Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT: Vote in US presidential election Nov. 4

0 views
Skip to first unread message

stonej

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 10:53:23 PM11/1/08
to
Who you vote for is your own business of course.

Because the turnout is expected to be huge and could break all time
records my
strategy is to leave work at noon and take the rest of the day off so
I can vote in the
early afternoon when hopefully the line will not be as long as it most
likely will be in
the late afternoon and early evening when I expect a crush of people.

Numismatically we will get a new treasury secretary, mint director
and Treasurer of the United
States along with an official inaugural medal and most likley a slew
of unofficial medals
and tokens. Most likely some shakeup of congressional committees
etc. will occur that could affect numismatic related legislation.

clarkent

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 10:55:44 PM11/1/08
to
Already voted via mail. Hope my choice dosen't commit murder between now and
Tuesday.
"stonej" <sto...@mail.lib.msu.edu> wrote in message
news:21398cd1-f23a-47a1...@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com...


** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Arizona Coin Collector

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 12:31:03 AM11/2/08
to

"stonej" <sto...@mail.lib.msu.edu> wrote in message
news:21398cd1-f23a-47a1...@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

> Who you vote for is your own business of course.

<><><><><><><><><><>

Hello

I voted back on Saturday, October 4, 2008 by mail
here in Arizona. They are expecting and 80 percent
turnout of voters in Arizona.

There is now a real chance that John McCain may
loose in Arizona. John McCain is only leading by the
margin of error in polls in Arizona.

This is the first Presidential in forty-eight years
that no incumbent is running for reelection as
President (1960).

This is the first presidential election that might
Elect either the first African American, or the
Oldest American as president.

Good Historical Election Site Available

There are several Websites that summarize previous
presidential elections, but this one is particularly
nice, with photos of all the candidates and electoral
college maps going back to 1864. It also has many
links to Wikipedia articles. Definitely a good find
for political history buffs. It gives one a better
sense that things change. For example, the 1924 map
shows the Democrats winning the entire south--and the
Republicans winning everything else except Wisconsin.
The difference between the 1928 and 1932 maps
is astounding.

Please allow time for the link below to load. If it
should stall out (as it did for me), just click the
REFRESH BUTTION on your web browser.

http://www.100bestwebsites.org/alt/evmaps/electoral-maps.htm

..


Arizona Coin Collector

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 12:43:04 AM11/2/08
to

"Arizona Coin Collector" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:V62dnSS7TLDosJDU...@earthlink.com...

>
>
> This is the first Presidential in forty-eight years
> that no incumbent is running for reelection as
> President (1960).
>
Correction! It was 1968 (40 years ago)

Nixion, Humpry, and Wallace.


RF

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 8:53:27 AM11/2/08
to

"Arizona Coin Collector" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:-4OdnTQQI4xgspDU...@earthlink.com...

>
> "Arizona Coin Collector" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:V62dnSS7TLDosJDU...@earthlink.com...
>>
>>
>> This is the first Presidential in forty-eight years
>> that no incumbent is running for reelection as
>> President (1960).
>>
> Correction! It was 1968 (40 years ago)

In 1988 Bush I and Michael Dukakis were not the incumbent presidents
In 1996 Bush II and Gore were not the incumbent presidents

RF

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 8:56:03 AM11/2/08
to

"RF" <R...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:gekbcq$j89$1...@registered.motzarella.org...

OOPS, that should be 2000, not 1996

Bruce Remick

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 9:15:37 AM11/2/08
to

"Arizona Coin Collector" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:-4OdnTQQI4xgspDU...@earthlink.com...

I was never much impressed by either Nixion or Humpry, but I did like Mike
Wallace.


tony cooper

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 9:36:08 AM11/2/08
to
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:15:37 -0500, "Bruce Remick" <rem...@cox.net>
wrote:

Three spelling mistakes in one post: Nixion (Nixon), Humpry
(Humphrey), and Mike (George).

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

mazorj

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 10:46:54 AM11/2/08
to

"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:dkerg41uaht6j78qu...@4ax.com...

Two by my count - Nixion and Humpry - but who's counting?

RF

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 10:54:07 AM11/2/08
to
"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:dkerg41uaht6j78qu...@4ax.com...
>>I was never much impressed by either Nixion or Humpry, but I did like
>>Mike
>>Wallace.
>
> Three spelling mistakes in one post: Nixion (Nixon), Humpry
> (Humphrey), and Mike (George).

You really are a humorless half-wit, Cooper.

Michael G. Koerner

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 11:02:17 AM11/2/08
to

First since 1968 where there was no incumbent president or *vice president* on
the two the major-party ballots (four fresh new faces).

--
___________________________________________ ____ _______________
Regards, | |\ ____
| | | | |\
Michael G. Koerner May they | | | | | | rise again!
Appleton, Wisconsin USA | | | | | |
___________________________________________ | | | | | | _______________

tony cooper

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 1:52:59 PM11/2/08
to

George Wallace, not Mike Wallace, ran for President in 1968.

Peter

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 2:54:06 PM11/2/08
to

I always preferred Noxin; in this election, Paling.

mazorj

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 3:09:23 PM11/2/08
to

"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:bntrg4tkkf4tlrnj7...@4ax.com...

