Palin does Newsweek...What's next "Dancing with the Stars"?
Too_Many_Tools
I wonder if Playboy is next.
Of course they will have to airbrush the flab off her butt.
TMT
Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover
Tue Nov 17, 2:41 pm ET
For the second time since Sarah Palin stepped into the national
political spotlight, a photo of the former Republican vice-
presidential candidate featured on the cover of Newsweek magazine is
sparking controversy. Palin herself blasted the "out-of-context" cover
as "sexist" on her Facebook page.
Originally published in the August 2009 issue of Runners World, the
photo features the former Alaska governor in short runner's shorts. It
was part of a multi-photograph slideshow that accompanied an article
about Palin and her love for the sport titled, "I'm A Runner." In her
Facebook post late last night, Palin took issue with Newsweek using a
photo from an article about health and fitness to promote an analysis
piece contemplating her relevance as a political figure:
"The choice of photo for the cover of this week's Newsweek is
unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this "news" magazine has
relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The
Runner's World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was
taken was all about health and fitness -- a subject to which I am
devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-
context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If
anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn't judge a
book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do
anything to draw attention -- even if out of context.
The reaction to the Newsweek cover has predictably sparked outrage
from conservative supporters of Palin and kudos from liberals who
oppose her. CBN commentator David Brady called the cover "a new low"
for the "biased" magazine, adding that Newsweek has a history of
portraying liberal women as "heroes for the next generation," while
portraying conservative women like Palin as "nuts and dopey."
Meanwhile, documentary photographer Nina Berman hailed the cover as
"brilliant" and "shrewd" for using a "propped photo where Palin is an
obvious participant ... to show how far out she is willing to travel
on the road of self promotion" while "shield[ing] themselves from what
would have been the inevitable criticism if they had dolled her up
themselves and posed her the same way."
The current cover flap isn't the first time Newsweek has generated
controversy with a photograph of Palin. The October 13, 2008, issue
featured an extreme close-up of Palin that seemed to be devoid of the
high-tech retouching often employed by magazines. Conservatives
claimed this highlighted some of Palin's supposed "flaws," like
wrinkles around her eyes.
Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham told Yahoo! News that the photo choice was
simply the "most interesting image available":
"We chose the most interesting image available to us to illustrate the
theme of the cover, which is what we always try to do. We apply the
same test to photographs of any public figure, male or female: does
the image convey what we are saying? That is a gender-neutral
standard."
-- Brett Michael Dykes is a contributor to the Yahoo! News Blog
RBnDFW
> Hey check out this porn that Crazy Sarah did for Newsweek!
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20091117/pl_ynews/ynews_pl984;_ylt=AhJRiG.dx_MeNyF0FBYz0ZKs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTJiMzBjMDhzBGFzc2V0A3luZXdzLzIwMDkxMTE3L3luZXdzX3BsOTg0BHBvcwM1BHNlYwN5bl9tb3N0X3BvcHVsYXIEc2xrA3BhbGluYW5nZXJlZA--
>
> I wonder if Playboy is next.
>
> Of course they will have to airbrush the flab off her butt.
>
> TMT
>
> Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover
> Tue Nov 17, 2:41 pm ET
You are just frustrated because you get "wood" whenever you look at a
photo of Palin. She's the only person over 13 that does that for you.
I bet you have a photo of Pelosi as an antidote.
Fred B. Brown
She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
Ramon F Herrera
On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
than imagined.
-Ramon
HH&C
What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
Too_Many_Tools
People like you.
TMT
Buerste
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
<snip>
What's next? The White House.
rangerssuck
> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> <snip>
>
> What's next? The White House.
That would make you happy? Seriously?
Lookout
Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
can't even win her own party AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH
HH&C
I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
HH&C
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:00:05 -0500, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >"Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> ><snip>
>
> >What's next? The White House.
>
> Republicans don't believe that she is presidential material.
Even the majority of Republicans don't believe that Barack is
presidential material.
