The entire thread was deleted by the moderator.
Really a good way to address the confidence problem with coin
certification
Don't see can't tell? The PCGS way?
Next time you might try using freon 12 (the stuff that depletes the
ozone layer). A few years ago, you could still get it at Radio Shack as
an electronic component cooler. Spray it on the sticker and the glue
becomes brittle for a few seconds and pops right off. The glue should
stay on the sticker and be reusable in moments.
Ripley
That's not the real problem, I predict.
My prediction is that counterfeit stickers of high quality will hit the
market eventually and probably not in the too distant future; my
prediction is within six months.
And, please, when it happens, don't accuse ME of doing it or of having
had anything to do with it just because I predicted it. (And I promise
you, just because I "knew" and predicted that PCGS was going to add plus
signs didn't mean I had insider info....I did not.....it just made
sense, just like my idea of "rational grading" - averaging the graders
grades together -- will eventually become how grading is done.)
....a friend of mine had some holographic stickers made for around
3K.....(not CAC stickers....)
Also, I think CAC is making a big mistake by not making images available
for viewing on their website of the coins that they sticker.
I think what we need is three catagories of PQ.....I propose
......Incredible, Exceptional and Worthy.....and I think those
characterizations can be assigned based soley on knowing what holder a
coin is in AND by having high quality images. The problem is that I am
not sure the market will go with that.....yet....
And on that note, I am working on a new website....IncredibleCoins.com.
Initially it will be primarily a central informational site identifying
the best coins available on the market and who has them for sale, and an
all around coin portal.
--
anaconda