That's not a "misspelling". That's a different name, spelled
correctly.

I took "Mike" Wallace to be a humorously deliberate misstatement
inserted to make it a triad of name errors. Even if it wasn't a
deliberate error, "Mike" is way too far different from "George" to be
called a misspelling. It would be an error of fact.


mazorj

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 3:13:30 PM11/2/08
to

"Peter" <w2...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b84d6aa3-ae6f-4c90...@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

During his term, a commonly sighted protest sign was

Nix On
Nixon

As to the current veep candidate, she apparently agrees with you
anyway. With Palin regularly droppin' gerundive g's to sound folksy,
Palin = Paling


tony cooper

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 3:39:18 PM11/2/08
to

And my comment was a deliberate humorously-intended reply. Trust me,
I know a spelling error from an incorrectly used name.

Jud

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 4:51:57 PM11/2/08
to

mazorj wrote:


> As to the current veep candidate, she apparently agrees with you
> anyway. With Palin regularly droppin' gerundive g's to sound folksy,
> Palin = Paling

"Kin ah get me a huntin' licence here?" <John Kerry - 2004> 8-)

Rav

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 5:25:34 PM11/2/08
to

We referred to him as the sh*t heard 'round the world.

RF

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 5:31:48 PM11/2/08
to
"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:2s3sg49mtppq7rdn4...@4ax.com...

> And my comment was a deliberate humorously-intended reply. Trust me,
> I know a spelling error from an incorrectly used name.

No you don't, you senile old humor-impaired fart.

RF

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 6:05:12 PM11/2/08
to
"Rav" <Pa...@cais.com> wrote in message
news:51d6f$490e28de$4...@news.teranews.com...
>> Nix On
>> Nixon

Back in the day, the youngsters around our house thought Tricky Dick's
first name was "that son of a bitch".

Bruce Remick

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 3:52:56 PM11/2/08
to

"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:2s3sg49mtppq7rdn4...@4ax.com...

Touché, then. I guess your intent at humor passed right over MY head. Your
"George Wallace" correction posts certainly seemed like they were pointing
out a historical Wallace name error on my part. You sure have a wry sense
of humor after all.

Bruce Remick

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 3:54:41 PM11/2/08
to

"mazorj" <maz...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:TNnPk.2212$225....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

Thanks. I began to think maybe this group had become too "cerebral" , but
I'm relieved to see it's only one or two whose heads are so low that many
things pass right over the top.

Bruce Remick

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 3:54:13 PM11/2/08
to

"mazorj" <maz...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:KRnPk.2215$225...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

Ya betcha.


tony cooper

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 8:29:04 PM11/2/08
to
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 15:52:56 -0500, "Bruce Remick" <rem...@cox.net>
wrote:

The "You misspelled..." line is an old cliché in Usenet, and probably
in some form before that. Whenever you see, "You misspelled...", you
can expect to see a different word rather than a different arrangement
of letters.

I wouldn't bother pointing out a straight spelling error or
typographical error. No fun in that.

Bruce Remick

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 9:23:49 PM11/2/08
to

"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:aeksg4pd93v0s3klq...@4ax.com...

Well, you didn't see that in MY post. I would hate to get caught
reinforcing a theory like that.

>
> I wouldn't bother pointing out a straight spelling error or
> typographical error. No fun in that.

I dunno. I kinda had fun replying to the earlier post that cited three
presidential candidates' surnames and spelled two of them wrong. Typos,
maybe. But I guess people are far too busy nowadays to take the time to
proof-read or spell check even a short post before sending it. Then again,
maybe the poster did read it first...............

Cindi LaFontaine

unread,
Nov 3, 2008, 4:01:35 AM11/3/08
to
Father, God, We come to You today in acknowlegement that this battle truly
is Yours. The odds against us seem unsurmountable. All of Hell is unleashed
on this election to allow a pro-baby murdering, pro-homosexual agenda,
anti-Israel, black moslem into the White House. Normally, I don't use those
terms when I pray but those words must be used to activate Christians into
action in this national emergency. We aren't faced with a mere difference
of opinion on how to run the goverment...We are faced with the total
destruction of this one nation under God founded for Your glory and for the
exaltation of Your holy name.

It angers many of us that we are even in this battle. People SHOULD see, but
they don't. And so, we come to You. Opener of blind eyes and deaf ears, we
pray that You will move on our behalf. Triumph over evil in this land.
Triumph over evil on the T.V. Triumph over evil in our homes and hearts.
Triumph over those who would steal the wealth of Your people to spread it
around to the undeserving and unfaithful. And, Lord, let this election be
one that glorifies You. Lord, I realize even as I type this that this could
mean glory through Your showing us mercy by installing mcCain and Palin or
damming us by installing Obama and Bidan.

We deserve punishment from you Lord, but we plea for Your mercy.