SaPeIsMa
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
#
# You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
# Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
# than imagined.
#
# -Ramon
Just because your mom sold herself on the corner does not mean that other
women are like her
Bret Cahill
>
> > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
> > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> > than imagined.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
Neonazis, white supremists, KKK cross burners . . .
Bret Cahill
Bret Cahill
>
> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> > > > than imagined.
>
> > > > -Ramon
>
> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
>
> > People like you.
>
> > TMT
>
> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
>
> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
Bret Cahill
HH&C
I see that you've been programmed by Nancy Pelosi.
HH&C
Nancy Pelosi willl probably imagine she saw that, too.
Too_Many_Tools
> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> <snip>
>
> What's next? The White House.
More like a trailer park near you. ;<)
How's that job expansion going Tom?
Got all of those two new employees yet?
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think much of her, but she is going to be at a Costco about
> five miles from my house this weekend. Do you think I should go see
> if I like her better in person?
>
> You do realize the leftist wingers ranting and raving about her at
> least twice daily is calling her to the attention of a lot of people.
> Some will like her.
>
> Perhaps not the best political tactic you guys could come up with.
>
> What's the old adage? I don't care what you say about me as long as
> you spell my name right?
Yeah....I would suggest going and film the event and post it.
Let us decide for ourselves.
Make sure to ask her if she can see Russia from your Costco.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> You forgot to mention the picture was not for Newsweek but for a
> running magazine. And she is dressed like most runners.
>
> You also forgot to mention that Palin is unhappy about their photo
> swap. Instead you make it sound like she wanted it to come out that
> way.
>
> Then again you are just a little dishonest leftist winger and we
> expect lies and deceit from you.
>
> Newsweek? That's Eleanor Clift's magazine and she/they are as liberal
> as they get. Ever see her on McLaughlin Group? They did a hit piece
> on the opposition? Wow, color me surprised.
Bullshit...she posed for it and it is considered porn in many places.
If she is SO UNHAPPY why did she POSE for it?
Hypocrite.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> Lookout <mrLook...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
> >can't even win her own party
>
LOL...the majority of Republicans consider her unacceptable for
President.
Poll results easily found...if you look for them.
Choke on it. ;<)
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> In article
> <4ced29b5-1ff0-450d-9426-a52bce518...@z35g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, "HH&C"
> Dick Cheney (maybe a point or two more popular in the US than the 9/11
> terrorists).- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
"Programmed" is a polite term describing what Dick Cheney did to
America.
TMT
Gunner Asch
Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
posts all across the land?
Gunner
>
"Aren't cats Libertarian? They just want to be left alone.
I think our dog is a Democrat, as he is always looking for a handout"
Unknown Usnet Poster
Heh, heh, I'm pretty sure my dog is a liberal - he has no balls.
Keyton
John R. Carroll
> On Nov 18, 6:00 pm, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
>> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> What's next? The White House.
>
> More like a trailer park near you. ;<)
Nawh,
Sarah has decided to write a Trilogy.
"Going Rogue" is out now.
"Going Nowhere" is in the works.
"Going Away" to follow immediately thereafter.
--
John R. Carroll
Gunner Asch
Oh..then you are talking about Democrats!
Thanks for clearing that up.
Gunner Asch
wrote:
>In article
><4ced29b5-1ff0-450d...@z35g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, "HH&C"
>And you and the other Republican party faithful have been programmed by
>Dick Cheney (maybe a point or two more popular in the US than the 9/11
>terrorists).
Dick Cheney? Didnt he go away a couple years ago when the Democrats
assumed control of Congress...2 yrs ago..before they and the Obamassiah
flushed the US down the toilet?
Buerste
"rangerssuck" <range...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11593915-c469-48db...@o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
*************************************
I'd love to see the libtards all have conniption fits! And, she would be
infinitely better than Obammy.
