Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What I learned from the debate....Obama is NO debater.
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Don't Like Either Candidate
Oct 4, 2012, 3:22:41 AM10/4/12
to
That was one of the most embarrassing spectacles I have ever
witnessed in presidential debating.
It's clear Obama is not the brains behind his presidency. He's
just a party puppet, and he was exposed by Romney as a tiny,
bitter, man.
witnessed in presidential debating.
It's clear Obama is not the brains behind his presidency. He's
just a party puppet, and he was exposed by Romney as a tiny,
bitter, man.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Oct 4, 2012, 7:40:12 AM10/4/12
to
>"Don't Like Either Candidate" <nob...@slug.sluggish.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
It gets really interesting when they have to step in front of the
curtain, with all the wires and strings cut.
curtain, with all the wires and strings cut.
Robert Frosty
Oct 4, 2012, 7:55:20 AM10/4/12
to
MOMENTUM LOST!
And probably too late for Obama to mount a comeback.
Oh, you're gonna like the next GOP recession, folks!
And probably too late for Obama to mount a comeback.
Oh, you're gonna like the next GOP recession, folks!
Ken
Oct 4, 2012, 8:11:13 AM10/4/12
to
for him. The press can refuse to print damaging articles and heap
praise on him in order to support his candidacy, but they cannot help
him in a one on one debate. "The king has no clothes."
clark
Oct 4, 2012, 9:21:01 AM10/4/12
to
Needs more teleprompter
JerryD(upstateNY)
Oct 4, 2012, 11:25:25 AM10/4/12
to
"Robert Frosty" wrote in message MOMENTUM LOST!
through he warned congress 17 times about Fannie and
Freddie failing, starting in 2001, he never DEMANDED
congress do something.
The liberal's wet dream of having "poor people" owning
their own home by lending them money, even if they had
bad/no credit or even if they had no job, was a HUGE
part in the housing meltdown.
From NY Times - September 11, 2003
The Bush administration today recommended
the most significant regulatory overhaul in the
housing finance industry since the savings and
loan crisis a decade ago.
The White House released this list of attempts by President Bush to reform
Freddie Mae and Freddie Mac since he took office in 2001.
Unfortunately, Congress did not act on the president's warnings:
** 2001
April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble of a
large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting
Federally insured entities and economic activity."
** 2002
May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance
principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to
apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
--
JerryD(upstateNY)
And probably too late for Obama to mount a comeback.
Oh, you're gonna like the next GOP recession, folks!<<<<<<<<<
Bush was partially at fault for the recession because even
Oh, you're gonna like the next GOP recession, folks!<<<<<<<<<
through he warned congress 17 times about Fannie and
Freddie failing, starting in 2001, he never DEMANDED
congress do something.
The liberal's wet dream of having "poor people" owning
their own home by lending them money, even if they had
bad/no credit or even if they had no job, was a HUGE
part in the housing meltdown.
From NY Times - September 11, 2003
The Bush administration today recommended
the most significant regulatory overhaul in the
housing finance industry since the savings and
loan crisis a decade ago.
The White House released this list of attempts by President Bush to reform
Freddie Mae and Freddie Mac since he took office in 2001.
Unfortunately, Congress did not act on the president's warnings:
** 2001
April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble of a
large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting
Federally insured entities and economic activity."
** 2002
May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance
principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to
apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
--
JerryD(upstateNY)
Michael A. Terrell
Oct 4, 2012, 1:31:16 PM10/4/12
to
re-run.
Michael A. Terrell
Oct 4, 2012, 1:32:59 PM10/4/12
to
clark wrote:
>
> Needs more teleprompter.
He needs someone to type the truth into his TelePrompTerŽ.
Jim Wilkins
Oct 4, 2012, 2:26:52 PM10/4/12
to
"Don't Like Either Candidate" <nob...@slug.sluggish.net> wrote in
message news:cd2945c30152332c...@slug.slugish.net...
him, just glib opportunists.
RD Sandman
Oct 4, 2012, 2:57:51 PM10/4/12
to
"JerryD\(upstateNY\)" <jer...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in
news:k4k9pn$3gp$1...@jerryd.eternal-september.org:
> "Robert Frosty" wrote in message MOMENTUM LOST!
> And probably too late for Obama to mount a comeback.
