Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mint Production Figures for 2009
0 views
Skip to first unread message
shreadvector
Feb 3, 2009, 4:11:57 PM2/3/09
to
Wow, quarter production is WAY down.
And what about all the Sacagaweas produced in December 2008? Were
those actually 2009 coins?
Jon Purkey
Feb 3, 2009, 8:10:55 PM2/3/09
to
I don't see the December only figures, just Jan-Dec 2008.
Interesting that Philadelphia minted 10x more Sacs than Denber though
in January. But I guess that will balance out by years end.
shreadvector
Feb 4, 2009, 9:01:53 AM2/4/09
to
On Feb 3, 5:10 pm, Jon Purkey <room321_em...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:11:57 -0800 (PST), shreadvector
>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:11:57 -0800 (PST), shreadvector
>
> <fred.e.shec...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >Wow, quarter production is WAY down.
>
> >And what about all the Sacagaweas produced in December 2008? Were
> >those actually 2009 coins?
>
> >http://www.usmint.gov/about_the_mint/coin_production/index.cfm?action...> >Wow, quarter production is WAY down.
>
> >And what about all the Sacagaweas produced in December 2008? Were
> >those actually 2009 coins?
>
>
> I don't see the December only figures, just Jan-Dec 2008.
>
> Interesting that Philadelphia minted 10x more Sacs than Denber though
> in January. But I guess that will balance out by years end.
Yes, for 2008 you would only notice the huge jump if you had seen the
previous month's year-to-date total (Jan-Nov). But, you can look at
previous year Sac production figures and compare. Very odd.
0 new messages