Buerste
"Deucalion" <som...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3t59g5d0mdmh5cvdr...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:00:05 -0500, "Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>What's next? The White House.
>
> Republicans don't believe that she is presidential material.
The important thing is to get rid of President Wee-Wee.
Too_Many_Tools
<snicker>....good one John.
TMT
Buerste
"Deucalion" <som...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3t59g5d0mdmh5cvdr...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:00:05 -0500, "Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>What's next? The White House.
>
> Republicans don't believe that she is presidential material.
The libtards have shown that they haven't a CLUE as to what is "Presidential
Material".
Buerste
TMT
*************************************
I had one quit after one day, he was doing repair work and found it too
boring I guess. We replaced him the next day from the stack of
applications. That new guy is meticulous and quick, I'll give him a nice
raise if he keeps up the good work. My new head mechanic is even better
than I hoped for! (Gunner's job if He wanted it, which he really didn't)
This guy has been able to analyze problems quickly and do repairs. He has
already come up with some great ideas of how to improve mechanisms, improve
ergonomics, organize the machine shop, materials and spare parts. He has a
great background and a lot was expected of him, especially for the salary he
wanted which was more than I had in mind. I'm so glad I brought him into
the team!
I have to run overtime 2 hours a day and four hours Saturday and Sunday on
three machines that are a bottleneck. I'll have a new machine on line in a
month or so and that should elevate the problem. My scheduler is lobbying
for another employee but I think we can make due. I'd rather do overtime
than hire somebody that I might not need in a month or two and It takes a
few months to train a good operator. Besides, my people LOVE double-time!
Strangely, there isn't a trailer park within at least ten miles, but I live
in the country now and enjoy the fresh produce and non-libtard way of life.
No crime, low taxes, friendly neighbors, great schools and churches,
everything's clean and fresh and there are plenty of good restaurants and
higher-end shopping malls close by. But no streetlights and the 6' deep
roadside culverts are frightening.
How's you job search going? Would you like me to give you pointers on your
resume? Do you need some contacts?
Buerste
TMT
**********************************
The fact that libtards hate her so much runs a thrill down my leg. My
enemy's enemy is my friend! You guys are going to propel her into the White
House! Especially after President Wee-Wee's dismal performance.
Buerste
Hypocrite.
TMT
**********************
The shot was for "Runner's World".
Buerste
Choke on it. ;<)
TMT
**********************************
But, more importantly, libtards HATE her! And, that's a great position to
be in.
Fred B. Brown
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
than imagined.
-Ramon
Go feed your donkey, Jose
Lookout
wrote:
>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Hey check out this porn that Crazy Sarah did for Newsweek!
>
>You forgot to mention the picture was not for Newsweek but for a
>running magazine. And she is dressed like most runners.
>
>You also forgot to mention that Palin is unhappy about their photo
>swap. Instead you make it sound like she wanted it to come out that
>way.
>
>Then again you are just a little dishonest leftist winger and we
>expect lies and deceit from you.
>
>Newsweek? That's Eleanor Clift's magazine and she/they are as liberal
>as they get. Ever see her on McLaughlin Group? They did a hit piece
>on the opposition? Wow, color me surprised.
NewsWeek, TIME and most major newspapers contract with writers from
all sides to present readers with different views so readers can make
up their own mind. It's not her magazine..she's just one of many
writers there. She has nothing to do with the content of an
issue..just her one article.
I have to believe you were ignorant on this one.
Lookout
>> > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>
>> > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>
>> > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
>> > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
>> > than imagined.
>>
>> > -Ramon
>>
>> What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
>
>Neonazis, white supremists, KKK cross burners . . .
>
>
>Bret Cahill
>
homophobes
Lookout
Proving once again that gummer is as up to date on current events as
Palin. The last magazine he read was a 1954 issue of Boys Life.
Lookout
wrote:
>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
>>can't even win her own party
>
>Your lack of a cite speaks volumes.