> Oh, you're gonna like the next GOP recession, folks!<<<<<<<<<
>
> Bush was partially at fault for the recession because even
> through he warned congress 17 times about Fannie and
> Freddie failing, starting in 2001, he never DEMANDED
> congress do something.
> The liberal's wet dream of having "poor people" owning
> their own home by lending them money, even if they had
> bad/no credit or even if they had no job, was a HUGE
> part in the housing meltdown.
While that is true....Clinton wanted 8 million new home owners on his
watc, Bush continued that with a desire for 5.5 million more.
> From NY Times - September 11, 2003
> The Bush administration today recommended
> the most significant regulatory overhaul in the
> housing finance industry since the savings and
> loan crisis a decade ago.
> The White House released this list of attempts by President Bush to
> reform
> Freddie Mae and Freddie Mac since he took office in 2001.
> Unfortunately, Congress did not act on the president's warnings:
Yep. His own party......
> ** 2001
>
> April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of
> Fannie Mae
> and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble
> of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets,
> affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity."
>
> ** 2002
>
> May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance
> principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate
> responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt
> Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
He also called for more regulation in 2005.
--
Democracy means that anyone can grow up to be President,
And anyone who doesn't grow up can be Vice President.
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman)
news:k4k9pn$3gp$1...@jerryd.eternal-september.org:
> "Robert Frosty" wrote in message MOMENTUM LOST!
> And probably too late for Obama to mount a comeback.
> Oh, you're gonna like the next GOP recession, folks!<<<<<<<<<
>
> Bush was partially at fault for the recession because even
> through he warned congress 17 times about Fannie and
> Freddie failing, starting in 2001, he never DEMANDED
> congress do something.
> The liberal's wet dream of having "poor people" owning
> their own home by lending them money, even if they had
> bad/no credit or even if they had no job, was a HUGE
> part in the housing meltdown.
watc, Bush continued that with a desire for 5.5 million more.
> From NY Times - September 11, 2003
> The Bush administration today recommended
> the most significant regulatory overhaul in the
> housing finance industry since the savings and
> loan crisis a decade ago.
> The White House released this list of attempts by President Bush to
> reform
> Freddie Mae and Freddie Mac since he took office in 2001.
> Unfortunately, Congress did not act on the president's warnings:
> ** 2001
>
> April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of
> Fannie Mae
> and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble
> of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets,
> affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity."
>
> ** 2002
>
> May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance
> principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate
> responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt
> Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
--
Democracy means that anyone can grow up to be President,
And anyone who doesn't grow up can be Vice President.
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman)
RogerN
Oct 4, 2012, 6:57:08 PM10/4/12
to
"Don't Like Either Candidate" wrote in message
news:cd2945c30152332c...@slug.slugish.net...
Obama might be a great debater, it's just that there isn't much to debate
when Romney told the truth about Obama.
The difference between Romneycare and Obamacare? Romney got bi-partisan
support, Obama crammed through with bi-partisan opposition.
Romney wants to work with others, take in their ideas, and use the best of
them, but libtards jump him because he doesn't have a detailed plan. Obama
had a detailed plan with Obamacare, the people said "NO", Obama said "I
don't care" and crammed it through anyway. If Obama would have worked,
negotiated, listened to the ideas of others, earned support for Obamacare,
then Obama would have earned and deserved respect, but he didn't earn it and
he doesn't deserve it.
The bottom line is that the worst criticism liberals have for Romney is that
he's open to the ideas of others, with libtard spin they term it as not
having detailed plans.
RogerN
news:cd2945c30152332c...@slug.slugish.net...
when Romney told the truth about Obama.
The difference between Romneycare and Obamacare? Romney got bi-partisan
support, Obama crammed through with bi-partisan opposition.
Romney wants to work with others, take in their ideas, and use the best of
them, but libtards jump him because he doesn't have a detailed plan. Obama
had a detailed plan with Obamacare, the people said "NO", Obama said "I
don't care" and crammed it through anyway. If Obama would have worked,
negotiated, listened to the ideas of others, earned support for Obamacare,
then Obama would have earned and deserved respect, but he didn't earn it and
he doesn't deserve it.
The bottom line is that the worst criticism liberals have for Romney is that
he's open to the ideas of others, with libtard spin they term it as not
having detailed plans.
RogerN
0 new messages