Dear Jesus, there are those in this nation who still long to see You first
in our land. Revive us. Heal our land. We confess our sins before You. Our
murders of babies. Our men leaving their wives for other men. Our men who
do shameful acts of sodomy. Our addiction to alcohol, drugs, perverse
movies, T.V. shows and music. Men who do not support the family, and women
who wear immodest clothes, paint their faces and act like harlots. Our
shameless disregard for Your ways. Heal us. Forgive us. Turn our hearts
towards You, and bless us not with wealth or riches but with Your presence
and peace.

Amen


RF

unread,
Nov 3, 2008, 6:57:36 AM11/3/08
to

"Cindi LaFontaine" <save...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:gemelh$1tv$1...@aioe.org...

That decides it for me, I'm voting for Satan, er I mean Obama.

Arizona Coin Collector

unread,
Nov 3, 2008, 11:47:30 AM11/3/08
to
Hello

I though of updating stonij posting below.

The last poll results for Senator Barack Obama and
Senator John McCain shown below. It does look like
the next president will be Barack Obama.

To become President of the United States, you must
win 270 Electoral votes. The election is not base
on the popular Vote, but the Electrol College Vote.

Check out the web links shown below.

----------------------------------------------

The Vote Master 2008 Presidential Polls map
National Polls. Also incudes Senate and House
races as well.

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

----------------------------------------------

Newsmax -- Dick Morris Map

Political analyst extraordinaire DICK MORRIS
plots out the critical states that may
determine whether John McCain or Barack Obama
becomes the next president. As we near the
wire, it could be an Obama landslide or a
finish that's too close to call.

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/morrismap/?s=3Dal&promo_code=3D6B10-1

----------------------------------------------

Tally Of national newspaper endorsments
for President

Senator Barack Obama 240

Senator John McCain 114

Source and List:
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003875230

-----------------------------------------

Leo Marx

unread,
Nov 3, 2008, 5:23:50 PM11/3/08
to

I don't see what you are seeing.

Maybe I need some rose colored glasses?

I don't think "numismatic related legislation" is red or blue, do you?

JAM

Charles Cooper

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 5:25:11 AM11/5/08
to
And get put back in the jury pool again. Screw you and no thanks.

Lorrie S.

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 5:31:23 AM11/5/08
to
"tony cooper" <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote in message > Three

spelling mistakes in one post: Nixion (Nixon), Humpry
> (Humphrey), and Mike (George).

I always had a lot of respect for George Wallace because he understood the
mindset of the common nigger.


sgt23

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 3:55:24 AM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 5:31 am, "Lorrie S." <lorriem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "tony cooper" <tony_cooper...@earthlink.net> wrote in message > Three

Just a warning your going to get ass fucked really hard for that
comment lol.

stonej

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 4:11:47 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 5:25 am, "Charles Cooper" <ccoo...@udoit.org> wrote:
> And get put back in the jury pool again.  Screw you and no thanks.
>
>
You would give up your right to vote just because you don't want to
possibly serve on a jury?

OK, to each their own. I have been called several times for jury
duty and served on one of them,
sure it was inconvenient but I didn't see it as that big a deal and it
is kind of interesting to see
how a courtroom works in person.

Scott Stevenson

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 8:46:52 PM11/5/08
to

Plus, depending on what state you're in, they may also use DMV
records (I know California uses voter rolls and DMV records).

I guess if you're willing to not drive, and never vote, you can
avoid jury duty, but it seems like it would be less inconvenient to
just man up and serve on a jury once in a while.

take care,
Scott

ygbsm2008

unread,
Nov 8, 2008, 10:35:03 AM11/8/08
to

"Lorrie S." <lorri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:geri8p$36u$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
Another racist ignoramus bites the dust:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/03/wallace.kennedy.obama/index.html

We'll give you a pass on this one since you weren't even born when he
ran. But it must burn your butt to know that your friends and
neighbors in Ohio went Obama, eh, Lorrie?

ygbsm2008

unread,
Nov 8, 2008, 10:52:54 AM11/8/08
to

"Lorrie S." <lorri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:geri8p$36u$1...@registered.motzarella.org...

YGBSM.

Another racist ignoramus bites the dust:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/03/wallace.kennedy.obama/index.html

You get a pass on this ignorant remark since you weren't even
born when he ran. But it must burn your racist butt to know that
your friends and neighbors in Ohio liked Obama, eh, Saboley?

Lorrie S.

unread,
Nov 8, 2008, 8:57:15 PM11/8/08
to
"ygbsm2008" <ygbs...@verizon.net> wrote in message news:HkiRk.226> We'll

give you a pass on this one since you weren't even born when he
> ran. But it must burn your butt to know that your friends and
> neighbors in Ohio went Obama, eh, Lorrie?

not really, since I also voted for Obama and am older than he is.


ygbsm2008

unread,
Nov 8, 2008, 9:29:15 PM11/8/08
to

"Lorrie S." <lorri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gf55lf$cs7$1...@registered.motzarella.org...

YGBSM.

No, LorrieLie, he's 8/4/61, Lorrie S. is 6/24/74, which makes Lorrie
S. 13 years younger, not older. Women may lie about their age but
they do it to make themselves younger, not older. If you'll lie the
wrong way about your age, you'll surely lie about how you voted. Not
to mention other things about your identity.

0 new messages