I have posted SEVERAL story links in the past few weeks showing her
5th. Do a quick search and look them up. Hell...in Iowa she was 5th
and you can't do anything until you make Iowa happy.
If you read TIME or NewsWeek you would have read the stories.
You really are this ignorant, aren't you?
And no, I'm not going to go back and look them up for you. If you
can't keep up that's not my problem. But it IS a common denominator
with republicans..not being informed of all the facts seem to be a
common thread with them. They only see what they want to see.
RBnDFW
> On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>
>> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>
>
> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> than imagined.
She's not the best, but she's good enough to be elected.
Surely BHO wasn't the best the Socialists had to offer.
RBnDFW
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:13:34 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
> <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>>
>>> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>>
>> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
>> Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
>> than imagined.
>>
>
> Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
Considering nobody is actually running, it is irrelevant
RBnDFW
> Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey check out this porn that Crazy Sarah did for Newsweek!
>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20091117/pl_ynews/ynews_pl984;_ylt=AhJRiG.dx_MeNyF0FBYz0ZKs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTJiMzBjMDhzBGFzc2V0A3luZXdzLzIwMDkxMTE3L3luZXdzX3BsOTg0BHBvcwM1BHNlYwN5bl9tb3N0X3BvcHVsYXIEc2xrA3BhbGluYW5nZXJlZA--
>
> You forgot to mention the picture was not for Newsweek but for a
> running magazine. And she is dressed like most runners.
> Newsweek? That's Eleanor Clift's magazine and she/they are as liberal
> as they get.
They are also on the ropes financially, and that's a Good Thing
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:5ji9g55rc8gdeag3e...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:58:28 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
> <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>> > > > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>>
>>> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>>
>>> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
>>> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
>>> > > > than imagined.
>>>
>>> > > > -Ramon
>>>
>>> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
>>>
>>> > People like you.
>>>
>>> > TMT
>>>
>>> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
>>>
>>> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
>>
>>I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
>>the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
>>
>>
>>Bret Cahill
>
> Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
> posts all across the land?
A persons fantasies tell a lot about them.
ArmyOfDorkness
"Fred B. Brown" <fredb...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:4b053537$0$321$bb4e...@newscene.com...
We need to do our own version of Operation Chaos. She has my vote getting
her as the republican candidate.
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
>news:5ji9g55rc8gdeag3e...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:58:28 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
>> <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> > > > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>>>
>>>> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>>>
>>>> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
>>>> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
>>>> > > > than imagined.
>>>>
>>>> > > > -Ramon
>>>>
>>>> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
>>>>
>>>> > People like you.
>>>>
>>>> > TMT
>>>>
>>>> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
>>>>
>>>> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
>>>
>>>I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
>>>the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
>>>
>>>
>>>Bret Cahill
>>
>> Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
>> posts all across the land?
>
>A persons fantasies tell a lot about them.
Indeed. I love the ones who think they elected a president that would
give them home and change..and has given them noting but pending death.
Gunner
ArmyOfDorkness
"Lookout" <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8ihag5595huchrpnl...@4ax.com...
And you know that ditzy Palin, and behind the scenes the republicans know
she is a ditz, getting all the attention has to really be burning republican
ass Just like Glenn Beck stealing all the thunder from O'Reilly and Coulter.
You hardly ever hear their crazy sound bites anymore. It's hard to out-crazy
someone who is truly insane.
Palin/Beck 2012 I'll do anything I can to help this dream ticket. Where do
I sign up to volunteer and get the word out?
Gunner Asch
I rather suspect you will be dead before that election. Dont fret about
it.
Lookout
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
heheheh...it's a cluster fuck circus and Palin and Beck are the head
clowns. I'm loving it.
RBnDFW
Since this time a year ago I've had to re-think what the qualifications
are. Seems I was wrong about the basic facts. Like, I thought you had
to be an American, and proud of it. silly me.
I wonder when Qhadaffi is going to announce as a candidate?
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:uedbg5len52l05lc3...@4ax.com...
