On Oct 30, 7:31 am, Peter Irwin <
pir...@ktb.net> wrote:
> oly <
oly2...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > @#!*% fingers and eyes don't quite work together like they used to:
The United States paper dollar (greenback) didn't get back to par with
the Gold dollar until 1879, I believe. During 1862 to 1879, if you
wanted gold for your paper notes, it took more than $1 in paper to get
$1 in gold coin.
I'm not a paper money collecting person, but there wasn't Federal
paper money until 1862-ish, the worst trouble (depreciation) was a bit
later than that.
I used the illustration of the gold sovereign versus five dollar gold
as they were nearly physical gold weight equivalents and (for some
people) it is easy to see how the small gold content difference in the
two coins amounted to a nominal "fifteen cents". As you have shown,
the math can be expressed quite a few different ways.
In the nineteenth century, "pound" and "dollar" were essentially two
different national "brand names" for the same product, gold.
Then, the "exchange rate" for gold between nations was a purely
mathematical exercise; if the exchange rate in the money center
marketplaces varied by only two or three percent, gold would actually
shift/move between respective countries until the exchange markets
moved back closer to par.
oly