Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Mounting Conundrum, Revisited
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tim Wescott  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 6:04 pm
Newsgroups: rec.crafts.metalworking
From: Tim Wescott <t...@seemywebsite.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:04:58 -0600
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 6:04 pm
Subject: Re: Mounting Conundrum, Revisited

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:55:15 -0500, Jim Wilkins wrote:
> "Tim Wescott" <t...@seemywebsite.please> wrote in message
> news:qo-dna9a1_x_Ij_NnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@web-ster.com...

>>> This is a pretty neat training gizmo for control loops. Sort of like
>>> the
>>> ball balancer, but better.

>> I considered doing a ball balancer, but I figured this would cost less.

>> For that matter, I really wanted to do an inverted pendulum -- but I
>> couldn't see how to do the mechanism cheaply.

>> The wheel collars stayed tight on the flight home, yet the pot was
>> still
>> punched off the board.  Not by as far -- but all leads broken is still
>> all leads broken.  I suspect that any sort of collar that rides close
>> to
>> the board to limit travel in that direction will either rub or have too
>> much play to be safe -- but I could be wrong.

>> At this point what I see is a choice between some rotational slop
>> between
>> shaft and pot (which messes up the educational value of the thing), the
>> current setup (which leaves it fragile, but possibly manageably so),
>> some
>> sort of a flex coupling or spring (assuming I can figure out how to do
>> that well and cheaply), or some sort of a spring-loaded means of
>> holding
>> the shaft-pot joint to be snug in rotation, but still low friction to
>> axial motion.

>> --
>> Tim Wescott
>> Control system and signal processing consulting www.wescottdesign.com

> http://www.dynapar.com/uploadedFiles/_Site_Root/Technology/White_Papers/

Encoder%20Mounting%20WP.pdf

> #3, Direct mount with tether. The tether might be the connecting wires.
> jsw

If I use this pot then my situation is just about backwards from their
assumptions: the pot _doesn't_ have bearings, and by construction its
designed to be soldered onto the board.

--
My liberal friends think I'm a conservative kook.
My conservative friends think I'm a liberal kook.
Why am I not happy that they have found common ground?

Tim Wescott, Communications, Control, Circuits & Software
http://www.wescottdesign.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.