I never expected a home Gummer
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Mine is paid for. Unfortunately the homeless shelters are filled with
families these days..that lost theirs.
Ill bet each and everyone of them simply loves the Obamassiah ....eh?
Laugh laugh laugh
Michael A. Terrell
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:58:28 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
> <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
> >>
> >> > > > > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
> >>
> >> > > > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> >> > > > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> >> > > > than imagined.
> >>
> >> > > > -Ramon
> >>
> >> > > What do you mean by "you people," Ramon?
> >>
> >> > People like you.
> >>
> >> > TMT
> >>
> >> I hadn'tjoined the thread yet.
> >>
> >> Question stands; please allow Ramon to answer.
> >
> >I have a question: Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
> >the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
> >
> >
> >Bret Cahill
>
> Think there will be one with all those dead Leftists hanging from lamp
> posts all across the land?
Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
them, so it doesn't break. :)
--
The movie 'Deliverance' isn't a documentary!
Buerste
As bad as the Rebubs are, the Dems are much more dangerous.
Buerste
So is "Community Organizer"!
Harold Burton
<52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
Ramon F Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 3:54�pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
> >
> > She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
> >
>
> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> Republican Party has to offer.
No, you inferred that. . . and she still frightens the shit out of
leftards.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
<ddb85bc8-6bee-4f01...@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
> Who is going to be the MC at the cross burning at
> the 2012 GOP nat'l convention?
Robert Byrd.
snicker.
Gunner Asch
Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
hanging them.
Curly Surmudgeon
Re-register Republican so you can vote for their nominee in the primaries.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lib Loo
"Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>
>> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>
>
> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> than imagined.
>
> -Ramon
>
Dude, you elected Obama. Pot kettle black.
Lib Loo
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:pstbg5pqjde9ee43u...@4ax.com...
You misspelled Obamashugana.
Buerste
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:41:06 -0500, "Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Deucalion" <som...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
>>news:i2ibg55h6bd1n7m9b...@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:50:07 -0500, "Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Deucalion" <som...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:3t59g5d0mdmh5cvdr...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:00:05 -0500, "Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>><snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What's next? The White House.
>>>>>
>>>>> She had her shot. She missed the target. Even the majority of
>>>>> Republicans don't believe that she is presidential material.
>>>>
>>>>The libtards have shown that they haven't a CLUE as to what is
>>>>"Presidential
>>>>Material".
>>>
>>> They were following the Republican lead.
>>
>>As bad as the Rebubs are, the Dems are much more dangerous.
>
> and followers.
Dems aren't leaders, they are bullies.
Too_Many_Tools
> "Ramon F Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in messagenews:52f56f4c-e480-4157...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>
> >> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>
> > You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> > Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> > than imagined.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> Dude, you elected Obama. Pot kettle black.
LOL....no Dude...you ELECTED Obama.
Without the support he got from Republicans, Obama would not be there.
All of America thanks you for doing something right...for once.
TMT
Dan
How do you figure? Dems have a lot of faults, but BULLIES???
Of course, from my perspective, Republicans are bullies, and Dems,
because they cannot unite, are patsies.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we had an actual conservative party and a
liberal party!
Dan
Lookout
I have done just that several times.
RD (The Sandman)
news:joqdg51o6vkbhgghq...@4ax.com:
Ol' Honest Lookout......
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?
Hawke
> On Nov 18, 3:54 pm, "Fred B. Brown" <fredbbr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Sara still giving you nightmares I see. Hehehehehehehe
>>
>> She will be dancing on Obama's political tombstone in 2012
>>
>
> You are claiming that the Whore from Wasilla is the best the
> Republican Party has to offer. Gawd, you people are in worse shape
> than imagined.
