high places influence others, especially
>Yes..and?
>>> It was not Kennedy who appropriated the money to buy the real
I was _agreeing_, OK? ;) "Yeah, right." is indicative of
>>>estate, buy the parts, or pay the engineers. That had to happen in >>>the House. >>Right.
>It wasnt?
incredulous disagreement. --
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||