Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

SLQ's up for auction

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Aladdin Sane

unread,
Oct 13, 2009, 9:50:23 PM10/13/09
to
I mentioned before that I would be putting up a collection of SLQ's. I have
place the first batch up to end Sat.

The link to one in ebay is
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260489430714&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT

you can then click on the link to see all that are offered (20)

If you have questions, ask through ebay as I am having mail program issues

ty

--
*
/?\
/___\
-O=O-
^
AS & His Magic Hat

A conclusion is simply the place
where you decided to stop thinking.


Jim Menning

unread,
Oct 14, 2009, 9:35:10 AM10/14/09
to

"Aladdin Sane" <jmaz...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:fNWdndRScvf_s0jX...@giganews.com...

>I mentioned before that I would be putting up a collection of SLQ's. I have place
>the first batch up to end Sat.
>
> The link to one in ebay is
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260489430714&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT
>
> you can then click on the link to see all that are offered (20)
>
> If you have questions, ask through ebay as I am having mail program issues
>
>

Why are so many of the pictures taken with different cameras, backgrounds, and
lighting, including some that were obviously taken from the "Great Southern Coins"
listings? This makes it look like all the pictures are "borrowed" and that the
auctions are scams.


The Giant Brain

unread,
Oct 14, 2009, 9:54:09 AM10/14/09
to

"Jim Menning" <jmenni...@new.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hb4k2a$vgi$1...@news.albasani.net...

If you had taken the time to read the auctions, you would have seen that he
states that the photos are from the original auctions from which he purchased
the coins.


Jim Menning

unread,
Oct 14, 2009, 10:23:16 AM10/14/09
to

"The Giant Brain" <gi...@brain.invalid> wrote in message
news:hb4l6m$nuc$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

I guess my question shouldn't have been why, but more correctly "why do it that way"?

Looking at the seller's other items page is enough to scare away a lot of bidders,
without even going to individual descriptions. Like most other interested bidders, I
look at the images first. If I don't like the appearance of the coin, I'm not going
to waste my time reading the disclaimers in any particular description.

The varied images on the other items page gives the appearance of fraud. We all know
that any fraudster can make any claim in their eBay listing, so why alienate
potential buyers by not giving them current pictures of the items? If someone is
selling high-dollar coins, they should at least be able to afford a camera and take
their own pictures. I don't care what the coins looked at when they were purchased
in the past, I care what condition they are in now. Looks like very poor marketing
to me.

The Giant Brain

unread,
Oct 14, 2009, 2:37:01 PM10/14/09
to

"Jim Menning" <jmenni...@new.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hb4msg$4cc$1...@news.albasani.net...

Whatever...


Aladdin Sane

unread,
Oct 15, 2009, 1:53:25 AM10/15/09
to

"Jim Menning" <jmenni...@new.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hb4k2a$vgi$1...@news.albasani.net...
>

> Why are so many of the pictures taken with different cameras, backgrounds,

> and lighting, including some that were obviously taken from the "Great
> Southern Coins" listings? This makes it look like all the pictures are
> "borrowed" and that the auctions are scams.

Because, as I mention in my auctions, I am using the photos that I copied
from the auctions when I purchased them.

Aladdin Sane

unread,
Oct 15, 2009, 1:55:53 AM10/15/09
to

> I guess my question shouldn't have been why, but more correctly "why do it
> that way"?
>
> Looking at the seller's other items page is enough to scare away a lot of
> bidders, without even going to individual descriptions. Like most other
> interested bidders, I look at the images first. If I don't like the
> appearance of the coin, I'm not going to waste my time reading the
> disclaimers in any particular description.
>
> The varied images on the other items page gives the appearance of fraud.
> We all know that any fraudster can make any claim in their eBay listing,
> so why alienate potential buyers by not giving them current pictures of
> the items? If someone is selling high-dollar coins, they should at least
> be able to afford a camera and take their own pictures. I don't care what
> the coins looked at when they were purchased in the past, I care what
> condition they are in now. Looks like very poor marketing to me.
>
>

I did it that way because I was having problems with the coins not being in
focus. I don't have the best camera


0 new messages