>
> -Ramon
>
That's right, Palin is the best they have. Deep down they know she
hasn't a chance in Hell of being elected president. But compared to the
other bums in that party she's way ahead. They just had her at a book
signing event and like fifteen hundred people showed up and some waited
over night to see her. Not far away Mike Huckaby had a get together and
a couple hundred people showed up. As far as a legitimate presidential
candidate and a qualified one, Huckaby blows Palin away. But he's not
nearly as popular as she is. So that shows the unbelievably bad
situation the republicans are in. All their legitimate candidates are so
boring no one gives a crap about them and the one person they care about
, Palin, hasn't an icecube's chance in Hell of getting elected. Yep, it
looks like another season in the basement for the republican party.
Ain't it grand?
Hawke
Lookout
Why is it dishonest? I can vote for whomever I want.
Lookout
Going Rogue coloring book
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
Hawke
> "rangerssuck" <range...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:11593915-c469-48db...@o10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 18, 7:00 pm, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
>> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> What's next? The White House.
>
> *************************************
>
> I'd love to see the libtards all have conniption fits! And, she would be
> infinitely better than Obammy.
That's what you said when Bush got the White House. He'd be better. No,
he was the absolute worst. Now we know how good you are at predictions.
Here's your next beauty. Palin infinitely better than Obama. Sure. Name
one thing she can do better? I mean besides lie. Or suck dick.
Hawke
Hawke
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:00:05 -0500, "Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> news:108518e3-632f-4ef9...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> What's next? The White House.
>> Republicans don't believe that she is presidential material.
>
> The libtards have shown that they haven't a CLUE as to what is "Presidential
> Material".
Ha Ha, and you schmucks thought George W. Bush was presidential
material. After that no one in their right mind would listen to anyone
you would propose.
Hawke
Buerste
"Dan" <dnad...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:n0ANm.53024$gg6....@newsfe25.iad...
SONOFABITCH! We agree on something, what is the world coming to? (you ARE
Dan, aren't you?)
Michael A. Terrell
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >
> > Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
> >them, so it doesn't break. :)
>
> Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
> hanging them.
Out of Concertina wire, again? ;-)
Gunner Asch
<mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>Gunner Asch wrote:
>>
>> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
>> >
>> > Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
>> >them, so it doesn't break. :)
>>
>> Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
>> hanging them.
>
>
> Out of Concertina wire, again? ;-)
Razor ribbon really doesnt form a decent noose and it tends to not slide
across itself very well. While you can form a loop and even tie it..it
wont slide and cho......hummm...you know..thats not a bad idea..for
Libtards you really really find contemptious...like making a rope out of
dull razor blades and hanging them with it.
And it seperates their heads neatly..abliet over some time...slowly
slicing deeper and deeper into their necks as their body spasms work the
blades deeper and deeper....
Ya may have a winner here!! Ill forward it to the group writting the
manual.
Want credit or should I simply credit it to Radio Man?
Hawke
> On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
>> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think much of her, but she is going to be at a Costco about
>> five miles from my house this weekend. Do you think I should go see
>> if I like her better in person?
>>
>> You do realize the leftist wingers ranting and raving about her at
>> least twice daily is calling her to the attention of a lot of people.
>> Some will like her.
>>
>> Perhaps not the best political tactic you guys could come up with.
>>
>> What's the old adage? I don't care what you say about me as long as
>> you spell my name right?
>
> Yeah....I would suggest going and film the event and post it.
>
> Let us decide for ourselves.
>
> Make sure to ask her if she can see Russia from your Costco.
>
> TMT
> **********************************
>
> The fact that libtards hate her so much runs a thrill down my leg. My
> enemy's enemy is my friend! You guys are going to propel her into the White
> House! Especially after President Wee-Wee's dismal performance.
>
>
Liberals don't hate Palin, you idiot. They couldn't care less about her.
It's you wingers that love her so much that you think anyone who doesn't
hates her. Just because you folks hate everyone you disagree with makes
you think the rest of us are the same as you are. As usual, you're
wrong. Most people do not care about Palin one way or another. The fact
that she's getting so much free media coverage means we can't get away
from her. Believe me, the minute she's gone she will be quickly
forgotten. None of us hate Palin. She doesn't mean anything to us so we
can't understand why someone with so little going for her would be so
idolized by the right. I mean, what's so great about her? I just don't
see it. Like I said before, her resume is about as thin as it gets.
She's politically inexperienced and clearly no expert on anything. She's
nobody to fear that's for sure, let alone hate. It's you who hate
everyone that you disagree with, not us. No wonder you accuse everyone
else of your problem.
Hawke
Hawke
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:08:27 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hell..the latest polls show she's FIFTH in the republican race! She
>>> can't even win her own party
>> Your lack of a cite speaks volumes.
>
> I have posted SEVERAL story links in the past few weeks showing her
> 5th. Do a quick search and look them up. Hell...in Iowa she was 5th
> and you can't do anything until you make Iowa happy.
>
> If you read TIME or NewsWeek you would have read the stories.
>
> You really are this ignorant, aren't you?
>
> And no, I'm not going to go back and look them up for you. If you
> can't keep up that's not my problem. But it IS a common denominator
> with republicans..not being informed of all the facts seem to be a
> common thread with them. They only see what they want to see.
There is that, but then they also only know what Fox News tells them. If
it isn't on Fox they don't know about it. Unless they read it on a right
wing blog.
Hawke
Michael A. Terrell
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:55:24 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.t...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Gunner Asch wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Don't forget the trolls!!! Of course it'll take some 1.5" rope for
> >> >them, so it doesn't break. :)
> >>
> >> Nah..for them one simply doubles up on strands of barbed wire before
> >> hanging them.
> >
> >
> > Out of Concertina wire, again? ;-)
>
> Razor ribbon really doesnt form a decent noose and it tends to not slide
> across itself very well. While you can form a loop and even tie it..it
> wont slide and cho......hummm...you know..thats not a bad idea..for
> Libtards you really really find contemptious...like making a rope out of
> dull razor blades and hanging them with it.
>
> And it seperates their heads neatly..abliet over some time...slowly
> slicing deeper and deeper into their necks as their body spasms work the
> blades deeper and deeper....
>
> Ya may have a winner here!! Ill forward it to the group writting the
> manual.
>
> Want credit or should I simply credit it to Radio Man?
Credit it to Cliffie, and let him explain it to the other losers! ;-)
Of course, there is always 'Die knife' that can be heated and formed
into lots of useful shapes. The corrugated container industry uses tons
of it.
HH&C
> Buerste wrote:
> > "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:89c02ab6-33c7-40a5...@n35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> > On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
> >> Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> I don't think much of her, but she is going to be at a Costco about
> >> five miles from my house this weekend. Do you think I should go see
> >> if I like her better in person?
>
> >> You do realize the leftist wingers ranting and raving about her at
> >> least twice daily is calling her to the attention of a lot of people.
> >> Some will like her.
>
> >> Perhaps not the best political tactic you guys could come up with.
>
> >> What's the old adage? I don't care what you say about me as long as
> >> you spell my name right?
>
> > Yeah....I would suggest going and film the event and post it.
>
> > Let us decide for ourselves.
>
> > Make sure to ask her if she can see Russia from your Costco.
>
> > TMT
> > **********************************
>
> > The fact that libtards hate her so much runs a thrill down my leg. My
> > enemy's enemy is my friend! You guys are going to propel her into the White
> > House! Especially after President Wee-Wee's dismal performance.
>
> Liberals don't hate Palin, you idiot. They couldn't care less about her.
A blatant lie. Do you want to be known as a liar? Oooops! Too late.
Why do they go berzerk at the mere mention of her name?
> It's you wingers that love her so much that you think anyone who doesn't
> hates her. Just because you folks hate everyone you disagree with makes
> you think the rest of us are the same as you are. As usual, you're
> wrong. Most people do not care about Palin one way or another. The fact
> that she's getting so much free media coverage means we can't get away
> from her. Believe me, the minute she's gone she will be quickly
> forgotten. None of us hate Palin. She doesn't mean anything to us so we
> can't understand why someone with so little going for her would be so
> idolized by the right. I mean, what's so great about her? I just don't
> see it.
It's gonna be OK.
> Like I said before, her resume is about as thin as it gets.
"Present!"
> She's politically inexperienced and clearly no expert on anything.
"Present!"
> She's nobody to fear that's for sure, let alone hate.
She sure got your attention.
> It's you who hate
> everyone that you disagree with, not us. No wonder you accuse everyone
> else of your problem.
>
> Hawke
We're not so shallow as to not understand your illness. We wish you
well.
Wes
>But, more importantly, libtards HATE her! And, that's a great position to
>be in.
It does seem to be an endorsement.
Wes
--
"Additionally as a security officer, I carry a gun to protect
government officials but my life isn't worth protecting at home
in their eyes." Dick Anthony Heller
Beam Me Up Scotty
We know.... I'm going to register Democrat and get all your
Progressives out that I can. Fight fire with fire.
Now you see why the progressive Republicans are being shown the door.
Specter and that woman in NY 23 were handed their hats.
Harold Burton
Hawke <davesm...@digitalpath.net> wrote:
Unlike the leftards who only know what MSNBC tells them.
Snicker.
Gray Ghost
You keep telling yourself thise lies if they keep you warm at night. The
disinformation campaign is working.
--
�Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel
of envy, its inherent value is the equal sharing of misery.� Winston
Churchill
Hawke
Well, you got that wrong, Snicker. The difference between the left and
the right is the left has many sources of news and information. You guys
only have one place to get right wing slanted news and that is Fox. As
you often point out, the main stream media is biased liberal. But there
are plenty of places and many degrees of liberalism for liberals to
choose from. Not so with you. I mean, where else can you get your
slanted information? It's Fox or nothing. I'm talking TV here, not
radio. We all know you right wingers have a monopoly of AM radio
stations. As for TV you watch Fox or you're out of luck. That means if
you don't see it on Fox you don't see it. Which is what I said to begin
with.
Hawke
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ahhhh....<TMT holding hand up>....Sarah can see Russia from
ANYWHERE....and sometimes she even opens her eyes.
TMT
Gray Ghost
The reason for this is simple.
Truth only has one version.
RD (The Sandman)
news:9a5eg5d40am8iue1s...@4ax.com:
In most states, the only way you can vote in a primary (either Democratic
or Republican) is if you are registered as an Independent. Then you can
choose one. You are "re-registering" in order to do that. IOW, you are
intionally bypassing the system and trying to have a voice in a party you
are not a member of. You call that honest?
Ed Huntress
"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9CCA73E51...@216.196.97.130...
'Not following you here, RD. Roughly half the states have closed
primaries -- you can only vote for candidates of the party for which you are
registered. The rest of the states have various versions of open or
semi-closed primaries. These work in a variety of ways but, in general, you
can vote for someone in either party, or even both parties, in the case of
Wisconsin and maybe one or two other states.
What do you mean that you must be registered as an Independent to vote in a
primary?
--
Ed Huntress
Lookout
Very true. Like 5th graders who get all their information for a book
report from one source.
Lookout
"your" If you mean mine then you're wasting your time..I'm not a
progressive.
I change to the republican side to vote AGAINST some who are running
for governor. I'm trying to help a dem get elected here. >
>
>Now you see why the progressive Republicans are being shown the door.
>
>Specter and that woman in NY 23 were handed their hats.
I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
Lookout
Actually your wrong. As someone posted earlier the liberals DO watch
Faux Commentary so they can hear both sides. It's the conservatives
who are narrow minded and don't care about the facts from both sides.
Hey..it was a conservative who posted that poll..blame him
Curly Surmudgeon
> I have no idea what a progressive republican is.
It's an oxymoron.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Sarah, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------